💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Although I don't mind living in an HOA, it seems apparent that there really is no use for us to have one any longer which is a change of heart for me personally. The county owns and maintains roads and all that stuff, and although I didn't check the deed to confirm, the developer sold the conserved land to someone else. So we dont' even pay property taxes any longer. The only benefit we get from our HOA is the constant headache to have a board of three directors. Thus my investigating how to dissolve it.

Understanding the order of our docs, the Articles of Corp being the highest of ours personally, (outside of state etc), if we were to follow that doc on how to dissolve, the CCRs and Bylaws wouldn't much matter correct?

I know none of us here are attorneys, but would like to know if that is anyone or everyone elses understanding of the documents and their pecking order. Thanks in advance!
PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
Order of Docs:

constitution
federal code
state law
local law (county, city)
Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions
articles of incorporation
by-laws
resolutions (HOA rules and regs)

the HOA merely administers the Covenants

it is 'usually' incorporated for liability purposes (corporate shield of members)

removing the corp does NOT dissolve a required HOA under the Covenants

make ABSOLUTELY SURE y'all own no 'common elements' nor have ANY obligations as a group before you dissolve your shield

CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
THanks Pita! As I read and understood your reply, I started saying, "oh crap, I bet that is what it says" and went to pull it out with a bit of a heavy heart. But wait! It does actually say we can dissolve the Association with 2/3 vote...so now I'm thinking the theory is still workable?
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Hi Crystal

There are really 2 separate and independent paths to follow.

1. Articles of Incorporation. This gives your association protection under the Corporate laws of your state. It's typically filed with the Secretary of State. You could either let this lapse or you can fill out a form (probably available on the State's website) to dissolve it. Cost is probably in the range of $20-$50. I would do this last. In case you find something that bogs you down, it's best to keep the Articles (corporate protection) intact until everything else is gone.

2. Deed Restrictions. aka CC&Rs. These are filed at Recorder of Deeds office. If you have a valid vote to dissolve the HOA and eliminate all the deed restrictions, that dissolution document should be filed with the Recorder of Deeds. You can hold the vote without a lawyer, but I recommend using a lawyer for filing the dissolution document. Should be fairly inexpensive if you provide the lawyer with the appropriate record of the vote.

The complication comes in if a non-member has rights that will be affected by a dissolution. Example = mortgage lender. It really depends what your CC&Rs say. If the association has no real estate or easements, it should be fairly easy.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
Yes

the 2/3 would be of the TOTAL membership, not merely a quorum

an abstention is equivalent to a NAY

? Y'all own nothing in common, not even an entrance sign ?
? No common landscaping ?
? No snow removal contract ?

!? NOTHING ?!

eg.

200 homes would require 134 actual AYE votes, rounded up from 133.3333, to amend/revoke

GOOD LUCK
CarolF (Florida)
Posts: 435
Posted:
Do you have deed restrictions? Nothing about what can or cannot be built, etc.?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Keep in mind, dissolving the Corporation is the not the same as dissolving the Association.

The Association is created by the CC&Rs. You would need to amend or abolish the CC&Rs in order to dissolve the Association.

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CyrstalB on 05/13/2015 8:33 AM
THanks Pita! As I read and understood your reply, I started saying, "oh crap, I bet that is what it says" and went to pull it out with a bit of a heavy heart. But wait! It does actually say we can dissolve the Association with 2/3 vote...so now I'm thinking the theory is still workable?

Crystal,
1) You can stop being a Corporation by not paying the yearly fee required by your state. But, that does not dissovlve the homeowners association.

2) Check your Bylaws to determine if the association can be terminated. But, terminating the association does not terminate the Declaration of CC&R (or whatever is the name of the document which controls your community).

3) To terminate the Declaration of CC&R you should talk to an attorney to see if it is possible. And if so, it may be very difficult and expensive.
BanksS
Posts: 403
Posted:
I lived in a neighborhood in Nebraska that had deed restrictions and that is it. There was no association, no dues , no board, no members. It would be up to the homeowner to enforce the restrictions. We were not allowed to have sheds per the cc&hrs but one neighbor put one up anyway. Another homeowner sued the neighbor to remove the shed. I moved before I knew the outcome. Our ccrs were all architectural. Yours may be more complicated than that. But if they are simple with no common elements you might look into dissolving the association and the corporation but leaving the ccrs.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RogerB on 05/13/2015 3:10 PM

Posted By CyrstalB on 05/13/2015 8:33 AM
It does actually say we can dissolve the Association with 2/3 vote.

3) To terminate the Declaration of CC&R you should talk to an attorney to see if it is possible. And if so, it may be very difficult and expensive.


If you want to be guaranteed that it will be both difficult and expensive, hire a lawyer. Heck, why not hire two so you can pay them both to argue with each other.

Crystal, you have already found the clause in your CC&R's that allows you to dissolve your association. Just do it. It is neither difficult nor expensive.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Crystal

What services does your HOA provide? What amenities, common areas, ponds, signage, street lights, etc. does the association provide/maintain?

What advantages would there be in not having an association?

CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Thanks for the help everyone! In answering the questions We don't have any common area, but there is a sign, I guess that could be a hiccup. We have no services of any kind. I believe that our HOA was solely created to benefit the developer so that he could make the deal happen. The county owns the road and the water collection pond or whatever it's called. We do not pay any property taxes, so I would think that means we own no property.

We started to self manage several years ago so at this point, we are only building up our bank account since we don't have anything to spend it on. No one wants to be on the board and as it is in most HOA's, the same group of people show up for meetings. So add that no one wants to enforce any of the CCR's even when we had a board, it only makes sense to disband it.

There are some hold out's but I feel that they are living in a bit of an HOA fantasy land where the HOA drives the home values. And that is subjective at best.
thanks again!
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CyrstalB on 05/14/2015 6:24 AM

We do not pay any property taxes, so I would think that means we own no property.

Not necessarily. For example, you may own the property the sign is on but exempt from property taxes.
Storm water retention ponds are typically in an easement but the land the easement is on may belong to the Association (regardless of who maintains the pond).

The only way to know for sure is to get a PLAT from the County or contract for a survey of the development.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Crystal

My immediate concern would be how would we "control" our neighbors without an HOA? Like all of a sudden 2 junk cars show up on someones property. A house needs painting real bad. Sheds pop up all over.

The controls (an active HOA) to prevent things are important to me.

Some years back I was looking at two similar new HOA developments. We decided on one versus the other. Some years later I drove through the one we looked at. The place had become chit hole. It looked like no one was in charge and people were doing as they wanted to do. The one we choose looked as good if not better then when we first bought.

BanksS
Posts: 403
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/14/2015 7:10 AM
Crystal

My immediate concern would be how would we "control" our neighbors without an HOA?


Hmm, "control" your neighbors. That says a lot about you.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The HOA purpose is NOT to keep or improve Home VALUES... It is to keep your homes ATTRACTIVE to potential buyers. Your example of why you did not buy proves that point. Home VALUES are based on real numbers. A Home being
ATTRACTIIVE TO POTENTIAL BUYERS keeps people wanting to pay those prices for that value.

Our HOA stated we could disband our HOA. However, if we did it had to be turned over to a management company. Which meant that we as owners lost all voting rights or control in our neighborhood. The Management company would be in charge. There would be no HOA board driving the MC. It would be ALL the MC. An option we choose not to do.

So make sure your documents don't have that caveat... Most HOA's do not own land. That is another misconception as well. That is why you do not hire a Real Estate attorney in a HOA. A HOA is a corporation and deals with contractual laws...

Former HOA President
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 05/14/2015 6:57 AM
Posted By CyrstalB on 05/14/2015 6:24 AM

We do not pay any property taxes, so I would think that means we own no property.


Not necessarily. For example, you may own the property the sign is on but exempt from property taxes.
Storm water retention ponds are typically in an easement but the land the easement is on may belong to the Association (regardless of who maintains the pond).

The only way to know for sure is to get a PLAT from the County or contract for a survey of the development.


Second that. Our common areas are not assessed and therefore not taxed. The market value of our common areas is apportioned to the individual homes.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Thanks again for the advice, my next step is to research the deed as suggested here. I did find a deed last night, but the date the developer signed over the deed to our Association was while we had no state status as a corporation. We had lost our charter years before that and it wasn't until 2013 that we reinstated it. That may be a just a technicality or could it void the deed I wonder!

I also found the right of way easement for electric company for each lot. Is that common area?

Regarding the home values etc, in order to maintain that aspect of the HOA, you need a board. No one wants to be on the board, the same six people are quite done being on the board, which is why I feel the way that I do, just get rid of it. Even with the previous boards no one wanted to enforce the covenants. Everyone takes care of their yard etc and we are pretty lucky up to now that is the case.

But for now it feels like we are only paying an annual assessment for the sole purpose of, having a headache.

PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
I also found the right of way easement for electric company for each lot. Is that common area?


NO

You need the final approved PLAT for the subdivision to ascertain any 'common elements'.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Crystal,

As a side note, are there any services the Association provides (trash/recycling, utilities for street lights, etc.)?

If there are, those would need to be handled as well.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Cyrstal

If you have an assessment, that money goes somewhere. Where it goes is what some of us are trying to figure out before we advise on disbanding the HOA.

I was criticized for using the word control but one reason I like HOA's is the ability to set and maintain (I call it control) a standard. When I select a neighborhood it has met my standards and I want to be sure it maintains/raises those standards and this calls for the ability to "control" your neighbors.

BanksS
Posts: 403
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/15/2015 6:48 AM
Cyrstal

If you have an assessment, that money goes somewhere. Where it goes is what some of us are trying to figure out before we advise on disbanding the HOA.

I was criticized for using the word control but one reason I like HOA's is the ability to set and maintain (I call it control) a standard. When I select a neighborhood it has met my standards and I want to be sure it maintains/raises those standards and this calls for the ability to "control" your neighbors.


I find it way too much work to control others. That is why HOA living is not a good fit for me. I just do not see that in Crystal's case the benefits out way the headaches and I believe worthy of looking into dissolution.

But obviously it works for you and many others. I wasn't being critical just making a statement.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
We have don't have any services, up until we started being "self managed" 2/3 of the money went to paying a management company, and insurance and an electric bill for one lightpole. That's it! Which is why we are now looking for ways to spend all the extra money in the bank account to stay in the not for profit zone.

Outside of that, the control part of the HOA, is subjective at best because, well, heck, you have to have a board to do it. The developer allowed a lot of "improvements" that were in violation of the CCR's to begin with which only added to the grief.

If control is the only reason to keep the HOA, then it's time to dissolve because we only have a headache to manage. Like I said, I have not problems living in an HOA community, but there is not purpose for it at this point in time.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PitA on 05/15/2015 5:57 AM
I also found the right of way easement for electric company for each lot. Is that common area?


NO

You need the final approved PLAT for the subdivision to ascertain any 'common elements'.


if I found the Plat, and it's the only one recorded, would that be considered the approved plat? I ask because the only one I found still has the builder listed as the owner. I am still looking though! love the internet on a rainy sunday!

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Typically, the PLAT and other documents are not updated when control is transferred to the membership.

If it was recorded, it's likely the official PLAT.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Thanks again everyone! I am going to start a new thread as I move forward, I have deduced the same thing now that I have the approved plat and the deed transferring it to us. We were not a corporation, but that does not affect the HOA itself from what you all have helped me to understand. So I need to figure out how to determine who the developer sold it to, (using a loophole), as I suspect it is they who are paying the taxes on it.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here