💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JoanH3 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3
Posted:
2 owners are in a dispute about water damage to the lower unit's ceiling. Now the upper unit owner is alleging that the lower unit owner did work without a building permit. There was certainly work done by the lower unit-owner that required a permit. Does the board have any responsibility in checking that the unit owner has taken out the correct permits? The work was done 2 years ago. Since the upper owner is clearly retaliating against the lower unit owner, I'd prefer not to get involved. If it turns out that there was no permit for this work, are we required to act in any way? On top of that, this person (the lower unit-owner) is a member of the board now...
I'd prefer not to be policing unit-owners doing renovations - is this just a matter between the town and the unit-owner, if the other unit-owner reports it to the town? Or could we be held liable for a problem down the road? The upper unit-owner is claiming that his bathroom floor is sloping because of the work, but I seriously doubt that is the cause. It was either like that already, like most of the units here, or caused by the water damage from his carelessness.
We are in Massachusetts in case that impacts anything. Buildings constructed in 1975, converted in 1982.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Work without a permit need to check the ramifications with the place that issues them. Find out what happens from the source. The local permit department. The ramifications could be nothing, insurance won't cover lower units future damages, or fines. Considering it's been over two years it's most likely too late without proof. Which is something the HOA should not be involved with. The HOA can't enforce building laws or codes. The building department would.


Former HOA President
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
While we would all prefer that our homeowners get permits, it is not the HOA's responsibility.

The lack of a permit is between the lower floor owner and your local building inspectors.

A potential buyer of the lower unit could have standing to challenge the lack of permit, but not the upper unit owner (unless he experienced some loss due to poor construction. His remedy would be through the courts, not the HOA.)

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
If the lower unit's contractor 'notched' or drilled joists improperly it WILL become a BOD issue, as the association owns the structural members of the building.

Your Architectural approval form should include:

It is the owner's responsibility to comply with any / all building codes.
If the requested work requires a building permit, the 'unit' owner is required to obtain same AND give copies, including the final CofO, to the Architectural.......

Y'all need spherical objects and actually protect your investment from well meaning but law-breaking members.

ps. in MA all, repeat all, plumbing modifications requires both a licensed plumber AND a permit

JoanH3 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3
Posted:
I just looked at the MA code, and it basically requires a permit for anything a plumber does. However, I have never had a plumber tell me I needed a permit for any of the jobs - connecting pipes, repairing leaky faucets, etc. Interesting. We don't have any architectural forms, and our bylaws just require permission for pretty major renovations involving walls or windows, which this would have been. I was not on the board when it occurred. A basic bath or kitchen remodel does not require board approval.
JoanH3 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 08/07/2014 9:35 AM
While we would all prefer that our homeowners get permits, it is not the HOA's responsibility.

The lack of a permit is between the lower floor owner and your local building inspectors.

A potential buyer of the lower unit could have standing to challenge the lack of permit, but not the upper unit owner (unless he experienced some loss due to poor construction. His remedy would be through the courts, not the HOA.)

MA condo law actually allows the HOA to go after someone if their unit is damaging another unit or a common area, so we are pursuing them to fix their plumbing and floor, since it damaged the subfloor. So in order for her work to damage his unit, the work would have damaged the common area in some way, so the HOA would be involved. He's trying to claim that her work caused the damage, not his negligence in shutting off a faucet, or not mopping up after water overflowed from a clogged drain, so why are we going after him and not her? Since she's on the board, it might be seen as self-serving.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoanH3 on 08/07/2014 9:18 AM
Does the board have any responsibility in checking that the unit owner has taken out the correct permits?

Only if your governing documents require that the Association checks permits. Typically they do not.

I would simply tell the upper unit owner that building permits are outside the jurisdiction of the Association, and he should direct any such allegations to the appropriate authority.

Typically, good contractors will tell you if a permit is needed or not. If they are needed, unless the contract says otherwise, it's the owners responsibility to apply for and obtain the necessary permits.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
.....major renovations involving walls or windows, which this would have been.


? Y'all did not inspect the work performed ?

? Load bearing wall ?

? Electric ?

? Plumbing ?

? Carpentry ?

? HVAC ?

? How would y'all have a clue w/o a filed APPROVED plan prior to a permit ?

! Y'all have reaped what y'all have sowed !
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 08/07/2014 1:16 PM

? How would y'all have a clue w/o a filed APPROVED plan prior to a permit ?

John,

I don't think that it was unreasonable for an owner to seek permission from the Association prior to obtaining a permit.
It makes sense to see if the Association will approve the plan and then deal with the permit process vs. obtaining a permit, having the Association require changes and then going back and modifying the permit.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
In a condo/multi unit building there always will be an issue of how does something effect the other unit(s). In my standalone home, if I get a building permit or not is between me and the local authorities. Once I share floors, ceilings, walls, etc. with others (unit owners or unit owners association) I believe the other party(s) has a "right" to be sure what I did does not "harm" them.

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
Tim,

If a common element is to be altered then the HOA really really needs to be involved.

Checking for the permit AND SIGN-OFF would be the minimum needed.

Apparently this HOA 'routinely' approves MAJOR alterations based solely on their appearance.

The association's approval should be granted CONDITIONALLY upon the getting of the required permit(s) BEFORE actual work begins.

An individual owner should not be allowed to make alterations to common elements w/o at LEAST building department approval.

-never mind an actual engineer's approval-

?removing walls?

?fire walls?

?smoke check walls?

w/o a permit who would know until it hit the fan (God forbid)
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
As per the OP:

There was certainly work done by the lower unit-owner that required a permit. Does the board have any responsibility in checking that the unit owner has taken out the correct permits?


If any aspect of a common element was altered: YES, they do have an obligation to ensure the work was done properly and code compliantly.

IMO: they could get an engineer to inspect, or, simply check the permit(s)

ps. what about the insurance if a modification to an insured element was made w/o notification and permits ?
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
pps:

The responsibility to obtain said permit rests with the owner of the property being altered.

Yes, a permit is required to remove even a non bearing wall as electric, at least, would be involved ~ not to mention fire/smoke, HVAC, carpentry, noise, etc.

Since the HOA owns a common element which the homeowner wants to alter ?????

This entire major modification by an owner to a multi-story condo is a can-o-worms !!!

Better the BOD get some legal advice IN WRITING and check with the authority having jurisdiction about required permits.

Since the OP is asking about this subject it would appear that the BOD is 'clueless'.

Best of luck.

CAVEAT EMPTOR
DoryR1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7
Posted:
I saw this thread and it piqued my interest to know what actions have been done towards the building permit issue, especially with the HVAC. Maybe I can help in some way if there were no developments.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here