💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
in 1992, the subject property was purchased by the current owner who lives overseas. It involves a small HOA with 14 lots. In 1994 the house was developed on the property the third one in the HOA at that time. While the owner was overseas, the association hired a contractor to install a security gate for vehicular access with a disconnect and electrical meter (240V), along with a large transformer and a sprinkler controller (120V) which is referred to as medium voltage switchgear and it was master planned to be installed adjacent to the gate on common property where the sprinkler control valves are located. However, there was only one neighbor living within the development at that time and very selfishly she directed the contractor to install the gate controller/electrical meter, the transformer and sprinkler controller on the subject lot (private property) approximately 100 feet from the gate and the sprinkler control valves. The neighbor chose this option because she did not want it located on common grounds where she might see it from her living room window.

The owner at 541 san julio returned from overseas about one year later and was furious that a selfish decision had been without any notification and that that the medium voltage switchgear is very large with an industrial appearance which would affect his property value. Because one year had lapsed he felt the statute of limitations had run out so he installed a landscape screen around it. Recently the local power utility indicated that the equipment does not meet code and all landscaping needs to be removed within four feet of the unit. So now the HOA wants to replace the gate disconnect. Does the owner have a legal right to refuse access to his personal property and demand that the gate disconnect be relocated to where it was master planned, adjacent to the gate and near the sprinkler control valves on common property of the HOA? The HOA is claiming that the easement has been established and they can do whatever they want and tear up the property and landscaping to install a much bigger unit. Can the owner simply refuse access to his property to which the association will have no choice but to relocate it or simply disconnect power? Please help. This just does not seem fair and would like to know if the owners have rights to refuse granting access and giving up a larger portion of a very small front yard when other options are available.

Thank you in advance!
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Tell the owner to do what he should have done when he discovered that they located it on his property in the first place ---- CONTACT AN ATTORNEY. He may or may not have lost part of his property rights do to his lackadaisical treatment of the problem so far.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GregB8 on 04/26/2014 11:32 PM
she directed the contractor to install the gate controller/electrical meter, the transformer and sprinkler controller on the subject lot (private property) approximately 100 feet from the gate and the sprinkler control valves.

And where was the Board to oversee this project?

Quote:
Posted By GregB8 on 04/26/2014 11:32 PM
Does the owner have a legal right to refuse access to his personal property and demand that the gate disconnect be relocated to where it was master planned

I don't know. That would be a legal question that needs to be asked of an attorney.

Is there an easement on that portion of the property? If so, what is the easement for?

Gregg, I'm going to expect that you are the owner the transformer is on. You should have sought legal action options at the time the installation was discovered (regardless of how much time had passed). There may or may not have been options available at that time. Now that time has passed since the issue was discovered by the homeowner, some of those options may not be available. I'd suggest that you contact an attorney versed in property law (as it may be an encroachment of your property and damages may or may not be warranted).

At the very least it may be possible that the Association has to pay rent for using that property.

Allow me to reiterate what Glen posted:

"Tell the owner to do what he should have done when he discovered that they located it on his property in the first place ---- CONTACT AN ATTORNEY. He may or may not have lost part of his property rights do to his lackadaisical treatment of the problem so far. "
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
No easement has been established. This would have to be agreed upon by both parties, written and recorded at the registry of deeds..... or forced by the courts. None of this has happened, thus no easement exists.

The HOA likely has no choice but to relocate the unit to HOA property.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Dont bother with a lawyer, you will tie this up in court for years and loose. Just move the system its the cheapest thing to do. You will spend 100 times more on lawyers than just moving the box.

Bottom line, the HOA is trespassing.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I am not nor do I play a lawyer.

Most properties are riddled with easements (rights of way) for utility companies, municipalities, storm drains, etc. As a example in newer developments with underground utilities it is quite common for there to be an easement as far in as 6 feet from the curb/sidewalk. Quite often the first 4-10 feet of what someone consider their front lawn is a easement if there are underground utility lines like electric, phone, cable, gas, etc.

Typically one is not allowed to build on nor over an easement. The easement owner can request any structures be removed. The easement owner can remove any obstructions. Obstructions removed during say a repair/replacement do not have to be replaced.

I could be wrong, but I doubt some neighbor directed the utility company where to put something. The utility company probably put it where it wanted on their easement.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Greg,

This situation is the result of absolutely everybody acting stupidly twenty years ago and then compounding it with one stupid decision after another for two decades and counting.

The HOA has several choices, all of which are going to cost some money.

First, the HOA could likely seek title to the property where the electrical gear is under a claim of adverse possession. The owner was foolish to play attorney and decide that there was somehow a one-year statute of limitations. This now the 20th year that the equipment has been on his property. If the HOA wants formal title they will likely have to go to court but they will prevail.

Second, the HOA could alternatively seek to compel the owner to grant an easement instead of seeking title. Basically the same issues in the same court and the same costs.

Third, the HOA could remove all the stuff from the owner's yard and install it where it was supposed to go in the first place. Probably not as expensive as going to court and likely to cause less resentment between association and owners.

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
there you go Larry, being reasonable and accurate AGAIN

GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Thank you all for your responses! The difference is $11k but the property manager has a chip on his shoulder and thinks an easement has already been established and there is no need to go to court. Would the courts grant a prescriptive easement that would allow the prescriptive aspect (that it has been there for 20 years) be replaced with something totally new that requires a lot more space and a much bigger clearance requirement?
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Thank you all for your responses! The difference is $11k but the property manager has a chip on his shoulder and thinks an easement has already been established and there is no need to go to court. Would the courts grant a prescriptive easement that would allow the prescriptive aspect (that it has been there for 20 years) be replaced with something totally new that requires a lot more space and a much bigger clearance requirement?
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Thank you all for your responses! The difference is $11k but the property manager has a chip on his shoulder and thinks an easement has already been established and there is no need to go to court. Would the courts grant a prescriptive easement that would allow the prescriptive aspect (that it has been there for 20 years) be replaced with something totally new that requires a lot more space and a much bigger clearance requirement?
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
how much would court costs be to procure the easement or title?
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
how much would court costs be to procure the easement or title?
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GregB8 on 04/27/2014 4:13 PM
how much would court costs be to procure the easement or title?


Court costs could go on for years and your lawyer fees could easily reach $100,000. And if you loose, you may owe the other guys lawyer fees as well. So might be $200,000.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Would the courts grant a prescriptive easement that would allow the prescriptive aspect (that it has been there for 20 years) be replaced with something totally new that requires a lot more space and a much bigger clearance requirement?


Courts are very reluctant to take someone's property away and give it to another person. Be prepared for a long, long fight, many appeals, etc.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
The difference is $11k


If the cost is $11k, offer the homeowner $2k to settle and give you a legal, written easement and filed with the registry of deeds.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GregB8 on 04/27/2014 4:11 PM
Thank you all for your responses! The difference is $11k but the property manager has a chip on his shoulder and thinks an easement has already been established and there is no need to go to court. Would the courts grant a prescriptive easement that would allow the prescriptive aspect (that it has been there for 20 years) be replaced with something totally new that requires a lot more space and a much bigger clearance requirement?

In my previous response I did not understand that your association is trying to take even more of this owner's property. Your argument would be, "Your Honor, we screwed this guy over twenty years ago by taking some of his land for our own use even though we had property of our own. We hereby request the blessings of the court to screw him again by taking away more of his property even though we have our own property set aside just for this purpose." What do you think your chances will be?

Your property manager has misstated the matter. You do not have an easement nor do you have title. You only have grounds for seeking either an easement or title to what you already have taken. You have no entitlement to take even more. In the future, seek legal advice from your attorney.

My opinion is that the least expensive thing you can do is remove all the equipment from the owner's yard and install all the new equipment in the common area where it was supposed to be. Doing this will allow you to predict and control your expenses. As previously pointed out, court costs are unpredictable and there is little chance that you would prevail if you seek even more of this owner's property.

GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
unfortunately I am the subject that the HOA is putting into the meat grinder and it just got more complicated. They say that the property is zoned as condominiums and that we only own the lot that the house is on and therefore they do not need a title deed or easement. the whole dang thing was started by the contractor who built two of the houses made a drop for construction power but it was underground because they wouldn't allow overhead lines. The gate controller was added on while the original owner was overseas so they didn't need to add an additional power connection because well they wanted to do it "cheapo". But they didn't inform the original owner and he was pissed about it but chose not to fight it for a number of reasons that are not clear to me. the utility would have added the new drop for new gate service at no cost because that is their policy to get new customers online. Now the utility is saying that the connection never met code and needs to be completely rebuilt at a cost of $7k and to move it will cost $18k, which doesn't seem right if the utility would make the drop at no cost.

the complication is that the HOA says they don't need title or an easement cause the HOA owns all of the property and that the lot lines are meaningless but I dare not make improvements beyond the lot line. We are on a hillside with about 7 acres but our lot, if there is such a thing is only about 0.25 acres. This doesn't seem fair as all of the other houses have completely walled in their yards making it clear that this is their private property. One homeowner objects strongly to having to pay to upgrade our lot (his words not mine as I simply don't want to give up even more property) and is adamant that the HOA will make this upgrade on our lot regardless of the impact to our lot. It is a much bigger unit and requires a much larger footprint because the utility requires 3 feet of clearance around the entire unit making it an 9 foot easement in circumference. Our front lot is tiny and this takes up about 10% of our front yard.

Am I screwed or is there any hope that since all other homeowners have privatized their lots that I should have the same option and that an easement should be required? Can I stop the construction until a judge sorts this all out? They claim they don't need my approval but it sure feels like the lot is mine. I have to pay for its upkeep. Please help me decide if it is worth fighting for. I know I need an attorney. just don't want to throw good money after bad. the DH owner says if I protest his attorney will sue me and he will own my house. yeah right!
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GregB8 on 04/30/2014 10:30 PM

Am I screwed or is there any hope

As we have been saying. You need to get an attorney who will have full access to your governing documents and knowledge of applicable laws to find out that answer.

It is possible that the Association will back down or at least enter into negotiations with you if you prove that you are willing to fight if need be. That proof would be a letter from your attorney, perhaps even getting an injunction to stop the work until all of this can be sorted out.

Honestly, there are simply too many variables, and you just added another big one about being a condominium vs. fee simple home, for anyone on here without knowledge of those variables to provide any real answer. The question involves property rights, property boundaries, perhaps zoning, easements and contracts. Therefore, the best advice that we can give is go spend the money and consult with an attorney.
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Yes I suspected that was the case and am getting emotional about this so not thinking clearly. Was just hoping someone would say you may have a decent position or stop wasting your time and look for an easy retreat as you are in a bad position. But it is truly difficult to do the midnight quarterbacking without the relevant documents.

I just wanted to shout out and say thanks to all who replied. At the very least it helped me exercise some of these demons plaguing my pursuit of happiness and peace of mind.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Personally, I think the issue is going to hinge on platted easements and, since you tossed in the condo issue, actual ownership of the land.

GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I know I don't understand the platted easement issue. The ownership of land is intriguing since the other homeowners have walled in their lots. Probably means nothing though. Will try to find a cheaper solution through the utility company but worried that the HOA can start construction before I am able to legally stop them.
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I know I don't understand the platted easement issue. The ownership of land is intriguing since the other homeowners have walled in their lots. Probably means nothing though. Will try to find a cheaper solution through the utility company but worried that the HOA can start construction before I am able to legally stop them.
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I know I don't understand the platted easement issue. The ownership of land is intriguing since the other homeowners have walled in their lots. Probably means nothing though. Will try to find a cheaper solution through the utility company but worried that the HOA can start construction before I am able to legally stop them.
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I know I don't understand the platted easement issue. The ownership of land is intriguing since the other homeowners have walled in their lots. Probably means nothing though. Will try to find a cheaper solution through the utility company but worried that the HOA can start construction before I am able to legally stop them.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
A PLAT is simply the map of your development or street that shows actual or proposed features (lots, easements, sidewalks, streets, etc.). An easement is where someone other than the property owner has a right to use a specific portion of your property for a specific purpose. Common easements are utilities (power, water, phone, etc.), sidewalks, perhaps streets and storm water drainage).

To oversimplify it, if your Association did not have an easement for your property saying that they could instal the gate power box where they did, then they are trespassing and, as the owner, you can order them to remove it or remove it yourself. Another option would be to sell the land to the Association or, and I would consider this one, charge them rent in an amount equal to the annual assessment (as adjusted yearly).

Hope this helps,

Tim
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
As has been stated before, you need to hire an attorney to sort this mess out but until then, you might consider reading the CC&R's and your deed, it will show you exactly what you own.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
the complication is that the HOA says they don't need title or an easement cause the HOA owns all of the property and that the lot lines are meaningless


If you go to a lawyer, to sort this out, make sure to tell him its a condo before you start talking about easements, etc. Lay out everything, dont give info in small chunks like you did on this forum. The lawyer charges hourly and you will end up with a huge bill if you waste his time. If it is indeed condo property, the condo does not need to make an easement on its own property. It owns it.

Personally, I would consult with a lawyer before spending $$$ on this project.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
All

The confusing part is when Greg says other owners have walled in "their" lots. Something does not make sense about this.
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
single family homes that are on lots, in essence, but were zoned at the last minute prior to development as a condominium for the property. they function as individual lots but the entire 11 acres are zoned as a condominium. everyone treats their lot as their private property and have walled them in. each lot is about 0.25 to 0.3 acres so with 11 homes there is plenty of common property.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
How the property is zoned does not actually identify the property. Zoning just identifies what the property may be used for and there are some properties that are zoned for multiple purposes. For example: I've seen many properties that are zoned for both commercial and residential.

Gregg,

Go get an attorney.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
GregB,

Since your property is designated as Condominium, your Documents should contain words that describe exactly “what” is defined as Common Areas and Elements (owned by all the Owners in Common), LIMITED (exclusive use) Common Areas and Elements, and what defines the “Unit” – in your case the “house” and apparently some property surrounding the house.

Part of the answer you are looking for may be in those words (definitions, descriptions).

Would you be willing to post those words from your Condominium Documents?

If not fully described in writing in your Declaration of CC&Rs, then you may need to view the “Site Development Plan” drawing. It might be attached to one of your Documents, but if it is, it is probably too small to read. So you may need to go to “City Hall” or wherever your “Land Record Maps” are filed, to look at a full size copy.

Just a guess on my part, but it is possible that that Site Development Plan might show an approximate location for the Security Gate Controller, etc. Also it is possible that the Plan might show the location and types of walls and fences, etc. permitted, along with the Lot Lines and the Green Spaces.

Also if City Council Review and approval, or something along those lines, was required prior to each of the houses being built, that “Report” might be another place to look.

But first, since you posted that your development was Declared a Condominium, IMO best to start with that Document.

Also just based on your postings, I wonder if you are relying “too much” on your Property Manager. What position, if any, has your Board of Directors taken on resolving “what needs to happen”, assuming that they have “tackled” the problem?
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
The devil is in the details, which we don't have access to. Typically when stand alone homes are built with a condo designation, the homeowner only owns the footprint of their home and perhaps a small radius around the home. The backyard may be owned by the homeowner or may simply be an exclusive limited common element, which is why the HOA allowed them to be walled off. The poster's issue is with the box in his front yard which is evidently HOA property, nor do I believe the utility company simply installed it there because some random woman told them to.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Due to underground utilities my neighborhood has metal boxes about 36in tall and 36 x 36in wide in the front yard of about every 6th or so house. The boxes were in place after the streets were done and before any house was built. I admit they are ugly, but they are what they are.

RwT (Florida)
Posts: 154
Posted:
Similar here.

HOA infrastructure such as gate controls, irrigation, lake level control & aeration, etc., are on common areas. Utilities such as Power xformers (we have underground electric distribution), phone, street lights, and cable are located on utility easements within private property. We also have drainage and maintenance easements for access to storm drain feeds into the lakes and into the local water management (flood) authorities within PP as well.

* Non-Lawyer spokesperson.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/02/2014 4:18 AM
Due to underground utilities my neighborhood has metal boxes about 36in tall and 36 x 36in wide in the front yard of about every 6th or so house. The boxes were in place after the streets were done and before any house was built. I admit they are ugly, but they are what they are.


You could spend $5 on tall grass or a little more on bushes to hide the boxes. Much better than just sitting there and looking at them thinking they are ugly. Utility box hidden in here.

Google
GregB8 (California)
Posts: 14
Posted:
That's cool. We need to maintain an easement with 3 foot clearance around the unit, no vegetation. I have definitely calmed down and come to accept that there is noting I can do but thought you might like to know the rest of the story.

Turns out the box appeared was installed for temporary power to construct the home, no OH power in the area. the contractor likely added the gate controller to this box, instead of getting a second drop which the utility would have added at no cost. It looks like a temp facility and the construction is shoddy with poor materials. Now the utility company is saying that it does not meet code and needs to be replaced. The previous owner had explained that he always thought our neighbor was involved in the decision to add the gate controller to it but I am not sure she was.

Regardless, too many issues and I have conceded that the property is owned by the HOA and that I do not have a position here worth fighting for. Thanks again!

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GregB8 on 05/02/2014 11:34 AM

I have definitely calmed down and come to accept that there is noting I can do

Well, you could get an attorney and see if the Association had the authority to actually install the control box where they did (i.e. they have an easement or own the property) or if they are trespassing.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
....juuuust a thought

since you appear unsure re; who owns what land

get a survey done of your property

show the surveyor your deed ~ they are familiar with these issues

then YOUR property will be marked and you will have your own legal proof of boundary

maaaybe $175 ~ value of peace of mind?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here