Quote:
Posted By SteveM24 on 05/23/2014 6:39 PM
I am so sick hearing this you signed a contract. I get that i am not saying i didn't.
Good to know. Often the regular posters read that individuals don't believe that they agreed to be part of a contract. We are human and sometimes don't always read everything before responding. It shouldn't happen that way, but it does (I've done it myself).
Quote:
Posted By SteveM24 on 05/23/2014 6:39 PM
I am shedding light on how silly hoa can be when their egos.
I agree. If you take the time to read most of the court cases surrounding HOA's, most of the cases, in my opinion, could have been avoided if ego's or personality conflicts were not involved in the decision making. Unfortunately, it does happen.
This is why it's important that the entire membership be involved in the running of the Association, as it's the membership that are the checks and balances for the Boards.
In my opinion, minimum participation is attending the annual meeting (or send a representative in your place if you can't attend) and actually casting a vote. Unfortunately, just as it can be comical (silly) when Boards allow egos and personality conflicts to enter into decisions, it can become disastrous if membership apathy removes the checks and balances (by lack of participation).
Quote:
Posted By SteveM24 on 05/23/2014 6:39 PM
It has been one whole year since it was taken over by the community and in one year 65 letters go out. All of a sudden everyone went nuts in the neighborhood?
Well, to be honest, typically the Declarant won't be as forceful in ensuring compliance as their main interest is selling houses.
When you say that everyone went nuts, are implying that it was the members of the Board, the individual members or both that went nuts?
Quote:
Posted By SteveM24 on 05/23/2014 6:39 PM
Letters ranging from mailbox does match ti the garage door open to long. Come on!!!
So are you upset because the violations are being identified and brought into compliance?
or
Are you upset because the members chose to ignore the CC&Rs and now have to deal with the consequences of that choice?
or
Are you upset over the methodology used to enforce the covenants?
Quote:
Posted By SteveM24 on 05/23/2014 6:39 PM
But maybe i am so willing to challenge them is simply because they are pushing way to much.
So perhaps it is the methodology used.
Perhaps you could volunteer to serve on the enforcement committee and implement a different methodology.
Quote:
Posted By SteveM24 on 05/23/2014 6:39 PM
But then again i guess if you give anyone to much rope they will hang soon or later.
To look at that statement from a different perspective and to use an analogy, it appears that sometimes everybody knows what the speed limit is, chooses to go faster than the posted limit and then complains when the police set up cameras to catch the speeders. Those who chose to speed, are ticked at the police rather than admitting that they made a poor decision. If they believe that the speed limit should be higher, then they should have lobbied for a higher limit rather then simply choosing to ignore the limit established.
Or in other words, don't shoot the messenger.
If you believe that a covenant or rule should be changed, gather support and propose the change. If you have enough support, the documents can easily be changed to what you believe is more appropriate.