💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
I posted my question to another thread about restrictions on commercial vehicles. Am moving it here.

Unfortunately, ladder racks aren't mentioned in our docs. Wish they were.

We have 2 long time residents who would have a hard time with such a rule and we wouldn't want to antagonize them unnecessarily. Any thoughts?

We do have a weight restriction. But it looks like auto manufacturers are getting smarter - on some models, we haven't been able to find anything published - apparently there are many options and the published weight would depend on the options ordered.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
One thing you have to look at is what does a neighborhood consist of and what parking does it offer. In my last HOA, each home had at least a 2 car garage (some 3 car) and a double wide, double car deep (meaning at least 4 cars) driveways plus a satellite parking lot for boats, RV's, etc. We were very tough. If your vehicle had a sign on it, we considered commercial and it could not be parked in your driveway overnight. One realtor had a typical SUV with a letter sign on the rear window. Her husband had an identical vehicle without the sign. We ruled hers was commercial due to the sign. She complained about a State Trooper's Cruiser. We ruled safety vehicles did not count. Yes we were tough but we felt we could be as there garages and plenty of parking available plus we were looking to maintain an upmarket tone.

In my new HOA we do not have that luxury. In some models, garages were optional. We do not have satellite parking. Basically we allow any vehicle if it fits in the driveway (no overnight street parking allowed) but we have to.

I can understand either situation and enforce/accept either. It all depends on the situation.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Thanks John.

Our definition of commercial vehicles is not as comprehensive as some of those mentioned in the previous thread on commercial vehicles.

We don't allow signs or ladders. We don't have major issues with either of these.

None of the vehicles with ladder racks would fit inside a garage. This leaves driveway and on-street parking.

When I saw that in some HOAs, the docs banned "ladder racks," I had an aha moment. If we could ban them here, it would improve the general appearance. But my next thought was, what do we do about the homeowners who already have vehicles with ladder racks?

That's where I am stuck.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 10/02/2014 7:09 PM
Thanks John.

Our definition of commercial vehicles is not as comprehensive as some of those mentioned in the previous thread on commercial vehicles.

We don't allow signs or ladders. We don't have major issues with either of these.

None of the vehicles with ladder racks would fit inside a garage. This leaves driveway and on-street parking.

When I saw that in some HOAs, the docs banned "ladder racks," I had an aha moment. If we could ban them here, it would improve the general appearance. But my next thought was, what do we do about the homeowners who already have vehicles with ladder racks?

That's where I am stuck.

You would prohibit any and all such vehicles, or only those owned/used by residents and parked on-site while they're not working?

So would it be ok for the cable guy, a home improvement contractor, a cleaning company, etc... all to frequent the association, but not ok for a resident to park a similar vehicle there at night?

I'm wondering what the intent is with the restrictions.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DaveD3 on 10/03/2014 3:42 AM
You would prohibit any and all such vehicles, or only those owned/used by residents and parked on-site while they're not working?

So would it be ok for the cable guy, a home improvement contractor, a cleaning company, etc... all to frequent the association, but not ok for a resident to park a similar vehicle there at night?

I'm wondering what the intent is with the restrictions.

Hi dave
No objection to contractors working on site. No objection to owners loading and unloading materials from their house.
Objection is to the appearance of the community shifting from residential to commercial in nature.
So our original restrictions said no signs and no ladders, but didn't mention ladder racks.

.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
When I saw that in some HOAs, the docs banned "ladder racks," I had an aha moment. If we could ban them here, it would improve the general appearance.


You want to ban anything that appears that people work for a living? Work to pay for the house........ Sheesh, what is this world coming to?
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SteveM9 on 10/03/2014 7:52 AM
When I saw that in some HOAs, the docs banned "ladder racks," I had an aha moment. If we could ban them here, it would improve the general appearance.


You want to ban anything that appears that people work for a living? Work to pay for the house........ Sheesh, what is this world coming to?

Good to hear from you Dave. That's a perspective we'll have to address if we move forward with the idea. Thanks.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 10/03/2014 8:10 AM
Posted By SteveM9 on 10/03/2014 7:52 AM
When I saw that in some HOAs, the docs banned "ladder racks," I had an aha moment. If we could ban them here, it would improve the general appearance.


You want to ban anything that appears that people work for a living? Work to pay for the house........ Sheesh, what is this world coming to?


Good to hear from you Dave. That's a perspective we'll have to address if we move forward with the idea. Thanks.

Oops. Said Dave instead of Steve.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
That's a perspective we'll have to address if we move forward with the idea. Thanks.


It shouldn't even be discussed. I dont know why your pursuing this domineering social behavior. Its not normal.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SteveM9 on 10/03/2014 12:51 PM
That's a perspective we'll have to address if we move forward with the idea. Thanks.


It shouldn't even be discussed. I dont know why your pursuing this domineering social behavior. Its not normal.

Steve. The first question is - How far should a particular community go in its efforts to restrict commercial vehicles?

From everything I read on this forum, many HOAs restrict signs on vehicles. Is this abnormal?

I have also read that, like ours, other communities, prohibit ladders on vehicles. Is this abnormal?

What got my attention was that, even though it's not restricted in my HOA, several other HOAs don't allow ladder racks. Is this abnormal?

You may live in a community where there are no commercial vehicle restrictions at all. If so, I would guess that your HOA is in the minority.

The second question is - if we sought to make our rules more restrictive on commercial vehicles by disallowing ladder racks, how might we deal with homeowners who cannot comply because of their current vehicles?

You say we shouldn't discuss it at all. I say we may never decide to make such a change, but discussing it what we absolutely should do.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 10/03/2014 8:11 AM
Posted By NpS on 10/03/2014 8:10 AM
Posted By SteveM9 on 10/03/2014 7:52 AM
When I saw that in some HOAs, the docs banned "ladder racks," I had an aha moment. If we could ban them here, it would improve the general appearance.


You want to ban anything that appears that people work for a living? Work to pay for the house........ Sheesh, what is this world coming to?


Good to hear from you Dave. That's a perspective we'll have to address if we move forward with the idea. Thanks.


Oops. Said Dave instead of Steve.

No problem. Happens a lot since Steve is my brother. Just not the Steve that's posting here :-)
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DaveD3 on 10/03/2014 6:35 PM
No problem. Happens a lot since Steve is my brother. Just not the Steve that's posting here :-)

:-)

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:

From everything I read on this forum, many HOAs restrict signs on vehicles. Is this abnormal?


Since this is a forum of dysfunctional HOA's, I wouldn't regard anything you see in this forum as "normal" Its typically the abnormal HOA's that are having all the problems.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 10/03/2014 2:12 PM
Posted By SteveM9 on 10/03/2014 12:51 PM
That's a perspective we'll have to address if we move forward with the idea. Thanks.


It shouldn't even be discussed. I dont know why your pursuing this domineering social behavior. Its not normal.


Steve. The first question is - How far should a particular community go in its efforts to restrict commercial vehicles?

From everything I read on this forum, many HOAs restrict signs on vehicles. Is this abnormal?

I have also read that, like ours, other communities, prohibit ladders on vehicles. Is this abnormal?

What got my attention was that, even though it's not restricted in my HOA, several other HOAs don't allow ladder racks. Is this abnormal?

You may live in a community where there are no commercial vehicle restrictions at all. If so, I would guess that your HOA is in the minority.

The second question is - if we sought to make our rules more restrictive on commercial vehicles by disallowing ladder racks, how might we deal with homeowners who cannot comply because of their current vehicles?

You say we shouldn't discuss it at all. I say we may never decide to make such a change, but discussing it what we absolutely should do.

I think the first question should be "What is the problem we're trying to solve by permitting some commercial vehicles, but not those owned by our residents that use them to make a living?"

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DaveD3 on 10/03/2014 7:34 PM
I think the first question should be "What is the problem we're trying to solve by permitting some commercial vehicles, but not those owned by our residents that use them to make a living?"

I clearly understand your perspective. But what I am more interested in is how you have dealt with the issue of commercial vehicles in your own HOA. Do you have no restrictions at all? And if you tried to change what you have, do you think people would object?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
NPS

Sometimes simple discussion ends up like pulling teeth.

I live in a condo property. We do not allow commercial vehicles of any type.

Here they cause two concerns. When the owners bring them to the property in many cases they also have other vehicles which have caused issues with available parking. If you have two vehicles and bring home the company truck now we have.......... 3 vehicles. Not hard to follow hopefully.

As in your case our other concern is appearance. If you allow commercial vehicles just where then do you draw the line. A pick-up with ladders and tools, a tow truck or flat bed that occpies two spaces,a delivery box truck, horse trailer, how about a tanker for emptying septic tanks?

Once had a resident bring home his tractor trailer rig and park in in a spot designated for visitors. Gee what's the problem with that?

So if you wish to make some attempt to maintain the apperance of the property for all then institute some restrictions on ladders and those owners will have to somehow comply.

If you are unwilling to have everyone abide by the new rules don't bother.

Some folks might feel trucks, vans, plow trucks, utility trucks all add to the apperance
and value of their properties. I don't agree. Residential, as most properties are, includes vehicles used by residents not commercial enterprise.

Hopefully, your property can come terms that suit their goals of where and how they wish to live.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Thanks Jon

Appreciate your added perspective.

It's interesting that you mentioned # of vehicles - both of the current homeowners who have ladder racks on their trucks are painting contractors. Both own multiple trucks in addition to their cars/SUVs. As a townhouse community, parking is always tight - and we would not want any increase in vehicles. Along with that, non-commercial trucks/SUVs are getting longer which only makes things tighter.

I was wondering if we could somehow grandfather these two contractors, but institute a new rule moving forward. What problems do you think this might cause?

Below are our current vehicle regs. Would appreciate any recommendations on how we could improve them given our current circumstances and objectives. Thanks.

Motor Vehicle Usage & Restrictions
• The speed limit within the Property is 15 m.p.h.
• No owner or occupant shall park, store or keep on any Lot or street or any parking space so as to be visible from anywhere on the Property, any commercial or other non-passenger type vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) above 9,200 pounds (including, but not limited to; trailers, campers, mobile homes, tractor trucks, "semis", trailer trucks, commercial machinery, vehicles with dual rear wheels, or any vehicle with a commercial body such as: utility, dump, stake, van box, delivery, flatbed, tank, etc.), or any vehicle with commercial signage or logos of any type, or any vehicle deemed to be a nuisance, safety hazard or incompatible with the residential character of the Community as determined by the Board of Directors.
• No unregistered, inoperable or abandoned motor vehicle may be parked, permitted, maintained, stored or kept on or about a Lot, or within the Property for more than forty-eight (48) hours per year without prior approval and/or notification to the Board of Directors. An exception is allowable providing (a) said vehicle is completely garaged and (b) the garage door can be properly closed with no part of the vehicle extending beyond the garage door entrance.
• No ladders, building materials or other commercial accessories shall be attached and/or stored on any vehicle parked in, on or about any Lot or common area.
• No vehicle shall cause or contribute to any damage to the road surface or adjacent curbing. Major car repairs are NOT permitted in driveways, roads or parking areas.
• Motor vehicles shall be operated in a safe and reasonable manner while in, on, or about the Community.
- All operators of motor vehicles shall comply with all traffic signs, devices and all local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws.
- All operators of motor vehicles shall comply with the vehicle traffic flow pattern as illustrated in Exhibits¬¬” attached hereto.
- Homeowners are required to communicate these rules to their guests and those to whom they entrust their vehicle.
• To accommodate short breaks and lunch periods between the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, residents may park a commercial vehicle with signs displayed in their driveway for a period not to exceed one (1) hour.
- Said vehicle cannot exceed 9,200 pounds.
• Excessive resident vehicle noise of any type is prohibited in, on or about the ------------ Community.
• No vehicle shall be repaired, tuned, or otherwise mechanically serviced or attended in driveways, roads, or parking areas, except for emergency road service.
• Since water is a common expense, Lot Owners are permitted to wash one (1) vehicle no more than twice (2 times) per week, or two (2) vehicles no more than once (1-time) per week for each vehicle.
- Cleaning of vehicles is permitted only in Lot Owners driveway.
- Cleaning of vehicles in the street and common areas is prohibited.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
NPs,

In my opinion, other commercial accessories = ladder racks
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 10/04/2014 1:35 PM
NPs,

In my opinion, other commercial accessories = ladder racks

Thanks Tim

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
SO ................... a mini van with 'factory' roof-rack bars upon which one 'could' secure a ladder is OK ? Or not ............................. ?

? HOW ABOUT A LEMON YELLOW 'HUM-VEE' which comes in at 9.000 lbs. ?

Just try to impose your Fascist Regime on me
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
oops: 9,000 lbs.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
NP

One has to accept what they have and can offer versus what they want.

The HOA I mentioned could afford to be strict. 2-3 car garages, at least a 4 car long/wide driveway, and a satellite parking area within a hundred yard walk.

Crammed together townhouses, little or no garages, small driveways, no satellite parking, etc. should/can not be as fussy as we were.

Let us take one small example. A Ford Escape SUV with a vehicle wrap around it advertising a national insurance company. Same as my Ford Escape but mine has no signage.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
NP

Another thought. Our tough restriction HOA said no over night parking of commercial vehicles. You need not try to fix the hours.

A plumbing truck in my driveway at 10pm is more then likely not mine nor of my choosing nor desire.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Your list already seems really complete, NpS. We have underground parking so the kind of vehicle doesn't matter much so long they fit in the deeded space. We do have the following rule that may interest you, I don't think we've her needed to enforce it:

"Vehicles that are of sufficient volume when driven that they set off car alarms in the garage may not be parked in the garage."

We also have the right to call a locksmith if a car alarm goes off incessantly & the vehicle owner can't be reached.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Thanks everyone. We haven't had any problems with alarms going off, so we're lucky there.

I did get a chance to look at the trucks today. I wanted to make sure that the ladder racks are in fact accessories and not built into the vehicles. They could be removed. However, we have a hard enough time getting one of the owners to remember to remove the magnetic signs from the side of his truck when he parks for the night. Asking him to remove the ladder racks every night wouldn't work.

Two questions:

1. Both of the owners have lived here with these or similar trucks on site for decades. Do you think we can grandfather them on this basis alone?

2. Do you think that by taking no action for decades against ladder racks (which we could apparently do under our "no commercial accessories" provision), we have given up the right to enforce the rule moving forward?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
It's possible, research the defense 'Laches'.

An excerpt from Wiki:
>failure to assert one’s rights in a timely manner can result in a claim being barred by laches. Laches is associated with one of the maxims of equity:

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit.
Equity aids the vigilant, not the sleeping ones (that is, those who sleep on their rights).

* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
From Connecticut DMV:


Definition of a Commercial Motor Vehicle

A commercial motor vehicle can be defined as:

Vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds
Vehicle designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver
Vehicle designed to transport 11 or more passengers, including the driver, and used to transport students under the age twenty-one years of age to and from school
Any vehicle transporting hazardous materials which is required to be placarded.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 10/07/2014 9:13 AM
From Connecticut DMV:


Definition of a Commercial Motor Vehicle

A commercial motor vehicle can be defined as:

Vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds
Vehicle designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver
Vehicle designed to transport 11 or more passengers, including the driver, and used to transport students under the age twenty-one years of age to and from school
Any vehicle transporting hazardous materials which is required to be placarded.

I think this is used for a different purpose John. I expect that these are the vehicles that require a commercial drivers license.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RwT on 10/07/2014 8:51 AM
It's possible, research the defense 'Laches'.

An excerpt from Wiki:
>failure to assert one’s rights in a timely manner can result in a claim being barred by laches. Laches is associated with one of the maxims of equity:

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit.
Equity aids the vigilant, not the sleeping ones (that is, those who sleep on their rights).

Hi Rw

Not sure that a HOA would be subject to the defense of laches.

If laches applied, then anytime a new board decides to beef up enforcement, they could be stopped.

On the other hand, our HOA has been through many boards, and none of them has attempted to enforce a restriction against ladder racks.

Thanks for the input though.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 10/07/2014 5:28 PM

Not sure that a HOA would be subject to the defense of laches.

They are. The issue would be when did the Association know about the issue and what was done when they found out.

If you had a fence on your property that did not comply with rules/regs and the Association did annual inspections but one day - two years later, decided to say you can't have that fence, a defense of laches would be a good argument. However, if the Association did not do annual inspections and just found out when they took enforcement action, then I don't think that arguing laches would work.

See:

http://www.wncwlaw.com/services/community_associations/pdf/Caught%20In%20the%20Act-%20Enforcing%20Protective%20Covenants%20While%20the%20Violation%20Occurs.pdf

http://www.hindmansanchez.com/resources/article/avoiding-common-covenant-enforcement-defenses

http://www.houseofmgmt.com/houseofmgmt/item_list.asp?subcat=60&subtitle=Enforcement+of+Covenants+-+Part+5

http://www.condoandhoalaw.com/Documents/Quick_Facts-Covenant_Enforcement.pdf

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Interesting stuff Tim. Thanks.

I think I have a decent picture of how laches could be a defense to construction violations like your fence example.

But there are so many ways that vehicles aren't like fences.

So let's assume there's an HOA that has a lazy board that does nothing about abandoned cars for years, and the definition of abandoned cars includes unregistered cars. Finally, after a long battle, that board gets ousted and a new board is established. The new board goes after the abandoned cars. A homeowner who has an unregistered car on the street claims laches because his car has been parked on premises for over 3 years.

As you can see, I am struggling with the overlap of 2 issues - the difference between vehicles and real property - and the ability of a new board to dig itself out of a hole created by prior boards.

Would appreciate your feedback.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Interesting stuff Tim. Thanks.

I think I have a decent picture of how laches could be a defense to construction violations like your fence example.

But there are so many ways that vehicles aren't like fences.

So let's assume there's an HOA that has a lazy board that does nothing about abandoned cars for years, and the definition of abandoned cars includes unregistered cars. Finally, after a long battle, that board gets ousted and a new board is established. The new board goes after the abandoned cars. A homeowner who has an unregistered car on the street claims laches because his car has been parked on premises for over 3 years.

As you can see, I am struggling with the overlap of 2 issues - the difference between vehicles and real property - and the ability of a new board to dig itself out of a hole created by prior boards.

Would appreciate your feedback.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
There are a number of defenses available for the HO. This lists a few:

http://www.hindmansanchez.com/resources/article/avoiding-common-covenant-enforcement-defenses

* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 10/07/2014 7:22 PM

So let's assume there's an HOA that has a lazy board that does nothing about abandoned cars for years, and the definition of abandoned cars includes unregistered cars. Finally, after a long battle, that board gets ousted and a new board is established. The new board goes after the abandoned cars. A homeowner who has an unregistered car on the street claims laches because his car has been parked on premises for over 3 years.

Actually, in that example, I would simply contact the police and have them ticket the vehicle. I suspect it would then be registered or moved onto their property.

The police typically won't issue citations like that on private property (which would include private roads). However, the Association can grant permission to the police to do just that. We have, and we renew it every year. Simply contact your local station to identify what they need in the letter.

Lets not use an unregistered vehicle. Lets use something like a trailer. If the trailer was on the street every night and a Board member lived across the street and never enforced leaving the trailer on the street - the Association now knew about the issue and failed to enforce. This could open the issue up for various defenses (if it went to court).

With all this being said - lets get to reality. Realistically, I doubt that you would have anyone take the Association to court over ladder racks. If your Board wants to use the interpretation that commercial accessories includes ladder racks, I think you should do the following:

1) Adopt a resolution better defining commercial accessories.
2) Publish the resolution to the membership
3) Send a letter to the membership that enforcement with this interpretation will begin on mm/dd/yyyy (giving notice and some time for the individuals to look for other parking or different ladder racks).
4) Start enforcement.

Now, prior to doing all of that, you may want to also take a survey of the membership to see if a majority of the members will agree with that interpretation. Perhaps, just perhaps, it's only a minority of the membership who have an issue with ladder racks.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 10/08/2014 7:51 AM
If the trailer was on the street every night and a Board member lived across the street and never enforced leaving the trailer on the street - the Association now knew about the issue and failed to enforce. This could open the issue up for various defenses (if it went to court).

With all this being said - lets get to reality. Realistically, I doubt that you would have anyone take the Association to court over ladder racks. If your Board wants to use the interpretation that commercial accessories includes ladder racks, I think you should do the following:

1) Adopt a resolution better defining commercial accessories.
2) Publish the resolution to the membership
3) Send a letter to the membership that enforcement with this interpretation will begin on mm/dd/yyyy (giving notice and some time for the individuals to look for other parking or different ladder racks).
4) Start enforcement.

Now, prior to doing all of that, you may want to also take a survey of the membership to see if a majority of the members will agree with that interpretation. Perhaps, just perhaps, it's only a minority of the membership who have an issue with ladder racks.

I am good with everything you recommended Tim. Thanks.

One twist. How do you think that things would be affected if we grandfathered the 2 homeowners who currently have ladder racks on their trucks? We would still follow your four steps outlined and announce the clarification (and the 2 waivers).


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
I wouldn't grandfather that type of an issue.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here