💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AminB
Posts: 313
Posted:
I posted a thread yesterday. I have posted numerous threads over the past couple of years or so. I know the rules for posting and have never had a thread deleted. All of a sudden , and without warning , my thread was deleted.The only difference I had with times before I wrote with live examples about how board members and property managers have been convicted of embezzlement and are now serving time in prison. I also wrote how I am now verifying checks written by my HOA to see if it was spent the way it says on the their books.

Guess the administrator of this site on her own didn't want people get ideas, how to control their own out-of-control and a lot of times crook HOA board members and therefore her.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Amin

If I am not mistaken, did you not accuse all BOD's of embezzlement/cheating?
AminB
Posts: 313
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 07/27/2014 10:31 AM
Amin

If I am not mistaken, did you not accuse all BOD's of embezzlement/cheating?

You are mistaken. I didn't. I haven't even accused mine. Right now I have a suspicion.

There is censorship here.
BillH10 (Texas)
Posts: 1,217
Posted:
If I remember correctly, your original post described a situation in which you, as the owner of three units in your (association?) had been unable to obtain a copy of an insurance document which provided details of a payment or payments related (presumably) to damage caused by Hurricane Ike.

You stated you were given a heavily redacted copy, which did not provide the information you sought. You also asked for input as to how you could prove collusion between certain parties, presumably the board and/or management company, and a contractor who had been awarded approximately $75,000 in work for the association, apparently without competitive bidding. A suggestion was made that you could hire a private investigator.

Perhaps in that same post, or subsequent posts, you made general comments about unethical behavior of boards of directors and management companies, without providing specific details to support your allegations. You may well have made similar posts in the past with specific details. I am new to this message board and am not familiar with your previous posts. You also specifically stated "Did you say "thankless task of running an HOA"? Running an HOA is rewarded by getting money under the table or other perks that come with this "thankless" job." In my opinion, that comment was totally unnecessary and out of line. Serving on a board is often a thankless job and no, my previous and current board colleagues are not getting money under the table. We take great pains to ensure nothing we do can be interpreted as inappropriate conduct.

I personally felt your general comments regarding boards and management companies to be more or less a “rant” and possibly an attempt to anonymously stir something up. While you felt you should have been given the information you requested, and on the face of it I agree you should have, your purpose in making your other remarks was not clear to me.

Since you seem to be knowledgeable in association governance, and since you are apparently a resident of Texas or your properties are located in Texas, I was puzzled why you did not seem to be familiar with the laws enacted by the Texas Legislature in the 82nd session in 2011. Those laws, promulgated through the Texas Property Code give you, as the owner, specific rights to see virtually every document possessed by your association and/or its management company which relate to the association. The primary exception is you cannot see documents related to other property owners or details of executive sessions although those could probably be obtained through a subpoena.

If you are not being given the documents, or access to the documents you wish to review, I strongly suggest you familiarize yourself with the open records provisions enacted by the Legislature and restate your requests referring to the requirement to produce such documents. A good property attorney would be able to advise you further. I should add the association is entitled to certain protections, such as reasonable request/response intervals, and reimbursement for reproduction expenses. You should be able to determine from those records why there was apparently no competitive bidding for the work costing $75,000. As a homeowner, you are certainly entitled to ask that question of the board.

I don’t think there is censorship, however the words and tone of your original post were offensive to me and, I suspect to others. You can present your information in a way in which you request information, convey facts, and your opinions, without insulting others.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Someone advised you to hire a P.I. to investigate. I agreed and added the suggestion to hire a forensic accountant. What else did you want from this forum?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Amin,

From the last time you were posting to know, this site has had a lot of individuals posting only to sow discord, start arguments and post inflammatory messages. Because of this, it appears that the moderators have taken a more active role then they had in the past.

You are not the only one to have had posts or threads removed. It has happened to many (including regular posters). Some individuals have actually been banned from the site.

From the link at the top of the page (next to the smiley face):

This is a positive place for community association leaders to share ideas and learn. This forum is for community association Boards, Committees, Volunteers & HOA Professionals to discuss topics concerning their association duties.

Topics from individual homeowners, who are not acting as association volunteers, may be addressed if the person has come here to learn in a positive way.

We have only a few other rules:

(1) Post any relevant topic you like, but please keep it clean, helpful, positive and friendly.

(2) No Selling: No solicitation, advertising, or selling of any kind is allowed here, except for occasional announcements from official site sponsors.

(3) No Mention of Community/Company/Person Names: In order to fairly enforce (2) and prevent liability, we do not allow the mentioning of any community name, company name or product. Please also do not post the full name of any person.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 9:50 AM

Guess the administrator of this site on her own didn't want people get ideas, how to control their own out-of-control and a lot of times crook HOA board members and therefore her.

Amin,

Do you think calling the moderators crooks will have them reconsider their actions or do you think it will simply reassure them that their actions were valid?

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
After following Amin's past posts I doubt Tim he is capable of putting those pieces together.

You visit a site set up to encourage positive sharing of ideas for those non-crooks who volunteer their time while those that find fault do nothing.
Then you throw personal insults out and wonder why oh why your posts were removed.

Not really all that complicated.......

DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 9:50 AM

Guess the administrator of this site on her own didn't want people get ideas, how to control their own out-of-control and a lot of times crook HOA board members and therefore her.

If you're trying to make friends and influence people, you're going about it the wrong way.

And as I recall, you most definitely called your past board president a criminal.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
"Please do not feed the trolls."

Troll (Internet)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

And yes I'm as guilty as anyone here when it comes to troll baiting, because it's just too much fun but I've been going to an online support group, and am slowly getting the urge under control.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:13 PM

Referring to my original thread that was deleted, did you see anything that violated any of those?

Yes. In, I believe, your second post of that thread.

Glen indicated that working on an Associations Board was a thankless job. You countered with (as Bill pointed out) that it wasn't a thankless job. That Board members received their thanks through kickbacks.

This implied that in your opinion not only your Board but anyone who served on a Board was a crook.

There was nothing in Glens response that could have been interpreted as an insult. Yet, you chose to insult, not only Glen but everyone else (which is most of the members of this forum) who may have or are currently serving. From there, the whole thread sort of went downhill.

In my opinion, you then justified the actions of the Moderators by calling them crooks simply because they deleted a thread that was anything but positive.

Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:13 PM

And by positive , you mean we have to sing the praises of the board members and can't pursue activities that exude criminal activities?

No. But you don't resort to name calling when you receive advice you don't agree with.

Of course, it's not what you or I consider positive.
It would be what the moderators consider positive.

Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:13 PM

What are the parameters for positiveness, being pro board?

To me, it means being civil.
Discussing the merits of an issue and not resorting to name calling./a>
Not placing everyone who serve their Association in the same category because of the known or suspected actions of a few. (also known as
stereotyping
Being open to receive (not agree with, but to receive) advice given from a different perspective

Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:15 PM
Posted By TimB4 on 07/27/2014 2:13 PM
Amin,

Do you think calling the moderators crooks will have them reconsider their actions or do you think it will simply reassure them that their actions were valid?


Did I say they are definitely a crook? I said may be it rings too close to home.

Amin, it appears to be a difference of interpretation.

From what I read (and provided the posting of) you definitely called the moderators crooks.
From what you are posting now, you believe that you did not call them crooks.

Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:45 PM

To add to my response are you saying that there are more people trying to after their HOA and they are banned from this site?

No. As I posted, and I'll try to clarify here, there have been a number of individuals who have broken the posting rules and were banned.

Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/27/2014 6:45 PM
Other than that I don't see any reason.Can you tell me why they were banned?

I can not specifically say. I can only expect and suppose reasons why. For the exact answers you would need to contact the moderators.

I expect that the individual who were banned was because the moderators decided that the individuals continued to break the posting rules. Said rules are available on the top of the page by clicking on the large smiley face that says posting rule. I even copied those posting rules and placed them within this thread.

Here is a thread the moderators posted when they informed us of this change:

http://www.hoatalk.com/Forum/tabid/55/view/topic/forumid/1/postid/152715/Default.aspx
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
You aren't the only one being censored on this forum, the rest of us who have had stuff deleted so don't take it personally, and if you don't like the fact that they "censor" when they have the time to, then move to another forum.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I have over 3900 posts and I have never been censored.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Sometimes I've noticed when this forum has crashed, they go back to a previous backup and the posts between the last backup and today are lost. This might have happened to your post.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I am staying out of this conversation.... We all know where it is going... History repeats.... Plus my violion stopped playing poor old pitiful me and why you all picking on me??? I only play now for hoe downs and showdowns at my board meeting shows... :-)

BTW... Do not come to a site with board members or people truly interested in volunteering in their HOA and tell them we do not care or blind. Our purpose is to EDUCATE not PREACH your version of the truth. I am based from REALITY no mater how ugly or against my personal opinion it is. It is NOT about my personal feelings. It is about the greater good of all.... (No Hot Fuzz reference):-).....

So done and moving on... I expect Amin to post comments and call me names or something... I am not interested. My interest ran out on Amins problems a long time ago as they are hurting others. Do not play victim while weilding the knife...

Former HOA President
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
So just let me get this straight, when someone posts on this site of anonymous members the affect makes others nervous.

WTF?.

Can anyone understand who the real problem is in Amin's property?

In fact to me Amin's posts and responses are comical. He assumes his words have the power to intimidate but on his own property IN PERSON
he can accomplish nothing.

I think the moderators fell short with their actions. If in fact they deleted his post. I would support his ability to make future be removed too.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Amin, I thought of another choice you might have. If your CC&R's don't already require a bidding process, you and your fellow homeowners could amend your documents to require a bid for all expenditures of over say $2,000.00. Of course you would need some language in there requiring the Board to accept the lowest bid which could be problematic because low bid is not always the best bid but it would solve your latest conundrum. Of course there are unfortunately ways around that like breaking the work into smaller chunks that fall below the bid threshold, that's how the government does it but I'm sure you can come up with a way to prevent that.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/28/2014 10:06 AM
We asked them but they wouldn't do it. We asked for anything over $10k. However because our owner-occupancy is very low (below 40%), most homeowners are apathetic and the board knows it.

I have distributed many newsletters informing the homeowners that lack of competitive bidding (without accusing the board directly) could lead to higher maintenance fees. We didn't have any increase the past year.

Respectfully Amin, I don't care how apathetic a homeowner might be, if you tell them that someone is misusing their funds, either wasting them or as you have alleged in the past taking kickbacks and using them for their own personal gain, that is beyond apathetic, that is downright catatonic. If you can't convince your fellow homeowners that there is chicanery afoot how do you expect to convince us, people who don't know you or have any way of verifying your statements.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Again Amin it's not us you have to convince, it's your fellow homeowners and I don't care what the owner occupancy rate is, if I'm a homeowner even if I lived in Alaska and someone could show me that the Board is misusing MY MONEY, I'd be out for blood.

That was why I suggested amending the Covenants, the homeowners can do it without Board approval and the Board would then have to comply.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Amin you can try to obfuscate the issue but it's all about the bottom line especially for non-resident homeowners. If you can show them that the Board though either mismanagement or fraud is taking dollars out of their pockets, you'll have their interest and their support.

BTW "how are you going to convince us" and now you say I don't have to convince you? If you're going to quote use the entire quote: If you can't convince your fellow homeowners that there is chicanery afoot how do you expect to convince us, people who don't know you or have any way of verifying your statements.

If you'll look closely in one, I ask if you can't convince your fellow homeowners (people who should know your character and veracity) of something how can you convince strangers on an internet chat site. In the other I simply remind you that it's your fellow homeowners you have to convince not us. Basically saying the same thing but with different words.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
You can blame it on whatever you want Amin but as I said it all comes down to the bottom line and wealthy people are more apt to pay attention to it.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AminB on 07/28/2014 1:50 PM

2 questions come to mind:

1. Do you or have you ever lived in a condo complex and if you did what was the owner-occupancy rate?

2. What is the rate of participation of your local city council election?

1. Yes I do, exact rate is unknown to me but I would guess 90%

2. I don't live in a city but I would guess the turn out rate for the township would be around the national average.

But we're not talking about me, we're talking about why YOU can't convince YOUR FELLOW HOMEOWNERS that someone (the current Board) is mismanaging THEIR MONEY. I know you blame it on apathy but the bottom line is what these people care about, every dollar misspent is a dollar out of THEIR pockets. Believe me people care when it comes down to MONEY.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Glen,

Past history has shown that Amin doesn't want advice. He wants to argue.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Tim, I know that. He has a ready excuse for everything. It's not that he hasn't proven malfeasance it's owner apathy.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here