💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Our board (NJ) keeps changing the rules "by proclamation". For example, our CCRs say that snow will be removed when the depth reaches 2 inches, but after a few years of doing this, the board decided it was too expensive and that they would wait for 3 inches of snow before calling the snow removal company.

Is this legal? How do residents find attorneys who can answer such questions?

Thanks.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Edward,

Typically, the Board of Directors has full authority over the common areas and Association contracts.

As for legalities, you would need to contact a local attorney. These can be found through the yellow pages or simply doing an internet search for attorneys near me.

In my opinion, instead of finding out if the Board can or can't establish contracts as they see fit, you may want to find out the reason why the change is occurring.

Perhaps you have a Board that doesn't want to raise assessments - so is finding other ways to minimize expenses.

Perhaps there are a lot of delinquent accounts that is forcing this action.

Perhaps your board simply can't plan a proper budget.

Perhaps the membership is voting down increases to assessments.

Perhaps expenses went up in other areas and they had to make up the difference.

Perhaps this was an extra snowy winter and the budget for snow removal was being depleted quicker than expected - and the Board didn't want to call for a special assessment.

Fortunately, Spring is in the air and, even in NJ, there shouldn't be too many more snow storms. This will give you time to better understand the reason for the Board's decision. Once you know the reason, you can decide if you want to take action to remove this board and replace them with those who will start snow removal at the 2" level or simply leave this Board in place.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Thanks. Attorneys near me will show lots of attorneys with different specialties. How do I determine which are appropriate?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
In this type of situation, it would likely be someone versed in contract law (as your CC&Rs is effectively a contract).

Keep in mind that the last time my Association asked what we considered a simple question of our attorney, it cost us $600. Legal opinions typically are not inexpensive.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EdwardC1 on 03/22/2015 8:16 AM

Our board (NJ) keeps changing the rules "by proclamation". For example, our CCRs say that snow will be removed when the depth reaches 2 inches, but after a few years of doing this, the board decided it was too expensive and that they would wait for 3 inches of snow before calling the snow removal company.

Is this legal?


Unless the CC&R's give the board authority to make such a change, the BOD would have no authority to take an action that contradicts the CC&R's. Lack of money is not a justification as it is their job to raise sufficient funds to carry out the association's work.

Quote:
How do residents find attorneys who can answer such questions?


My personal opinion is that those who specialize in HOA law ought to be avoided. In my area they are uniformly lazy and usually do not wish to represent homeowners. I would look for lawyers who specialize in contract law, corporate law, or real estate. Your local bar association my be able to help.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I would never look for a real estate lawyer when dealing with a HOA. Contradictory to popular conception... HOA's do NOT typically involve "Real Estate". A HOA is a non-profit or For-Profit Corporations. They are CONTRACTUAL agreements. They are NOT selling or buying property. Plus they typically do not even own property. They MANAGE the property. They manage it by ALL the owners or by the developer.

I know it's confusing as you naturally think HOA's deal with real estate as you bought a house in one. However, unless that HOA sold you that land, you don't have a need for a Real Estate type attorney. Real Estate attorney's mostly deal with the sell of homes, property, and verifying property ownership is clear.


Former HOA President
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
At last .... sense from Melissa

CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
Agree that Real Estate attorneys are not a good choice, but many will sell you on the idea that they are qualified and experienced in HOA law.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 03/22/2015 8:57 AM
In this type of situation, it would likely be someone versed in contract law (as your CC&Rs is effectively a contract).

Keep in mind that the last time my Association asked what we considered a simple question of our attorney, it cost us $600. Legal opinions typically are not inexpensive.

Thanks. I'll check with the bar association. At one point in the past, they would refer you to someone who would meet with you for 20 minutes for $50, I think.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EdwardC1 on 03/22/2015 11:48 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 03/22/2015 8:57 AM
In this type of situation, it would likely be someone versed in contract law (as your CC&Rs is effectively a contract).

Keep in mind that the last time my Association asked what we considered a simple question of our attorney, it cost us $600. Legal opinions typically are not inexpensive.


Thanks. I'll check with the bar association. At one point in the past, they would refer you to someone who would meet with you for 20 minutes for $50, I think.

"Under this public service of the Burlington County Bar Association, you may have a consultation with an attorney for a nominal fee of $35 for the first half-hour consultation. During the consultation, the attorney will determine any possible solutions or courses of action, and any additional costs or fees that may be involved."
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Edward

I doubt your Covenants, Bylaws, etc. dictate at what snow depth, must it be plowed. I expect they say snow removal is the responsibility of the BOD but little else.

Most BOD's can make Rules and Regulations to clarify but not override the docs. As an example. The docs say the BOD will maintain the swimming pool but they do not say when the pool opens nor closes. The hours/days are something the BOD can set. I think the same applies to if the plows arrive at 3 or 4 inches of snow.

EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 03/22/2015 12:56 PM
Edward

I doubt your Covenants, Bylaws, etc. dictate at what snow depth, must it be plowed. I expect they say snow removal is the responsibility of the BOD but little else.

Most BOD's can make Rules and Regulations to clarify but not override the docs. As an example. The docs say the BOD will maintain the swimming pool but they do not say when the pool opens nor closes. The hours/days are something the BOD can set. I think the same applies to if the plows arrive at 3 or 4 inches of snow.


Right from the Covenants, Easements and Restrictions document!!

"7.1.5. providing for snow clearance of over two (2) inches of snow from drives, parking* lots and
walkways, as contained on the Common Property;"

So, what do we do when the board ignores what it says in the CERs and bylaws and makes changes by fiat???

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EdwardC1 on 03/22/2015 1:09 PM

So, what do we do when the board ignores what it says in the CERs and bylaws and makes changes by fiat???

That answer is easy. However, implementing the answer is difficult and a lot of work.

What you do is make them comply with the CC&Rs just as they would make you comply with them.

This is done by one of the following options:

a) Gather support and vote the bums out (through a recall or at the next election) - replacing them with individuals who will comply with the CC&Rs (perhaps you and a neighbor or two).

b) Inform the Board, politely, that you were of the understanding that they did not have the authority to alter the terms of any covenant. Then request that they either comply with the covenants as written or show you under what authority they have to alter the covenants without membership approval (membership approval being in the form of an amendment to the covenants).

c) Same as option b, but have an attorney write the letter on your behalf. Keep in mind that this can cause more issues as the Board may consider this potential legal action and hide behind their attorney.

d) Seek an injunction from the court to force the Board to comply with the governing documents.

e) Find the reason for the change and suggest to the Board other options then ignoring the CC&Rs.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 03/22/2015 1:27 PM
Posted By EdwardC1 on 03/22/2015 1:09 PM

So, what do we do when the board ignores what it says in the CERs and bylaws and makes changes by fiat???


That answer is easy. However, implementing the answer is difficult and a lot of work.

What you do is make them comply with the CC&Rs just as they would make you comply with them.

This is done by one of the following options:

a) Gather support and vote the bums out (through a recall or at the next election) - replacing them with individuals who will comply with the CC&Rs (perhaps you and a neighbor or two).

b) Inform the Board, politely, that you were of the understanding that they did not have the authority to alter the terms of any covenant. Then request that they either comply with the covenants as written or show you under what authority they have to alter the covenants without membership approval (membership approval being in the form of an amendment to the covenants).

c) Same as option b, but have an attorney write the letter on your behalf. Keep in mind that this can cause more issues as the Board may consider this potential legal action and hide behind their attorney.

d) Seek an injunction from the court to force the Board to comply with the governing documents.

e) Find the reason for the change and suggest to the Board other options then ignoring the CC&Rs.


As it is in the Covenants (which I find surprising that it is) I agree with Tim.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Since your board "keeps ignoring" your CC&Rs, Edward, can you supply other examples too?

I'd do Tim's (a) first before spending $$ for an attorney. Take a bunch to a board meeting with you. or are such meeting closed in NJ?
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
"7.1.5. providing for snow clearance of over two (2) inches of snow from drives, parking* lots and walkways, as contained on the Common Property;"


3" is most definitely over 2"

One could also interpret the provision to mean that a removal LEAVING 2" or less is required.

Best of luck in your endeavor to have the BOD comply with your covenant(s) ... be prepared to properly fund said compliance ... as YOU are obligated to pay !
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
oops .... meant:

... is permitted.

The key is "...over 2"..."

A lot of wriggle room for the BOD, IMO.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/22/2015 2:22 PM
Since your board "keeps ignoring" your CC&Rs, Edward, can you supply other examples too?

I'd do Tim's (a) first before spending $$ for an attorney. Take a bunch to a board meeting with you. or are such meeting closed in NJ?

We're permitted to observe at open meetings and workshops. Resident comments are permitted at open meetings and one can request a place on the agenda of workshops.

We're trying to replace two members at the next election. However, our board has become overbearing and arrogant and it's been difficult getting people to run. We're an over-55 community and I'm WAY over-55. :-)
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 03/22/2015 2:32 PM
"7.1.5. providing for snow clearance of over two (2) inches of snow from drives, parking* lots and walkways, as contained on the Common Property;"


3" is most definitely over 2"

One could also interpret the provision to mean that a removal LEAVING 2" or less is required.

Best of luck in your endeavor to have the BOD comply with your covenant(s) ... be prepared to properly fund said compliance ... as YOU are obligated to pay !

It has been interpreted as "when the snow accumulation has reached 2 inches, the snow removal company will be activated"

Yes, the board has cards and spades, as they say!
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Keep rallying support, Edward. when is the election? How many are on the board? Can you supply others examples of the Board's ignoring your CC&Rs?

Hey, we're not a 55+ HOA but have t rouge finding folks UNDER 55 to run for the Board!
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
nope

the PRESENT board has interpreted it as:

"when the snow accumulation has reached 3 inches, the snow removal company will be activated"

The crux of the matter is that the phrasing IS open to interpretation.

Perhaps better wording might be:

"When snow-fall accumulation has reached 2 inches, said accumulation shall be removed as soon as practical."

'As soon as possible' would be cost prohibitive as it is possible to have people on standby like in an airport.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
My two cents:

Snow contractors typically measure snowfall in 1/4 or 1/2 inch increments. This is the industry standard.

If the local standard is 1/2 inch, then a snowfall of 2 1/2 inches would trigger an obligation to remove the snow.

Yes it is open to interpretation, but 1 inch increments IMO would exceed common practice - which ought to be an acceptable basis for resolving any questions.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Edward
You might want to look at your HOA's snow contract and see what the cost would be at the different heights - and where the increments are set.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 03/23/2015 9:15 AM
nope

the PRESENT board has interpreted it as:

"when the snow accumulation has reached 3 inches, the snow removal company will be activated"

The crux of the matter is that the phrasing IS open to interpretation.

Perhaps better wording might be:

"When snow-fall accumulation has reached 2 inches, said accumulation shall be removed as soon as practical."

'As soon as possible' would be cost prohibitive as it is possible to have people on standby like in an airport.

It's a little late to be worrying about the wording of a 15-year-old document. :-)
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
The BOD is operating under said document.

They have interpreted it to be 3".

Said doc's wording is vague.

The BOD, IMO, is operating within its' authority.

I suggested 'tighter' wording if ever amended.

IT IS NEVER TOO LATE
(unless you are already planted)
even then you 'may' be able to ring the bell.......................

'google' : bell ringer
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
oops: coffin bell ringer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_coffin
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 03/23/2015 1:50 PM
The BOD is operating under said document.

They have interpreted it to be 3".

Said doc's wording is vague.

The BOD, IMO, is operating within its' authority.

I suggested 'tighter' wording if ever amended.

IT IS NEVER TOO LATE
(unless you are already planted)
even then you 'may' be able to ring the bell.......................

'google' : bell ringer

No. They were very happy removing snow when the accumulation reached 2" for years.

Then they decided that it was too expensive.

Yes, the wording is vague. You'd think an experienced developer by KHovnanian would have better docs.

With respect, I would ask an attorney for a legal opinion, but thanks anyway. :-)
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Edward, you've said the board "keeps Ignoring" your CC&Rs. I "keep" asking for other examples. Can you supply some?

I don't know much about snowfall, but I've read your winter has been exceptionally harsh with lots of accumulation. Does that mean that prices went up? Or at least the cost went up because more removals were needed?

Anyway, you & your other owners keep going to meetings and demanding the Board adhere to your CC&Rs. Joint action is a lot cheaper than an attorney!
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
Do you wish to have a special assessment to pay for the unexpected and higher than normal snow removal ?

Or, perhaps, juuuust perhaps, the BOD actually 'DONE GOOD' by 'stretching' from 2 to 3 inches !?

I assume YOU will be a board candidate next year !?

I'm sure you 'get the drift'.

EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 03/23/2015 2:36 PM
Do you wish to have a special assessment to pay for the unexpected and higher than normal snow removal ?

Or, perhaps, juuuust perhaps, the BOD actually 'DONE GOOD' by 'stretching' from 2 to 3 inches !?

I assume YOU will be a board candidate next year !?

I'm sure you 'get the drift'.


JohnB26, you just don't get it. If the CERS say 2", the Board does not have the right to arbitrarily change that, no matter how good their reason is.

I'm too old for the rigors of being a board member.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/23/2015 2:22 PM
Edward, you've said the board "keeps Ignoring" your CC&Rs. I "keep" asking for other examples. Can you supply some?

I don't know much about snowfall, but I've read your winter has been exceptionally harsh with lots of accumulation. Does that mean that prices went up? Or at least the cost went up because more removals were needed?

Anyway, you & your other owners keep going to meetings and demanding the Board adhere to your CC&Rs. Joint action is a lot cheaper than an attorney!

Why do you need more examples? I can point to two off the top of my head and, to me, that's enough to establish as a fact they are not adhering to the contract.

If I implied that changing from 2" to 3" was recent, I apologize. It occurred a couple of years ago when the board looked at the snow removal bill.

No idea about prices. Presumably, prices were negotiated back at the beginning of the contract year and would not be affected by actual snowfall.

Knowledgeable people here have told me that if we go over budget, we will take money from one of the reserve funds. A typical snow removal activity costs a homeowner about $2/month.

But that's not the point. The point is failure to adhere to the contract.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Poorly written yes, however it is clear.

When snowfall is over 2 inches the Association shall provide services to clear the walks, roads, etc.

However, and this is key in my opinion, the section cited does not specify when the clearing will begin. The Association could start the clearing after the storm is over or during the storm.

Question: Has there been a time when the snowfall was over 2 inches but below 3 inches and the Association did not clear the walkways, etc.?
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 03/23/2015 4:32 PM
Poorly written yes, however it is clear.

When snowfall is over 2 inches the Association shall provide services to clear the walks, roads, etc.

Question: Has there been a time when the snowfall was over 2 inches but below 3 inches and the Association did not clear the walkways, etc.?

Last Friday, we had a 3-5" (according to the weather bureau) storm but because of previous warm weather, snow on streets was mostly slush. Snow on driveways and walkways was more than 3" for most people.

The board decided to do nothing citing the forecast for warming temperatures. Some people shoveled their own driveways. Some tried and were not physically able to do that.

People were upset because of the possibility of slipping and falling, always a concern for us older folks.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Sorry, Edward, I was just curious about the Board's other violations of your CERs.

Good luck electing new members to your Board!
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EdwardC1 on 03/23/2015 4:24 PM
Posted By JohnB26 on 03/23/2015 2:36 PM
Do you wish to have a special assessment to pay for the unexpected and higher than normal snow removal ?

Or, perhaps, juuuust perhaps, the BOD actually 'DONE GOOD' by 'stretching' from 2 to 3 inches !?

I assume YOU will be a board candidate next year !?

I'm sure you 'get the drift'.



JohnB26, you just don't get it. If the CERS say 2", the Board does not have the right to arbitrarily change that, no matter how good their reason is.

I'm too old for the rigors of being a board member.

Edward

Based on what you posted people are saying the Covenant you posted does not say plowing/snow removal must begin at 2 or more inches. They are saying plowing/removal must began at more then 2 inches.

More then 2 inches is open to interpretation. Your interpretation is anything more then 2 inches (2.0001). Their interpretation was 3 inches, moving to 4 inches.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
They didn't reinterpret what it said. Here's what management said in December, 2013:

"As you have all heard by now, we are expected to receive some more snow tomorrow. According to the most recent forecast we should not have much accumulation in any, but since there was some question about removal after the snowfall last Tuesday, I thought it might be good to remind everyone of the policy within our community.

"Should an accumulation be less than 3 inches, the contractor will not be called out unless consistent icing conditions exist as the result of a sleet or ice storm. "

And in January, 2014, they said, "Please remember that snow removal will not begin until we have received over three inches and the snow has stopped falling."

And,

"As you all know, we are expecting a significant snow storm beginning late morning/early afternoon which will continue through the night. Landscape Maintenance Services is fully prepared and will do their best to keep the roadways clear during the storm in case of an emergency. Walkways and driveways will not be cleared until after the snow has stopped. Please be mindful, that due to the expected heavy snowfall, it will take a solid 15 hours or so to complete the community. That means that you will likely be stuck at home tomorrow."

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EdwardC1 on 03/23/2015 4:41 PM

People were upset because of the possibility of slipping and falling, always a concern for us older folks.

Understood. The problem the Board could have faced would have been potential liability if anyone did slip, fell and hurt themselves. The liability would have been due to the requirement to clear the walks (based on the CC&Rs) and the fact that they chose not to do it.

I do understand your concern. You may want to gather support and let the Board know of your concerns about liability to the Association for failing to clear the walks as required in the CC&Rs.

I also encourage you to take the time and ask what the real reason behind that decision is. I gave you possible options as to why such a decision may have been made earlier in the thread. Some of those decisions can be understood (the concern of going over budget due to a heavy winter for example), while some of them should be looked into (delinquent accounts for example).

There are always risks and benefits associated with making decisions on snow removal. Being the primary contact for making that call within my Association, I know those risks and benefits all too well.

Be safe.

Tim
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 03/22/2015 12:56 PM
Edward

I doubt your Covenants, Bylaws, etc. dictate at what snow depth, must it be plowed. I expect they say snow removal is the responsibility of the BOD but little else.

Most BOD's can make Rules and Regulations to clarify but not override the docs. As an example. The docs say the BOD will maintain the swimming pool but they do not say when the pool opens nor closes. The hours/days are something the BOD can set. I think the same applies to if the plows arrive at 3 or 4 inches of snow.


I agree with John.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Bonnie,

You are aware that after John made that posting, Edward provided the citation from his CC&Rs?
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
The point is, does the board have the legal right to change the terms of the CCRs and/or bylaws without passing an amendment.

IMO, it doesn't matter how valid their reasons are. A contract is a contract. They would surely jump on any homeowner who violated the contract.

I told you why they changed from 2" to 3": it was too expensive.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
The Board may not change CERs without a vote from your homeowners.

But the problem is, how do H/Os force the Board to comply? Tim gave you several options. I agreed that you H/Os getting together and putting pressure on the board via letters, attendance at meetings, Voting them off the Board, and so on is a lot cheaper than hiring an attorney.

Perhaps a bunch of you owners can chip in to have an attorney send the board a letter on your behalf insisting the Board comply with your CERs.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
AND raise the assessment to whatever it takes.

The required snow removal WILL COST MORE MONEY !

Probably MUCH MUCH more.

Are you actually willing and able to pay ?
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 03/24/2015 10:00 AM
AND raise the assessment to whatever it takes.

The required snow removal WILL COST MORE MONEY !

Probably MUCH MUCH more.

Are you actually willing and able to pay ?

1) The chair of the grounds committee told me that removing a 3" snowfall costs about $8,000. So if a special assessment were needed, it would be less than $200 per house.

2) A finance committee member told me that they would take money from a reserve fund if needed.

BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT (as I keep saying)!!!

Our board keeps sending messages about what Federal and NJ laws they operate under and what governing documents, implying that we are expected to comply.

They should as well!
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Of course they should comply, Edward.

By the way, Your Finance Comm. pal did not offer a good suggestion. Certified Reserves specialists would say that you should NOT remove $ from your reserves account to pay for operating expenses (such as snow removal). An exception might be if your reserves are over 100% funded.

So, JohnB is right; imo, you each will need to pay more if snow is removed as you all would like. More services = more costs.

I hope my most recent response above, edward, does answer your question.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/24/2015 11:06 AM
Of course they should comply, Edward.

By the way, Your Finance Comm. pal did not offer a good suggestion. Certified Reserves specialists would say that you should NOT remove $ from your reserves account to pay for operating expenses (such as snow removal). An exception might be if your reserves are over 100% funded.

So, JohnB is right; imo, you each will need to pay more if snow is removed as you all would like. More services = more costs.

I hope my most recent response above, edward, does answer your question.

1) Who/what establishes the 100% level of funding for a reserve account?
2) You're assuming that there was not enough money in the operating budget to pay for removing the last snowfall. I don't know why you're assuming that. :-)
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 03/24/2015 10:00 AM
AND raise the assessment to whatever it takes.

The required snow removal WILL COST MORE MONEY !

Probably MUCH MUCH more.

Are you actually willing and able to pay ?

I think you missed where I posted that the cost for a typical snow removal would add about $2/month to the maintenance fee. I'm pretty sure that most of us here can afford that. :-)

I get the impression that, rather than have our board behave in a legal manner, you'd prefer that they act paternalistically!
DarleneN
Posts: 25
Posted:

The original Covenant and By-Laws to this HOA clearly state that the BOD has the right to add or alter to the laws but.... the board has to abide by the original laws.

We've made several changes but never outside of the original laws. Example is we've allowed owners to add & maintain a few annual flowers in their "limited condo area" but they may not remove or alter bushes that are there. which is clearly described. The original By-Laws simply stated no one could alter the planted bushes or trees put in by the developer.

Another one we've changed is the original By-Laws state you are allowed 2 vehicles in the garage and 2 vehicles behind your garage door. We've added that the 2 outside vehicles behind the garage have to be parked perpendicular to the garage door so they do not overlap to the neighbor's garage in any way.

BTW: If you find an attorney with a legal aid in employ, it is much cheaper to get your answers from the legal aid person. Not cheap, but cheaper. We do that and we do not pay a retainer for that service.
EdwardC1 (Florida)
Posts: 90
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DarleneN on 03/24/2015 3:00 PM

The original Covenant and By-Laws to this HOA clearly state that the BOD has the right to add or alter to the laws but....

Without making amendments?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/24/2015 11:06 AM
Of course they should comply, Edward.

By the way, Your Finance Comm. pal did not offer a good suggestion. Certified Reserves specialists would say that you should NOT remove $ from your reserves account to pay for operating expenses (such as snow removal). An exception might be if your reserves are over 100% funded.

So, JohnB is right; imo, you each will need to pay more if snow is removed as you all would like. More services = more costs.

I hope my most recent response above, edward, does answer your question.

Typically an association may "borrow" from the Reserve Fund if they present a detailed plan to repay it. In snowbelt areas, the snow removal budget is a very, very moving target and a real area of consternation. I have seen cases were it varied quite a bit. $10K allocated, $3K spent. $10K allocated, $20K spent.

In my part of SC, we always are right to the penny....$00.00...LOL
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Good pint, JohnC! Yes, we too, can borrow from reserves but must show owners how we intend to pay the$$ back.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here