CalebE (Texas)
Posts: 7
Posts: 7
Posted:
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could give me some sound advice as I have a meeting with the board of directors to appeal my storage shed getting denied.
This started when we put in a shed without approval (it sounds dumb, but I didn't know at the time I needed approval) about a year ago. 2 months ago we received a letter saying we need to get approval from our architectural committee. So I submitted paper work along with pictures of our already installed shed. We received a denial letter stating the the roof needed to be shingled. The shed I purchased is a suncast resin shed which has a shingle style roof already so I resubmitted the paper work with more pictures clearly showing the shingle style roof. We received another denial letter and a letter saying to take down the shed within 10 days or we will be fined. So I have an appeal meeting with the board tonight.
My thoughts are:
The only requirements for installing a shed are that it must be "visually harminious with the house or fence to which is it most visually or physically attached, including matching major materials such as siding and roofing, dominant colors construction details and pitch of roof." This line sounds very ambiguous and vague to me and in my opinion is open to interpretation. The shed we installed does have matching colors to our house and fence which in my opinion is the definition of visual harmony.
The denial letter makes this argument
lastic sheds do not meet section 5.4(e) of the Declaration stating, "visually harminious with the house or fence to which is it most visually or physically attached, including matching major materials such as siding and roofing, dominant colors construction details and pitch of roof."
I have been doing a lot of reading in preparation of this meeting and found that the architectual committee requires at least 3 members but no more that 7. Right now, my community website only shows 2 members on this committee. Do you think I could have an argument there?
Please let me know if you think I stand a chance getting them to appeal or if I am up a creek.
Thanks!
[IMG]http://i763.photobucket.com/albums/xx274/cdudeman/2014-06-05175456_zps573e3467.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i763.photobucket.com/albums/xx274/cdudeman/2014-06-05175450_zpsbbf19731.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i763.photobucket.com/albums/xx274/cdudeman/2014-06-05175435_zps0fb58933.jpg[/IMG]
I was wondering if someone could give me some sound advice as I have a meeting with the board of directors to appeal my storage shed getting denied.
This started when we put in a shed without approval (it sounds dumb, but I didn't know at the time I needed approval) about a year ago. 2 months ago we received a letter saying we need to get approval from our architectural committee. So I submitted paper work along with pictures of our already installed shed. We received a denial letter stating the the roof needed to be shingled. The shed I purchased is a suncast resin shed which has a shingle style roof already so I resubmitted the paper work with more pictures clearly showing the shingle style roof. We received another denial letter and a letter saying to take down the shed within 10 days or we will be fined. So I have an appeal meeting with the board tonight.
My thoughts are:
The only requirements for installing a shed are that it must be "visually harminious with the house or fence to which is it most visually or physically attached, including matching major materials such as siding and roofing, dominant colors construction details and pitch of roof." This line sounds very ambiguous and vague to me and in my opinion is open to interpretation. The shed we installed does have matching colors to our house and fence which in my opinion is the definition of visual harmony.
The denial letter makes this argument
I have been doing a lot of reading in preparation of this meeting and found that the architectual committee requires at least 3 members but no more that 7. Right now, my community website only shows 2 members on this committee. Do you think I could have an argument there?
Please let me know if you think I stand a chance getting them to appeal or if I am up a creek.
Thanks!
[IMG]http://i763.photobucket.com/albums/xx274/cdudeman/2014-06-05175456_zps573e3467.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i763.photobucket.com/albums/xx274/cdudeman/2014-06-05175450_zpsbbf19731.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i763.photobucket.com/albums/xx274/cdudeman/2014-06-05175435_zps0fb58933.jpg[/IMG]