💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
Last year our board "wrote off" over $800 in unpaid dues because they said it was too expensive to pursue collecting the dues. The board said that several homeowners had simply put their home up for sale, sold their house, and moved away without paying their dues.

A couple days ago at the most recent board meeting the same excuse was given again...homeowner sold house without paying dues and more write offs.

Yes, I understand that a lien recorded on the house would protect the association against this type of loss, but our board didn't do that. Why, because they don't like to and only want to as a last resort.

It is my view that the board should have a policy whereby homeowners are told that if you don't pay your dues after 30 days a lien will be put on your house, and that the cost of that lien as well as the cost to record it in the courts now attaches to your assessment. In other words, if you don't pay within 30 days your cost will rise substantially.

Please share your views on this type of conduct by both homeowners and our board. What if anything can we do differently? And also, would you recommend securing the services of a collection agency to continue the collection effort against these now transient homeowners.

Thank you in advance.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
How much are your dues? For us we had a 6 month we liened policy. That is because our dues were $50 a month. The 6 month point would have been $300. It cost about $400 to file a lien. We added on the $20 a month late fee and the allowable interest rate (6%) at the 6 months point. It was basically the break even point of expense. We could also negotiate by dropping the late fees and interest if they paid the filling and back dues.

We did NOT CONSIDER foreclosure until a year of back dues. If the bank already foreclosing, we kept the lien on. You can NOT foreclose on someone on active duty. I found just leaving a lien on a home is a no foul no harm situation for some long term situations. It does accumulate but may need refiled for certain time limits. Check with your county/state.

I found a solid policy of when we liened for back dues helped. Once people knew we were serious and followed up. They tended to do something. Even setting up payment plans to avoid it.

BTW: A lawsuit would still left you in the same condition you are now. The person can sell their home and move off never paying. A lien holds them to the house and has to be paid to sell.

Former HOA President
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Cf,

I agree that the board should have filed liens when assessments became delinquent. That would have almost guaranteed collection when the house sold.

Each board member has a fiduciary duty to the association and must perform the duties of his office without regard to whether it makes it him feel bad. A person should not seek a position on the board if he is unwilling to act in the best interests of the association instead of his own personal best interests.

As to those who skipped out owing money: You can file a civil suit against them but you should do so only if 1) you know precisely where to find them and 2) you know that they have the means to pay a judgment. Otherwise, you are wasting your time and money trying to sue those you cannot find and/or those whose ability to pay is less than certain.

A debt is money that you have never received. Should you spend hard cold cash in now your possession to chase down money you have never had? I have no pat answer but in each situation I think you need to factor in the chances of collecting, the amount owed, and the cost of collecting among other matters.

PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
Each board member has a fiduciary duty to the association and must perform the duties of his office without regard to whether it makes it him feel bad. A person should not seek a position on the board if he is unwilling to act in the best interests of the association instead of his own personal best interests.


D'OH

The corporate directors need to establish a policy re: when to actually RECORD the lien which the nonpayment of assessment created.

A fine, but legal, distinction.

The purchaser has no way of satisfying the lien at 'closing' unless it had been recorded.

If recorded, the collection rate would be almost 100/100.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
CfD

You need a lien policy ASAP. In some states (such as SC), one does need a lawyer to file a lien. In SC, an officer of the BOD can file a lien for about $75.
CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
Melissa,

Our dues are almost $800 a year, paid in two installments 6 months apart.

We still have a terrible time with collections, at least in my opinion. For the last few years our board has "set aside" over $5000 in what they call doubtful acts money to account for nonpayment of dues. We usually eat into that at least several thousand a year. This unpaid dues as well as last years is counted against that balance. But still, my feeling is if the board has the means to avoid this type of unnecessary loss they should do it.

Cost to file a lien through the courts here is about $66, which our governing documents allow us to add to the assessment. That is not hurting anyone substantially, but it does provide an incentive to compel a homeowner to pay on time in my view.

Here is what our Declaration says on the issue. When asked at the March board meeting why the board does not charge interest on the overdue dues like our Declaration says "shall" happen, our board at first didn't know they could or should, but then had the attitude that it wouldn't be nice to add additional costs to a delinquent homeowner (even though they charge them late fees). Then the treasurer tried to make me look foolish by moving to charge "0%" interest, which the board was satisfied with.

Here is what our Declaration says on the issue:

Section 5.08. Non-Payment of Assessment. If an Annual Assessment,
or installment thereof, is not paid on the due date, established pursuant to
Section 5.03 hereof, then the balance of the annual assessment shall be deemed
delinquent. Any delinquent assessment payment, together with such interest
thereon, accelerated future installments, if any, and cost of collection thereof as
herein provided, shall thereupon become a continuing lien on the property which shall bind such property in the hands of the then Owner and such Owner's heirs,
devisees, personal representatives, successors and assigns. In addition to the
lien rights, the personal obligation of the then Owner to pay such assessment
shall remain such Owner's personal obligation and shall not pass to such Owner's
successors in title unless expressly assumed by them.
If the Assessment or any installment thereof, is not paid within ten (10)
days after the due date, (i) the Association may impose a late charge or charges
in such amount or amounts as the Board of Directors deems reasonable, not to
exceed 2% per month of the amount of such overdue Assessment or installment
thereof or $20.00 per month, whichever is greater, and, if not paid within thirty
(30) days after the due date; (ii) the Assessment shall bear interest from the due
date at such rate as may be fixed by the Board of Directors from time to time,
such rate not to exceed the judgment rate of interest then imposed by law; (iii) the
Board of Directors may accelerate the remaining installments, if any, of such
Assessment upon notice thereof to the Owner; and (iv) the Association may bring
legal action against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same or foreclose
the lien against the property, and the cost of such proceedings, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, shall be added to the amount of such Assessments,
accelerated installments, if any, late charges and interest.
Once an Assessment is deemed delinquent as described above, any
payments received from the Owner shall be applied in the following order:
Attorney's fees, other costs of collection, late charges, interest, and then the
delinquent Assessment or installments thereof beginning with the amounts past
due for the longest period.
Dissatisfaction with the quantity or quality of maintenance services
furnished by the Association shall, under no circumstances, entitle any Lot Owner
to withhold or fail to pay the Assessments due to the Association for the Lot or
Lots owned by such Owner.
There is hereby created a lien, with power of sale, on each and every Lot
within the Development to secure payment to the Association of any and all
assessments levied against any and all Owners of such Lots under the
Restrictions, together with interest thereon. If any assessment remains
delinquent for thirty (30) days the Association may elect to record in the deed
records a lien on behalf of the Association against the Lot of the defaulting Owner
in the appropriate Clerk's office upon approval of the Board of Directors. Such a
claim of lien shall be executed by any officer or managing agent of the
Association, and shall contain substantially the following information:
24
(i) The name of the delinquent Owner;
(ii) The legal description and street address of the Lot against
which claim of lien is made;
(iii) The total amount claimed to be due and owing for the amount
of the delinquency, interest thereon, collection costs, and
reasonable attorney's fees (with any proper offset thereof);
(iv) That the claim of lien is made by the Association pursuant to
this Declaration; and
(v) That a lien is claimed against said Lot in an amount equal to
the amount stated.
Upon recordation of a duly executed original or copy of such a claim of lien,
and mailing a copy thereof to said Owner, the lien claimed therein shall
immediately attach and become effective in favor of the Association as a lien
upon the Lot against which such assessment was levied. Such a lien shall have a
priority over all liens or claims created subsequent to the recordation of the claim
of lien thereof, except only tax liens for real property taxes on any Lot,
assessments on any Lot in favor of any municipal or other governmental
assessing unit, and the liens which are specifically described hereinafter. Any
such lien may be foreclosed by appropriate action in court or in the manner
provided by law for the foreclosure of a realty mortgage or trust deed as set forth
by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, as the same may be changed or
amended. The lien provided for herein shall be in favor of the Association and
shall be for the benefit of all other Lot Owners. The Association shall have the
power to bid in at any foreclosure sale and to purchase, acquire, hold, lease,
mortgage, and convey such Lot. In the event such foreclosure is by action in
court, reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, title search fees, interest, and all
other costs and expenses shall be allowed to the extent permitted by law. Each
Owner, by becoming an Owner of a Lot in the Development, hereby expressly
waives any objection to the enforcement and foreclosure of this lien in this
manner.
PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
The non payment of assessment actually creates a lien in and of itself.

Y'all need to determine WHEN, not if, to actually RECORD said lien with the Register of Deeds.

After it is recorded the property can not be sold/closed without the satisfaction of said lien.

Said lien will also have accumulated whatever interest penalties your documents specify.

Y'all may then laugh all the way to the bank.
PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
from YOUR documents:

There is hereby created a lien, with power of sale, on each and every Lot
within the Development
to secure payment to the Association of any and all
assessments levied against any and all Owners of such Lots under the
Restrictions, together with interest thereon. If any assessment remains
delinquent for thirty (30) days the Association may elect to record in the deed
records a lien on behalf of the Association
against the Lot of the defaulting Owner
in the appropriate Clerk's office upon approval of the Board of Directors.
ChrisP5 (Missouri)
Posts: 165
Posted:
We find that engaging our attorney with the threat of a lawsuit gets most balances resolved pretty quickly. Our policy is reminders at 15 days, 30 days, a collection letter from our attorney at 60 days and a lawsuit filed for collections at 90 days. All legal fees are charged back to the individual owners. This typically gets money collected much faster than filing a lien and waiting on the potential sale of a unit. We rarely move past the first letter from our attorney without a resolution (payment or payment plan).

Much like your documents liens are automatic at non-payment. We are typically contacted by title companies at closing to check on any outstanding balances and anything unresolved through our normal collections process is paid at that time. We only write off dues if an owner files for bankruptcy AND has the court wipe out the debt. We have had a few owners file but never complete the process, after nearly getting burned we started leaving the debt on our books until it is officially discharged.

Our total dues collection is over $250,000 per year and we write off less than $500 on average.
CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
This is an interesting approach Chris, but my view would be the filed lien protects the association against loss, the "threat" of a lawsuit, although seemingly effective, doesn't stop anyone from selling and making a quick get away.

For others, as I originally said, I'm aware that filing the lien would have avoided these losses. Said unpaid dues would then have to be taken care of at closing. Looks like most agree that the board should have a policy in place whereby a lien is filed after a certain amount of time without any more letters saying please pay.

I like your success rate though Chris.

What are everyone's views on the charging of interest on unpaid balances? Our Declaration says interest "shall" start to accrue?
PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
shall means must

contractually speaking

not opinion, fact
CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
I know it means must...but our board says no, and they can choose to charge 0 percent interst. I'm not making this up.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
If I'm remembering your many previous posts complaining--and it seems rightfully so about your Board's errors and maybe arrogant disregard for your own docs & state law, CfD-- isn't it time that you & likeminded Owners take action to recall them or not reelect them at the next election?

Please remind me of the answer that you may have given previously because i can't remember it. Thanks.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 1:03 PM

If the Assessment or any installment thereof, is not paid within ten (10)
days after the due date, (i) the Association may impose a late charge or charges
in such amount or amounts as the Board of Directors deems reasonable, not to
exceed 2% per month of the amount of such overdue Assessment or installment
thereof or $20.00 per month, whichever is greater, and, if not paid within thirty
(30) days after the due date; (ii) the Assessment shall bear interest from the due
date at such rate as may be fixed by the Board of Directors from time to time,
such rate not to exceed the judgment rate of interest then imposed by law; (iii) the
Board of Directors may accelerate the remaining installments, if any, of such
Assessment upon notice thereof to the Owner; and (iv) the Association may bring
legal action against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same or foreclose
the lien against the property, and the cost of such proceedings, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, shall be added to the amount of such Assessments,
accelerated installments, if any, late charges and interest.

While I disagree with zero percent interest, it is within the board's discretion to set it at that rate. I read nothing that requires the board to charge any specific rate. There is no stated lower limit and the upper limit is "the judgment rate of interest then imposed by law."

CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
Kerry, we haven't had an election the last two years. As a reminder, our quorum requirement is 25% for the first go round, which we have trouble meeting. But in an association with 250 homes we usually get about 45-50 homeowners to come to a first attempt at an annual meeting only to be told "sorry, no quorum and no meeting". For a second attempt it is only 10%, but the board comes up with every excuse in the book not to try a second time (the most recent excuse was it costs $300 dollars to notice the meeting again) and then they simply reappoint themselves to the board. They actually did try this year and deliberately scheduled the second attempt on the one evening of the week I work to keep me from being there. But the night of the second attempt we got 8 inches of snow and had to cancel. So they said forget about it. At the next board meeting two weeks later they simply appointed two of their friends to the board.

Unfortunately, most of our members have absolutely no idea how an HOA should be run to begin with. They pay their dues and look the other way. Some who are interested listen to every word the board says like it is gospel and treat me like I have no idea what I'm talking about.

I've actually lost friends in my neighborhood for having opinions like "Most if not all board and committee decisions should be made in open meetings" or "the membership is supposed to elect board members" or "our president lies to us all the time, but hey, you don't have to take my word for it...listen to the recordings yourself".

Tim sometimes speaks of a silent majority that probably is in my camp, but no one has ever come forward, and enacting change is impossible to do alone. Sadly, when I go to board meetings to make my concerns known the board carefully crafts the minutes of the board meetings to eliminate my concerns, or even alters facts to paint a story that may be untrue. I think most of you reading this would be appalled at what I've had to put up with.

I wish I knew the proper and best way to communicate my concerns to the membership.
ChrisP5 (Missouri)
Posts: 165
Posted:
Our documents indicate that we charge interest after the payment is late (10 days). Since we also charge a $15 late fee per our documents we have taken a bit of a softer stance and don't charge interest until the 90th day past due which is when a lawsuit is filed. Our documents specify that our rate should be between 9 and 18 percent. We charge 12 percent.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Sorry to hear that your HOA is in this situation, and it sounds like you could be at a crossroads as to what you personally should do on the behalf of your membership. If you haven't had an actual meeting in two years, and your board is ok with violating the contract on many different avenues, it sounds like you only two options; either find enough like minded individuals to recall this board with your leadership and you become the president, or let it go and step off the board.

At the end of the day, it is just a neighborhood with a bunch of people who don't get it, won't get it and dont' care to get it. Until that frightful day when one of them decides to sue because they were denied for some reason.

Do not take the weight of the HOA onto your shoulders for a bunch of apathetic sheeple. Live your life and move forward, don't get yourself twisted up with this stuff. I have personally found it is not, nor was it ever important enough to lose sleep over

Good luck
PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
good advice above

but

consider petitioning the court for receivership

if

you really like your home and its' location

or

consider relocating
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 11:45 AM

Yes, I understand that a lien recorded on the house would protect the association against this type of loss, but our board didn't do that. Why, because they don't like to and only want to as a last resort.

They have it wrong.

You file a lien because you have a fiduciary duty to collect that money.

You foreclose on the lien as a last resort.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Are there no estoppel letters requested by the banks in your state?
PaulM22 (Florida)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Why not use a collection agent? Ours is a Florida HOA - about 70 single family dwellings - with $200 per year dues. Liens are placed on all houses where dues are more than 12 months past due but that does not bring in any cash. [Don't you love it when the deadbeats have new cars in the driveway?]

As Treasurer of our HOA, I am looking into offering "amnesty payment plans" which remove penalties and interest if homeowner pays up. If not, turn past due accounts over three years into a collection agent. My understanding is that a collection agent can "ding" a credit report without the HOA having to supply a social security number.

I am looking into this right now ... and the only issue is the comparatively small amounts involved ($700 - $1,600).

Any experience with collection agents in Florida would be appreciated.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 11:45 AM

The board said that several homeowners had simply put their home up for sale, sold their house, and moved away without paying their dues.

Serving as Treasurer in my Association (which is also located in VA) I can assure you that prior to every closing, I have been contacted by the closing company or attorney (unless it was sold/transferred to family member) to complete one of their forms asking:

Amount of assessment
Frequency of payment
When is the next payment due
Amount dues are in arrears (if any)
Amount due for disclosure package
Any special assessment and amount

Therefore, even without a lien, the Association has an opportunity to collect at closing if they were asked and completed the paperwork properly.

Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 11:45 AM

Yes, I understand that a lien recorded on the house would protect the association against this type of loss, but our board didn't do that. Why, because they don't like to and only want to as a last resort.

It should only be used as a last resort. The best practice is to have a policy in place and follow it to the letter. Ours is:

1) 30 days - letter
2) 60 days - letter
3) 90 days - letter via certified & first class mail
4) 120 days - letter of Agenda Item stating the Board is considering escalting collection efforts
5) After Bd meeting - letter of results of meeting - via certified & first class mail
(typically saying if account is brought current by mm/dd/yyyy, the issue will not go to collections
6) 150 days - Issue turned over to attorney

Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 11:45 AM

It is my view that the board should have a policy whereby homeowners are told that if you don't pay your dues after 30 days a lien will be put on your house, and that the cost of that lien as well as the cost to record it in the courts now attaches to your assessment. In other words, if you don't pay within 30 days your cost will rise substantially.

You should have a policy - I agree.

Lien after 30 days, in my opinion, is too extreme. The fault may be poor bookkeeping by the Association. You need time to provide them an opportunity to fix that.

Perhaps you can draft such a policy and present it to the Board for their consideration.

Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 11:45 AM

Please share your views on this type of conduct by both homeowners and our board.

It happens. Perhaps the Board is overworked and misses things until the timing is too late. This can be fixed by offering your time and energy either now to assist the Board or as a candidate at the next election.

We have one member we sent to our attorney last year for lack of payment. They paid, including late charges and legal costs, sometime in December. Guess what, we are doing it again this year. This example shows that some people won't or, due to circumstances, are unable to change.

Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 11:45 AM

What if anything can we do differently?

I think you need to gather more information first.

Being treasurer with a medium sized Association (we have 130 lots) takes a lot of time without assistance from others. It could simply be a matter of needing help and not realizing it.

As discussed earlier, there should be a policy on collection of assessments.

Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 11:45 AM

And also, would you recommend securing the services of a collection agency to continue the collection effort against these now transient homeowners.

Collection agencies typically do not work with Association issues.

The issue needs to be addressed with the associations attorney. Lien policies vary by county. In Fairfax County Associations are heading to court for a judgement prior to liening (due to case law that I can't find at the moment). Keep in mind that it costs to use attorneys up front (we had $450 worth of attorney fees/legal costs that had to be paid. Yes they were collected from the owner when they paid, but if they didn't pay - we would have spent that money plus more, going after them)

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
My HOA dues are paid quarterly and due the first month of a quarter. We lien when two quarters have been missed which would be 6 months. Example:

Jan 1st quarter due. Over due on Feb 1.
April 2nd quarter due and 1st quarter not paid.
July 3rd quarter due. If no payments have been received by August 1, then we lien.

Though there is a policy, each lien request is presented to the BOD before the MC has our law firm place the lien.

Presently there is some form of action taking place on 6 of our owners. 2 in foreclosure by banks and we have a lien on them but we expect nothing. 2 we have liens on and they have arranged payment plans via our lawyer. 2 that have ignored all correspondence from the lawyer. The next action will be to begin foreclosure on these two. We have never done nor desire to do a foreclosure. We will see what happens when our lawyer "commences" a foreclosure. I believe we will only go so far and hope they pay. I do not expect us to foreclose.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/16/2015 8:15 AM

Though there is a policy, each lien request is presented to the BOD before the MC has our law firm place the lien.


Why is the lawyer doing this? It seems like an extra and needless expense. In most states anyone can create and print the form and information and anyone may deliver it to the recorder's office. Is there a statute that requires a lawyer's signature instead of an officer's?

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Larry

Sorry for any confusion. Our PM is the one who tracks payments so the PM is the one asking the BOD shall we turn this over to the attorney? We have never said no and I doubt we ever would.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/16/2015 12:33 PM
Larry

Sorry for any confusion. Our PM is the one who tracks payments so the PM is the one asking the BOD shall we turn this over to the attorney? We have never said no and I doubt we ever would.

OOPS

Did not read before I spoke.

Yes the PM or the BOD can file a lien (in SC for about $50) but our Lawyer's Legal Assistant (she has some fancy title like Foreclosure Specialist) does it for a nominal cost and it does begin a paper trail for further action.

I did not get into details but there are late payment letters automatically generated and sent by the PM so the lien is a later step. As an example if you do not make the quarterly payment by the 15th of the month after it is due you get a notice letter. If no payment then 30 days later you get a letter with a late payment charge.

Our limited experience has shown that letters from most anybody do not have the effect that one from a lawyer has. We also believe that once one is 6 months late there are issues and collection efforts have to be stepped up. We consider the lawyers fee a small price to pay.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 3:38 PM
I know it means must...but our board says no, and they can choose to charge 0 percent interst. I'm not making this up.

The proper way to do this is to charge the interest and then waive the interest charged.
CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 05/16/2015 4:12 PM
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 3:38 PM
I know it means must...but our board says no, and they can choose to charge 0 percent interst. I'm not making this up.


The proper way to do this is to charge the interest and then waive the interest charged.

Why waive? Even at the maximum 6% apr allowed in VA we're talking about less than $50 a year.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
Based on what you posted from your documents, in looks like the process has already been created and even references whatever is permissible by state law. The problem isn't that your Association doesn't have a defined way to proceed with collecting the outstanding debts. The problem is you have a Board that isn't prepared to put themselves in the position of collecting the debt.

I have said it before and I will say it again, not everyone who wants to serve on a Board is cut out for the responsibilities. There are people who do not want to be in the position of enforcement because they aren't comfortable with it or because they want to be the popular guy. What should concern you and your fellow owners is if there is any hint of "selective enforcement" with debt collection. You can't allow delinquent owner A to walk from their obligations and then hit delinquent owner B with late fees, interest, and attorney fees.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
I didn't say to waive. I simply pointed out the proper way to do things if your Board didn't want to charge the interest.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 05/17/2015 3:28 AM
I didn't say to waive. I simply pointed out the proper way to do things if your Board didn't want to charge the interest.

Your other residents who have been late in the past and paid the interest would complain for sure, if you created a temporary amnesty program. The beauty of the situation is that you can say you have no right to make exceptions to any of the rules that everyone agrees to live by. The rules must apply to everyone equally, with very limited exceptions. For instance, I would be willing to make an exception for a homeowner that had health issues that made it impossible to make dues payments (serious illness in the hospital). Right now I have a husband and wife in arrears; the husband who has Alzheimers was caring for his wife who also has Alzheimers, and when his became bad enough his son traveled here and put them in a facility. In the interim, they have fallen behind in dues but the son is trying to take care of the affairs, has to get a lawyer to get access to their bank accounts, etc. We will vote at a properly noticed board meeting whether this situation should be granted an exception to our normal collection rules. I will bet that we all vote yes. Some situations are dire enough to warrant an exception.

CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AllisonD on 05/17/2015 6:11 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 05/17/2015 3:28 AM
I didn't say to waive. I simply pointed out the proper way to do things if your Board didn't want to charge the interest.


Your other residents who have been late in the past and paid the interest would complain for sure, if you created a temporary amnesty program. The beauty of the situation is that you can say you have no right to make exceptions to any of the rules that everyone agrees to live by. The rules must apply to everyone equally, with very limited exceptions. For instance, I would be willing to make an exception for a homeowner that had health issues that made it impossible to make dues payments (serious illness in the hospital). Right now I have a husband and wife in arrears; the husband who has Alzheimers was caring for his wife who also has Alzheimers, and when his became bad enough his son traveled here and put them in a facility. In the interim, they have fallen behind in dues but the son is trying to take care of the affairs, has to get a lawyer to get access to their bank accounts, etc. We will vote at a properly noticed board meeting whether this situation should be granted an exception to our normal collection rules. I will bet that we all vote yes. Some situations are dire enough to warrant an exception.


In my view this is a textbook way to handle your situation Allison. When done openly everyone can see and make sense of the circumstances...when done secretly all homeowners can do is speculate.
AnneB4 (Florida)
Posts: 19
Posted:
PaulM22, I am the treasurer of a Florida HOA with 267 homes we were about $60,000 in arrears when I came on the Board(don't ask why it was allowed to get so large, long story) and our dues were only $400 a year. We are now about $48,000 in arrears. If you'd like info about our collection agency, you can PM me at [email protected]
NigelB (Texas)
Posts: 254
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CfD on 04/25/2015 6:12 PM
Kerry, we haven't had an election the last two years. As a reminder, our quorum requirement is 25% for the first go round, which we have trouble meeting. But in an association with 250 homes we usually get about 45-50 homeowners to come to a first attempt at an annual meeting only to be told "sorry, no quorum and no meeting". For a second attempt it is only 10%, but the board comes up with every excuse in the book not to try a second time (the most recent excuse was it costs $300 dollars to notice the meeting again) and then they simply reappoint themselves to the board. They actually did try this year and deliberately scheduled the second attempt on the one evening of the week I work to keep me from being there. But the night of the second attempt we got 8 inches of snow and had to cancel. So they said forget about it. At the next board meeting two weeks later they simply appointed two of their friends to the board.

Unfortunately, most of our members have absolutely no idea how an HOA should be run to begin with. They pay their dues and look the other way. Some who are interested listen to every word the board says like it is gospel and treat me like I have no idea what I'm talking about.

I've actually lost friends in my neighborhood for having opinions like "Most if not all board and committee decisions should be made in open meetings" or "the membership is supposed to elect board members" or "our president lies to us all the time, but hey, you don't have to take my word for it...listen to the recordings yourself".

Tim sometimes speaks of a silent majority that probably is in my camp, but no one has ever come forward, and enacting change is impossible to do alone. Sadly, when I go to board meetings to make my concerns known the board carefully crafts the minutes of the board meetings to eliminate my concerns, or even alters facts to paint a story that may be untrue. I think most of you reading this would be appalled at what I've had to put up with.

I wish I knew the proper and best way to communicate my concerns to the membership.

I don't see how a board can reappoint itself to another term. Surely your governing docs call for an election. If so, does the HOA mail out absentee ballots or proxies? If they do then you could merely visit every home and collect enough proxies to make a quorum. Also surely your governing documents provide for a way to remove the board via a vote of the membership, it would take some legwork but would be worth it it you want a board that follows the governing docs.
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
I haven't read every single response but the ones I did read mentioned placing a lien on the property which I agree with 100%. Do you have a PM and/ or a lawyer. Our PM does the leg work when we need to place a lien on a property.

We had a lien on a property that recently sold after the owner paid $400.00 in fines that were owed due to noncompliance with Master Deed. We don't figure any fines when setting our budget because we expect people to comply with the rules.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
When our association itself tried collecting late dues, few paid attention even when we threatened liens. When we hired a lawyer/collection firm and they started doing their thing (threats, liens, foreclosure, credit reporting, etc.), 5 of our 7 delinquent owners paid attention and made payment arrangements.

To give you an example. We have one owner who has not paid dues in 4 years so they owed $2,400. They basically ignored the HOA requests. Granted the HOA did not play tough. The lawyer/collection firm put it all together and they owed $6,000. Past dues, late fees, interest, lawyer costs, etc. It took only one letter for the law firm and the owner made payment arrangements.

Get tough and get tough early.
ChrisK7 (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Some of the comments here were on the cost of a lien... You can do it yourself without an Attorney and in our county it's only $25, providing you have all the documentation (invoices, certified letters, etc).
A good management company or a savvy board member can do this...
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
I've alerted mods to the rash of spam postings by TimP6

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
GordonS1 (Washington)
Posts: 18
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DouglasK1 on 02/26/2016 11:50 AM
I've alerted mods to the rash of spam postings by TimP6

Thank you Douglas.

Quote:
Posted By TimP6 on 02/26/2016 11:54 AM
Why? Its not a SPAM posting. Merely suggesting an alternative solution for consideration when HOA's are faced with late assessments.

I consider a bunch of copy-pasted responses referencing a single company spam. But regardless, it's against the rules to solicit or sell here on hoatalk, which includes mentioning any company names.

http://www.hoatalk.com/PostingRules/tabid/71/Default.aspx
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimP6 on 02/26/2016 11:54 AM
Why? Its not a SPAM posting. Merely suggesting an alternative solution for consideration when HOA's are faced with late assessments.

Crossposting the same thing to a bunch of existing threads is practically a definition of spam.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Mr. Palmer

Want to promote your company, consider being a paid sponsor of the site!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here