💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FlM (Florida)
Posts: 8
Posted:
This issue has become so screwed up (pardon my language) that to start writing everything out would take a very long time, and would be so long most of you probably wouldn't read it. But for what I have written, I am begging that you read it and read it carefully... pretty please!

If you don't want to read the cliffs-notes version of the drama ensuing, then please answer these questions for me. What do you understand about easements?? What are your neighborhood's rules for easements? Are residents allowed to build fences or have any landscaping in easements, or does it depend on the easement?? What does your county or state say? Please provide me any information you have or know about easements. Ok, now the long part:

When I joined the board, I noticed the HOA President was very focused on ponds, pond maintenance. And I understand that this is important and one of the HOA responsibilities. But I was surprised that this was his focus to a point that it bordered obsession. But I figured OK, while he worries about that, I'll try and pick up other pressing issues, like the recreation center becoming dilapidated to the point residents don't use it (and it's only tennis and basketball courts), and vandalism keeps occurring. To me, this would be just as important, but different strokes for different folks I guess.

The current president has been in that position since 2011 after the long-standing president (served since the neighborhood was built) became ill (and has since passed on). The HOA voting system seems flawed. Since no one else ran against him, and hardly anyone came to the meeting, and only a few handed back their proxy form, he was automatically president again and will be for 2 more years.

Anyway, in the 21 years this neighborhood has been in existence, neighbors have built fences along these easements. Shrubbery and landscaping are along these easements. Heck, the developer himself had some trees planted in some easements which are now beautiful, mature (maple) trees!

My understanding of an easement is that it is still the property owners' land. They are required to maintain it (ie: make sure the grass is still mowed, or the sidewalk is kept clean, etc). My understanding of an easement is also that IF there is a necessity by the county, HOA, whoever is authorized - to access the easement, that they may do so - IF THE NECESSITY EXISTS. And that they may access by any means necessary (meaning that if there are obstructions such as fences or shrubs, that these may be removed and the cost is on the homeowner, NOT the entity entitled to the easement.)

So for example, if Joe Smith has a fence in an easement, and there is a pipe under that easement, and the pipe collapses, whoever oversees that pipe (lets say swfwmd, as an example) has the right to remove Joe Smith's fence at HIS expense in order to fix that pipe. Joe Smith should already be aware of this and accept that a necessity *may* someday present itself in which his fence, or shrubs, etc may need to be removed for easement access. Most homeowners are willing to accept that risk in order to enjoy full use of their land.

Some easements are needed for access points on a more regular basis. And those access points do need to remain accessible so that the "pond guys" and "landscape" guys can get in and mow around/maintain the ponds. Those easement access points have been identified and have been in a document (I suppose unofficial? But it's like 20 years old. It MAY be official, but I don't know) and those easements have remained clear (the homeowners are aware and due to the ongoing necessity of maintenance, keep those easements clear at all times).

So, follow me? We have easements that are used as access points to certain ponds between certain houses, that have been designated as such for many years and have always remained clear.

There are other easements in our neighborhood as well. One of those easements is behind my house. My house backs up to another house that is in a cul-de-sac. Well, this easement is a drainage easement. Although my lot is NOT 'on' a pond (but I can see it from my house), it is clear to me that the easement behind my house (which dips) is meant for overflow/drainage after heavy rains. It runs along many properties, actually. It is also where one of the pond pipes is underground (this is not a pressurized pipe like a water line... it is a passive-flow pipe, if that makes sense. The best way I can describe it is its the underground pathway gators can take to navigate from one pond to another.

So ANYWAY. My property and the property next to me has had wooden fences in place since at LEAST 1996. Obviously old, but in better shape than you'd think after all this time. In 1997, a resolution was passed disallowing any NEW fences to be wood, which is how I know these fences are very old and longstanding. My next door neighbor has lived here since 1999 and said the fence has been up since he moved in. Follow me here: My next door neighbor also has mature landscaping and a maple tree (easily over 20 years old, may even have been there PRIOR to the neighborhood development) that is technically IN this drainage easement.

We had a very heavy tropical storm a few years ago named Debby. Some of you may remember if you are in FL. The drainage easement looked like a little river. It certainly did its job. And it did it just fine with fences and that maple tree in place. This particular easement has NEVER had problems, and along the way almost every neighbor has a fence. Many have the fence right on the property line so neighbors back-to-back meet up at the property line (follow me still I hope?) Although my neighbor's and my fence is wood, most of the others that follow along this easement are newer and vinyl.

In that document I mentioned (pointing out easement access points) - there were two easement access points that I REMEMBER board members being puzzled about, INCLUDING the HOA president, because they did not KNOW there was an easement along these properties. Those easemement access points were/are for MANHOLE covers, so that routine maintenance can be done on the underground pipe. Or if there is an obstruction, there is access to the manhole cover so they can snake something in there to see what the obstruction may be (this has never happened).

So for this whole time, this easement has been doing its job, but has remained off the radar of the HOA. There has been no need to access it (beyond regular maintenance through the manhole cover by the pond maintenance guys, and honestly I'm not sure they've even done that?) and the easement has done its job.

So now comes a new neighbor. The house he bought had very mature, thick hedges along the back of the property ("in" the easement for over 20 years). This guy is apparently a peach... so nice (note sarcasm) and went to the neighbors behind his house (which are my next-door neighbors - neighbors next door... and said "Hey look, I want to put up a fence. And it might be on your property, but maybe only by a few inches or so... do you mind?" Those neighbors, of course, minded, and the guy was very crotchety (the attitude he had left a big impression) so they ran to the HOA president with that concern (and also this guy said he planned to have a wood fence, which is NOT allowed). So, the HOA president contacts this guy and says "We have rules, and one of them is that you must fill out the ARC form before doing any of that sort of work."

So we come back and reject his request for the wooden fence and tell him it must be vinyl. At this point, I'm still in agreement with our actions. The President doesn't like this guy because of the way his demeanor is. So he decided he's going to scrutinize this guy's request. Requires the guy to do a survey and not use the survey that the original homeowners (from 1993) had given to him. The guy does the survey. The guy comes back and says "Ok, now that I know where my property line is, I'll use the vinyl material you want, which is over 1k additional cost but fine, but I want to build up to my property line."

It is ONLY AT THAT POINT that the freaking HOA president even REALIZED that there is an easement back there!!!!! Suddenly that easement (which my house also backs up to) becomes the FOCUS of the president. He decides to come back and tell the guy NO, you need to build OUTSIDE of the easement. NO fences in the easement.

(Also worth noting, shortly before that, the HOA President decided that EVERY EASEMENT in the neighborhood needed to be cleared, regardless of any necessity. He wanted to be "fair" and apply "across the board" so instead of only having the easements cleared where there was necessity to have them clear, he decided EVERYONE on an easement needed to be clear out of the easement). Some homeowners complied, mostly because they don't care to put up a fight. And some have not (which he is calling "problem children.")

The HOA consulted with the attorney who said this 'requirement' WILL NOT STAND UP IN COURT. The HOA DOES NOT HAVE A LEG TO STAND ON WITH THIS and advised to let the guy build his fence in the easement, as it is clear there has been no enforcement of this prior (evidenced by all the other fences in the easement) and that no problems have occurred with fences in the easement.

The HOA president takes things personally. So since he decided this guy is an a$$hole (and jerk-neighbor even had his own attorney sending letters that this is NOT right, the president is misunderstanding what a drainage easement is, etc etc) - the president decided that our HOA attorney's aren't giving him the answer he wants to hear so he's just going to keep pressing forward with pushing that EVERYONE clear out of EVERY easement, and now this one too that he didn't even know about prior to the incident.

The rest of the board is OK with this. I am ABSOLUTELY FLOORED by what I perceive as pure stupidity with this easement issue. My husband has researched thoroughly, has several case-law studies backing up that what the HOA is doing is WRONG, and that the President (and the lemmings on the board) are setting the HOA up for a huge lawsuit.

So anyway, this guy goes back and forth with the HOA. Finally after MONTHS of this crap, he decides to concede and have his fence OUTSIDE of the easement just because he is sick of waiting (as the HOA purposely dragged their feet with this whole issue). His lawyer had pointed out several things, such as the fact that the hedges have been in place since the neighborhood began, and by placing his fence outside of the easement, how would he be able to maintain those hedges? Also, by having his fence outside the easement (losing 5 feet of his land) - it brings his fence right up against his pool cage (so much so that a person cannot fit in between the two). But none of this mattered to the board. And this guy conceded. And honestly I'm disappointed he did but I can't blame him. He might not be a nice guy but I think the way he was treated was ridiculous.

Up to that point (the guy moving in and making the stink) the HOA pres didn't even realize an easement was back there. The Pres. decided to call in SWFWMD on the "problem children" in the neighborhood, which included the fence guy. Swfwmd decided to threaten fines with the 'problem children' (and ONLY the problem children!!!) because supposedly they are in violation of swfwmd's original permitting condition with the neighborhood. I am SO CONFUSED. How can the county give approval, even having in their fence brochure that fences ARE ALLOWED in easements, and then this happen?

Mind you, swfwmd has been in this neighborhood before. EVERYTHING HAS BEEN THE WAY IT STILL IS for decades. How is this suddenly such a big issue!? Because the pres. is making it a big issue. And swfwmd didn't cite everyone with fences in easements. ONLY the ones the president pointed out.

So now at the recent mtg, the pres and lemmings told me that I am going to have to remove my fence. That my neighbor, whose fence has been there forever, is going to have to move his fence. That the pres. is going to enforce that over 10 houses need to remove their fences, or rather, move them 5 feet back from their property line. This will, in effect, create an ALLEY behind these houses. I'm sorry, but I left a city to escape alleys. And now this jerk wants to create an alley behind our houses "just in case" the pipe may "someday" collapse.

I tried to discuss with the board but I feel like what I am saying is falling on deaf ears. I would really appreciate any advice or thoughts about this situation, and in particular, about easements and your understanding of them (or facts about them).

Thank you.
FlM (Florida)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Please read and respond. I know it's long, but I could really use some advice, thoughts on this matter. Or if its too long, as I said in the novel I mean post - just answer for me, what are easements in your understanding? How are they used, applied, etc (2nd paragraph in the post).

This is an escalating issue here so as I am working (from home) I am also checkng back here to see if there are any responses and see that some people have opened the post but no responses.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Easements may be granted for many different purposes: ingress and egress, utilities, drainage, recreation, and wildlife, for example.

Easements are usually granted by a previous property owner and most often created when recording a plat. Once an easement has been recorded it is nearly impossible to revoke it, no matter how old it is. There may even be overlapping easements, a part of a property that has easements for ingress and egress, utilities, drainage, recreation, and wildlife all in the same place.

The fact that the association has an easement to allow them access to a pond does not mean that they have control over all easements. In the case of the drainage easement, if there is no clear intent in the dedication to allow access, then your association cannot go onto your property to inspect without your permission.

There was a 2011 Arizona case (Smith v. Beesley) involving a drainage easement. A homeowner built his driveway across a drainage easement and his neighbor sued. The AZ Court of Appeals held that a drainage easement is not an exclusive-use easement and that other uses may be made of the property if it does not interfere with drainage.

Based on my reading of case law I would agree with both you and the attorney for your association that your president has no leg to stand on. If the fences do not interfere with drainage then there is no reasonable objection to be made. If the fences do interfere with drainage then it would depend on a host of variables as to whether the association has any standing to object.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I am not nor do I play a lawyer.

Typically an easement cannot be built on nor over. If you ask the easement owner (generally a utility, city, etc.) they will tell you that you cannot build there.

That said, it is done in HOA's all the time especially when it comes to fences, landscaping, etc. It is not the duty of the HOA to control the easement unless they own it. In my last HOA, the ARB would warn someone that they were infringing on an easement. People would then ask are you giving me permission to build/plant there or are you telling me not to build/plant there? We would reply it is not our job nor responsibility to do either. The easement is your situation to deal with. All those I knew (myself included), choose to ignore the easement. In my case it was a fence over the easement and a row of hedges over another easement.

If one has an easement and they need to get at/use it, they can remove any obstacle (fence, hedges, etc.) and they do not have to restore/replace it.

I saw one case where the utility workers were nice enough to neatly cut a section of fence out and prop it up against another section of the fence. The fence owner replaced it when the utility work was done.

PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
... and that other uses may be made of the property if it does not interfere with drainage.


if the fence interferes with drainage it may NOT be erected

if the fence could potentially catch debris and become a 'beaver dam' it may NOT be erected and any existing fences would ALSO be in violation

most fences in drainage swales are NOT built in the 'valley', but well within the HO's lot line

just like the newly planted trees in the roadway median are 'staggered' on either side of the actual drainage channel

however

private easement would be the HOA's easement eg. pond, swale, etc.

public easement would be drainage from county road to HOA pond

your president very well may be correct in his zealousness
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Questions:
1. Who owns each easement? Is it the county, the township, some other government entity, a public utility, the HOA, some other entity, or all the members of the community? You may own the land, but someone else owns the easement. Find out who it is.
2. Are these easements recorded at the Registry of Deeds? If so, the limits of the easement are typically written in the recorded doc.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 07/05/2014 9:11 PM
Questions:
1. Who owns each easement? Is it the county, the township, some other government entity, a public utility, the HOA, some other entity, or all the members of the community? You may own the land, but someone else owns the easement. Find out who it is.

Easements are not owned by the grantees. The owner of the property with the easement is known in the law as the subservient estate and the grantee is the dominant estate. The dominant estate has the right to use the easement but does not own it.

Quote:
Posted By NpS on 07/05/2014 9:11 PM

2. Are these easements recorded at the Registry of Deeds? If so, the limits of the easement are typically written in the recorded doc.

Easements can be dedicated either by graphically showing the boundaries and purposes on a plat or they can be verbally described in a deed. The problem with including the language in a deed is that each time the property is sold the language must be replicated very precisely. Either way, the easement will be recorded.

There are some easements that may not be recorded although I doubt that is the case here. An easement by necessity may not be recorded but it exists because your neighbor has no other access to his property except across yours. A prescriptive easement is one created by allowing others to cross your property for long periods of time.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
I am not an attorney but I will tell you this- is SWIFTMUD tells the HOA to get the fences and shrubbery out of the drainage easements then no matter how long they have been there, they will have to be removed. Not only that, SWIFTMUD can go after the HOA, not the individual homeowners.

If is very important that your HOA Board as well as property manager be aware of what property falls under SWIFTMUD, whether that be a pond, a drainage easement, or conservation land AND that those areas are maintained per SWIFTMUD guidelines. What you don't want to happen is some maintenance issue that ends up costing your owners even more and you don't want to incur fines.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
When I lived in California for the two worst years of my life I dealt with SMUD (Sacramento Municipal Utilities District) for my electricity. I assume they also provided water, sewer, and trash services but do not know for sure.

What is SWIFTMUD and what is their mission?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I think this is the info:

From:

Southwest Florida Water Management District Headquarters
Brooksville, FL 34604-6899
Telephone: (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476

Please be aware that a corporate entity doing business in Tampa and surrounding areas as “SWIFTMUD, Inc.” is not in any way affiliated with, or endorsed by, the District. The District has been advised that “SWIFTMUD, Inc.” is soliciting customers in southwest Florida through direct mailings that offer to prepare inspection reports for surface water management systems, promising customers that, for a stated fee, they “can be worry free of compliance issues with [the District] and its code enforcement.” Please be advised that “SWIFTMUD, Inc.” is not associated with the District in any way, and it does not have the District’s permission or authority to represent that any inspection reports submitted to the District will insure against compliance issues.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Larry
The grantee owns the easement. It's the land that the easement is on that he doesn't own.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
FlM (Florida)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AnnH5 on 07/05/2014 10:24 PM
I am not an attorney but I will tell you this- is SWIFTMUD tells the HOA to get the fences and shrubbery out of the drainage easements then no matter how long they have been there, they will have to be removed. Not only that, SWIFTMUD can go after the HOA, not the individual homeowners.

If is very important that your HOA Board as well as property manager be aware of what property falls under SWIFTMUD, whether that be a pond, a drainage easement, or conservation land AND that those areas are maintained per SWIFTMUD guidelines. What you don't want to happen is some maintenance issue that ends up costing your owners even more and you don't want to incur fines.

See, this is what I don't get (I agree and understand what you are saying though, Ann). SWFWMD has been out to this development before for general inspections. NEVER BEFORE have they said the fences in the easements were issues. NEVER (unless there was access needed to get to an area).

The HOA president got ticked off that some of the "problem children" were questioning his "one size fits all" approach to clearing EACH AND EVERY EASEMENT 100%. The president also didn't like that our own attorney was telling him that if this goes to court, the HOA is going to lose.

So, in my opinion, he stomped his feet, crossed his hands and said "FINE! Then I'll call SWFWMD and get them to attack on my behalf!" so sure enough, he goes calling SWFWMD. The engineer comes out. He points out "problem children" - "There, there and there!" SWFWMD engineer sends threatening letters to the particular "problem children" that he pointed out. DOESN'T address the other fences that are, and have been in the easements. Doesn't say "Well wait, who is at this property? We need to send them a letter too!" No. JUST the residents the president has a "beef" with.

He has only STARTED. He's about to create a sh!tstorm of massive proportions by telling the other people along my easement that they NEED to move their fence, otherwise he'll call SWFWMD on them.

To me, it makes NO sense why SWFWMD wouldn't have noted the 20+ year old fences at any other time in the last 20 years. It makes NO sense that SWFWMD, on their most recent visit out here, ONLY noted the houses that the Pres. had a problem with and not all the other houses that are in "supposed" violation.
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
... they are in violation of swfwmd's original permitting condition with the neighborhood.


NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
I'm not sure if you already described it, but can you explain the nature of the easement. Does something run underground? Or is only an easement that allows them to manage the flow of water?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
from nationally recognized Clemson University:

question: There is an easement around my pond. Does that affect what I can do to the shoreline?

answer: Many communities have established easements around ponds. Most commonly the easement extends up the bank 10 to 15 feet from the normal water line. In some cases this easement is merely for maintenance, and what goes on in the easement is determined by the HOA's bylaws. In other instances, the pond is owned/maintained by a municipality rather than an HOA, so it is important for homeowners to know the rules about activities in the easement and who has authority over those activities. Activities such as planting plants or building bulkheads may be restricted by the terms of the easement, and homeowners may be liable for damages and repairs for illicit activities in the easement. Nevertheless, the terms of easements can be changed if the community feels the need to do so. For HOAs, this may mean amending the bylaws.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FlM on 07/06/2014 9:29 AM
Posted By AnnH5 on 07/05/2014 10:24 PM
I am not an attorney but I will tell you this- is SWIFTMUD tells the HOA to get the fences and shrubbery out of the drainage easements then no matter how long they have been there, they will have to be removed. Not only that, SWIFTMUD can go after the HOA, not the individual homeowners.

If is very important that your HOA Board as well as property manager be aware of what property falls under SWIFTMUD, whether that be a pond, a drainage easement, or conservation land AND that those areas are maintained per SWIFTMUD guidelines. What you don't want to happen is some maintenance issue that ends up costing your owners even more and you don't want to incur fines.


See, this is what I don't get (I agree and understand what you are saying though, Ann). SWFWMD has been out to this development before for general inspections. NEVER BEFORE have they said the fences in the easements were issues. NEVER (unless there was access needed to get to an area).

The HOA president got ticked off that some of the "problem children" were questioning his "one size fits all" approach to clearing EACH AND EVERY EASEMENT 100%. The president also didn't like that our own attorney was telling him that if this goes to court, the HOA is going to lose.

So, in my opinion, he stomped his feet, crossed his hands and said "FINE! Then I'll call SWFWMD and get them to attack on my behalf!" so sure enough, he goes calling SWFWMD. The engineer comes out. He points out "problem children" - "There, there and there!" SWFWMD engineer sends threatening letters to the particular "problem children" that he pointed out. DOESN'T address the other fences that are, and have been in the easements. Doesn't say "Well wait, who is at this property? We need to send them a letter too!" No. JUST the residents the president has a "beef" with.

He has only STARTED. He's about to create a sh!tstorm of massive proportions by telling the other people along my easement that they NEED to move their fence, otherwise he'll call SWFWMD on them.

To me, it makes NO sense why SWFWMD wouldn't have noted the 20+ year old fences at any other time in the last 20 years. It makes NO sense that SWFWMD, on their most recent visit out here, ONLY noted the houses that the Pres. had a problem with and not all the other houses that are in "supposed" violation.

SWIFTMUD probably needs to be called upon to go through your entire community and note all of the violations once and for all. I think it would be a terrible mistake for there to be any type of selective enforcement. HOWEVER, I have no idea if SWIFTMUD grants variances so that might be something to look into (if you are talking about 20 year old fences). Perhaps a variance was previously granted or owners may seek a variance? It never hurts to ask.

In the instances that I have seen, SWIFTMUD has noted violations on behalf of the owner but pinned the repairs or corrections on the HOAs. Our Association has been dinged a few times. Nothing big but when SWIFTMUD says do it or else (fines), you do it.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 07/05/2014 10:44 PM
When I lived in California for the two worst years of my life I dealt with SMUD (Sacramento Municipal Utilities District) for my electricity. I assume they also provided water, sewer, and trash services but do not know for sure.

What is SWIFTMUD and what is their mission?

Copied from the SWIFTMUD website:

The mission of the Southwest Florida Water Management District is to manage water and related natural resources to ensure their continued availability while maximizing the benefits to the public. The District encompasses roughly 10,000 square miles in all or part of 16 counties and serves a population of 4.7 million people. The goal of the District is to meet the water needs of current and future water users while protecting and preserving the water resources within its boundaries.

A 13-member Governing Board oversees District activities. Members are unpaid volunteers appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the state Senate to set policy and administer the budget. Central to the mission is maintaining the balance between the water needs of current and future users while protecting and maintaining water and related natural resources which provide the District with its existing and future water supply.

The Governing Board of the District assumes its responsibilities as authorized in Chapter 373 and other chapters of the Florida Statutes by directing a wide range of programs, initiatives and actions. These include, but are not limited to, flood protection, water use, well construction and environmental resource permitting, water conservation, education, land acquisition, water resource and supply development, and supportive data collection and analysis efforts.

PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
some/most of y'all have been in violation for 20 years

y'all have now been caught

? do y'all tell the cop: but other people were also speeding ?

remove the offending encroachments upon the drainage utility easements

blame the action(s) of your previously ELECTED directors for the mess

y'all made the mess, y'all clean it up

CAVEAT EMPTOR the easements were in place when you purchased
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Sure glad we don't have anything like swiftmud around here. Awful lot of power with a wide-sweeping mandate.

Does swiftmud send demand notices to the HOA?

Does the HOA share those swiftmud notices with the community?

Do you have access to swiftmud records that show how an inspection was initiated? Routine? Complaint? Other?

Do members of the HOA Board, committee, or management co participate in the inspection?


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 07/07/2014 7:40 AM
Sure glad we don't have anything like swiftmud around here. Awful lot of power with a wide-sweeping mandate.

Does swiftmud send demand notices to the HOA?

Does the HOA share those swiftmud notices with the community?

Do you have access to swiftmud records that show how an inspection was initiated? Routine? Complaint? Other?

Do members of the HOA Board, committee, or management co participate in the inspection?


SWIFTMUD will notify the HOA, especially if the issue violates the original terms of agreement that were in place in order for the developement to be built. For example, our original covenants are explicit about SWIFTMUD conservation areas (we are not allowed to remove native plants and we are not allowed to alter/disrupt/build upon those areas). Same with ponds and lakes that are in the development (no removal of the natural vegetation, HOA must maintain the water and provide for control of invasive plants).

Our Association does not share those notices. The Board may openly discuss such notices in Board meetings. We do have the option of doing a records review of our HOA as allowed by statutes so if I really wanted to read the notices, I can do it anyway.

I have never gone to the SWIFTMUD offices to ask to see their records but since it is a government agency, I probably could do it.

From time to time, members of the Board and the management company have met with the SWIFTMUD reps. Personally, I don't mind that we have SWIFTMUD to deal with. Their purpose is to protect the wetlands and to provide water mamangement. When you consider that much of our fresh water (hence drinking water) comes from the aquifer AND that fresh water is in short supply in Florida (we have been in a drought for around 12 years), the SWIFTMUD mission is appropriate.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Nice recap Ann.

So if F/M has similar limitations, the issues appear to be:
- do "build upon" restrictions include the types of fences that F/M has in place?
- does it makes a difference if the fences were built before the restrictions were put in place?
- could the type of fence be modified to comply with swiftmud requirements?
- does the Board have personal biases that influence swiftmud investigations & notices?

I would like to hear more on the first 3 questions and less on the 4th.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 07/07/2014 9:02 AM
Nice recap Ann.

So if F/M has similar limitations, the issues appear to be:
- do "build upon" restrictions include the types of fences that F/M has in place?
- does it makes a difference if the fences were built before the restrictions were put in place?
- could the type of fence be modified to comply with swiftmud requirements?
- does the Board have personal biases that influence swiftmud investigations & notices?

I would like to hear more on the first 3 questions and less on the 4th.

Only F/M can answer much of that. I suspect, based on what was presented, that the real problem is there is mature landscaping and fencing in the easements and I will tell you from some experience that SWIFTMUD has every right to demand that it all be removed from the easement if the easement is related to SWIFTMUD. I don't think the real problems are vinyl versus wood fencing but are the location of any such fencing.

ANYONE (Board or not) can call SWIFTMUD and lodge a complaint, ask a question, or ask for SWIFTMUD to take a look at something. If my neighbor were to dig up the conservation lot behind their home or if they were to alter the drainage easement, my other neighbors could possibly notify SWIFTMUD. SWIFTMUD is going to look out for SWIFTMUD interests.

The best thing the owners can do for themselves is to comply with the demands to remove the fencing. If the owners reamin out of compliance, SWIFTMUD can fine the HOA and then the HOA would have to go after the owners to recover the fines (and any associated legal fees).


NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AnnH5 on 07/07/2014 10:27 AM


ANYONE (Board or not) can call SWIFTMUD and lodge a complaint, ask a question, or ask for SWIFTMUD to take a look at something. If my neighbor were to dig up the conservation lot behind their home or if they were to alter the drainage easement, my other neighbors could possibly notify SWIFTMUD. SWIFTMUD is going to look out for SWIFTMUD interests.

The best thing the owners can do for themselves is to comply with the demands to remove the fencing. If the owners reamin out of compliance, SWIFTMUD can fine the HOA and then the HOA would have to go after the owners to recover the fines (and any associated legal fees).




So F/M's complaints against the Pres could be unrelated to HOA business - because - If the Pres has a personal bias, then he could file a complaint as an ordinary HO without even mentioning that he represents the HOA.

In your case, what happens if the HO refuses to comply? Does your HOA go in and make the corrections?


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 07/07/2014 11:01 AM
Posted By AnnH5 on 07/07/2014 10:27 AM


ANYONE (Board or not) can call SWIFTMUD and lodge a complaint, ask a question, or ask for SWIFTMUD to take a look at something. If my neighbor were to dig up the conservation lot behind their home or if they were to alter the drainage easement, my other neighbors could possibly notify SWIFTMUD. SWIFTMUD is going to look out for SWIFTMUD interests.

The best thing the owners can do for themselves is to comply with the demands to remove the fencing. If the owners reamin out of compliance, SWIFTMUD can fine the HOA and then the HOA would have to go after the owners to recover the fines (and any associated legal fees).





So F/M's complaints against the Pres could be unrelated to HOA business - because - If the Pres has a personal bias, then he could file a complaint as an ordinary HO without even mentioning that he represents the HOA.

In your case, what happens if the HO refuses to comply? Does your HOA go in and make the corrections?

The part of F/M's concerns about the President bringing SWIFTMUD to the "problem kids"? F/M needs to have a sit-down with SWIFTMUD if there are any questions aboit which lots are out of compliance. It sounds like a few owners have already made the mandated corrections and a few have not. But yes, anyone can call SWIFTMUD to report a violation.

If the owner refuses to comply? In a few cases, the HOA had to make the corrections and then go after the homeowner for the reimbursement. SWIFTMUD cited our HOA since the alterations were made on conservation property that was adjacent to the home (but the owner went out and altered the property anyway). In another instance, an owner was cited for planting some landscaping in the drainage easement and SWIFTMUD sent a demand that it be removed (that owner complied). In another instance, an owner decided to "fill in" the drainage easement because they didn't like the way it looked at the end of their yard (and then they had to excavate the fill and restore the drainage easement after a warning from SWIFTMUD). In other occurences, SWIFTMUD manadated that the HOA make some corrections to some conservation areas that the HOA is obligated to maintain per the covenants.


NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
You have turned my thinking around Ann.

Sounds like swiftmud has its act together and can force the hoa to take action when the ho doesn't.
Also sounds like your hoa knows how to work through the issues. Very nice. Congrats.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
LOL- thanks but it isn't so much that the HOA has it together as much as it that SWIFTMUD can and will impose fines and nobody wants to pay a hefty penalty. SWIFTMUD has also pursued lawsuits against businesses for mismanagement. Best to just comply with their rules and regulations.
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
? why would one not want a drainage easement to be clear of any and all obstructions ?

? of any POTENTIAL obstruction ?

? would you be upset if said obstruction(s) caused YOUR home to flood ?

SHEEEEESH

RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
Sorry I did not read the OP so this may have been discussed within...

How were these fences permit-ted by the local county or city building department(s)?

Each home in our community has a maintenance & drainage easement on the zero-lot-line side of the property.

About 80% have fences which cross the easement...ALL properly permit-ted by local city authorities.

* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RwT on 07/08/2014 10:47 AM
Sorry I did not read the OP so this may have been discussed within...

How were these fences permit-ted by the local county or city building department(s)?

Each home in our community has a maintenance & drainage easement on the zero-lot-line side of the property.

About 80% have fences which cross the easement...ALL properly permit-ted by local city authorities.

What is zero lot line?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
One wall of your house (typically a side) is on the property line.
So basically you have three sides to your house that you can access without trespassing, thus the 'maintenance' easement.

* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.
RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
Allows developers to 'cram' more units into a given space.

* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here