💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MichaelO4 (Montana)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Our Declarations require that all Unit Owners purchase and maintain casualty insurance on their units,
AND that they provide proof of insurance to the Board annually. Some owners see this as an invasion of
privacy, even though they agreed to abide by the Declarations upon purchase. Just wondering if any other
HOAs have this provision to provide proof of insurance to the Board.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Michael,

I do not know how common this is but I suspect that almost all condo declarations have similar provisions.

A person who purchases in a condo or HOA gives up a certain amount of privacy and certainly has no expectation of it when the declaration explicitly requires compliance. Tell them to grow up or move out!

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I think that is a bit much to provide the HOA annually. It makes more sense for when they move in if the HOA is going to make such a provision. The HOA usually has to provide the owner's this information at their closing about the HOA's insurance.

It's a good idea for this but not practical IMO. This is something I would want updated and changed. Not they do not need the insurance, but providing proof constantly. Look into the ramification if something did happen like a tornado, earthquake, or fire. That should provide you the answer the HOA really needs in regards to this requirement.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
We are an HOA with 113 private, standalone homes. Our Covenants say the HOA must be named as co-payee. That rankles some and we have been questioned on it more then once.

Our lawyers say this is to prevent someone from having damage, taking an insurance settlement and not having the work done to restore the place. They also said there are cases where people took a settlement and abandoned the property.

KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 01/03/2014 12:33 PM
We are an HOA with 113 private, standalone homes. Our Covenants say the HOA must be named as co-payee. That rankles some and we have been questioned on it more then once.

Our lawyers say this is to prevent someone from having damage, taking an insurance settlement and not having the work done to restore the place. They also said there are cases where people took a settlement and abandoned the property.


The "Live Free or Die/Don't Tread on Me" argument falls with a THUD when resident Libertarians buy properties that require socialized funding of building maintenance (and want the HOA to maintain their property) The lawyers are looking out for the community by requiring insurance and requirement to prove coverage is in place. As a resident, there would be no problem in proving insurance coverage unless I was trying to sneak around uninsured in hopes the Condo master policy would fund my interior fire.

I've not even considered your theoretical situation, John, on residents getting burned out yet cashin' in and moving on.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here