๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Hi All,
I am the board President of a 400 plus single family association. We tried last year to update our CC&Rs with the many new changes that have been made recently adding the Davis Sterling renumbering and since our community is 15 years old we removed all of the builder stuff that no longer applies. Our attorney prepared a cover sheet that explained all of the changes as best she could. It cost us nearly 20k for the printing, mailing and all of the other election cost and we could not reach quorum. Many people started spreading misinformation about how they interpreted the changes and made it sound like the board had some motive for get the CC&Rs updated.

So 15 months later we are talking about sending them out again along with a separate vote to ask the community if we can Gate our community. This is two separate votes but the committee responsible for the gate has asked for Marketing help to make sure that we put the gate information in a format that people can both understand and also feel motivated to vote even if it is against it. I thought that since the CC&Rs failed last year we could have the Marketing company work on both items. I brought the idea to our PM and she said that she had never heard of doing it and wanted to run it by the attorney. The attorney said that she does not recommend using this Marketing company and thinks that the information should come from her firm. I think that doing the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity. She said that we have to be concerned with the fact that it could be said that we are using HOA funds to win an election or influence it. She also says that anyone opposed to the CC&Rs or that Gate could get the same amount of funds to put together a anti campaign. We had planned to have a website where FAQs would be posted and a separate Blog would be set so people can post comments and concerns.

Anybody ever try anything like this and had it succeed or fail?

Thanks in advance
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
Personally I would be suspicious of something written by marketing people, which would probably be heavy on feel good and light on information. And lawyers seem to have considerable difficulty writing in clear and plain English.

I would say: write it yourself, put substantial effort into making it clear; make sure it answers obvious questions, make sure it explains the benefits of the change(s).

And follow up with meetings and discussions.

MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Fred,
I hear you on all points. We have a committee that is feeding the information to the Marketing company. The idea is that we hope to have a interactive website that can be updated regularly with the facts and answer any questions that HOs have without having to do many additional mailings.

I feel like the attorney who may have real concerns about the possible liabilities but is also trying to strongly recommend us using her services and not the Marketing guy. I am hoping someone has done something like this in the past and we can learn from their experience.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Mark

Why the urgency to change the Covenants? As an example. The builder stuff is no longer applicable so all one has to do is read through/around it versus spend the money to remove it. Also, I am at a loss as to how Covenant changes could have cost over $20K.

I would not be linking the gate and a Covenant change attempt (already shown not to have much interest) unless you believe together they will enable you to obtain a quorum. Otherwise, they stand or their own merits.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM19 on 04/23/2015 10:40 AM
Hi All,
It cost us nearly 20k for the printing, mailing and all of the other election cost and we could not reach quorum.


$50 per house for a mailing? Simply make a webpage and send post cards with the address for more information. Good grief your wasting tons of money....

Web page - free
Post card - $134 for 400 houses (print off home printer)

Sheeeeesh....
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Anybody ever try anything like this and had it succeed or fail?


No. And if I was a homeowner I would try and toss all of you out. Your simply wasting valuable money that people worked hard for and paid in dues.
MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Steve,
I know you have been on the site for a long time but you should know that the entire CC&R document has to be sent out to every homeowner along with all of the ballot information like any other election. Printing and mailing costs do add up. We sent follow up mailers to homeowners and even paid our PM who is the inspector of elections to go door to door and still only got a little over 50%. At the time last year we also had sent out the Bylaws with some changes and that is the only thing that passed.

I am totally with you regarding the website. The attorney is saying that this may be viewed as a one side site and the other side can make the association pay for a site dedicated to the anti vote.
MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
John,
The only urgency to change the CC&Rs is to make them up to date. This is from the Davis Stirling website. Our board chose to clean up the CC&Rs and make them accurate.

QUESTION: Will my homeowners association have to update its documents to conform to the 2014 Civil Code changes including references to past Civil Code numbers?

ANSWER: You may need to update your documents for other reasons--because they are out of date, badly written, contain Declarant language, are ambiguous about maintenance duties, etc. but restating your documents for the sole reason of changing Civil Code numbering is admirable but not necessary.

Renumbering. The most noticeable change in the Davis-Stirling Act is the renumbering. The current Act is found in sections 1350 to 1378 of the Civil Code. The rewrite moves everything to sections 4000 to 6150 of the Civil Code. For example, Civil Code ยง1350 becomes ยง4000 starting January 1, 2014. If your CC&Rs and bylaws refer to the old numbering system, there is no legal requirement that you switch to the new numbering system. However, there will likely be other more compelling reasons for updating your documents.

Conversion Chart. If your documents are new and otherwise in good shape, except for outdated Civil Code references, all you need is a conversion chart to find the new numbers. Charts can be found on many law firm websites, including my own (see Conversion Chart). You can download and distribute our chart to the membership and include it in escrows for new owners. That should allay any angst about the new numbering system.

RECOMMENDATION: If your governing documents need updating to get rid of legalese, eliminate confusing declarant language, include disclosure requirements and Open Meeting provisions, then renumbering references to the Civil Code make sense. Talk to your association's attorney about the merits of restating your documents. If you don't have legal counsel, contact us for a proposal.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Wish I could offer some help based on experience but can't, Mark.

Our 14y.o original CC&Rs (for sou high rise) are in the same shape as yours and are 120 pages long. Our Board has not wanted to update them and we were unsuccessful getting enough approval votes to even rewrite our bylaws, which only require 50% + one votes approving. We did achieve about 85% of what we needed, but the Board didn't want to pay to send them out again to the non-voters.

What % do you need to approve your rewritten CC&Rs? Did your HOA attorney do the work to update them and you have that expense too? Or did she just write a cover sheet?

It's not unusual to need to mail the changes, ballots, etc. out 2-3 times, but I believe you only need target those who didn't vote. If you try diligently, you then, as i imagine you know, can petition the court to approved a revision. One of our neighboring high rises succeed with that approach.

Without much knowledge at all, I'm thinking that it's not a good idea to send it out again with the request to vote on a gate. I guess you're sending out the latter because it'll require a raise in dues of more than 5% or because it's just good practice to do so?

So, Fred seems to make the most sense to me. But our HOA is 34% tenant occupied so attendance at a meeting would be slim. You'd can learn who DID vote and you make find it was mainly owner-occupants anyway. I assume the ballots are unopened?

I'd say with your attorney's guidance, try to re-write the main points clearly as you can as Fred suggests I do think she's right that if the Board spend funds on a marketing type to promotes the Board's opinion, you'd have to grant opponents the same service. That's how I understand it per Davis-Stirling election statutes.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
My thought is that if you truly need to make changes to the CCRs, would including the rationales along with the proposals help to make the owners understand why the proposed changes are fair, necessary, and in their best interests? You don't need a marketing company to do that, you just need basic, easy to read, informative education. If the owners reject the proposals after that, a marketing company is not going to help. You can lead the horse to water....
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 163
Posted:
$20K for printing and mailing is WAY out of line. The responsibility of marketing the changes is the Association and the law firm handling the re-write. Your PM, if you have one should have been instrumental in getting it marketed to your homeowners.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM19 on 04/23/2015 12:11 PM

We have a committee that is feeding the information to the Marketing company. The idea is that we hope to have a interactive website that can be updated regularly with the facts and answer any questions that HOs have without having to do many additional mailings.

Here is a novel idea: Get up off your collective asses and start knocking on doors. All that stuff you mailed out went straight into the trash, unopened. No one reads anymore. Talking to homeowners, you will quickly find the source of the rumors and be able to put them to rest.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
No, I'm not aware that CCR must be sent out to every homeonwer. Never heard of that. Typically an HOA records it with the county clerk and it becomes public record.

Personally our HOA would notify the homeowner that there are new CCR's with a postcard (as a courtesy) and provide a link to a PDF on our web site or tell them how to view it at the county clerk registry web site.

Does your town, state, federal mail you a copy of the new laws as they are enacted? Course not. They are also public record.
KennethS2 (California)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Mark,

I am in California and did this 4 years ago. We have over 6700 single family homes and our CC&Rs required 67% positive vote. We extend the election two times (took over 6 months) to get around 80%+ to make sure we had at least 67% yes votes to pass the changes. If we had mailed our documents, which is required, it would have cost us around $60,000 - printing and mailing. The CC&Rs were 137 pages and the By-Laws 66 pages, envelopes, labor and mail cost can be very high. Example to mail would have been in the range of $6-7 each, with that weight, times 6700 is $40,200 add the rest up and you can see it can get expensive. At the time I was on the Board and asked our Lawyer if we could send it out on a CD, the answer was yes, use the technology. We did that at the cost of less than 25 cents per CD and the mailing was at that time about 50 cents - great savings. We let our residents know that if they wanted a printed copy, for those that did not have a computer, they could get one at our Lodge front desk - only 50 residents requested a printed copy.

In California we are required to send out once a year a great deal of documents, they are spelled out in Davis-Stirling, we now do that via a CD to keep costs down.

The hard part it getting owners to respond to an election - we gave prizes away to those that turned in ballots. Kept in mind that any information that tells about one side of an issue and others don't agree have the right to provide information about their views - again Davis-Stirling. If you put money into one side, using a marking company, you must provide the same amount of money to the opposing side (or same marking company) of the issue. If you don't you are in violation of Civil Code and the election can be voided.

Ken
PitA
Posts: 311
Posted:
Kept in mind that any information that tells about one side of an issue and others don't agree have the right to provide information about their views - again Davis-Stirling. If you put money into one side, using a marking company, you must provide the same amount of money to the opposing side (or same marking company) of the issue. If you don't you are in violation of Civil Code and the election can be voided.


DUUUUUUH
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
I guess in a large HOA you might need a marketing company to make it all appealing and attractive, but jeez, professional marketing is like a single notch above propaganda. I loathe marketing of all types, especially when it's directed at me. You could have the best idea since sliced bread but if my HOA sent me anything that gave off a whiff of professional marketing behind it, I'd vote against it on general principles. But that's just me.

I'm already on record here as opposing an expense for a community website simply because the company behind it is more interested in "marketing opportunities" than providing a service to our members. But again, maybe it's just me.

Such expenses! Oy vay. Note to self: do not ever move into an association with more than a couple hundred owners max.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM19 on 04/23/2015 1:31 PM
Steve,
I know you have been on the site for a long time but you should know that the entire CC&R document has to be sent out to every homeowner along with all of the ballot information like any other election. Printing and mailing costs do add up. We sent follow up mailers to homeowners and even paid our PM who is the inspector of elections to go door to door and still only got a little over 50%. At the time last year we also had sent out the Bylaws with some changes and that is the only thing that passed.

I am totally with you regarding the website. The attorney is saying that this may be viewed as a one side site and the other side can make the association pay for a site dedicated to the anti vote.

This attorney is only lining their pockets with such advice. Who exactly can make the association pay for an anti vote website? Is that not up to you and your HOA? If you can't get enough people interested for a quorum, I would doubt any of them would put that type of effort into an anti campaign. I'm sorry but that is poor advice. She or he has you where they want you, and that is to sit back, relax and keep paying me.

BTW, your docs state you have to include a copy of the docs with every mailing?

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here