💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Hi

For some background info, These are all townhouse that share a common exterior insurance policy.

History when I first move in 2005, I submitted an ARC form for a sattelite dish and never heard back.
Some time last A previous Board President check the installation and said the disk was below the roof line and okay.
The wiring for the dish goes down the side of the house (firmly attached by a professional installer)
. HOA wants the wiring removed.

My unit does not have an attic (There is a crawl space across 6 units but no access or holes from inside the unit.
, just a concrete slab covering between my unit and the crawl space.
This crawl space is currently inhabited by Bees.(Association is claiming the crawl space is not a common area and will not removed).

The Management Corp said the drill a hole if roof and then go into the crawl space and drill a hole in the concrete slab into the unit and claim they will remove the dishes if the wiring on the side is not removed and ARC form not filled out.

Does this violate the Telecommunication Act of 1996?
What should I do? The management Company is not being helpful, and no answers from the Board.

My HOA recently sent out of a letter stating:
" SATELLITE DISHES and/or OMG DISHS: you computer the enclosed ARC form and return back to us at the address listed below and the follow the instruction page for all SATELLITE DISHES and OMG DISHES.if you do return the ARC form by Jun 30, 2014, the Association will have all satellite dishes and OMG dishes removed at the homeowners/residents expense for that unit. Also anyone who has install an OMG DISH is now responsible for any and all roof repairs or diames to their unit, since approval was not given and importer installation was done casuing a void in the roofing warranty for your unit. As per the insurance company which protests the Assoiciation for Hazard and Liability for the exterior of the units all satellite dish wires must be installed inside of the unit and run through your attics.and all satellite dishes cannot be the tops of roofs they must be installed on the back of the units not to exceed past the roof line for the wind load specifications. There cannot be any exposed or cables lying or hanging from the walls or on the roofs, this will void our insurance and roofing policies. You will have intill JUNE 30, 2014 to correct these insurance violations, if not the Association will have all Satellite Dishs, OMG dishes removed and all wires remove to protect the Association from any claims or liabilities and these charges will be assessed to that unit. PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SATELLITE DISH CARRIER TO MAKE THE PROPER INSTALLATIONS TO YOUR UNIT AND CORRECT THE INSTALLATIONS VIOLATIONS.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Fred,

So I understand that you are in a condominium complex. As a condominium, the Association has absolute authority on what may or may not be done to the common elements (in your case, as I understand it, the exterior of the building).
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Fred I would suggest you do a web search for "otard rules and regulations", generally speaking a HOA cannot have restrictions that impair a person's ability to install, maintain, or use an antenna covered by the rule. The rule applies to state or local laws or regulations, including zoning, land-use or building regulations, private covenants, homeowners' association rules, condominium or cooperative association restrictions, lease restrictions, or similar restrictions on property within the exclusive use or control of the antenna user where the user has an ownership or leasehold interest in the property. A restriction impairs if it: (1) unreasonably delays or prevents use of; (2) unreasonably increases the cost of; or (3) precludes a person from receiving or transmitting an acceptable quality signal from an antenna covered under the rule. The rule does not prohibit legitimate safety restrictions or restrictions designed to preserve designated or eligible historic or prehistoric properties, provided the restriction is no more burdensome than necessary to accomplish the safety or preservation purpose.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
The key words there are "exclusive use".

Here is a link to the FCC OTARD page
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
From the FCC Q&A on Otard:

Q: If I live in a condominium or an apartment building, does this rule apply to me?

A: The rule applies to antenna users who live in a multiple dwelling unit building, such as a condominium or apartment building, if the antenna user has an exclusive use area in which to install the antenna. "Exclusive use" means an area of the property that only you, and persons you permit, may enter and use to the exclusion of other residents. For example, your condominium or apartment may include a balcony, terrace, deck or patio that only you can use, and the rule applies to these areas. The rule does not apply to common areas, such as the roof, the hallways, the walkways or the exterior walls of a condominium or apartment building. Restrictions on antennas installed in these common areas are not covered by the Commission's rule. For example, the rule would not apply to restrictions that prevent drilling through the exterior wall of a condominium or rental unit and thus restrictions may prohibit installation that requires such drilling.
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I live in a townhouse (not a condo), but I do not own the roof on the townhouse
and the place has condo-like insurance.
While I do not own the roof, the antenna is not on the roof(It is on the lip under the roof )
The sides are considered "exclusive use" (They are not shared with any other unit)

Basically, they applying new rule sto an existing installation that has been there 8 years.
(I have read the OTARD rules and 1996 telecomunication act),

1. Is it legal for them to impose new restrictions on existing installations
when those installation do not have safety issues ?
(The HOA is claiming windstorm issues but this is not allowed under OTARD/telecom 1996)?

2. It is legal for the HOA to remove an existing installation that has been there for 8 years?
(With no safety issues, I filled out an ARC in 2005 but never heard a respond,
A a previous Board if there was an issue, who looked at it and said no)

3. What steps can I take to avoid them removing the existing antenna?
Trying th comply with the regulations will result in more damage to my home
(Extra holes in the side of roof, Hole in the concrete slab which will let the bees in from the crawl space.

Any help here?

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Here we go again. HOAs and satellite dish restrictions.

First, the FCC prohibits associations from requiring prior approval because, in their view, it results in unnecessary delay.

The FCC does permit restrictions for legitimate safety reasons, but the restrictions must state how the safety concerns can be mitigated. Also, if you will take the time to read some of the previous FCC rulings you will discover the FCC is very good at determining when safety concerns are really aesthetic concerns in disguise.

The burden of proof is on the association to show that their restrictions are based on valid safety concerns. My guess is the association would have to prove how they determined that damage from a windstorm was likely.

My recommendation would be to petition the FCC for a ruling and then inform the association that removal of your satellite dish prior to a ruling from the FCC would be at their expense and that if the ruling should be in your favor the association would be required to replace it, also at their expense. If the FCC should rule in favor of the association you would comply with the ruling within the time frame allowed by the FCC.
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Petitioning the FCC directly will take alot of time, money and paperwork,
Also, under the Telecommunications ACT of 1996, the Assoicate should be the one filing for an exceptions.

Is there another option to help resolve this?
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FredF4 on 06/06/2014 10:08 AM
Petitioning the FCC directly will take alot of time, money and paperwork,
Also, under the Telecommunications ACT of 1996, the Assoicate should be the one filing for an exceptions.

Is there another option to help resolve this?

Not true.

You may file the petition yourself by simply stating the facts in a letter. You should include copies of any documents that apply. You do not need to hire a lawyer. Your costs are only the cost of obtaining copies and postage to mail everything to the FCC at the address given on their website for filing petitions. The time is how much time it takes you to write the letter and gather the necessary documentation. That time is either worth it to you or it isn't.

The association is not required to file a petition nor should you expect them to. There is nothing for them to gain in doing so. They are driving the events unless you are willing to challenge them. If you will take the time to look at the opinions and rulings you will find that most petitions have been filed by homeowners or renters - not by associations.

Do nothing and the association will likely proceed as they have stated. They have no reason not to unless you to take the initiative to stop or delay it. You can try sending the association a letter with the appropriate FCC information, but that will likely take as much time as filing a petition to the FCC. Then, you have to rely on the fact that it will cause the board to think differently, but that's not realistic because you have no clout; the FCC does.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
FredF4,

Forgetting the insurance issue for a minute, because safety is only one part of the equation. The OTARD rules probably control – although the Association may choose to allow satellite dish installations, even if they do not have to, per OTARD.

How do your Documents describe the Common Areas or Common elements of the buildings? Are there any exclusive use or limited Common areas?

You imply that the roof is common area. And, you described the building sides are exclusive use. And you mention a crawl space – common or not – or limited common or not? Would you be willing to post the exact words from your Documents that define these various areas?

Are there a number of other buildings similar to yours, in the Association?

Is there a specific section of OTARD that you feel allows an installation such as you have? And if yes, would you quote from the OTARD Document so that we can better understand your problem.

I am not familiar with the term OMG in reference to Dish Antennas? Is that perhaps a “trademarked” service name in your area, perhaps local to Florida? (Just to add to my knowledge).

Also I am curious, are or were, all the Condo Town House Units wired for Cable TV?

Thank you.
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
The HOA document does not have clear definer "common areas" defination.
Nor does it even use the term "exclusive use" except for inside the unit and limited common areas is not memtioned.

These are townhouses,
Some of the townhouses(1/4) do not have attics, instead have a crawl space above each unit's conrete slab.
(Crawl space is accessible only through a hatch on the roof on the other side of the building(6 units down).

Other townhouses(3/4) (Owned by Board members) have a wood roof with access to an attic space.

The HOA docs do not account for this, nor is the "exclusive use" and limited common areas" defined.
The does do say you can mount a satellite dish with Board approval but does not say where.

All of the units were wired for Comcast when built.

OMG is a local inter proivder that uses a extenally mounted antenna for the internet.
(I think the misinstallation of these antenna's is what started this whole thing).
These are also protect under OTARG?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FredF4 on 06/06/2014 9:17 AM

I live in a townhouse (not a condo), but I do not own the roof on the townhouse and the place has condo-like insurance.

Fred,

Just because you are in a townhouse, it does not mean that you do not live within a condominium complex. However, that is a common misconception.

The fact that the Association, and not you, carry insurance on some of your property would be a good indication that you are in a condominium complex.

I also live in a townhouse development. However, due to design (staggered heights and setbacks), I have "fee simple" ownership and must maintain and insure everything (including the exterior of my property and the roof) I own.

Here is an article that may help explain it better: The Towndo Phenomenon – Condos vs Townhouses

PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
FredF4;

depending on your exact location in Florida your 'dish' may need to withstand a 150 mph wind gust for 3 seconds

should it become airborne during a wind event and damage other property, will YOU pay the damages in full ?

I doubt that it actually meets code

juuuuust perhaps your HOA is actually doing a good job
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PitA1 on 06/16/2014 7:10 AM
FredF4;

depending on your exact location in Florida your 'dish' may need to withstand a 150 mph wind gust for 3 seconds

The FCC OTARD rules state that any wind load restriction must also apply to any other structure of similar weight and size, otherwise, it is not a valid restriction. Wind load restrictions cannot apply only to antennas.
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
> The HOA document does not have clear definer "common areas" defination.
Nor does it even use the term "exclusive use" except for inside the unit and limited common areas is not memtioned.

It would be surprising if this were not clearly defined, as this determines responsibility for maintenance, etc.

> Any help here?

I think you need to help yourself by (1) reading carefully and understanding your association documents and (2) doing this same with the FCC OTARD rules.

No shortcuts here, unless you want to pay someone to do it for you.
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BruceF1 on 06/16/2014 1:40 PM
Posted By PitA1 on 06/16/2014 7:10 AM
FredF4;

depending on your exact location in Florida your 'dish' may need to withstand a 150 mph wind gust for 3 seconds

The FCC OTARD rules state that any wind load restriction must also apply to any other structure of similar weight and size, otherwise, it is not a valid restriction. Wind load restrictions cannot apply only to antennas.

correct as stated

wind RATINGS are required by the building code and apply to ALL structures including signage

? did you know that flagpoles are wind rated according to the size of the flag being flown ?

presumably all other structures were (building) permitted and are code compliant

the 'improper' attachment of a 1 meter 'dish' may actually void the compliance of the structure to which it was attached (before it blew off leaving holes) as the added wind load was not considered - many dishes are actually mounted to sheathing only as opposed to being anchored to actual structural members with 3" lag screws or bolts

? do you think the typical installer actually cares ?

ps. I have 40+ years experience in construction management and am a retired (thank god) master plumber
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
ps.

most HOAs are the victims of:

"Self inflicted volunteerism"
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
John (PitA),

>the 'improper' attachment of a 1 meter 'dish' may actually void the compliance of the structure to which it was attached (before it blew off leaving holes) as the added wind load was not considered - many dishes are actually mounted to sheathing only as opposed to being anchored to actual structural members with 3" lag screws or bolts

? do you think the typical installer actually cares ?

No argument.

The problem lies with the fact that installers must be given the requirements for installation and held responsible if they fail to comply.

The FCC will not permit advance application and approval to insure an installation will meet requirements. What should happen is that a document describing proper installation (in a manner similar to what you described) should be prepared by a knowledgeable person (or firm) and made available by the association to homeowners. All that should be required is for a homeowner wishing to install an antenna must obtain a copy of the requirements and provide it to the installer. The homeowner can be held responsible if he or she fails to obtain the document and the homeowner and the installer can be held responsible if they fail to comply with the requirements. This approach does not require an advance application and approval and would be in compliance with the OTARD rules.
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
This started where a local internet provider(OMG) puts up antennas which damaged the roof tiles,
There are also a number of unused dishs with wires hanging.

Currently the HOA docs (from 1995) require ARC(Association committee) approve to get dish installed.

Now, the HOA is putting down rules for the installation of satellite dish and internet antenna.
The say the dish(or antenna) needs to be below the roof line
and all wires cannot be on the roof or sides of the building,
All wires must go through the attic.

They say they will remove any EXISTING dish or antenna that does not meet these rules.
They require approval for any new and EXISTING dish or antenna.

Putting in rules and guidelines for new installations, which do not violate the 1996 act or OTARD
is legal for hoa

But Removing the existing dishs in use violates the OTARD and 1996 act?

In 2005 I submitted the ARC before installation (when applied to the HOA),
Never received a reply and 6 weeks later, had the disk installed.
Dish is installed below the roof line.
But since my place does not have an attic,
(and the crawl space in place of an attic I am not allowed to use)

I had the dish installer come over to see if anything could be done.
Since the existing comcast cables are being used for internet, they cannot e used for both.
There seems no way to completely remove the wires for the side of building.
(I had the installer buying the cable and secure the wires as much as possible)

There does not seem to be any way for me comply with these rules and keep the dish.
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
so be it

install it properly as per the mfg's installation guidelines or BYE BYE DISH
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Say, PitA, I want to change my display name, but can't figure out how to do it. I went to profile, to my account, etc. I asked for help and was told, that as a free service, they'd get to me eventually. Completely understandable. I know you changed yours recently. Can you help me? Please don't DOH me! Thanks.
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
your display name is generated by the first name + first letter of last name + a number if needed

you will need to cancel your existing account (found under 'my account') and register for a new account

there is an element of 'pot luck' and planning involved

eg. assuming the site already has a JoeB4 and you sign up as Joe Brown your new name will be JoeB5

doh
(could not resist)
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PitA1 on 06/17/2014 12:33 PM
your display name is generated by the first name + first letter of last name + a number if needed

you will need to cancel your existing account (found under 'my account') and register for a new account

there is an element of 'pot luck' and planning involved

eg. assuming the site already has a JoeB4 and you sign up as Joe Brown your new name will be JoeB5

doh
(could not resist)

There may have been a BruceF (no number) at one time, but I haven't seen any other BruceFs. So, I ended up with BruceF1. I guess I'm still the only one.

We have three people named Bruce in our community. At one time all three of us were on the board. We were known as Bruce 1, Bruce 2 and Bruce 3.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Carol,

If you don't mind sharing, why do you want to change it?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I wanted to be reincarnated as a kinder, gentler person, Tim--just like PitA. See, he even typed "doh" instead of "DOH!" I'm looking for a similar transformation ; )
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/17/2014 4:02 PM
I wanted to be reincarnated as a kinder, gentler person, Tim--just like PitA. See, he even typed "doh" instead of "DOH!" I'm looking for a similar transformation ; )

And what made you think you weren't that type of person to begin with?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/17/2014 4:02 PM
I wanted to be reincarnated as a kinder, gentler person, Tim--just like PitA. See, he even typed "doh" instead of "DOH!" I'm looking for a similar transformation ; )

Carol..it that you....LOL

Why change names? Pita was nice enough to do so as he and I were being confused but I have never confused you with someone else....except Melissa........LOL
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/17/2014 4:02 PM
I wanted to be reincarnated as a kinder, gentler person, Tim--just like PitA. See, he even typed "doh" instead of "DOH!" I'm looking for a similar transformation ; )

Well, I doubt changing names will change posting styles.

Sure, new members to the forum won't know who you were but the regular posters will and may even address you by Carol (similar to many addressing PitA as John).

However, to each their own. Thank you for sharing.
LauraR5 (Tennessee)
Posts: 220
Posted:
I was told there is not much that we can do about satellite dishes. We can make homeowners move exterior wires and I am told that if a dish causes damage to the roof we can ask them to pay for it, but we cannot make them fill out an ARC request or ask them to remove it, because that restricts their access to public television waves.

Perhaps your Association isn't up to speed on the new laws. I only found out about it from reading this forum and had to educate our other board members.
FarT (Alabama)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Hey, this name changing is fun!
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
ANY and ALL damaging additions to a common element may be removed.

It is the 'dish' owner's responsibility for its PROPER and WORKMANLIKE installation.

A rule requiring installation of 'dish' according to mfgr's instruction WILL hold up under FFC scrutiny.

NO mfgr. will specify or allow equipment to be bolted to NON STRUCTURAL façade elements, eg. stucco, siding, sheathing, roof sheathing, faux brick, etc.

ALL installation 'specs' state "......to a structural element with at least 1.5" screw/bolt penetration".

"But I had them install it" is NOT a valid rationale to permit improper installs to remain ~ the OWNER merely has recourse against the installer.

Only a mental midget would penetrate an actual roof to install an antenna

A PROPER roof penetration requires PROFESSIONAL flashing to remain water tight.

PLUS: Exactly how is the HOA supposed to re-roof down the road? Around the dishes?

Let us stop all this ignorant BS and use some common sense and ACTUALLY READ the OTARD which ALLOWS structural bans and REQUIREMENTS for code compliant proper installations.

The fact that a building permit may not be required does NOT negate the requirement for a code compliant installation

The installation is a critical issue in wind prone areas where attachment to sheathing only may result in a compromised building envelope which may lead to total structural failure.

see: http://k7nv.com/notebook/topics/windload.html
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
According to the 1996 act and OTARD,
You can make homeowners fill out an ARC form.
You cannot "unreasonably delay" installation or use of the satellite dish,
Meaning they can make you fill out the form but not wait 30 days for approval.

When I sent in the ARC form, I said denial should violate the 1996 act and OTARD
along with a copy of the relevant portions.

I am wondering if I still need to file a petition with the FCC
or wait intill I get a response?
RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
I may have missed it but...

Fred,
Do you have a balcony?

My townhouse had two.

That is an 'exclusive use' element as only you can access it.

* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
There cannot be any exposed or cables lying or hanging from the walls or on the roofs, this will void our insurance and roofing policies.


Reasonable and 'bullet-proof'.

CAVEAT EMPTOR[/b[
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
No Balcony in townhouse, Patio on the first floor,
But the dishs is mounted on the lip of the roof(below the roof line),
Do not know if it has 3" screws.

According the HOA guidelines given before( and a talk with the previous board president)
The current installtion is below the roof line and acceptable. (3-4 years ago).

Since these are townhouses, the lip below the roof and the walls should be "exclusive use"?
(No one else has access to them).
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
There cannot be any exposed or cables lying or hanging from the walls or on the roofs, this will void our insurance and roofing policies.

Reasonable and 'bullet-proof'.???

Since there is no way use a satellite dish without having a wire coming out it.
And since there is no attach and the crawlspace is unusable,
(My cables are all secured to the wall)

This would not allow my existing dish (and not allow all of the others in the community).
Which would be a violation of the 1996 teelcommunications act and the OTARD?

RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FredF4 on 06/19/2014 7:28 AM
No Balcony in townhouse, Patio on the first floor,
But the dishs is mounted on the lip of the roof(below the roof line),
Do not know if it has 3" screws.

According the HOA guidelines given before( and a talk with the previous board president)
The current installtion is below the roof line and acceptable. (3-4 years ago).

Since these are townhouses, the lip below the roof and the walls should be "exclusive use"?
(No one else has access to them).

Fred,

In these situations typically a buildings exterior is in fact common area.

Therefore it would not be exclusive use (common element).

You may have to 'pole' mount from inside the patio it if you have SW exposure from your unit.

If not you may be in a pickle if there is no suitable EUA or a location in or of the common area set aside by the association for this purpose.


* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
The patio faces North, so no way to put ant atenna, the pole would need to be over 20ft high.
But remember the dish have been their for 8 years. (with paperwork filled out).

Can they legally tear it down now?

(About 1/3 of unit has similar dishs,
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
if it is damaging a common element (even an 'eyesore' is damage) then

YES, THEY CAN

the improper installation should never have been originally permitted

your only possible recourse is against the 'person' who improperly gave authorization for a prohibited action

this issue is EXACTLY why the place was originally wired to a 'master antenna/provider'

not the answer you wanted ..............
FredF4 (Florida)
Posts: 10
Posted:
No "resonable" saftey issues,
Dish is not visible from the street but under the 1996 act,
if the only locate with a good signal is visible from the street,
No powerlines needby,
All cables securely attached and grounded.
No power lines needby (all underground).

The 1996 act says for speific safety reasons.

Windstorm only applies to the mounting not to dish or antenna itself?

HOA is claiming this is an insurance requirement but I read the policy
and it says that dishes and any damage they create is not covered.

PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
I read the policy and it says that dishes and any damage they create is not covered.


Hoisted by your own Petard!
PitA1
Posts: 222
Posted:
the 'coup de grace' :

? would it be permissible to mount a flagpole where the cable is 'stapled' ?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here