๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AlexG2 (California)
Posts: 18
Posted:
The HOA won a small claim court judgment against a homeowner for delinquent special assessment. The judgment was appealed and was reinstated by the appeal judge. The judgment money was not satisfied by the homeowner, however, the homeowner hired an Attorney who sent a letter to the HOA requesting documentations for his client, which was already provided to his client through out the course of the trial. Her Attorney is insisting that the HOA to supply the information.
My questions, does the HOA have the right to deny the request until the judgment is fully paid? The CC&R limit the homeowner right to the full use and enjoyment of his individual owned subdivision interest when a judgment of a court order to pay assessment duly levied by the Association, does that include financial documentations?
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 556
Posted:
How much documentation is in question?
RayC4 (Virginia)
Posts: 173
Posted:
I'm not an attorney but I don't see how a trial can ensue with evidence given regarding the validity of the unpaid charge(s), have a judge's (and appellate judge) decision for the monies to be paid, and then have the loser's attorney ask what the charges are for! I would think the HOA could deny the request cold. If the homeowner has a problem with that, she could file a separate action based on HOA 'rules' etc. But the special assessment case is done imo.

That said, if the request is an easy one to fulfill (Mark's question), maybe it would be more practical to just go ahead and do that.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I think in CA, Alex, that HOAs are required by the Davis Stirling Act to provide copies of records to H/Os upon written request no matter if they're in good standing. Your documents will state specifically which privileges may be withheld (sully recreational amenities), but they cannot oppose state statutes.

Check Davis-stirling.com, Documents Inspection (I think). The HOA only needs to provide records going back a couple of years and does not need to compile records, e.g., dig through files to show the H/O how many times H/Os have been called to hearing.

I'm with Ray, if easy for your PM or director who handles such matters, and the H/O is billed for the copies, go ahead and do it.
AlexG2 (California)
Posts: 18
Posted:
A few pages plus a copy of the Condo. Bylaws.
AlexG2 (California)
Posts: 18
Posted:
Ok Thanks, your point is well taken
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 556
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlexG2 on 12/30/2014 11:09 AM
A few pages plus a copy of the Condo. Bylaws.

Bylaws as in recorded in the deed, or separate and not recorded?
AlexG2 (California)
Posts: 18
Posted:
Bylaws separate and not recorded
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
It is best to turn this court judgment into a lien as fast as possible. A lien will prevent them from selling the home without paying the judgment. A court judgment allows them to run off and not pay. It can take years and it has to be renewed in a few years in order to collect. A lot of wasted time and money. A lien would be the first recommended means of action before going for a court judgment/lawsuit.

CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation are PUBLIC documents and filed. They are filed at the local courthouse for the CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation at the State level. By-laws are a bit more complicated. Some states do require by-laws to be filed with the CC&R's. We do it as a "courtesy" as the by-laws are typically PRIVATE to the corporation/HOA. However, the CC&R's override the by-laws regardless. Not sure why they would even bother with the by-laws.

I say if it's the CC&R's they want, then the lawyer should know they are on file at the courthouse and NOT the HOA's responsibility to provide. The only person with any slight responsibility to provide the HOA documents was the previous owner. There are no requirements Realtors, Lawyers, or the HOA provide these documents to a potential buyer. It is the right of the buyer to be informed... Thus why the documents are kept PUBLIC. It is a just good "business practice" in my opinion for a HOA to provide documents.

Yes, they are on the hook for paying the special assessment if it was voted on properly and put into place. I had a person who tried to skip out on a special assessment for us getting separate water meters. It was a special $350 amount. They refused to pay and even their dues. Tried to get the tenant to pay... We foreclosed on them and their tenant sued them and won. All they had to do was pay the money owed and kept the house...

Former HOA President
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
IMO once the court has ruled and then an appeal denied this matter is settled.

The court's decision should be clearly stated in its ruling.

The attorney is simply going through the motions by now requesting repeat documentation. My suggestion if this applies to a settled court matter best to
Cease any further back and forth. Simply request payment and if the other party fails to abide by the court order file a lien and if permitted begin foreclosure action.

The court rules done deal over and out.

CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Unhappy HO has a new attorney, which is why they are requesting the docs, they are so wrapped up in it that they will fight it until it kills them or their job, marriage, etc and they found one attorney who will milk it because they can, in hopes of "finding fault" with the last attorney.

Cynical? Yes. Send it to them, it's easy enough to do.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Melissa, please read my first reply re: CA . The man is an Owner--he has a legal right to his HOA's bylaws. It doesn't matter whether or not they're recorded. In addition why do you care what his reasons are for wanting the bylaws???

Your repeated claims, Melissa, about how bylaws are a "bit more complicated" are not helpful, yet you must cut & paste that remark as we see it so often!! What bylaws share with CC&Rs and Articles is that they ALL are governing documents! In many states, buyers are permitted to examine them BEFORE the close of escrow.

Alex, generally bylaws are indeed a separate document from the CC&Rs. We have our bylaws, CC&Rs and Articles on a protected portion of our website. Think about doing that in your HOA. Btw, are you on the Board?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Most people do NOT know the documents are available PUBLICLY prior to purchasing. First time I bought into a HOA, I had no idea what the documents were until closing day. They were then brought to the closing by the previous owners. A scenario I've heard time and time again. Who is going to hold up closing to read documents? If you just finished a lease agreement and have a moving truck parked outside?

You are NOT an owner until you sign the dotted line. Which means that by-laws NOT typically being "Public" are not always available until closing. The other ones are available since they are PUBLIC. I can't fault someone in purchasing in a HOA for NOT being properly informed of the documentation due to how the system works. Each state is different in the requirements of filing as well. I can't speak for each and every HOA on the planet on how, who, and if documents are provided. I can only state that By-laws are typically "Internal" HOA documents and CC&R's/Articles are PUBLIC. You may not get a copy of the bylaws until purchase day.

I have been through a similar issue and we had to foreclose on the person. However, we never sued them. We simply filed a lien for unpaid dues and unpaid assessment. We put in a policy of 6 months we liened once I was in office. That way we did not "randomly" pick and choose who we collected on. A solid collection policy shows one is not "selective enforcement". Which is what it sounds like the new attorney may be trying to prove.

Our person went through 4 lawyers and stiffed them. Their renter they had paying off their second mortgage in a "false rent-to-own" scenario went on to sue them in court for back over payments. I testified in court over the matter. We were able to finally foreclose on the property. It took about 8 months and the property sat vacant for over a year due to issues. Eventually it sold at a tax auction for unpaid taxes. We could not touch the property.

So I would consider going the lien process ASAP and making a solid collections policy. That way this won't happen in the future. 6 months lien, 1 year CONSIDER foreclosure. Stop going the lawsuit route...

Former HOA President
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Alex

You cannot deny an owner the right to certain documents. You can charge for them, but they must be made available, upon proper written request, and within a certain time period. If you a website and they are on the public side of the site, then they can download for free. A delinquent homeowner does not have the right to the private side of the site, if there privileges were properly suspended, in California, its called due process.

In a number of states, Bylaws are REQUIRED to be recorded and thus are PUBLIC documents. In California, I have seen a number of Bylaws that were recorded, and thus are PUBLIC documents.

A court judgement becomes a lien once the court records the abstract of judgement.

If an attorney is asking for documents for their client, I find it best to cooperate fully, as it should show the court the HOA has nothing to hide.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Melissa

In California, governing documents are required to be provided when escrow has opened, not when a person is signing the final documents at closing. Matter of fact, California Civil Code ยง4530 requires the seller to provide the buyer ten different documents and the request cannot be deny except for payment of the fees.

As the OP is from California, it might be helpful to provide correct information per state laws.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlexG2 on 12/30/2014 9:29 AM
The HOA won a small claim court judgment against a homeowner for delinquent special assessment. The judgment was appealed and was reinstated by the appeal judge. The judgment money was not satisfied by the homeowner, however, the homeowner hired an Attorney who sent a letter to the HOA requesting documentations for his client, which was already provided to his client through out the course of the trial. Her Attorney is insisting that the HOA to supply the information.
My questions, does the HOA have the right to deny the request until the judgment is fully paid? The CC&R limit the homeowner right to the full use and enjoyment of his individual owned subdivision interest when a judgment of a court order to pay assessment duly levied by the Association, does that include financial documentations?

Alex,

As others have advised I would provide the documents requested by the owner's attorney. I would also remind the attorney in writing that the association has already obtained a judgment against this client and that the client has already exhausted his/her appeals.

I would also include a copy of the judgment when responding to the attorney along with a statement that the requested documents were previously provided to the client during the discovery phase of litigation so that any new claims the client may wish to make would be barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. (That doctrine means that claims that could have been raised during your lawsuit cannot be raised in a new round of litigation.)

AlexG2 (California)
Posts: 18
Posted:
Thank you, I agree with you, why the attorney want the documentations is beyond me, the case was settled by the appeal judge. We will file a lien on the property to protect the HOA, usually SCC judgments are hard to collect.
AlexG2 (California)
Posts: 18
Posted:
yes, I'm a board president
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Alex, I very much like Larry's elaboration of our overall general advice.

Thanks, Richard for repeating CA statutes on the point of H/Os having access to their governing docs. In addition, in CA, but also in MANY states sellers, must provide many documents to buyers well before the close of escrow, not when the UHaul's engine running curbside! But whenever I ask Melissa what the AL law about this, which must be what she keeps repeating, she never replies.

But I'm curious about your quote here, Richard: "A delinquent homeowner does not have the right to the private side of the site, if there privileges were properly suspended, in California, its called due process."

The privileges that our HOA may suspend are in both our CC&Rs and are repeated in our bylaws. They do not include barring the delinquent owner from the private part of our website. Please cite your source, Richard. And even if so, the HOA still is required to provide them to this Owner.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Suspension of Privileges on the Davis-Stirling website.

We use the provisions as outlined in our collection policy, as you know, have the same effect as the Rules and Regulations.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Kerry

I was going to add, the documents are available to them, but at a cost to them. The website is an amenity, that they choose not to enjoy because of lack of payments.The private side requires a username and password given to them by an administrator. Of course, this is only done after due process. If, they become delinquent after they had signed up, and after due process, their log-in is suspended or cancelled.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
OK, Richard. suspending access to the protected part of our website isn't on our list of privileges that may be suspended. But it is on yours? Interesting.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Kerry

I suggest you have it added with either your R & R's or Collection Policy.
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Being able to look up the Documents that are legally attached to ones property is considered an amenity? I don't see how that would benefit any HOA? Even if the delinquent Homeowner's rights are suspended why would they not have access to bylaws and rules? Wouldn't you still want them to follow them and why not let them discover that the board is following procedure? (Just curious)
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Sure, why not give them back the key to the pool so they can work on their tans while reading the documents(s) they freely choose to ignore?
AmandaR2 (South Carolina)
Posts: 566
Posted:
Hmmm, interesting answer to the question.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I'm with Amanda (welcome to the forum), Richard. I don't see how suspending access to the protected site benefits an HOA at all!! We won't be amending our R&Rs for that reason. Or is there actually something fun on your protected site? Anything on ours, an Owner can get from our PM via written request. So why make more work for our PM?

In our urban high rise, suspending controlled access Visitor Parking privileges really does work!
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Homeowner dues pay for the maintenance of the website, as well as the pool. Why would you not suspend one without the other.

Our community is gated. We give owners codes to program their remotes, but access to the intercom is an amenity. If a visitor shows up, they can call the owner via cell phone and the owner can drag their delinquent butts to their car and drive down to the gate and remotely open for their visitor or family member.

BTW, if you look at where most governing docs are placed on a HOA website, its generally on the PUBLIC side. Most HOA websites don't have a PRIVATE side.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Alex

I am not nor do I play a lawyer.

My reading is the person had their day in court and the new lawyer is looking to find grounds for an appeal.

That said, my advice is do not play lawyer. I suggest you respond with the required information that an owner would be entitled to. Do not add Internet suggested legal comments, play lawyer mumbo jumbo, etc. Do not play lawyer. Play photo copy button presser only especially if what they are requesting is simple enough to do. Send the copies with a note saying as per your request and no other comments/wording, etc.

My other advice is turn the request over to your association's attorney. This is the same advice as above. Do not play lawyer.

Hope this helps.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/30/2014 7:07 PM

That said, my advice is do not play lawyer. . . . Do not add Internet suggested legal comments, play lawyer mumbo jumbo, etc. Do not play lawyer.

My only reason for suggesting that they add the legal stuff is that there is a high likelihood that the delinquent owner has been less than truthful with his/her attorney. That is, the attorney is unaware that his client has already been to both the trial court and the appellate court and lost both times.

My thought was that the sooner the attorney realizes that he has been hoodwinked, the less hassle there will be for the association. Additionally, it is to the association's benefit that the owner does not spend her last dime on attorney fees for a case that has already been decided to a finality; let her spend it on satisfying the judgment.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
A client not being honest with their attorney, what a shock that would be!
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
What!? Has it happened before?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I still like your advice best, Larry.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Alex, I would suggest you fulfill the attorney's request for the documents the owner requests. While I'm sure the thought never, ever crossed his mind: Members may bring an action in small claims court to enforce their right to inspect and copy the association's records. Making a request for ADR is not required before going into small claims court. If the court finds that the association unreasonably withheld records, the court may assess a penalty of up to $500 for the denial of each separate written request and order the production of records. (Civ. Code ยง5235.)

Could just be he is hoping to offset the HOA's judgement with one of his own. Remember you can charge and collect reasonable copying costs before handing the documents over.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 12/30/2014 8:30 PM
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/30/2014 7:07 PM

That said, my advice is do not play lawyer. . . . Do not add Internet suggested legal comments, play lawyer mumbo jumbo, etc. Do not play lawyer.


My only reason for suggesting that they add the legal stuff is that there is a high likelihood that the delinquent owner has been less than truthful with his/her attorney. That is, the attorney is unaware that his client has already been to both the trial court and the appellate court and lost both times.

My thought was that the sooner the attorney realizes that he has been hoodwinked, the less hassle there will be for the association. Additionally, it is to the association's benefit that the owner does not spend her last dime on attorney fees for a case that has already been decided to a finality; let her spend it on satisfying the judgment.

Larry

It would shock me that they never told their lawyer about the other courts but it is possible. Thus I would advise if going sent copies requested also send any copies of the court verdicts but again, no comments, only copies.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/31/2014 5:57 AM
It would shock me that they never told their lawyer about the other courts but it is possible.

John,

My suspicions stem from the facts that a non-paying owner fought in trial court, fought in appellate court, has not paid the judgment but did hire a lawyer to make demand for documents already in his/her possession. There is no shortage of delusional people who think they can re-litigate a case they already lost and this owner does not seem to be playing with a full deck.

Quote:

Thus I would advise if going sent copies requested also send any copies of the court verdicts but again, no comments, only copies.

This is good advice as it gets the message across without playing Matlock in front of a real attorney. It is better advice than what I gave.

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here