💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ThomasC11 (California)
Posts: 210
Posted:
We have many residents in our So Cal townhouse community that are placing planters/pots in the common area - in the grass, along sides of units, in front of garage doors for example. Some reflect borderline hoarder tendencies.

Our documents state that all planters/pots must remain on Exclusive Use concrete slabs.

This situration is mainly interfering with the vendors ability to complete tasks.

Do we have the ability to (after sending a notice), remove these items from the Common Area?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Yes you do. Simply site the section of the rules and send them a notice. Explain that if their items are damaged while sitting in the common area the HOA is NOT responsible nor the vendor. Define the area that is not common and allow them to use it for exclusive use.

I find when you put in writing the exact rule and NOT paying for their item damage they make changes. Plus take pictures. If they are renters contact the owner to correct and explain.

Former HOA President
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
We have occasionally removed items that have been "donated" to our high rise condo HOA, e.g., (unwanted) exercise equipment from our gym, rose bushes planted in our common area planters.

We also would remove items in our interior corridors, door mats, an occasional plant, but a warning letter to the owner of the unit solves that one.

But your situation is a little different. Still your rules say that nothing should be placed in the common areas so Our Board would enforce that rule. I'd start with a general and friendly reminder to your community that items may not...blah,blah. Please remove them with the next xx days. Put in your newsletter or web site for a couple of weeks.

Make certain you know for sure which areas are common areas and which are not. Driveways, for instance??? Or are some of these exclusive use common areas?

If that doesn't work, and it won't for everyone, treat as any other violation with a warning letter (to the owner) or whatever your documents specify giving violators XX days to remove these items. if the Owners don't see to it that the items are removed, invite them to a hearing to hear their side of the story.

Based on that, you can fine them or hire someone to remove the items and bill the owners for that process. I do think, though, that you should check with your attorney before removing them about your wording and methods of removal.

Another alternative is to modify your rules and permit items in some common areas, but that could open up new issues.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Thomas

We are having somewhat of the same issues

1. Our HOA does all outside maintenance including landscaping.

2. Our Covenants call for adhering to Community Wide Standards and what the BOD can do if you do not, but another subject.

Not sure how to begin but let me cite one recent example. We had an owner that came to the BOD complaining that our landscaper had broken one of those solar powered lights people install along driveways and he wanted us/our landscaper to pay for a replacement.

Let us discuss Community Wide Standards for a moment. If we have 112 homes and each home had an identical backyard fence installed at time of construction is that type, style, spec, etc. fence not the Community Wide Standard?

If none of the original 112 homes had solar panel lights installed at construction time, is no solar panel lights not the Community Wide Standard?

We do have Covenant restrictions that one must request permission for any landscape modifications so overall one cannot do anything they wish to do. There is language about lawn statues, figurines, etc. and Plastic Pink Flamingos are actually mentioned. When I questioned the attorney who originally did the Covenants he said it was inserted as an "inside joke" as his staff had an expression, as in you mean the Pink Flamingo restriction.

If someone violated the Community Wide Standards should we not be fining them for such versus replacing their not Community Wide Standard item?

I say we should not be paying for a solar panel light replacement and we should be ordering them removed.

Comments and questions welcome.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
OOPS...no editing feature:

Back to the original question. While I do not know CA, if someone violates our Covenants (such as planters only on concrete surfaces though we do not have such) or what we consider a Community Wide Standard the BOD can order the owner to commence correction within 10 days or the BOD will have the situation corrected and bill the owner. That part (us correcting) is in our Covenants.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Pretty much like CA, JohnC, but we're required to call them to a hearing first.

BTW, since I didn't state it earlier, we do have rules against placing anything in any of our common areas. When some of us first became active in our HOA, all newbies, one of the issues was numerous residents storing items in the common area aisles of our exclusive use garage level storage cages, and on top of them too. A mattress stored on top, for instance was dangerously close to a sprinkler head.

We nagged the Board until they finally did get a written opinion from our Gen. Counsel about warning residents, then removing and storing the items for two weeks. Then finally discarding them or donating them.

In this case it often wasn't possible to determine to whom the items in the aisles belonged.
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/06/2014 5:28 PM
Thomas

We are having somewhat of the same issues

1. Our HOA does all outside maintenance including landscaping.

2. Our Covenants call for adhering to Community Wide Standards and what the BOD can do if you do not, but another subject.

Not sure how to begin but let me cite one recent example. We had an owner that came to the BOD complaining that our landscaper had broken one of those solar powered lights people install along driveways and he wanted us/our landscaper to pay for a replacement.

Let us discuss Community Wide Standards for a moment. If we have 112 homes and each home had an identical backyard fence installed at time of construction is that type, style, spec, etc. fence not the Community Wide Standard?

If none of the original 112 homes had solar panel lights installed at construction time, is no solar panel lights not the Community Wide Standard?

We do have Covenant restrictions that one must request permission for any landscape modifications so overall one cannot do anything they wish to do. There is language about lawn statues, figurines, etc. and Plastic Pink Flamingos are actually mentioned. When I questioned the attorney who originally did the Covenants he said it was inserted as an "inside joke" as his staff had an expression, as in you mean the Pink Flamingo restriction.

If someone violated the Community Wide Standards should we not be fining them for such versus replacing their not Community Wide Standard item?

I say we should not be paying for a solar panel light replacement and we should be ordering them removed.

Comments and questions welcome.


JohnC,

-Would your landscaper be responsible if he broke something else that fit within community standards?

-Do you have a contract with the landscaper where the landscaper states he is or is not responsible for items such as lights, planters etc;? it seems like this would be a common issue that may arise for a landscaper. (maybe he has insurance and replacing it wouldn't be a big deal to him?)

-How do you view the meaning of "community wide standards"? What does it mean to all the members of your community? Does it mean no one can add any personality to the exterior of their homes that was not put there by the builder? (builders don't usually do anything). Do you all want homes to look completely identical/sterile, or do you all a certain amount of individuality/creativity allowed? Do you have specific rules of what is allowed?

Did this person have the solar light in their driveway because they were for instance an elderly person and needed lights at night, for safety reasons like preventing a fall when getting out a car for instance?

p.s. I personally think a neighborhood of single family homes look much more inviting when homeowners are able to express some pride in ownership in their property to me that would add warmth and value (of course within reason....I would be ok with the no statues or pink flamingos in front yards....lol)

Emma
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Oh, I agree with you, Johnc. Don't reimburse that owner for breaking your covenants! Why does he think you should????
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/06/2014 6:26 PM
Oh, I agree with you, Johnc. Don't reimburse that owner for breaking your covenants! Why does he think you should????

I think John said they were asking the landscaper to replace the light not the HOA.

EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/06/2014 6:28 PM
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/06/2014 6:26 PM
Oh, I agree with you, Johnc. Don't reimburse that owner for breaking your covenants! Why does he think you should????


I think John said they were asking the landscaper to replace the light not the HOA.


John did not state that the covenants were broken, he asked if we thought the covenants were broken.
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/06/2014 6:29 PM
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/06/2014 6:28 PM
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/06/2014 6:26 PM
Oh, I agree with you, Johnc. Don't reimburse that owner for breaking your covenants! Why does he think you should????


I think John said they were asking the landscaper to replace the light not the HOA.



John did not state that the covenants were broken, he asked if we thought the covenants were broken.

correction "community wide standards" not covenants, he was asking for comments and opinions on that
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/06/2014 5:28 PM

If someone violated the Community Wide Standards should we not be fining them for such versus replacing their not Community Wide Standard item?

John,

If the member asked and received permission to place the lights outside their home, then I think it's the Associations responsibility to pay for any damage.

If the member did not ask or was refused permission to place the lights outsider their home, then I think it's the owners issue and not the Associations. However, I also know that if I were the owner I wouldn't be thinking like that.

My recommendation, replace the light and then insist that the member remove them as it interferes with the maintenance of the area.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
JohnC, do your quotes below summarize what you wrote?

Gardeners broke a solar light next to a driveway, I assume on the ground cover or turf, which interferes with your gardener's work:

The owner, "wanted us/our landscaper to pay for a replacement."

"We do have Covenant restrictions that one must request permission for any landscape modifications."

"I say we should not be paying for a solar panel light replacement and we should be ordering them removed."

I again suggest that neither your HOA nor your gardener replace it since it violates your covenants. The only reason, imo, to do so is if your board gave the person permission to install it...
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
JohnC,

Just curious since I have never lived in a home where I was not responsible for maintenance of my own property, does you have to get written permission for everything/anything you add? what are your basic rules? Will you in the future after the transition from the developer define "community wide standards" with more detail/specifics of exactly what that means?
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/06/2014 5:28 PM
Thomas

If none of the original 112 homes had solar panel lights installed at construction time, is no solar panel lights not the Community Wide Standard?

Comments and questions welcome.


I would say in my opinion if you were to take that literally, it would mean that NOTHING could be added, because if "community wide standards" means nothing other than what was installed at construction time, then it would mean no one could install anything that was not put in by the builder.

A BOD could get real carried away with that kind of power and make a neighborhood very unpleasant and uncomfortable to live in. IMO not many people would be okay with living that way in stand alone home. People would not want to purchase a home there. I have drive through these types of neighborhoods you can figure out what they are like immediately it is very apparent. They usually don't sell homes very fast in this area.

John, you don't live in a high rise, condo, or apartment where that rigidity would be more appealing (and necessary). You are in a small town in South Carolina that should be factored in your BODs decision on what type of rules you create and enforce in order to have and keep happy residents. Happy residents means less problems and more homeowner and neighborhood pride. Be careful not to be too strict and become resented by some nice people in your community.

Just my opinion.

p.s. I don't think the light was a really big issue to you anyway, I think you wanted more opinions/feedback about what "community wide standards" should be considered to be. I mean really how inexpensive are those solar lights you stick in the ground anyway? maybe a couple of bucks at walmart? (personally I don't like how they look, not that that matters)
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/06/2014 7:22 PM
JohnC, do your quotes below summarize what you wrote?

"We do have Covenant restrictions that one must request permission for any landscape modifications."

..

Not sure if a little solar light stuck in the ground would be considered a "landscape modification" in Johns neighborhood or not. It certainly would not be considered that in my neighborhood or any ones that I know of. Landscape modifications around here usually refer to plantings and usually of trees and other larger items not flowers and smaller plantings etc;.....owners of stand alone homes need some amount of freedom.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 12/06/2014 6:59 PM
If the member asked and received permission to place the lights outside their home, then I think it's the Associations responsibility to pay for any damage.

From time to time the landscaper's lawnmowers kick up a clod of dirt or stone that shatters a glass slider. Generally, the landscaper considers it a cost of doing business and pays for the replacement. I know of one incident where I am fairly certain that the slider was not damaged by the landscaper, but he covered the replacement cost anyway to keep the peace. These costs are factored in when he prices his services to us.

Our docs say any alteration requires approval. Even though we have many solar lights, I don't think that anyone has ever requested permission. If someone was going to request permission, we would probably approve them because others have them, but we would say that any damage would be at the HOs own risk. We have no inclination to establish some exacting standards on where or how they have to be placed. We even have one HO who puts them in the middle of the lawn to catch the sun during the day and then moves them to her walkway which is always in shade at night. If one gets run over or dinged, it's on her.

I do not believe that liability automatically comes with approval.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/06/2014 8:25 PM
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/06/2014 7:22 PM
JohnC, do your quotes below summarize what you wrote?

"We do have Covenant restrictions that one must request permission for any landscape modifications."

..


Not sure if a little solar light stuck in the ground would be considered a "landscape modification" in Johns neighborhood or not. It certainly would not be considered that in my neighborhood or any ones that I know of.

It would be considered an exterior change within our Association and require prior approval (per our CC&Rs).

Since we don't maintain the individual lots, the approval is easily obtained.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ThomasC11 on 12/06/2014 4:22 PM
We have many residents in our So Cal townhouse community that are placing planters/pots in the common area - in the grass, along sides of units, in front of garage doors for example. Some reflect borderline hoarder tendencies.

Our documents state that all planters/pots must remain on Exclusive Use concrete slabs.

This situration is mainly interfering with the vendors ability to complete tasks.

Do we have the ability to (after sending a notice), remove these items from the Common Area?

Thomas, I would suggest the Board send a letter to every home citing the relevant section of the CC&R's and state that some homeowners perhaps in error have been ignoring it. I would then state that anyone violating it, has X number of days (be reasonable) to remove the planters/pots or the HOA would have no choice but to consider them abandoned property and dispose of them.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/06/2014 7:32 PM
JohnC,

Just curious since I have never lived in a home where I was not responsible for maintenance of my own property, does you have to get written permission for everything/anything you add? what are your basic rules? Will you in the future after the transition from the developer define "community wide standards" with more detail/specifics of exactly what that means?

Emma

Keep in mind we are standalone patio homes on small lots. The sides of many homes are only 20 feet apart. The HOA does all landscaping and maintains the outside shell of each home. Overall there is little for you to do here but also there is little you can do.

In our association you basically cannot make any modifications and certainly none without permission. Yes we are somewhat Stepford Wife looking but all knew such when they moved here and the vast majority of us want it left that way. Like at least keep it to the level/standard it was when I decided to move here.

Each home does have a 6ft privacy fence around its back yard. We do not maintain the landscaping inside the fence. One is free to do as they desire in that fenced in area so if one wants to be an "individual" that is their space to do so.

One is not allowed to plant anything on their property outside that fenced in area. What landscaping is presently there (bushes, trees, lawn, mulching, fertilization, etc.) will be maintained by the association.

We do allow planters on front porches and at the top of the driveway, up against the garage/house. We allow seasonal decorations on front porch but not on the house nor on the property.

Community Wide Standards is something we are discussing. Our Covenants address it in that the association and owners are expected to adhere to Community Wide Standards. One school of thought (the one I subscribe to) is that as our 112 fences are identical size, style, construction, color, etc. that by default, this is the Community Wide Standard for fences.

As far as driveway lights no one (about 5 homes have them) has ever asked permission to install such thus any installed are in violation of the Covenants as they did not request permission for. As to if a request would have been approved is another question and not what we are discussing.

While is has not become a major issue yet, our landscaper has told us if they have to mow around things like driveway lights, etc. then go back and trim around them, then they are going to want to discuss an increase in the yearly landscaping contract as it takes more time for them to complete their tasks.

We have no limit on household pets.........LOL

EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:

John,
I can certainly understand your being in patio homes would need to as a community establish more specific guidelines/rules than for stand alone homes on large lots like mine. I imagine from what you describe you must have a lot of like-minded individuals for neighbors who shopped for the type of neighborhood you have and they're happy there (so if its not broken....).

I wonder why you don't have more homeowner participation in your community, like you have said? Do you think it's because your declarant is still involved, and maybe that will change later on and people will get more involved?

**IMO I think finding a balance of having restrictions and allowing people to have individuality must be one of the most difficult things to do and keep a majority of people somewhat happy. I have mixed emotions because we all have certain tastes and styles and I don't think a BOD should have their taste come into play.
For instance, I have an older couple in my neighborhood that, I will put it this way to be nice "more ornate" taste than myself, and while it does not please me to look at some of their choices, I would rather concentrate on if they keep things neat and clean. They are immaculate and spend hours everyday in their garden so......I guess I 'd rather see them happy and a neat yard then have a miserable person that is lazy. (It is not one of those crazy people homes just not my personal taste, I feel it's the lesser of the evils to let them be, rather than try to control them and hurt them.)

Good luck achieving that difficult balance,

Emma
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GlenL on 12/07/2014 3:49 AM

Thomas, I would suggest the Board send a letter to every home citing the relevant section of the CC&R's and state that some homeowners perhaps in error have been ignoring it. I would then state that anyone violating it, has X number of days (be reasonable) to remove the planters/pots or the HOA would have no choice but to consider them abandoned property and dispose of them.

Excellent advice
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/07/2014 5:14 AM
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/06/2014 7:32 PM
JohnC,

While is has not become a major issue yet, our landscaper has told us if they have to mow around things like driveway lights, etc. then go back and trim around them, then they are going to want to discuss an increase in the yearly landscaping contract as it takes more time for them to complete their tasks.

We have no limit on household pets.........LOL


Hey JohnC,

Just an idea not sure if you/your neighbors would even want this but:

What if you allowed/added the ability/choice that each owner could have a _______wide strip along one side of their driveways in which they may have no grass (so you don't get charged more by the landscaper for having to go around things.) but are allowed a certain controlled amount of creativity/customization to their property? I have seen this in many high end patio home communities it adds some character/interest in my opinion. (I guess you would call it a landscape berm).

You could have specific guidelines that you all vote/agree on so that it does not become "distasteful" or too random and crazy. Maybe keep certain rules like: must have mulch, river rock, pine straw etc; and can only plant flowers, plants ___tall etc;, no statues, fake flower/plants or pink flamingos.....lol. Then state the homeowner is soley responsible for upkeep/maintenance in accordance to the established "community standards" that you set/agree on.

Well, just an idea that popped into my head.

Emma
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Might be nice to add a little color and life in a attractive way??
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
I guess if you all agreed that would be a place to allow solar lights too.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Below is Glen's wise reply, Thomas:

"Thomas, I would suggest the Board send a letter to every home citing the relevant section of the CC&R's and state that some homeowners perhaps in error have been ignoring it. I would then state that anyone violating it, has X number of days (be reasonable) to remove the planters/pots or the HOA would have no choice but to consider them abandoned property and dispose of them."

And here's part of mine from way above.

"I'd start with a general and friendly reminder to your community that items may not...blah,blah. Please remove them with the next xx days. Put in your newsletter or web site for a couple of weeks. " And then I continue with further steps if needed.

I hope that these two among all the verbiage in this thread will give you a good start to solving your issue.
ThomasC11 (California)
Posts: 210
Posted:
Looks like my post got hijacked somewhat to an interesting discussion about solar lights. Thanks for all the great feedback on how to move ahead on the issue!
EmmaH1
Posts: 674
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/07/2014 9:10 AM
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/07/2014 5:14 AM
Posted By EmmaH1 on 12/06/2014 7:32 PM
JohnC,

While is has not become a major issue yet, our landscaper has told us if they have to mow around things like driveway lights, etc. then go back and trim around them, then they are going to want to discuss an increase in the yearly landscaping contract as it takes more time for them to complete their tasks.

We have no limit on household pets.........LOL



Hey JohnC,

Just an idea not sure if you/your neighbors would even want this but:

What if you allowed/added the ability/choice that each owner could have a _______wide strip along one side of their driveways in which they may have no grass (so you don't get charged more by the landscaper for having to go around things.) but are allowed a certain controlled amount of creativity/customization to their property? I have seen this in many high end patio home communities it adds some character/interest in my opinion. (I guess you would call it a landscape berm).

You could have specific guidelines that you all vote/agree on so that it does not become "distasteful" or too random and crazy. Maybe keep certain rules like: must have mulch, river rock, pine straw etc; and can only plant flowers, plants ___tall etc;, no statues, fake flower/plants or pink flamingos.....lol. Then state the homeowner is soley responsible for upkeep/maintenance in accordance to the established "community standards" that you set/agree on.

Well, just an idea that popped into my head.

Emma

JohnC,

Since this post was officially hijacked, (with several participants and guilty parties I might add.....lol).
Did you not care for the idea to deal with your landscape/common area/lights issue? Just wondering?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Emma

When living in close proximity it is generally believed best to tightly control what can and cannot be done other wise one can get a hodge podge, junky looking real fast.

As we do all the landscaping can you imagine the time, effort, cost, etc. of letting each owner decide they type mulch they want, the height of their grass, etc. Same with having or not having driveway lights. Some of our driveway are only 12 feet apart. Again, a hodge podge.

What one can do on a large lot (mine in Andover MA was 2 acres) is quite different then what one can do when living close even if private homes.

You would love some of our restrictions. All house must have the same color and style front door and storm doors. All garage doors are identical and must remain that style/color. All window dressings facing the street must be a solid neutral color as seen for the outside. No barnyard animals and no animal breeding facility but we do not limit household pets. Gal next door has two dogs, two cats, and two sons.......LOL

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here