A service of:
Community123.com
Professional websites for HOAs & condos, since 2004
🎁 1st year FREE for HOATalk members! →
Return to Topics List

Board calling special meeting with only 5 days notice--Need help with Davis-Stirling

Started by TamaraS423 replies • 2596 views

💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

TamaraS4 (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Hi All,

You have been such a help to me in the past, mostly in dealing with a board that is not adhering to Davis-Stirling and more likely than not does't even know they should be following it's guidelines.

Our Board sent an email out to the residents stating there would be a special meeting held in order to discuss hiring a management company to over see our 10 unit HOA. The two items to be discussed are raising monthly dues as well as adding a special assessment to pay for this until the budget can be revised for our fiscal year which begins in August.

Two of the ten residents have stated they are unable to make the meeting on such short notice and are upset since they would like to be there as this concerns their finances.

Regarding special meetings, here is the procedure to be followed according to Davis-Stirling:

"Setting the Date. The date of the special meeting is set by the board and may not be less than 35 nor more than 90 days from receipt of request."

Read more: Special Meetings http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/SpecialMeetings/tabid/586/Default.aspx#ixzz3SKO9fG65

There is another piece that mentions a 10 day notice so it's a bit confusing. Either way, 5 days notice is too short.

If we notify the Board we would like to be in attendance and to ask them to please give the minimum amount of notice, they SHOULD comply, right? This is not an emergency meeting.

We are just trying to get clarification of Davis-Stirling and see what our rights are regarding getting notice of the meeting.

Any advice?

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Tamara,

It's not clear if the special meeting is a meeting of the membership or simply a meeting of the Board.

If it's a meeting of the Board, then all that is required is a 48 hr notice to the directors and a 4 day notice to the membership. See: Board Meeting NOTICE TO Members from davis-stirling and NOTICE TO Directors, also from davis-stirling. Keep in mind, if your governing documents require more notice than this, the statutes defer to the governing documents.

If it's a meeting of the membership, then a 10 day notice is required providing the membership is not voting on anything. If ballots are being used, then a 30 day notice is required. See Special Membership Meetings from davis-stirling.

So, if it's a Board Meeting, then the 5 day notice complies with the statutes. However, it may or may not comply with your governing documents.

If it's a general membership meeting, then 5 day notice is not enough time.

Personal opinion, based on what you provided, I believe that it's a notice for a special meeting of the Board of Directors.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Tim's right IF it's a special mtng . of the Board and that's what it sounds like. Boards can levy special assessment without H/Os' vote, but in CA:

"SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIMITATION
Boards are allowed to special assess the membership up to 5% of the current fiscal year's budgeted gross expenses without membership approval regardless of any limitations that might be found in the governing documents. (Civ. Code §5605(b).)

How Determined. If an association's annual budget is $100,000, then the maximum special assessment the board can impose without membership approval is $5,000. That does not mean $5,000 per unit. The $5,000 assessment is divided among all units

Read more: Special Assessment http://www.davis-stirling.com/tabid/715/Default.aspx#ixzz3SL9IwBP3
from Davis-Stirling.com.
TamaraS4 (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Thank you both for such quick and detailed responses.

This is what our documents say regarding a Notice of Special Assessment:

"Upon the imposition of a Special Assessment or an increase in a Special Assessment, in compliance with Civil Code section 1366(d) notice shall be sent by first class mail to each Owner not less than thirty (30) days and not more than sixty (60) days prior to the due date of the Special Assessment."

The purpose of this particular meeting is solely to discuss a potential increase in HOA dues as well as an assessment for the management company expenses.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Right, so you all need to get notice 30 days in advance--by US mail-- before the special assessment starts. The Board would send this notice IF they vote to levy a special assessment.

I'm plenty curious about why the Board wants a mgmt. co. for just units.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TamaraS4 on 02/20/2015 7:06 PM

"Upon the imposition of a Special Assessment or an increase in a Special Assessment, in compliance with Civil Code section 1366(d) notice shall be sent by first class mail to each Owner not less than thirty (30) days and not more than sixty (60) days prior to the due date of the Special Assessment."

The purpose of this particular meeting is solely to discuss a potential increase in HOA dues as well as an assessment for the management company expenses.

I believe that you are misinterpreting that section.

In reading the statute referenced Civil Code 1366(d) (now Civ. Code §5615) which states that prior to the special assessment becoming due (it had already been approved) the Association is to give a notice of not less then 30 days nor more than 60 days.

In other words, the Association can't send you a demand letter saying pay by next Monday. They must give you at lest 30 days and no more than 60 days before they tell you the money is due.

The process of deciding to have a special assessment or not is based on what Kerry told you. Membership approval is only needed if a special assessment of more than 5% of your annual expenses. Otherwise, the Board may impose the special assessment without membership approval. See Civ. Code §5605(b)

Based on the notice provided, I suspect your Board is simply seeking membership feedback on imposing a special assessment of 5% or less. The final decision is up to the Board.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Correction - in rereading, perhaps I mis-interpreted what you shared.
I think you understood what you posted.
TamaraS4 (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Ahhhh....okay. You all are absolutely correct. I did indeed misinterpret well...pretty much everything! (insert sheepish grin) I think part of the problem for us is the Board is pretty bad in that the meeting minutes generally have errors or omit important details to items being discussed. They then forget the details from the previous meeting so asking questions or seeking corrections is futile. Unless one can attend a meeting in person, it's pretty much impossible to find out what's really going on. For instance, the Board has been trying to hire a management company for a year but we aren't sure why. They also only hold the meetings on Mondays despite the fact all of them have flexible schedules and some of the residents have work that prevent them from being able to attend. If we seek clarification or have questions we are brushed off and told we should have attended the meeting.

If this were a large complex with many units, I can understand, but we only have 10 units!

Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 02/20/2015 7:17 PM
Right, so you all need to get notice 30 days in advance--by US mail-- before the special assessment starts. The Board would send this notice IF they vote to levy a special assessment.

I'm plenty curious about why the Board wants a mgmt. co. for just units.

The Board has decided to hire a management company for a couple of reasons. Getting anyone to serve on the Board is like pulling teeth and so is getting full Board attendance.

Projects keep getting deferred and will sometimes stay on the agenda for over a year simply because the Board cannot figure out how to proceed with something. I'm embarrassed to admit I was on the Board for 8 years and finally had to take a break from the nonsense this time around and misinterpreted our rules because in the 10 years I have been a resident, there has never been a special meeting nor has there been an assessment.

Having a management company will ensure our meeting minutes are correct, projects get done, as well as keep the egos of the Board members in check. We already pay $350/month in dues despite having only 10 units with minimal landscaping requirements and a healthy reserve in order to handle the larger tasks when needed.

Thanks again to all of you for taking the time to address my question as well as setting me straight!
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 556
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TamaraS4 on 02/20/2015 8:09 PM

Having a management company will ensure our meeting minutes are correct, projects get done, as well as keep the egos of the Board members in check. We already pay $350/month in dues despite having only 10 units with minimal landscaping requirements and a healthy reserve in order to handle the larger tasks when needed.

Not necessarily
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TamaraS4 on 02/20/2015 8:09 PM

the Board has been trying to hire a management company for a year but we aren't sure why.

If this were a large complex with many units, I can understand, but we only have 10 units! . . .

The Board has decided to hire a management company for a couple of reasons. Getting anyone to serve on the Board is like pulling teeth and so is getting full Board attendance.

I think you answered your own question.

Since you have served on your Board (and thank you for doing that), you are aware of the time and energy required to do the job properly. I suspect that with only 10 units, everyone is just burned out and they are looking for some way to reduce the work load required of the Board.

For example: 10 units, 2 adults per unit = 20 possible volunteers. However, with not wanting two members from the same household to serve on the Board at the same time, this equals 10 potential volunteers each year to serve.

So, with a 3 member board (which is typically the minimum requirements), and lets say one year terms, someone from each unit needs to serve at least once every 3 years.

Per your posting, you last served 8 years ago. Looks like your turn has come around again.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Correction - (I shouldn't try to participate in this forum when I'm tired)

You said you had served for 8 years. Not that you had served 8 years ago. Sorry for the misread.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM31 on 02/20/2015 8:49 PM
Posted By TamaraS4 on 02/20/2015 8:09 PM

Having a management company will ensure our meeting minutes are correct, projects get done, as well as keep the egos of the Board members in check. We already pay $350/month in dues despite having only 10 units with minimal landscaping requirements and a healthy reserve in order to handle the larger tasks when needed.


Not necessarily

True. It depends on the individual PM assigned by the MC to your complex, the terms of the contract and the willingness of the individuals serving on the Board to learn. If you get an inexperienced PM, the Board may be misguided. Even with an experienced PM, they work for the Board and it's still the Boards job to make the decisions. A good Board will utilize the expertise of the MC as a resource but also do their own research into the various issues of the Association.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 163
Posted:
I have to agree with Tim. Being in this business, it doesn't matter how experienced your PM is, if the Board is inexperienced or more importantly can't work together as a team, your association WILL suffer.
CarolF (Florida)
Posts: 435
Posted:
Not sure about California, but the following is from a Florida attorney with regard to Florida Association law-

Legally, all that is required to be reflected in the minutes is the date, time and place of the meeting, when it was called to order, the directors in attendance to establish the quorum, proof of proper notice, motions made and by whom, motion seconded and by whom, vote on the motion by roll call and time of adjournment. There is no requirement to reflect the nature of any discussion on the motion by directors or members in attendance.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CarolF on 02/21/2015 12:01 PM
Not sure about California, but the following is from a Florida attorney with regard to Florida Association law-

Legally, all that is required to be reflected in the minutes is the date, time and place of the meeting, when it was called to order, the directors in attendance to establish the quorum, proof of proper notice, motions made and by whom, motion seconded and by whom, vote on the motion by roll call and time of adjournment. There is no requirement to reflect the nature of any discussion on the motion by directors or members in attendance.

Many expect the minutes are a blow by blow, word by word report. They were never intended to be. You will also find the more contentious things become, the more the minutes will become shorter and "by the book". Funny thing is this most often happens when people threaten action unless things "open up" and their threats/demands usually end up creating quite the opposite effect.
TamaraS4 (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 02/21/2015 2:13 AM
Posted By MarkM31 on 02/20/2015 8:49 PM
Posted By TamaraS4 on 02/20/2015 8:09 PM

Having a management company will ensure our meeting minutes are correct, projects get done, as well as keep the egos of the Board members in check. We already pay $350/month in dues despite having only 10 units with minimal landscaping requirements and a healthy reserve in order to handle the larger tasks when needed.


Not necessarily


True. It depends on the individual PM assigned by the MC to your complex, the terms of the contract and the willingness of the individuals serving on the Board to learn. If you get an inexperienced PM, the Board may be misguided. Even with an experienced PM, they work for the Board and it's still the Boards job to make the decisions. A good Board will utilize the expertise of the MC as a resource but also do their own research into the various issues of the Association.

Quote:
Posted By RichardP13 on 02/21/2015 7:30 AM
I have to agree with Tim. Being in this business, it doesn't matter how experienced your PM is, if the Board is inexperienced or more importantly can't work together as a team, your association WILL suffer.

Interesting information, everyone. I think the Board is expecting unicorns and flowers when the management company takes over. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Thanks again for all of your great information!

TamaraS4 (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 02/21/2015 12:37 PM
Posted By CarolF on 02/21/2015 12:01 PM
Not sure about California, but the following is from a Florida attorney with regard to Florida Association law-

Legally, all that is required to be reflected in the minutes is the date, time and place of the meeting, when it was called to order, the directors in attendance to establish the quorum, proof of proper notice, motions made and by whom, motion seconded and by whom, vote on the motion by roll call and time of adjournment. There is no requirement to reflect the nature of any discussion on the motion by directors or members in attendance.


Many expect the minutes are a blow by blow, word by word report. They were never intended to be. You will also find the more contentious things become, the more the minutes will become shorter and "by the book". Funny thing is this most often happens when people threaten action unless things "open up" and their threats/demands usually end up creating quite the opposite effect.

It's a bit different here in CA. After reviewing information, it appears our Association has been doing wrong for pretty much the whole time.

http://www.davis-stirling.com/MeetingMinutes/tabid/1565/Default.aspx#axzz3SQIkXNBr

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Tamara

How have they been doing it wrong? Please explain your statement/reasoning.

Thanks
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I like to know too, Tamara!
ThomasD2 (California)
Posts: 208
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 02/20/2015 5:02 PM
Tamara,

It's not clear if the special meeting is a meeting of the membership or simply a meeting of the Board.

Personal opinion, based on what you provided, I believe that it's a notice for a special meeting of the Board of Directors.

Tamara says that it was called as a special meeting. The meeting concerns one specific agenda item , which qualifies it as a special meeting. So it sounds like a special meeting to me, and that would be the 35 day notice. Perhaps your board could use the trick my board uses; they don't have meetings. They haven't had a board meetiing in 18 months. Eliminates the need for minutes completely! The board still exists, and it is very proud of its fine work. Also, we have a management company that handles maintenance. They takes pains not to get involved in enforcing Davis-Stirling rules, or enforcing the requirements for meetings or minutes. So having a management company does not help there.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Thomas, What Tamara didn't make clear was whether it's a special meeting of the MEMBERS (homeowners), or a special meeting of the BOARD. If the latter, and that's my guess and Tim's too, only 4 days of a posted notice & agenda are required.

Take a look at davis-stirling.com -> Main Index -> Meetings to learn how those two types differ and to learn a bout other kinds of meetings too, Thomas. i'm sorry your HOA is such a mess. If you have really specific issues and questions, though, it's better to start a new thread.

I'm wondring, Tamara, why your dues are so high. Could it be that you all have been contributing too much to reserves??? And that your reserves are waaaaay more than 100% funded??

If so, a reduction in dues can get you back on track, which also would allow you to hire a mgr. at, perhaps no increase. (But I agree with others, if the board can't step up, a PM can make things worse.)
TamaraS4 (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 02/21/2015 6:14 PM
Tamara

How have they been doing it wrong? Please explain your statement/reasoning.

Thanks

I will review and let you know when I have a bit more time!
TamaraS4 (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 02/22/2015 11:06 AM
Thomas, What Tamara didn't make clear was whether it's a special meeting of the MEMBERS (homeowners), or a special meeting of the BOARD. If the latter, and that's my guess and Tim's too, only 4 days of a posted notice & agenda are required.

Take a look at davis-stirling.com -> Main Index -> Meetings to learn how those two types differ and to learn a bout other kinds of meetings too, Thomas. i'm sorry your HOA is such a mess. If you have really specific issues and questions, though, it's better to start a new thread.

I'm wondring, Tamara, why your dues are so high. Could it be that you all have been contributing too much to reserves??? And that your reserves are waaaaay more than 100% funded??

If so, a reduction in dues can get you back on track, which also would allow you to hire a mgr. at, perhaps no increase. (But I agree with others, if the board can't step up, a PM can make things worse.)

So, the Secretary sent out another email saying she was wrong to call it a Special Meeting, but it was a meeting for all homeowners. There was no agenda sent, just notification of which items were to be discussed.

Kerry, our dues are high for one very specific reason: the former bookkeeper (who recently, FINALLY) moved has been a resident since the units were built. She was on a complete power trip because any new people moving in had no Board experience of any kind, so she took it upon herself to "be in charge" so to speak. As long as you agreed with her, she was very nice but if you dared question anything, she became quite nasty. I was the only person who ever stood up to her but it wore me out which is why I needed to take a break.

Our association is very well funded, but she wanted to abide by the highest percentage of dues increase recommended each year. The only year it was not raised was when I fought like heck to explain why we didn't need to increase by the maximum every year.

Now this evil woman is gone, but the people left behind have been so used to her ruling with an iron fist, they are more like like moths fluttering around a light, which is why they feel a management company will come to their rescue.

The management companies being considered have monthly fees ranging from $300 to $1200.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
$1,200/mo for an MC sounds like a hella lot when you only have 10 units! what would th company do that offers services for $300/mo?

I'll try to be specific about your dues. How much per month (or year) is your HOA contributing to reserves? an annual budget is required to be sent out to Owners, and that amount will be listed in your budget.

What is the total value of the components in your reserves study? With such a small HOA, you may not have many components (items).

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here