💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AndreaM7 (New York)
Posts: 2
Posted:
We are a HOA in upstate New York and we are looking to find a new law firm as we are unhappy with our current firm. Are there any suggestions regarding important questions that should be asked when doing our interviews of potential new firms. We have determined what firms in our area specialize in HOA law and want to be prepared to find the best for our community.
Thanks.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Where are you located?
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Andrea,

Among other things, I would ask for a list of cases the firm (or lawyers working for the firm) have been involved in that resulted in published opinions from a court. The reason for this is they can b.s. you about how good they are but opinions issued by a court will be a good guide as to how effective they are.

The firm that previously represented my association was involved in four cases in recent years where the state court of appeals published an opinion. All four cases involved associations but not our association. In every case, our attorneys lost big time. In one case, the court chided them for not being able to articulate their case during oral arguments. In another case, the court criticized the attorneys for filing a frivolous lawsuit in the trial court and and a frivolous appeal. Most seriously, by far, was that the court sustained a finding by the trial court that the lawyers had perpetrated a fraud upon the court.

Needless to say, we dropped them.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisA13 on 02/19/2014 10:14 AM
I wouldn't think you are best to seek a law firm who claims knowledge in HOAs. Look into the Community Association Institute and you will see that this trade union is created for lawyers by lawyers to support other CAI members, such as engineers, insurance companies, management companies, etc. The lawyers connected with the CAI are experts in HOAs because they are a nationwide trade union that appears in court (without standing) on behalf of these corporations and lobby politicians (big time) to change laws that benefit their trade union. In short, the CAI doesn't welcome owners... only the boards who cut their checks.

The CAI has become the "voice" of legal authority for HOAs by self-dictate and lobbying. But again, they are self-serving and have NO STANDING (meaning no interest) in the HOAs except for ALL the money they can make off of them -- as debt collectors, etc.

Pick a good corporate attorney who knows corporate law and will ensure the corporation's interest are to be protected. Stay away from CAI-affiliated attorneys because... as I said... they have their own set of rules that they have created within their own "world" that benefits their own wallets and they are working nationwide to put them into effect to the detriment of the owners.

It's a curious thing that a trade union can speak on behalf of corporations and find ways to generate money for themselves when they have no "stake in the game." When I see CAI, all that comes to mind is trouble (whether it be a management company, insurance company, law firm, bank). Run like wind from anything connected to the CAI because their goal is taking care of themselves.

A good corporate lawyer is the way to go and one with a reputation for being ethical wouldn't hurt either.


Chris

Do you or have you ever belonged to CAI?

If not, please don't bad mouth the organization. There are a lot of good people that belong to the ORGANIZATION that have the BEST interest of the HOA's in mind, myself included. While I don't agree with everything, I joined to educate myself on overall management of an homeowner association really encompassed.
I think I am smart enough to take the positive things it has to offer, disregard others, but most importantly get involved to make changes.
DavidW5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 565
Posted:
Andrea,

Please take any advice from ChrisS with a grain of salt. He frequently posts rants about the CAI and attorneys.

One question to ask: Do you represent any associations that are still under developer control? If so, is our developer in control of one of those? That situation might compromise the attorney's objectivity in providing you with advice.

Another question: Will you provide a training session for all new board/committee members on their legal responsibilities? What will that cost the association?
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
With all due respect Chris, I think you’re a little biased because of the problems you’re having with your HOA, and while I don’t think CAI is the end-all or last word on HOAs, they do provide good resources for many people. Maybe I’m biased, but we have two law firms that are affiliated with our local chapter and for the most part, I’m very pleased with their work. Then again, except for the mind-blowing apathy among our homeowners, we’re fortunate in that our board has been pretty upfront with Association issues and they haven’t found it necessary to sue us.

That said, Andrea, if you don’t want to use someone who’s affiliated with CAI, there are other firms out there – and I do think you need someone who know something about how HOAs are supposed to be run. The main thing to remember is that the attorney works for the Association, not the other way around – you need to be clear about what you want, but also willing to listen to his/her advice and weigh the pros and cons before making a decision. That’s why anyone should do when hiring ANY attorney for any reason.

I would start with considering the biggest issues you have with your current firm and then ask potential firms about their policy. Without naming names, you could say, for example, you’ve had trouble getting timely updates on collection action and would like to know how often they provide those updates. Better yet, does the firm have a website where a designated board member could use a secured userID and password to get real time updates on their cases (this way, you wouldn’t have to talk to the lawyer directly and save money).

You should also get a schedule of fees or estimates on how much a case will cost. Depending on the issue, the board can then determine how far it wants to go and perhaps set a “drop dead” deadline where litigation might need to end if the expense outweighs the benefits. A good attorney should be willing to tell your chances at the onset – nothing’s guaranteed of course, but it’s better to be honest and save the Association money than throw away good money after bad.

I also think good attorneys educate their clients – ultimately that could help prevent unnecessary and expensive lawsuits in the first place. Our soon to be former attorney has sponsored annual dinners where the associates and partners provide board training or updates on laws affecting HOAs – it’s available for clients on retainer, so you can send one or all of your board members. Some firms offer a certain number of hours where the Board can call and get legal advice for free – if they do this, how many hours?

And make sure you know it has the necessary resources to do the work. One reason we’re moving towards dropping our attorney is because we haven’t been happy with his collection work. There are a number of things that have happened with the cases that he wasn’t responsible for, of course, and judges dance to their own beats regardless of what everyone else wants. However, we found that until recently, the firm didn’t have resources like Lexus, which has some databases that can be used for skip tracing. Again, not foolproof, but it’s better to have something to start with in-house rather than say “I can’t find him/her” and leave it at that. If you’re going to do collections work, you need the proper resources.

In the end, results are what you’re interested in, so be sure to ask for references and check them. The references probably won’t be able to disclose details on individual cases, but that isn’t necessary – listen out for problems in getting timely information, up to date fee schedule, itemized bills so you can better track expenses, etc.

Oh, yeah, before you dump the current firm, try having a heart to heart with them explaining what your concerns are and see what they’re willing to do to keep you as a client. Set a deadline to see if things don’t improve and if they don’t proceed with your selection process – and make sure you get all the files to turn over to the new attorney. Good luck!


If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Chris

You have to be a very frustrated person. Wish you all the best!
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Andrea, do avoid advice from ChrisA.

I agree that an attorney who specializes in HOA law is best as they need to be up to date on the HOA laws in your state as well as your state's corporations codes. They need to be experienced in interpreting CC&Rs (covenants; declaration).

David makes a very nice point about avoiding a firm that represents HOAs with the same developer as yours, especially if your HOA is still within the statutes of limitations re: construction defects.

We hired a new firm last summer and without asking, they each included a list of their local HOA clients in their packages.

You want to know their retainer fee per month or year and what they charge per hour or fraction of an hour for the services of paralegals, senior partners, etc. They might also include

Our former firm and the three we interviewed do not charge for phone calls from a designated director, usually the president, in a conference call that includes out PM. They do charge for other types of communication including emails.

Larry's suggestion about reviewing their court case verdicts might make sense but our 13-year old HOA has never been involved in any lawsuit except for a construction defect lawsuit for which we hired a specialist firm in that field.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisA13 on 02/19/2014 11:09 AM
Posted By SheliaH on 02/19/2014 10:55 AM
With all due respect Chris, I think you’re a little biased because of the problems you’re having with your HOA, and while I don’t think CAI is the end-all or last word on HOAs, they do provide good resources for many people.


Like I said, those who wish to praise them can feel free. Looking into them as what they are, I have serious issues as to how they have become so powerful in the arena of associations when -- to say it again -- they are a trade union with no standing in the associations. It's not a matter of issues at my HOA, it's a matter of how embedded they are with their lobbying effort to change laws. If my neighbor decided to protest about what I was doing with my financial investments (for example, stocks) and then sought to "train" me on how to invest properly (in stocks they liked), I would think -- What's in it for them how I spend my money?

And that's the case with the CAI. Why are they so eager to be the "voice" for associations and provide "education" when they aren't invested? Because they are invested in that they will generate money for those in their trade union.

It's not a coincidence that these companies join the CAI. Being a member of it has its perks -- including a pathway to lucrative contracts within these associations.

You may like how they are "assisting" you -- but always ask, what's in it for them? As I've said, they are not the advocates for the association. They are advocates for themselves. It's not a matter of my bias, it's a matter of fact. They do not have any "stake in the game" when it comes to COAs/HOAs other than as those who GET MONEY from COAs/HOAs.

They are teaching you how to invest in their metaphoric stocks...and for self-serving purposes.

You have not idea what you are talking about!!
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisA13 on 02/19/2014 11:30 AM
Posted By RichardP13 on 02/19/2014 11:23 AM

You have not idea what you are talking about!!


"AI: Who we are:

An international organization dedicated to building better communities, CAI provides education and resources to community association homeowner leaders, professional managers, association management companies and other businesses and professionals who provide products and services to community associations."

NOTE:...who provide products and services to community associations.

Products and services. Products and services. = They are lobbying for their own businesses to generate money within these communities.

CAN YOU READ, RICHARD?

"Advocating on behalf of community associations and CAI members before the U.S. Congress, federal regulatory agencies, state legislatures and the courts."

ADVOCATING ON BEHALF OF CAI MEMBERS (because they cannot speak for community associations since they have no legal standing to do so).

CAN YOU READ, RICHARD?

If you chose to read, you'd also see that they have a legislative action committee and powerful lobbyist who go to Washington to fight for THE CAI'S PUBLIC POLICY. Again, if you'd like to show me how these actions benefit me and not them, please... let me know.

Yet if you choose to be blind, choose to be blind. I can't help you.

Do not EVER insult me. Fix you mess before you try and lecture others on subjects you have no knowledge. Cut and paste from some website doesn't work for me.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
To get back to the OP's problem and not concentrating on our own... My recommendation for a lawyer is NOT to have one but for specific purposes. It will save your HOA money by NOT having a full time lawyer on retainer IMO. If you do have a full time lawyer, then limit who communicates to them. My recommendation is to ONLY have the President or an assigned person on the board the members feel comfortable with communicating to the lawyer. That doesn't mean that person can go to the lawyer willy-nilly. They MUST have permissions from the board and acknowledgement to do so. The HOA lawyer is the HOA lawyer NOT the individual member's lawyer. They represent the WHOLE.

Not all lawyer are created equal. You may have to shop around a bit. Lawyers will do what you want them to do. They don't always tell you of the other options you can take. It's not that they are lying to you or misrepresenting. They feel they do what the client requests is what they are obligated to do. Giving the client advice is just another excuse/reason to charge additional "consultation" money. So make sure if you do hire a lawyer what they consider "consultation" charges and actually filing court documents/appearing in court. They do charge for phone calls, emails, and conversations. That's why I will never leave a message at a lawyer's office. I will wait till they are in the office to talk to. Otherwise, they may consider that "consultation". They will put you on the clock when they return the message. (FYI).

Make sure to understand what type of lawyer you really need. Each situation is different so you may want to use different types of lawyers or legal services. A HOA lawyer is one that specializes in HOA laws. However, they are the most expensive because they specialize. Your going to pay for it if you have one of them. Your HOA does NOT need a "Real estate" type attorney. Your HOA doesn't exactly own "real estate". So a HOA does not need one in real estate. A HOA is a CORPORATION. It could use a lawyer that specializes in corporate law or business. Most of the issues are contractual in nature.

All in all, my recommendation is to really use the type of lawyer you need to handle each area. You may need a tax lawyer for tax issues. You may use a legal service for filing liens. You may need a general attorney to handle foreclosures or for general representation. It can be required that a lawyer represent the HOA in court. That's not always the case, as a BOD member can be chosen to do it. However, who would allow someone who doesn't practice law to represent them in court?

I don't advocate the HOA ever take an owner to court in the first place. A lien or foreclosure is the only real exception if that is required. Liens don't always need a lawyer to file. It is cheaper and a better option for a HOA to COUNTER-SUE than to bring a suit against a member. Let the member sue the HOA. 95% of the time someone threatens to sue their HOA, it's a bunch of hot air. My response has always been "See you in court! I will wait on the paperwork". No need to run to a lawyer on a threat. Ran a HOA for 3 years and not one lawsuit and threatened to be sued about monthly.

Remember this: Suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors. If anyone threatens to sue, then understand that is the consequences of their actions. Let them know that too. It goes the same for HOA's suing their members. They are using the HOA's funds to do it. A HOA is ONLY funded by it's members for it's members. Where else do you think the money is going to come from? Just READ your documents to find out the best way to handle things IN-HOUSE before running off to court or a lawyer for advice. The answers are there in your documents if you just take the time to read them.

Former HOA President
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
We have a legal firm we can go to. They serve as our registered agent for under $200. We can then utilize other services they provide (billed when used) as needed or go to a different attorney. The choice is ours. If we have no legal issues. The only cost is the registered agent fee.

This allows the Association to have quick access to an attorney if needed. However, it also allows the Association to take the time (when time permits) to choose the best attorney we need.

The firm we use is large enough that they have specialties in HOA/COA, contract and corporate law.

Perhaps your Association can enter into a similar arrangement with a firm in your area.

I do like Larry's suggestion as a way to check out the firm.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
I should have added that our firm charges $500 a year. As with Tim's, our current and previous firms were large enough to handle just about anything we'd need. They even have an ADA specialist, who did help when we had an ADA issue not long ago.

Yet, neither it nor our past firm are so big that our HOA would get "lost." We, in fact, did not hire a very reputable firm because it felt too big for us.

Perhaps Melissa's HOA's attorney charged for phone calls, but, as stated above, ours do not, the other two competing firms do not and our previous firm did not. In all of their contracts, they required their HOA clients to appoint a Board liaison to the firm as did our previous firm.

I have no idea if attorneys who specialize in HOA laws, governing documents and review the contracts that we enter charge more than other kinds of firms. I don't think Melissa's point here is necessarily valid. In CA, and because our high rise HOA has lots of contracts, we believe an HOA attorney is the best choice for us.

A less complex HOA might require fewer attorney services.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Seems the OP has gone on vacation. Nothing since her first post.

As for CAI as I have said it would be impossible for any rational human being to discount any lawyer associated with them.

I do NOT belong as a member but do attend their trade shows and seminars.
So to suggest each and every service provider associated with them is evil would be nonsense.

I would search for someone with HOA knowledge. I would also ask for references including other HOAs. And perhaps contact other properties in your area to search out some names.

And finally regarding Chris from Jersey. As most of you know by now I have little regard for her. As a mater of fact I dislike and do not respect those who would come to this site, blame everyone under the sun only to find out in the end it is CHRIS from Jersey that is the problem.

Chris has commented all HOAs are cancer. CAI is also cancer. In this thread she once again claims anyone associated with CAI in her view should be disregarded.

Then come to find out CHRIS had filed 4 lawsuits against her own HOA.
Legal costs for two of them exceeding $100,000.
One suit argued CHRIS had the right to prevent the HOA from granting an easement on the HOA property. Chris lost that case.
She then appealed and lost.
Chris also sued the judge who in one of her cases ruled against her. She lost again.

But Chris now lectures about the problems as she sees them in reagrds to HOAs.

And most telling for me is the fact when all of this information came to light CHRIS refuses to discuss or speak of any of it.

She demands transparency from her own HOA but hides from her own history.
You see it is not that Chris knows where the problems lie the truth is CHRIS herself is the problem.

She labels people who see things differenly as cowards and in her next breath claims she herself has "COURAGE". Just not enough courage to speak truthfully and own her own history.

So myself I have no use for CHRIS or frauds like her.

You bad mouth Board members but don't serve.
You bad mouth CAI when you have limited understanding or first hand knowledge of the organization except through your own blind eyes.
You make claims about all HOAs based on the ONE SINGLE HOA you live in.
You make claims you are fighting the good fight for others when in fact this is all about YOU.

So in the end everyone can make up their own minds in regards to CHRIS from Jersey I have made up mine.

It does not take courage to file a complaint in small claims court.
It does no take courage to sue a sitting judge simply to prove a point which accomplished nothing.
It does not take courage to speak ill of people nationwide whom you don't know and never will in the hopes tha might give you some clout. It does not.
It does not take courage to hide from your own actions while preaching where the fault in others lies.

Every property has at least one. This property in Jersey has Chris....

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 02/19/2014 7:08 PM
Seems the OP has gone on vacation. Nothing since her first post.

Jon,

It's only been a day or two since the thread started.

Honestly, the way the thread digressed, I can understand if the OP didn't leave any reply if she did check the threads' status.

AndreaM7 (New York)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Thank you all for your responses. Some of the points that were mentioned will be helpful, but the posts got a little to complicated for me.
Our HOA currently pays a monthly retainer fee and one of our issues is that it seems that every issue that arises is not covered by the fee and is then charged by the hourly rate. Fortunately our homeowners are satisfied with the job the Board is doing (I am the President)and we have not been sued by any homeowners. My question was more of a general one, the current Board inherited this law firm from our predecessors and we just want to assemble a list of questions for a RFP that will be sent to 3 local law firms that we know do HOA work. We have a good idea of what we want and I want make sure we didn't miss anything.
Andrea
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AndreaM7 on 02/20/2014 7:32 AM
Thank you all for your responses. Some of the points that were mentioned will be helpful, but the posts got a little to complicated for me.
Our HOA currently pays a monthly retainer fee and one of our issues is that it seems that every issue that arises is not covered by the fee and is then charged by the hourly rate. Fortunately our homeowners are satisfied with the job the Board is doing (I am the President)and we have not been sued by any homeowners. My question was more of a general one, the current Board inherited this law firm from our predecessors and we just want to assemble a list of questions for a RFP that will be sent to 3 local law firms that we know do HOA work. We have a good idea of what we want and I want make sure we didn't miss anything.
Andrea

I would ask for names or contacts at other HOAs which they serve.

I would ask for a copy of their billing schedule.

I would ask what areas of law they practice and what percentage is HOA.

I would ask if one specific lawyer would be assigned to your property.

I would ask for some details on how they would handle matters similar to those your property most often faces. Procedures, costs, billing rates.

Good luck....

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Honestly, like I stated before. I don't think a HOA should have a lawyer on retainer. It's a waste of money. You need to identify exactly what your using that lawyer for and define it. If you keep one around for knee-jerk reactions to everyone who threatens to sue, then you are really wasting ALOT of your HOA money/assets. It's not worth the long term costs.

If the HOA READS and obeys it's documentation, then there is no need for a lawyer. If you need help in translating your documents, then start doing some kind of "workshop" taking a section at a time. Work out your questions and then submit them to a lawyer if you feel the need. The HOA documents really do define how to handle HOA issues. If you stick to them and ALWAYS reference them when making decisions, then anyone that threatens or tries to sue won't have much of a case. Getting in that practice of always bringing the rules to each meeting and whenever writing notices refer directly to them will help ease the need for legal council. Your HOA does have that power of writing notices without a lawyer doing it.

You can't rule out that your insurance plays a BIG part in any lawsuit. The HOA needs to review it's policy on that. Most lawsuits would end up as claims on the insurance. That is if you have insurance. Which every HOA should have. The insurance company does cap the payout it will pay in cases of lawsuits. You need to find out what that cap is so you can see if that outweighs the cost of constant legal bills or other factors.

I use my lawyers as "tools". I know that I need a lawyer for 3 things: Lien filing, foreclosure filing, and representing us in court if need be. They also may assist in re-writing and filing HOA document changes. Otherwise, if you have a MC they may agree to write violation notices. We always wrote the violation notices ourselves. The HOA needs to make sure it has a fining schedule in place if you do use fines and a punitive measure.

Just define what your using the lawyer for. That should help you decide if you need to keep one on retainer or use a different source. Most items can be resolved using the HOA documents as reference and not always consulting a third party resource IMO.

Former HOA President
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Based on your reply, Andrea, it seems you want to learn what services are included in the retainer.

As noted, our $500 annual retainer includes phone conversations. But it also includes one training session for the Board, and whatever we'd like them to do at the annual meeting. Previous attorneys here, for instance, have discussed new legislation at the annual meeting. A different firm that we had made sure that we were conducting our election per our state civil code, specifically Davis-Stirling, when it was modified in '06.

Would you want them to also be your collections attorneys, Andrea?

When we have needed our general counsel's advice, it almost always involves our attorney's interpretation of certain parts of our governing docs with respects to changes in our numerous state laws concerning HOAs & concerning corporations. And as mentioned above we did need an ADA opinion concerning our parking spaces.

As previously mentioned, we have never been involved in a lawsuit in our HOA's 13 years. The exception was our lawsuit against our developer for construction defects for which we hired a firm specializing in that field. I'm not sure why Melissa constantly brings "lawsuits" into so many of her posts.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Gee whiz why would I bring lawsuits in my posts? That's because that is what most HOA's hire lawyers for. Either to sue or to defend themselves against a possible lawsuit. Why else do you consult an attorney even for your document changes? To make sure someone doesn't decide to bring a lawsuit.

I don't condone HOA's ever suing any member. I also am not against a member suing their HOA. However, I see so many HOA's over spend money on knee-jerk reactions on B.S. lawsuit threats or potential. Something a well run educated using the rules HOA would not have a need for except for liens/foreclosures and rule rewriting/filing. I've never found the need as President of the HOA to ever consult an attorney on lawsuits potentials or prevention.

Funny this coming for a person who demands law references from people who are NOT lawyers nor do they represent themselves as such...

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
My typical reply when threatened with a law suit is bring it on. Will meet in court. 99.99% go away.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
That is my reply JohnC every time. I do not jump up into action or run to a lawyer... Always let them know that suing the HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors... So sue if you want to...I will wait for the paperwork to arrive....

Former HOA President
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
But, Melissa & John46, Andrea is not interested in lawsuits--she wrote that her HOA has had none.in her most recent post My HOA hasn't either. One service that our attorneys do is review contracts of which we have about 20. Less complex HOAs have fewer, of course.

Andrea wants to know what questions her Board should ask in their RFPs to three firms. I tired to reply to that as did a few others. Some, however, got off into whether or not her HOA really needs an attorney. She did not ask that question.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here