Quote:
Posted By MaheshK1 on 04/30/2014 5:17 AM
The owner(s) themselves were casting their own proxy vote(s).
Perhaps you have the terminology wrong.
There are proxies and there are ballots.
A Proxy form identifies someone to vote on behalf of the member.
A Ballot is the actual vote.
Typically, if the member shows up to the meeting they invalidate the proxy (actually they revoke their proxy).
This allows the member to then cast a ballot in person. Yet, technically, unless the individual told the inspector of elections that the proxy is revoked, then, technically, only the named proxy representative is entitled to vote. This may be the technicality the person challenging the election is using.
OR, since 55-508 discusses applicability, perhaps there is a conflict in your governing documents and the statute and the Association chose to follow the Statute vs. following the governing documents as, per 55-508, perhaps the governing documents had control.
Quote:
Posted By MaheshK1 on 04/30/2014 5:17 AM
Nobody on the HOA board was informed about this complaint and the initiation of the inquiry by the board except one person who is president.
Since the President is considered the face and voice of the Association and the Board, it appears that the Association was informed. It was the President who failed to inform the rest of the board or the MC. That is not the members fault.
Quote:
Posted By MaheshK1 on 04/30/2014 5:17 AM
The proxy form was incorrect format, hence no quorum and no vote
Well, the format would be addressed by the Corporate law I provided earlier. It's possible that the member and/or their attorney failed to look at the applicable Corporate law.
If there was no quorum, then business could not be conducted and you will need to hold another election.
Now, to throw a curve into this, those same individuals were the ones who established the procedures and accepted the results of the election. Therefore, one could argue that since the old board accepted the results (and they were part of the old board) that the results should stand. I suspect that those same individuals also approved the proxy form that was used.
Quote:
Posted By MaheshK1 on 04/30/2014 5:17 AM
Suggestion by the attorney is to unseat the last two members who got elected in 2013 and re-instate 2 previous members even though their tenure is over.
Technically, the attorney's suggestion would be correct. Per
§ 13.1-857. Terms of directors generally:
"F. Except in the case of ex-officio directors,
despite the expiration of a director's term, a director continues to serve until his successor is elected and qualifies or until there is a decrease in the number of directors, if any. "
Therefore, if there was no quorum, there was no election and, per the above statute, those individuals would have stayed on the board. I would counter by offering to simply hold a new election.