💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KarenH14 (Wisconsin)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Our association changed a bylaw not allowing hot tubs after one single owner's broke down. Homeowner is putting a replacement in, claiming that they had their area custom built around it when they purchased - can they now that the bylaw is in place?
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
a corporate bylaw can not restrict a homeowner

corporate bylaws only govern the actual operation of the corporation, they are NOT part of the covenants and restrictions

? do you mean an amendment to the CCRS was passed by the requisite vote ?

if so, it may, or may not, be enforceable against a previous condition

since you are obviously 'clueless' and are seeking internet 'hack' advice you probably will ignore:

seek legal advice from a COMPETANT contract attorney
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Typically, if prior approval was required for the hot tub and prior approval was granted, then the Association needs to stand by that approval.

As John pointed out, there may be an issue about having the restriction in the Bylaws vs. The CC&Rs or in a resolution as a guideline for what is or isn't approved. I am not an attorney and I do not work in the legal profession. As I understand it, unless your Bylaws normally contain restrictions, it is possible that if challenged in a court of law that restrictions in the Bylaws might be ruled invalid as they may be in conflict with the CC&Rs which have no such restriction (an issue of amending the wrong document).

If the restriction was a guideline, and if there were no previous approvals for hot tubs, the restriction might withstand a legal challenge. However, if there were previous approvals, then the guideline might not withstand a legal challenge.

KarenH14 (Wisconsin)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thank you Tim,

The information that has been passed along to me is that the original owner did have approval from the Developer, before enough units had been sold to form the HOA, as stated, their custom deck construction was built to accommodate the required proximity to the building and additional electrical was put in at the time of build and is different than the other units deck set up. Now, after it needing to be replaced, has the HOA put the restriction in place. My observation is that there have been numerous board members, who have come and gone in a short span of time and very little attendance at board meetings, so the few ( less than 5 ) have made this decision. I will research which document was possibly amended. If the amendment was in the CC&R and not the bylaws, it that proper protocol on the part of the board?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
This is a replacement not a new install. Meaning no approval and grandfathered in. If this was new construction, then it could be denied. This is a replacementmof existing equipmentmalready approved in the past. It may be that even a new owner who has to replace in the future would be okay to replace in the future as well.

You were better enforcing a maintenance rule than a denial.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Karen

I am not nor do I play a lawyer.

I do agree with my fellow posters.

1. Any restriction such as not allowing hot tubs should be in the Covenants/Deed Restrictions not the Bylaws and most certainly not in the Rules & Regulations.

2. The owner of the present hot tub rightfully can keep and/or repair it even if the repair is a replacement.

Hope this helps.

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
{begin rant}

once again the idiot volunteer board strikes

power mad morons

all they need do to self educate is ACTUALLY READ the covenants

{end rant}
WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:
CCR amendments typically have to be approved (in some cases by 2/3 majority) of the home owners. The Board cannot modify the CCR's or the Bylaws by its own resolve.

My experience is that many Board members act in perfect ignorance of the governing documents.

Ed
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WalterM3 on 05/07/2014 11:43 AM
CCR amendments typically have to be approved (in some cases by 2/3 majority) of the home owners. The Board cannot modify the CCR's or the Bylaws by its own resolve.

My experience is that many Board members act in perfect ignorance of the governing documents.

Ed

One way most try do it with Rules & Regulations which are not allowed to override Covenants nor Bylaws. Often it is done in ignorance but also many times they know they are wrong and they are just try to make people think they are right.

WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:

Unfortunately the only way to get compliance oftentimes seems to be to go to court. Because that is tough to do the erring Board members just go their merry way.

Ed
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/07/2014 12:25 PM
Posted By WalterM3 on 05/07/2014 11:43 AM
CCR amendments typically have to be approved (in some cases by 2/3 majority) of the home owners. The Board cannot modify the CCR's or the Bylaws by its own resolve.

My experience is that many Board members act in perfect ignorance of the governing documents.

Ed


One way most try do it with Rules & Regulations which are not allowed to override Covenants nor Bylaws. Often it is done in ignorance but also many times they know they are wrong and they are just try to make people think they are right.


EDIT BY OP

Know of one BOD that bluffed people out for years on out buildings by having the ARC turn down each and every request for such even when the Covenants dais allowed but ARC permission needed. When a suit was threatened and their own lawyer told them they were wrong, the majority of the BOD said keep doing it. It will take years to get to court.

This was the straw that broke the camels back and a group worked to get "those thinkers" off the BOD, but another story how.
WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:
It might take a while to come to trial, but filing a law suit can be a matter of weeks. You would think that the fastest way to infuriate the residents would be to cause the HOA funds to be expended on useless litigation, especially when the BOD is using the HOA funds just to kick the can down the road.

Ed
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
DOH

{begin rant}

once again the idiot volunteer board strikes

power mad morons

all they need do to self educate is ACTUALLY READ the covenants

{end rant}
WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 05/07/2014 1:24 PM
DOH

{begin rant}

once again the idiot volunteer board strikes

power mad morons

all they need do to self educate is ACTUALLY READ the covenants

{end rant}

It often does come down to people who have too much time on their hands taking on the BOD positions. A often their life experience ill prepares them to make good decisions.

We had a situation where a resident moved out and left several mattresses in the driveway. They hoped the trash man would take them; that is the one thing the trash guys -won't- take, and mattresses and box springs are the only things not accepted in the city landfill.

So, one of the Board members is out walking and sees this situation. He immediately e-mails the other Board members (including me) to do a --retroactive-- fine starting the day previous. The CCR's require that ten day notice be given before any fines can be levied (it actually says that in two different places). Further -- this exact situation was covered in the CCR's. The Board can pay to have such unkempt conditions removed and then that cost is added to the next year's assessment (dues).

Even after I pointed out that the CCR's covered this exact situation, several of the Board members were dumb enough to say they still favored a fine. I say dumb because all this went on by e-mail, which of course created a paper trail of their ignorance and arrogance.

Ed
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
since you SHOWED the directors the covenant sections that they were violating their subsequent actions rose to the level of actual malfeasance

acts of malfeasance are NOT covered by D&O insurance

the morons left themselves open to personal liability

DOH


WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 05/08/2014 5:55 AM
since you SHOWED the directors the covenant sections that they were violating their subsequent actions rose to the level of actual malfeasance

acts of malfeasance are NOT covered by D&O insurance

the morons left themselves open to personal liability

DOH



They did, and I have copies of their e-mails.

What I think would matter is if they ever in fact did assess a fine against that resident. That would 'consummate' their actions. It is too long a story to go into here, but they may yet be called to account.

Ed
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
new info:

...if they ever in fact did assess a fine...


no malfeasance YET .... talk is cheap

WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 05/08/2014 6:23 AM
new info:

...if they ever in fact did assess a fine...


no malfeasance YET .... talk is cheap


Probably the only way at this point to find out if they assessed a fine would be through Discovery pursuant to a law suit.

If they did, then that owner/resident would have standing in a legal action.

The point remains that even after they were told the procedure in the CCR's (an assessment next year) three of the Board members still wanted to retroactively assess a fine.

Ed
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
then the 3 would be guilty of willful and knowing malfeasance

and PERSONALLY liable to pay any damages awarded from the HOA to the plaintiff

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
like I said: morons
JoK2 (California)
Posts: 198
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/07/2014 12:25 PM
Posted By WalterM3 on 05/07/2014 11:43 AM
CCR amendments typically have to be approved (in some cases by 2/3 majority) of the home owners. The Board cannot modify the CCR's or the Bylaws by its own resolve.

My experience is that many Board members act in perfect ignorance of the governing documents.

Ed


One way most try do it with Rules & Regulations which are not allowed to override Covenants nor Bylaws. Often it is done in ignorance but also many times they know they are wrong and they are just try to make people think they are right.


Yes, there are attorneys out there who give this exact advice. Then the next attorney say's no, no you can't do that. It's not always just the board members, it is also Board members who seek the advice and are given wrong advice.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Walter did they sell and move or just move? Besides being against the documents, if they no longer own, then the BOD has no power to fine them. IMHO if you know where they went, simply sue them in small claims court for the cost of removal. Granted that doesn't guarantee payment but you can file a lien if they don't pay which would affect their credit more than an unpaid HOA fine.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GlenL on 05/08/2014 9:24 PM
Walter did they sell and move or just move? Besides being against the documents, if they no longer own, then the BOD has no power to fine them. IMHO if you know where they went, simply sue them in small claims court for the cost of removal. Granted that doesn't guarantee payment but you can file a lien if they don't pay which would affect their credit more than an unpaid HOA fine.

They still owned the unit after they left. I think they still own it but it is vacant now.

Someone may know better than me, but Small Claims Court can only make you whole. That is, you have to be out something (money) and SCC can make the other party reimburse you that money. But SCC can't award punitive damages or awards. I think.

Ed
WalterM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 442
Posted:
Can you edit these notes, because I misread the one. There is no need to sue in SCC because the CCR's allow the cost or clean-up/removal to be assessed with the next year's dues.

Ed

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here