💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
FYI

Beginning with 2005, Ms. Jordan began complaining to the association and its board members alleging mismanagement. Ms. Jordan went on to file four different lawsuits against the association and its individual board members. She later dismissed or had the court rule against her on all four lawsuits. But Ms. Jordan did not stop there. In 2010, Ms. Jordan filed fraud claims with the North Carolina Real Estate Commission and the State Bureau of Investigations against the association. Following investigations, her claims were also dropped.

In 2011, Elizabeth Townes Association decided to put an end to it. The association sued Ms. Jordan seeking to stop the “continuous and repeated harassment.” After almost two years, on February 4, 2013, the trial court entered judgment against Ms. Jordan—compensatory and punitive damages in the amount of $34,929.59 for increased insurance premiums, increased property management fees, and direct legal costs. The court found that Ms. Jordan engaged in malicious prosecution and abuse of process and defamed the association.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
It should be pointed out that previous courts had instructed the defendant to cease contacting certain people (Board, PM) but they continued to do that.

The ruling was that the defendant was in civil contempt of the court NOT that they were contacting the Board concerning issues. It was the continual contact after a court ordered them to stop contacting that appears to be the crux of the case.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Lets try this again (as more info is being located):

Brawley v. Elizabeth Townes Homeowners Ass'n, Inc 2014 Appeals Decision (Jordan was acting on behalf of Brawley)

Elizabeth Townes Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Jordan 2013 Appeals Decision (previously posted above)

Elizabeth Townes Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Jordan

ELIZABETH TOWNES HOMEOWNERS ASS'N, INC. v. JORDAN 2014-03-06 NC Supreme Court denying request for review of case.

Articles:

Are You Being Reasonable, or Are You Harassing Your Association? It May Turn Expensive. Sept 2014 article in a law firms site

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Well, it appears I messed that attempt up.
Sorry about that - I'm in a rush trying to get out of here for an appointment.

The info is there, the comments next to the links and the order of the links may be off.

Tim
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
> Elizabeth Townes Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Jordan

The court judgment is very short and direct as these things go. I'll bet that this was the easiest case the judge decided that week.

One wrinkle: there was a continuation for "competency evaluation of all defendants." I take that to mean that the judge wondered if Ms. Jordan was, in the vernacular, nuts.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
I read that story quite a while ago, on a HOA attorneys website. She seemed as nutty as they come, crazy story never heard another quite like it. It was very extreme. It does certainly prove it's possible to go both ways.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here