💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

WilliamK4 (West Virginia)
Posts: 11
Posted:
Hi, The old Board was voted out and we are trying to get any or old documents concerning this HOA. The Treasurer has been contacted many times but has yet to contact any of the other newly created members. We have called, sent emails, and have mailed a certified letter requesting the documents. What recourse does this new board have?
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
Court Order + some testicles to get same

stop playing around and take ACTION
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Do your governing documents say anything about records and cement "turnover," when there's a big change such as you just experienced?

Often it's the secretary who'd be responsible for maintaining files, etc. But I assume you contacted the treasurer for financial records??

Check your bylaws to see which officer is responsible for which records. Your former sec'y, for example, probably was responsible for keeping & storing board meeting meeting minutes. You've probably seen the minutes for your open meet ins, but you also want to see the minutes form executive session for info about fines, contact bids, potential lawsuits.

If your HOA has had one or more audits done, that firm can send you certain financial records.

Meantime, I'd send registered letters to all former board members with your request. It's possible, for example, that the former president kept track of violations and how they were resolved.

Just as background, how many homes or condos in your HOA? How many were/are on your Board? Do you have no committees who might have records? An architectural change committee, for example?

It doesn't sound like you have a property mgr. Is that correct?

If everything fails, I assume you can hire an attorney as a last result to demand the records.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Two Board members knock on the door of the former members and say that you are there to collect the Associations documents.

It's easy to avoid messages and e-mails. Difficult to avoid a personal visit.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Not a big fan of curbside visits. Check whether your state's law creates some form of personal Director-specific penalty for failing to maintain "adequate records".

The remedy may require several stages. Typically wanting its own forensics to be protected, for inadequate records ( among others ) our jurisdiction empowers respective personal/corporate fines by the jurisdiction itself, limited to $25K individuals & $100K corporations. But imagine the shock/cynicism several years ago when a nosy researcher pried out the bureaucrat admission that over many decades NO ONE had ever been so fined nor was there any investigation underway. All window dressing. Maybe yours is different, and could motivate a transfer of what belongs to the corporation & owners generally, not merely the ex-Directors.

If there also has been a change of PMC, such may be part of the Black Hole, if that is what it is.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BobD4 on 11/11/2014 7:39 PM

Not a big fan of curbside visits.

I'm not either. However, they have already tried letters, e-mail and phone calls.
Therefore, a personal visit is required (in my opinion).
Other than this, it will require legal action through the courts and may take several more months.

Quote:
Posted By BobD4 on 11/11/2014 7:39 PM

Check whether your state's law creates some form of personal Director-specific penalty for failing to maintain "adequate records".

I've never seen this in any of the statutes I've researched.

WilliamK4 (West Virginia)
Posts: 11
Posted:
Unfortunately this may be our only option.
WilliamK4 (West Virginia)
Posts: 11
Posted:
To answer all. This HOA was formed by the "good old boy" network back in 1969. The Treasurer has been in office for over 20 . In retrospect she ran the meetings. She has told the newly elected treasurer that documents are ready but never delivered them. Since then we have even gone to her house but won't answer the door. It would seem it must be handled legally.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
“Check whether your state's law creates some form of personal Director-specific penalty for failing to maintain "adequate records".
- “I’'ve never seen this in any of the statutes I've researched.”

There was nothing worth missing, apparently.

This notorious window-dressing section 137 - introduced here in 1998 - is one of eight or nine distinct consumer-protection / rights protection remedies – some effective - including “oppression relief”.

( The 4 main "targets" ( ?) of the section 137 window dressing are : Declarant mis-disclosuring, integrity of condo corporation funds, political canvassing access, and corporation records including inadequacy under prior versions of the Act . Please note window-dressing section 137's twice- entrenched hurdle of proving “knowingly “ – as part of blameworthy mental scenario not too short of criminal “mens rea”, seen by many condo law critics here as a huge barrier to prosecution ) :

The Condominium Act 1998 S.O. 1998 ch 19
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_98c19_e.htm

Window-dressing section 137 : (Provincial) Offences
includes as target wrongdoing :
“Subsection 55(1) Records
The corporation shall keep adequate records including the following records . . .”

BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
from an A.D.R. standpoint, curbside visits OTHER THAN than by Cable 10 or 60 Minutes style pursuit by an external professional, may be a hot potato. What if the respondent has a heart attack or calls the police etc.? Its record of demand is rarely better than unanswered registered letters.

Curbside visits must make US judges a bit uncomfortable. Aside from what sometimes goes violent, they may proliferate damage onto innocent spouses and children etc. Is it comfortable knocking uninvited at a door where an angry responder may have a dog or weapon . . . ? ( I have no beefs with the 2nd amendment )
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Well can you just carry on without the documents? If you have access to the bank statements through the bank, that should help gather back most of the documents. The IRS only go back a few years, so rebuilding the records does not need to go back to creation. Possibly if this person sees you are capable of rebuilding and not needing the documents, they will turn them over. Right now they know they have the HOA by the nads. Cut them off and begin again.

Former HOA President
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Considering how reluctant the old board is to hand over the records, I would expect there is something there don't want others to see.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here