๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
In reference to VA 55-510.1 B

Unless otherwise exempt as relating to an executive session pursuant to subsection C, at least one copy of all agenda packets and materials furnished to members of an association's board of directors or subcommittee or other committee thereof for a meeting shall be made available for inspection by the membership of the association at the same time such documents are furnished to the members of the board of directors or any subcommittee or committee thereof.

The questions I have are as follows (the meeting in question is for a Committee --- that has been setup by the Board)
1) The Committee's first order of business is approving the prior meeting minutes. A non-committee member is attending this open meeting and is given a copy as well. After the meeting concludes, the non-committee member is asked for the prior meeting minutes back. Does the non-committee member's inspection period end at the conclusion of the meeting?
2) Are non-committee members that do not attend the meeting entitled to a copy of the prior meeting minutes?

The HOA, in question, is claiming that the meeting minutes are part of the books and records of the HOA. They will provide them, but only under the examination and copy rules where they can charge a reasonable fee.

Any thoughts on requirements of HOAs to record, publish (freely) meeting minutes, especially the committees that the Board steps up?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Tim'll help, but I do think your laws about minutes in VA are similar to ours in CA. So all minutes of the Board and of committees that have decision-making power (e.g., budgets) must be available to all owners upon written request once the Board of committee approves them. Yes there can be a charge, but we don't charge for them as they're sent by email.

So, I don't know if VA law makes ALL committee minutes available to all H/Os, or just those from committees who can make decisions without Board approval.

Anyway, our board meeting minutes are published on our website once approved and, just recently, they've been sent as an attachment to our monthly online newsletter that goes out to H/Os who've requested them.

In addition, in CA, draft minutes of the relevant committees and of the board must be available for review by all owners 30 days after the meeting.

I don't see any reason why approved committee meeting minutes could not be placed on your website....
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jerry,

If the minutes were amended before being approved, I can understand the desire to collect the draft minutes. If the minutes were approved as written, I wouldn't bother to collect the draft minutes.

Keep in mind that VA ยง 55-510.1 (B) does not say that each member receives their own copy of the agenda packet. It plainly states that: "at least one copy of all agenda packets and materials furnished to members of an association's board of directors or subcommittee or other committee thereof for a meeting shall be made available for inspection by the membership of the association at the same time such documents are furnished to the members of the board of directors or any subcommittee or committee thereof."

Some Associations, like mine, provide a packet to everyone who attends (but we get very little turn out from those who don't have to attend). Other Associations follow the letter of the statute and only have one packet available for anyone who does attend to review and pass on to the next member (those who do this I've heard simply keep a binder in the back of the room).

As for your second question:
Are non-committee members that do not attend the meeting entitled to a copy of the prior meeting minutes?

I believe you know the answer to that question. Per VA ยง 55-510, records (which include minutes) "shall be available for examination and copying by a member in good standing." Hence, technically, if you want a copy of the past approved (which relates back to my first paragraph) minutes of committees or your Board, the procedure is to request those copies (of which a reasonable fee may be charged).

My Association places copies of all approved minutes on the Associations website for any member to review at their leisure. Perhaps you can suggest that your Association does the same (or better yet, volunteer to do it for them). We keep ours in a members only area that is password protected.

Hope this helps,

Tim
JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Was hoping for a miracle!

Thanks for your replies
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JerryW on 03/17/2015 11:14 AM

Any thoughts on requirements of HOAs to record, publish (freely) meeting minutes, especially the committees that the Board steps up?

If your considering websites to "publish" the minutes, I know from personal experience, from digitizing and placing minutes on our website, that it takes time to do this. First there is the equipment involved (you need a scanner, perhaps a program or two, a computer and a place to have that equipment available - unless you use your own). Second there is the cost of the website. Third, there is the time to digitize, review, upload, amend the webpage to provide access and, in some cases, remove personal information (like e-mails, phone numbers, etc.) as you need to operate a website with the expectation that at some point in time it will be hacked into.

Some Associations simply post their minutes on the local bulletin board. This also takes time.

If you consider printing an mailing as a form of "publishing" the minutes, for a large association, that can be an enormous cost. We have some minutes (due to attachments) that are 10-15 pages long. Printing, stuffing envelopes, cost of postage, trip to the post office, etc. takes time. Volunteers are only willing to donate x amount of time. If the demands on a volunteers time are too high, individuals simply quit volunteering (causing another issue).

As I said in a different post, if you believe that your membership would benefit from having the minutes published, perhaps you can consider the options, propose this to the Board along with volunteering to provide your time and energy to make the proposal happen. Most Boards are more open to suggestions if they don't require additional work for them.
JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Currently the HOA places the meeting minutes of the main Board on a members only website, but has currently refused to do so for the committees. The equipment and process must already be there...probably just a lack of resources to most the others.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Or, as I have experienced, the committee simply doesn't remember to send the minutes to the individual posting them. If the individual fails to request the committee minutes, it is easily missed.
CfD (Virginia)
Posts: 265
Posted:
Seems like you've been well advised, but I'll add there is nothing stopping you from taking out a cell phone and imaging the draft minutes when they are handed to you in a committee meeting. Of course, as previously pointed out, these are only draft.

Same applies if you should go to a property management office to view them after they are approved. Nothing preventing you from "copying" the document yourself with a cell phone camera. But I can't imagine the cost would be prohibitive anyway.

As others do, we post ours on our web site.
JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Another issue came up with the HOA (not exactly meeting minutes, but could be extended to it)

The HOA has a Architectural Review Committee (ARC), who's purpose is to set forth minimum standards of design for the community. The manual for the ARC has sections on the home's design, look, maintenance and land design (including play equipment, etc.) -- pretty much everything that anyone could or want to do on their lot.

The manual states that the authority of the ARC is set forth in the Declaration....The Declarant appoints the ARC....

The manual contains a section on "Infractions", that reads that the ARC in concert with the HOA has the ability to impose $50 charge per infraction against Owners...

The Declaration has various Sections, one of which is on Architectural Review and references the ARC manual as developed by the Declarant and shall supplement the section. In addition, the section allows for the Declarant to revise the manual. The Declarant shall provide each owner of a lot purchased from the Declarant with a copy of the manual at the time of settlement upon such lot. Thereafter, the Declarant shall, upon request from any owner of a lot, make available any revisions thereof for inspection and copying during normal business hours.

The Declaration has another section referring to the HOA.

Sorry for the protracted background.

Questions --
1) The developer (aka the Declarant) is claiming that the ARC is a Declarant committee that is not subject to the open meeting statutes of Virginia, as its not part of the HOA (even though there is a lot of inter play between the two). Therefore owners have no claims to any information on the ARC.
2) Is the Declaration subject to any Virginia statutes, like the Property Owners' Association Laws? or is it just the actions of the HOA (which is setup through the Declaration).
3) Can provisions outside of the HOA have fine or "Infraction" monetary charges?

Thanks for your time in advance!
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jerry,

The fact that you have a declaration (CC&Rs) and collect assessments to pay for maintenance of the common areas makes the Association subject to Virginia Property Owners' Association Act.

Do the CC&Rs mention an Architectural Control Committee or are all mentions of the committee within the ARC Manual?

My first instinct would be that if the Developer is running the Association and the CC&Rs establish the ARC, then the ARC is part of the Association and subject to that statute. However, as much as I don't agree with it, it is certainly an interesting argument made by your Developer about the committee being part of his company and not the Association. My guess is that legal action or the threat of legal action (i.e. a letter from an attorney) may be required to decide which argument would win.

I'm sure that any decision would likely boil down to the language used in the governing documents.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Along with tim's questions, do your docs say that the ARC must be comprised of Owners? Do your docs require an ARC (sorry if i missed that)?
JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
The declaration only contains references to Architectural Control and the Manual. The Manual makes reference to the Committee.

The HOA (in its section) calls for a Board of Directors of the Association -- of which the Declarant controls the board for the shorter of 40 yrs or 90% of the lots conveyed by the Declarant to other owners. The assessments are in the HOA section too.

Another Section, called General Provisions --- allows for the President of the Association certifies that the cancellation or amendment [to the Declaration] was excecuted by the owners of 75% of the lots subject to the Declaration...and provided further, that no amendment to this Declaration shall diminish or impair the rights of the Declarant unless recorded version of such amendment is also executed by the Declarant.
JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
The Manual has a section called Authority and another called Members

Authority
The authority of thre ARC is set forth in the Declaration, which encumbers every Home Site in the Community. The Declarant appoints the ARC until it no longer owns any additional land for development in ..., or until such time as it may turn the responsibility over to the Association.

Members
The ARC consists of three or more members appointed by the Declarant and confirmed by the Board of Directors. Members may be added and removed at any time in the Declarant's sole discretion.

The manual's Definitions section doesn't appear to define the term Board of Directors -- is it the HOA's Board of Directors or the Declarant's Board of Directors? However, the term Architectural Review Committee (ARC) is defined as refering to the committee established by the Declarant to ... enforce the Declaration and this Manual, including any additions and/or revisions. The ARC is the entity through which the Declarant's exclusive rights of approval are exercised.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jerry,

Do the CC&Rs provide a direct reference or indirect reference to the ARC?

Would you please cite the language used?
JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
There's no reference to a Architectural Review Committee in the Declaration. The first reference to the Manual is as follows:

Article 3:
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL

Section 3.1. Approval of Contruction and Landscape Plans.

(a).... Drainage ways under driveways, and other improvements addressed therein, shall be constructed in accordance with plans developed by the Declarant and show in the Design Review and Contruction Standards Manual (the "Manual") or other written standards that shall be prepared and modified from time to time by the Declarant. The Manual shall supplement this Article 3 as to all matters, whether or not addressed herein, but shall not be inconsistent herewith.

Section 3.2 Building Materials.
Section 3.3 Minimum Finished Floor Areas.
Section 3.4 Minimum Finished Floor Areas-Estate Section(s)
Section 3.5 Setbacks
Section 3.6 Garages; Carports
Section 3.7 Landscaping; Sidewalks; Driveways; Trees
Section 3.8 Mail and Paper Boxes; Hedges
Section 3.9 Lackside Docks.

Section 3.10 Design Review and Construction Standards.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Declaration, the Declarant reserves the right to reject any plans that do not comply with such architectural and other standards as may be contained in the Manual promulgated, and revised from time to time, by Declarant. The Declarant shall provide each owner of a lot purchased from the Declarant with a copy of the Manual at the time of settlement upon such lot. Thereafter, the Declarant shall, upon request from any owner of a lot, make available any revisions thereof for inspection and copying during normal business hours.

A lot of the Article 3 sections are cited again in the Manual -- but there are sections in the Manual (not in the declaration) like: Swimming Pools and Spas; Fences; Play and Recreational Equipment; Lighting; Satellite Dishes; Signs; Modifications for Existing Homes and Yard Improvements -- to name a few
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jerry,

With this new information, I'd say it's open for interpretation. Everything you cited specifies the Declarant. Therefore, an argument could be made that the Architectural Committee is a tool of the Declarant and not the Association. I don't know if that argument would withstand a legal challenge, but it could cost a lot to find out.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
JerryW

When you say the "Manual" what does it mean? What is its significance? What is its legal standing?

We have had posts in the past where a "Manual" was something given new owners to "explain" things but when push came to shove, the recorded docs (Covenants, Deed Restrictions, Bylaws, etc.) out weigh whatever the "Manual" says.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
John,

I believe that the manual would be the architectural guidelines and, perhaps, procedures for submitting design changes and other duties of the committee
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 03/18/2015 4:42 PM
John,

I believe that the manual would be the architectural guidelines and, perhaps, procedures for submitting design changes and other duties of the committee

\Tim

My point. Conflicting whatevers...manuals, docs, etc.
JerryW (Virginia)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Thanks for everyone's insights.

I found the event that happened today stunning. It appears that the "Manual" that was posted on the HOA's members- only website was 6 years old -- and had been updated as of last year (unclear how many updates in the 5 year span). Apparently, by constructing the declaration in this way -- the Declarant, as the sole authority of the "Manual" can unilaterally change the document --- no HOA Board vote nor any other vote necessary.

If such an agreement is allowed -- the Declarant can easily grant all controlling powers of the community to itself in the Declaration and avoid any and all of the VA Property Owners' Association Act requirements claiming they apply sole to the HOA -- not the Declarant.

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here