๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I do realize laws can vary widely especially from state to state but let me begin.

We are transitioning from Declarant to Owners and have been interviewing management companies. One MC company that presented said that unpaid fines cannot be used to lien/foreclose but special assessments for violations could be used.

I have seen comments about this on this chat (especially the Farran case in VA), but I cannot recall all. Could someone point me to any article/document that might further explain/clarify this.

Thanks
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
John,

Since SC does not have HOA laws, I suspect that the MC is basing this info on the condominium law, ยง 27-31-210 (a) (scroll down).
That section seems to limit the issue to unpaid assessments or special assessments:

(a) All sums assessed by the administrator, or the board of administration, or other form of administration specified in the bylaws, but unpaid, for the share of common expenses chargeable to any apartment shall constitute a lien on such apartment prior to all other liens except only (i) tax liens on the apartment in favor of any assessing unit, and (ii) mortgage and other liens, duly recorded, encumbering the apartment. Such lien may be foreclosed by suit by the administrator, or the board of administration, or other form of administration specified in the bylaws, acting on behalf of the council of co-owners, in like manner as a mortgage of real property. In any such foreclosure the apartment owner shall be required to pay a reasonable rental for the apartment after the commencement of the foreclosure action and the plaintiff in such foreclosure shall be entitled to the appointment of a receiver to collect such rents. The administrator, or the board of administration, or other form of administration specified in the bylaws, acting on behalf of the council of co-owners, shall have the power to bid in the apartment at foreclosure sale and to acquire and hold, lease, mortgage and convey the same. Suit to recover a money judgment for unpaid common expenses may be maintainable without instituting foreclosure proceedings.

However, that section does defer to the Bylaws. Therefore, if monetary penalties for violations are mentioned in your Bylaws or CC&Rs, you can probably include them in a lien.

See:

South Carolina HOA and COA Foreclosures from NOLO press.

Homeowners Association Law Frequently Asked Questions from a SC law firm. This article says:
A lien may also be placed on the property for failure to pay fines properly imposed upon the owner; however the foreclosure process for foreclosing upon a lien for fines is more complicated and cumbersome.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) in South Carolina Master-in-Equity Court Master-in-Equity Court is used in lieu of circuit court for foreclosures in small counties.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 10/27/2014 7:15 PM

One MC company that presented said that unpaid fines cannot be used to lien/foreclose but special assessments for violations could be used.

Run away from this management company. Do not walk.

Assessments, including special assessments, are levied against all owners and are based on a perceived budgetary need. Fines are punishments levied against one owner.

In the section that Tim quoted, your condo board may foreclose for an unpaid "share of common expenses chargeable to any apartment." [Emphasis added.] A fine is not a common expense. Had the SC legislature intended to include unpaid fines, they would have said so.

The management company that suggested calling fines special assessments to evade the law will get your association into big trouble. Steer clear of them.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Larry,

I completely missed that the MC wanted to call fines special assessments.
I agree, thank them for their proposal and duly file the proposal into the shredder.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Tim and Larry

Thank you for the replies. I will take the time and read the links.

Ironically we did not chose the MC that raised the issue as one of my concerns was they were trying to "play lawyer". Additionally they seemed to nickel and dime their charges but another subject.

I think I have enough information.

Again, thanks.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Assessments, including special assessments, are levied against all owners and are based on a perceived budgetary need. Fines are punishments levied against one owner.

Not necessarily, before OH modified the Condo statutes to allow for fines, our CC&Rs allowed the Board to Special Assess individual units for violations i.e.fine them. And the Condo statutes also allow individual units to be SA'ed:

5311.19 Compliance with deed restrictions, declaration, bylaws and administrative rules and regulations.
(3) The costs of any eviction action brought pursuant to division (B)(1) of this section, including reasonable attorney's fees, shall be charged to the unit owner and shall be the subject of a special assessment against the offending unit and made a lien against that unit.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
BillH10 (Texas)
Posts: 1,217
Posted:
And I agree with Glen. It is common in Texas for language to describe Special Assessments to be applied to property owners generally, and other Special Assessments to be applied to a specific property owner, such as when the property owner, relatives, guests, etc. damage Association common elements.

The (individual) Special Assessment is not a fine as it is not a compliance matter, it is a process used to recover expenses incurred by the Association when the cause was an action or actions taken by a property owner or those for whom the property owner is responsible which resulted in damage to Association property.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Respectfully, what are sometimes voodoo onsite governance documents - drafted & interpreted by incompetents for decades - DO NOT legalize what a legislature may NOT have platformed. "Assessments" - special or otherwise - typically follow some form of percentage distribution entrenched within the site-specific governance documents.

If a legislature expressly provides a very specific platform for fine-levying by a shared ownership community, that is a totally different matter.

Otherwise mere unproven civil damage claims - eg : "You stained the common element hallway but not other unit owners. So without either a prior court order or a legislated fine-levying platform, we now demand $75 for the shampoo and $600 for this unsolicited, lawyer-signed letter actually prepared in India for $25/hr, else which we will super-lien and Power of Sale your unit out from under you without a court order." Some lawyers defend this voodoo "constructive fining" even in the absence of some legislative platform.

What civil disputants - except the taxman - would have the chutzpah to make such claim ? From time to time it encounters judicial competence and should get thrown out where the legislation does not specifically platform liens for civil claims and fines without prior court order. Check yours out with a lawyer familiar with your jurisdiction.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
the above does not imply application "new york", where I am not.
BillH10 (Texas)
Posts: 1,217
Posted:
Bob

I checked the Texas Property Code, assessments are defined and authorized, although the Property Code defers to the governing documents of the association for definition, execution, application, etc.

Using the term Special Assessment when levied against a single property owner is perhaps technically incorrect. The attorney for the association has used the term Individual Special Assessment in discussions in which it appeared the Association might incur expense due to the actions of a single property owner. However, he counseled the Board that the Individual Special Assessment could not be used to levy out of compliance fines. Two separate issues.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Do some jurisdictions avoid the terms "(civil) fine" like the plague ? If it cannot be lawfully labelled a fine, maybe the PMC bidders know it by some other name ? unit-specific charge without express legislative platform ? assessment for wrongdoing ? Thanks for checking.
BillH10 (Texas)
Posts: 1,217
Posted:
Bob

What is being discussed here is not a fine. A fine, in my experience, is generated in an out of compliance situation when the property owner does not cure the compliance issue. In the Governing Documents of one of the Associations we manage, there is no mention of fines. Consequently, the Board has no enforcement mechanism when a property owner refuses to maintain landscaping, etc. The Governing Documents of this association however do very specifically refer to a Special Assessment levied on a property owner when the property owner, family, guest, etc. damages Association property.

In the association in which we reside, the word "fine" is used in the Governing Documents; the process which is followed to levy a fine, and a schedule of fines, is provided to prospective buyers (along with a sheaf of other association documents)as is required in Texas. The Governing Documents of the association in which we reside also refer to the "Individual" Special Assessment scenario mentioned above.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The problem with fines in a HOA is that they are not "defined". HOA's have the right to fine but the definition and scope is missing in that statement. Which often leads to erroneous out of the wind fines to fit the whims of the board. Your cat meows after 10 pm? Well here is a fine for $100 and/or get rid of the cat...etc... What basis do you have to enforce this? You can fine but is that in the documentation that cat's meowing is a violation?

It is important to establish a "Fining Schedule". When developing one it is important to also know your state laws and restrictions. You may not be able to enforce fines like $50 a day till resolved. There is usually a cap. It's more falls under "Loan Sharking" type laws in your state. (If your doing research this may help give a direction). My rule of thumb is to look at the Bank's methods of collections such as late fees and such. Whatever the bank is doing is most likely the most legal pursuit.

We never fined in my HOA. We had another method which is a bit controversial for some. However, many HOA's do have the right to do in their documents. If the person is in violation of safety or aesthetic, then we could pay for the fix to put it back into agreement. We then send that bill to the owner if they refused to have corrected it on their own. If they do not pay that amount, then we can LIEN on that amount of money. We can not foreclose for it though. Our method worked like a fine but had more teeth. We could collect by lien or lawsuit after we spent the money. The court would consider that "damages".

Fines work like speeding tickets. Rarely anyone gets their car taken away for not paying their speeding tickets. They get jail time, points off license, or fined. In a HOA that would equal to restricting access to common areas, late fees, or a lien. Fines are NOT money making for a HOA. They are only punitive measures.

Former HOA President

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here