💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
Hello!

I bought a Fannie Mae foreclosure two years ago. It was listed as having no HOA. We did not sign any HOA documents at closing. The community consists of 12 lots with no common areas or private roads.

After 18 months, a neighbor mentioned deed restrictions and I looked up to see what he was talking about. Sure enough, there are deed restrictions in public records and there is an amount to collect at the time of acquisition of the property in the amount of $100.

We have never paid anything, nor have we ever received invoices. It appears the HOA is "sleeping".

Today we receive a letter of Notice of Meeting of the Membership. First time in two years.

How does the whole fact that we didn't acknowledge the deed restrictions or HOA play into the facts?? We seriously did not know about them! Curious if they can come after us for the acquisition fee etc.?
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
I forgot to mention that I am locating on Florida.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
The deed restrictions run with your property and you are subject to them regardless of whether or not you sign anything. If I were you I think the person I'd call first would be your closing attorney with questions regarding that $100. Being a Fannie Mae foreclosure, you may not be subject to that, ask your attorney to be sure, and about any other statute of limitations that may apply. If your deed restriction mentions a mandatory HOA most likely you'll have no choice but to be a member, even if it was inactive when you purchased. Hopefully someone from FL will chime in to help you with FL HOA specific details.
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
I can agree that the deed restrictions are there and will stay

I have contacted the closing company a few times, they just blow me off.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
If I were you, before you commit to anything I'd get all the legal details. If you have no common areas or private roads then does your notice or did you neighbor mention dues, if so what they go towards. It is possible that you have deed restriction but no HOA or a HOA but a voluntary one. I'm not familiar with FL but am aware that they have had quite a few legal dispute concerning older HOAs and the FL MRTA law. Seek legal advice things can get complicated, you need an attorney to read through all your documents.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
The people to contact would be your Realtor and the company that issued the title insurance. However, first go through all that paperwork you signed and see if there is any notification about deed restrictions within them (as that would have been your first clue that an Association may exist).

Since it's been two years, it may be too late to go after anyone for giving you wrong information.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Oh, since your in Florida, you should check to see if MARKETABLE RECORD TITLES TO REAL PROPERTY ACT (aka MRTA) and if those covenants were revitalized or not.

It could be that the Association never revitalized their covenants and now a group wants to change that.

Do your research, gather information and make sure to attend the meeting. However, don't sign anything until you have checked with an attorney on this issue.

Your Title Insurance may be able to tell you if the covenants are still valid or not.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Tim, Evelyn stated in her OP that she already confirmed there are deed restrictions the public records attached to her property. IMO at this point her Realtor of 2 years ago would be of no use, she needs an attorney before she pays or signs anything committing her to a HOA, without knowing if she legally must.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Sorry, Tim our last posts crossed, your last one was along the lines of my train of thought
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
These statutes sure are confusing!
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
According to public records, the deed restrictions were created in 2005.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AmandaR2 on 03/09/2015 4:35 PM
Tim, Evelyn stated in her OP that she already confirmed there are deed restrictions the public records attached to her property.

In FL, being attached and being valid can be two different things.
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
What exactly am I looking for to determine if they are "valid"?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EvelynB2 on 03/09/2015 4:38 PM
According to public records, the deed restrictions were created in 2005.

With the restrictions being dated in 2005, I doubt it's subject to MRTA. Therefore, the restrictions are probably valid.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Thanks Tim, that's why I brought up MRTA, guess we think alike
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
I can probably agree with that.

So reading the Statute under 720.405 (1), it says it has to be to initiated by an organizing committee consisting of not less than three parcel owners located in the community that is proposed to be governed by the revived declaration. Only one owner mentioned in the letter.
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AmandaR2 on 03/09/2015 4:35 PM
Tim, Evelyn stated in her OP that she already confirmed there are deed restrictions the public records attached to her property. IMO at this point her Realtor of 2 years ago would be of no use, she needs an attorney before she pays or signs anything committing her to a HOA, without knowing if she legally must.

The Realtor might be off the hook, but if Evelyn bought an owner's title insurance policy, that covers her for as long as she owns the property.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
I did have the seller pay for title insurance. How does this come into play?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
The title search is supposed to identify any claim or encumbrance on the property before you purchase it.

Title Insurance covers you if there were any encumbrance on your property that wasn't disclosed. An encumbrance would include deed restrictions.

Now, what the title insurance will do for you in this case, I don't know. That would be within the terms of the policy.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
From what I read the way FL disclosure law works it seems like you'd only have the right to cancel the contract within 3 days. I couldn't find anything that indicates any penalties or recourse for something this long after the fact. Is your title insurance still in effect? if so like Tim said read all the fine print of your policy.

Do you have a copy of your deed restriction? do they indicate that a association is to be formed or may be formed? if they do are the words mandatory/voluntary used? You mention a $100 fee, there should be a clear explanation/breakdown of what that fee is being used for?
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Evelyn, O
One more question, you said your a community consists of 12 lots with no common areas or private roads, do you have a sign maybe and that and the land it sits on is the common area? (I'm just trying to make some sense of it. If they claim to have a membership they must have some purpose in mind? maybe it's a good one you will want to willingly be part of?) I'd go to the meeting listen, gather facts, just don't commit till you have ALL the legal questions answered by a qualified attorney.
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
To my knowledge there are no common areas or signage for the neighborhood.
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
Found this language in the deed restrictions:

"No amendment shall be made as the the Rules and Regulations of the Assoc that will in anyway exclude mandatory membership of each lot owner of the subdivision."

So I guess that means I will HAVE to be a member.

AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Yes, it sounds that way. You need to find out what that entails. Read those documents over and over until you get a good understanding of your obligations. Under your circumstance I'd still consider consulting with an attorney to clear up any confusion you still may have about how things played out for you. I wish you well.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Also see if you can find out if there have been any amendments to the restrictions recorded at the deeds office, since 2005 for your subdivision.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
You became, in fact, a member when you signed the deed.

Yes, you DID sign the deed at closing.

The Covenants and Restrictions are public documents which were referenced in your deed.

This is WHY deeds require signature(s) from the buyer(s).

next time:

CAVEAT EMPTOR
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
So we had our initial organizational meeting last night.

They are talking about charging assessments for shared driveways, which are deeded to 6 of the 12 parcel owners. the driveways have ingress/egress easements on them to allow the neighbor lot to use it. Per the plat the maintenance of the driveways must be shared. They are referring to these driveways now as "common areas" and want to use the assessment fees to pay for the maintenance. That means that whoever owns the driveway and pays taxes on it will no longer have say in who cuts the grass!

Is that legal to just decide a piece of land is now common area??
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Evelyn,

What your asking is going to depend on what your governing documents specify. If the driveway is a shared expense, to me, it sounds like it's a shared expense between the neighbors who use it. However, you may need to consult a local attorney who would have full access to the governing documents you provide them.

Perhaps someone who wants to organize the Association has one of those driveways and wants to split the cost by 12 instead of 2.

JebbyJ1 (California)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Good advice here. I see this a lot, probably due to foreclosure crisis fall out. I like the title of this thread, it sounds like the HOA is a sleeping demon to be "reawakened" a quickening in the bowels of hell lol.
JebbyJ1 (California)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Good advice here. I see this a lot, probably due to foreclosure crisis fall out. I like the title of this thread, it sounds like the HOA is a sleeping demon to be "reawakened" a quickening in the bowels of hell lol.
EvelynB2 (Florida)
Posts: 17
Posted:
The Restrictive Covenants say each lot owner is responsible for maintenance.

The new HOA By Laws state the HOA will maintain these driveways and collect from the parcel owners for the maintenance.

What prevails??

Again, we are only 12 parcels. I am looking at Statute 720.303
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 03/09/2015 7:07 PM
The title search is supposed to identify any claim or encumbrance on the property before you purchase it.

Title Insurance covers you if there were any encumbrance on your property that wasn't disclosed. An encumbrance would include deed restrictions.

Now, what the title insurance will do for you in this case, I don't know. That would be within the terms of the policy.

I will bet that the CCRs are actually referenced in the OP's deed for which she DID sign.

The 'title co.' is off the hook because they only guarantee for encumbrances NOT MENTIONED in the deed itself.

? Wanna bet again ?

! I love winning !
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EvelynB2 on 03/18/2015 7:09 AM
The Restrictive Covenants say each lot owner is responsible for maintenance.

The new HOA By Laws state the HOA will maintain these driveways and collect from the parcel owners for the maintenance.

What prevails??

Again, we are only 12 parcels. I am looking at Statute 720.303

Since said maintenance will be required at some point;

what is the problem with the HOA getting it done at a 'volume discount' as opposed to 'every owner for themselves'

resulting in a 'hodge podge' of work performed ?

You joined a common interest community - is it not in the common interest to have the driveways UNIFORMALLY and PROPERLY maintained AT A LOWER COST than individual maintenance ?

Theoretically

HOWEVER:

The CCRs will prevail over the bylaws UNLESS a condominium situation exists.

? what does your attorney say ?
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JebbyJ1 on 03/18/2015 6:50 AM
Good advice here. I see this a lot, probably due to foreclosure crisis fall out. I like the title of this thread, it sounds like the HOA is a sleeping demon to be "reawakened" a quickening in the bowels of hell lol.

In some cases it is

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here