Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:13 PM
Referring to my original thread that was deleted, did you see anything that violated any of those?
Yes. In, I believe, your second post of that thread.
Glen indicated that working on an Associations Board was a thankless job. You countered with (as Bill pointed out) that it wasn't a thankless job. That Board members received their thanks through kickbacks.
This implied that in your opinion not only your Board but anyone who served on a Board was a crook.
There was nothing in Glens response that could have been interpreted as an insult. Yet, you chose to insult, not only Glen but everyone else (which is most of the members of this forum) who may have or are currently serving. From there, the whole thread sort of went downhill.
In my opinion, you then justified the actions of the Moderators by calling them crooks simply because they deleted a thread that was anything but positive.
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:13 PM
And by positive , you mean we have to sing the praises of the board members and can't pursue activities that exude criminal activities?
No. But you don't resort to name calling when you receive advice you don't agree with.
Of course, it's not what you or I consider positive.
It would be what the moderators consider positive.
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:13 PM
What are the parameters for positiveness, being pro board?
To me, it means being
civil. Discussing the merits of an issue and not resorting to
name calling./a>
Not placing everyone who serve their Association in the same category because of the known or suspected actions of a few. (also known as stereotyping Being open to receive (not agree with, but to receive) advice given from a different perspective
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:15 PM
Posted By TimB4 on 07/27/2014 2:13 PM
Amin,
Do you think calling the moderators crooks will have them reconsider their actions or do you think it will simply reassure them that their actions were valid?
Did I say they are definitely a crook? I said may be it rings too close to home.
Amin, it appears to be a difference of interpretation.
From what I read (and provided the posting of) you definitely called the moderators crooks.
From what you are posting now, you believe that you did not call them crooks.
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:45 PM
To add to my response are you saying that there are more people trying to after their HOA and they are banned from this site?
No. As I posted, and I'll try to clarify here, there have been a number of individuals who have broken the posting rules and were banned.
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:45 PM
Other than that I don't see any reason.Can you tell me why they were banned?
I can not specifically say. I can only expect and suppose reasons why. For the exact answers you would need to contact the moderators.
I expect that the individual who were banned was because the moderators decided that the individuals continued to break the posting rules. Said rules are available on the top of the page by clicking on the large smiley face that says posting rule. I even copied those posting rules and placed them within this thread.
Here is a thread the moderators posted when they informed us of this change:
http://www.hoatalk.com/Forum/tabid/55/view/topic/forumid/1/postid/152715/Default.aspx