DavidH30 (Alabama)
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
Posted:
I am a member of a Homeowner's Association in Alabama. The Homeowner's association was established in 2001 as a Non Profit Corporation in Alabama. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws both state that there are two classes of voters; Class A and Class B voters. Class A voters are regular members who own a lot, and get one vote. The developer is the Class B voter, and gets 3 votes for each lot that he owns.
Since at least 2007 or 2008, no further construction has been started in the neighborhood, although the Developer still owns lots in the neighborhood that were never sold or developed after the Real Estate crash around 2008. The majority of the lots in the neighborhood have been sold and built on, and the streets have recently been paved and turned over to the City (this was finally done a deal was worked out with the City, a nearby corporation, and the Developer, after the developer refuse to pave the roads). The City will not allow this particular developer any further permits to build in the City. So, essentially, this neighborhood is sufficiently complete so that I would think the developer would completely relinquish his Class B voting power, and turn over the HOA completely to the Class A members, even though he still technically owns some undeveloped lots.
However, this Developer continues to hold on, overriding the remainder of the residents with his 3 votes per lot, to put in place Officers to run the HOA that he controls. The developer and these Officers of the HOA state that the bylaws and articles cannot be amended, because they provide that amendments cannot be made without FHA or VA approval.
Alabama has no developed HOA law in the Alabama Code. My first question is, why would FHA or VA approval be needed to amend bylaws or the Articles now that construction in the neighbor is sufficiently complete? And secondly, can the members amend the Articles and bylaws without FHA or VA approval to remove the Class B voting block or the developer? Have any of you ever ran into a similar situation where a Developer did not want to relinquish control and turn over ownership to the HOA after the neighborhood was substantially completed?
I'm at a loss as to why the developer would want to remain effectively in control of the HOA when it's been 8 years or so since an construction was done in the neighborhood, and the neighborhood is substantially completed so that the City has taken over the roads.
Since at least 2007 or 2008, no further construction has been started in the neighborhood, although the Developer still owns lots in the neighborhood that were never sold or developed after the Real Estate crash around 2008. The majority of the lots in the neighborhood have been sold and built on, and the streets have recently been paved and turned over to the City (this was finally done a deal was worked out with the City, a nearby corporation, and the Developer, after the developer refuse to pave the roads). The City will not allow this particular developer any further permits to build in the City. So, essentially, this neighborhood is sufficiently complete so that I would think the developer would completely relinquish his Class B voting power, and turn over the HOA completely to the Class A members, even though he still technically owns some undeveloped lots.
However, this Developer continues to hold on, overriding the remainder of the residents with his 3 votes per lot, to put in place Officers to run the HOA that he controls. The developer and these Officers of the HOA state that the bylaws and articles cannot be amended, because they provide that amendments cannot be made without FHA or VA approval.
Alabama has no developed HOA law in the Alabama Code. My first question is, why would FHA or VA approval be needed to amend bylaws or the Articles now that construction in the neighbor is sufficiently complete? And secondly, can the members amend the Articles and bylaws without FHA or VA approval to remove the Class B voting block or the developer? Have any of you ever ran into a similar situation where a Developer did not want to relinquish control and turn over ownership to the HOA after the neighborhood was substantially completed?
I'm at a loss as to why the developer would want to remain effectively in control of the HOA when it's been 8 years or so since an construction was done in the neighborhood, and the neighborhood is substantially completed so that the City has taken over the roads.