💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JeanW2 (California)
Posts: 8
Posted:
I live in a 55+ condo complex in Northern California with 36 units built and occupied and another 84 units slated for completion within a year. I'm looking for sample rules concerning dogs.

Five occupants (all renters) have dogs. We are a very small, closely built complex; all buildings having a tiny back patio with railing looking out onto a common area. Dog walking is ruining the lawns throughout the complex - burn circles everywhere. Dog feces are being picked-up by some but not by all, in a timely manner - meaning as soon as it happens. Of course, ALL dog owners ALWAYS clean-up after their dogs. And, of course, the residents, depending upon with who they are friends, say one owner does while the other does not and vice versa. We have no dog park and no where to put one. The CC&R's allow two dogs per unit (our County allows three per household).

With these many problems with only 36 units, I can imagine what we will face with 120 units.

So, does anyone have examples of language that can be incorporated into the CC&R's that allows one dog per unit with a size limitation (15 pounds or less) so that the owner must carry, rather than walk, the dog near our lawn areas? I would like to disallow dogs altogether, but I doubt that is legal, especially considering the 55+ age.

I like dogs, I really do. Their barking is annoying, but understandable most of the time. I bought my unit because of its close proximity to the lawn areas outside my back patio and it is driving me crazy to see the grass killed.

hoatalk (California)
Posts: 603
Posted:
First, search this forum for the word: dogs

Use the Search box on the upper right side of the forum. You will find lots of discussion, since pets are one of the hottest topics here.

HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page)
HaroldS1 (Arizona)
Posts: 314
Posted:
Jean - is the builder still in control of your development, since there are 84 more to build? If so, only he can change the CC&Rs and how would that be retroactive to those who have already bought? If not, then your documents should tell you what percentage of your owners can make the change you're proposing. Would this change made by your 36 units also affect the 84 yet to build, or will they be a separate HOA?
Do read all the previous posts on "dogs" or "pets" and be prepared for some stomach churning if you get into changing these rules. Harold
BradD2 (Florida)
Posts: 418
Posted:
Another thought is to check your county/city ordinances. I would also check with Animal Services and see if there is something they can do. A governmental agency is better equiped to handle this than an HOA.
JM2 (Oregon)
Posts: 439
Posted:
Hi Jean:

Unfortunately, dog waste is a hard topic to enforce.

I talked several years ago with one of my landscapers...he said that during the hot/dry season (here in Oregon) the most effective way to deal with dog urine is to ask the owner to take along a gallon jug of water when they walk the dog; after the dog pees, pour the jug of water onto the pee spot, to dilute the acid in the urine. Even if some of the owners do this, it will help to reduce the problem. Ask owners to re-train their dog to pee on the curb (my brother's dog has been trained to do this...) and once one dog leaves a "calling card" there, it's amazing how other dogs will gravitate to the same spot.

One thing you might want to request is that your developer put up a dispenser for plastic dog waste collectors (our HOA uses "Mutt Mitts," a very good product). Make it more convenient for the dog owners to take care of the problem.

If you have a newsletter, a friendly reminder that the "right" of dog ownership comes with the "responsibilities" of dog ownership might be in order. Ultimately, if their irresponsible actions cause addtional landscaping costs, the additional cost is borne by all.

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA
JeanW2 (California)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Thanks for the insightful responses. Our complex is out of the oridinary in that the first Phase (3 bldgs, 36 units) ceased to be developer owned in 2005 when the last unit sold. The developer of Phase I then sold the second parcel, know to us as Phase II, early 2006. It is still under construction by the new developer. The original 36 owners have been told, although we have learned the hard way not to believe anything a developer tells you, that once completed, the second phase and the first phase will both be part of the same HOA.

None of that is particularly germaine to this thread about dogs, but just wanted to throw it out there.

To amend the CC&R's requires a majorty vote (19 votes in this case). My sense is we should act now, before it requires even more votes to get much needed amendments passed, dogs included.

I think the safest, fairest amendment to propose is a weight limitation on dogs (15 pounds or less) so that dog owners are required to carry their dogs to somewhere to relieve themselves. I have read of this restrriction by other HOA's, mostly of the type found in densely populated urban areas where the buildings have lobbies, elevators, etc. and they don't want dogs walking in those areas for all the obvious reasons.

I would also think that a weight limitation on dogs would point to the fact that owners can then purchase for themselves a number of popular indoor dog "lavatory devices," faux lawn "boxes" etc. that they maintain in the same manner that I maintain my cat's litter box.

Our greatest obstacle is that there isn't anywhere to put a "dog area" here now or in the future. Every square inch of this development is spoken for. The only viable place now for dogs to relieve themselves without ruining the lawns would be in the flower beds that line the outer edge of the carports. No flowers, just ivy and tan bark. Not sure if that is a good recommendation, though.

When I first came across this wonderful website, I did a search of dogs, etc. looking for some wisdom. The number of posts was staggering.

Thanks again.

MarloM (Texas)
Posts: 17
Posted:
Jean,

I am not in a condo unit, I live in a subdivision but I have dogs and have done dog rescue for many years so I think I have some good suggestions. I have a service pick up feces in my yard every two weeks, this costs 12$ per visit. I would think that you could pay someone and require only dog owners to pay this additional fee split between them. Also, there are dog foods out there that will cause urine to burn the lawn and those that don't, I would do a bit of research and make some recommendations to the dog owners, I am sure they like having nice grounds as well, either that or perhaps include a sod maintenance fee along with the cleanup fee which will allow for you to repair these areas in a timely fashion. I am sure that if they are all faced with these additional fees people will do more to care for the grounds. The only roadblock I see is if they are renters the lessor would have to raise the rent to cover these fees which may be contractually difficult if they cannot be changed for a certain window of time. But on the up side, if you do not want lessor's to rent to dog owners this may deter them. Good luck!
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JeanW2 on 04/04/2007 10:36 AM
...............

I think the safest, fairest amendment to propose is a weight limitation on dogs (15 pounds or less) so that dog owners are required to carry their dogs to somewhere to relieve themselves. I have read of this restrriction by other HOA's, mostly of the type found in densely populated urban areas where the buildings have lobbies, elevators, etc. and they don't want dogs walking in those areas for all the obvious reasons.

.........

I do not think that is the "fairest ammendment".

I have heard of many associations implementing a weight restriction on pets. How can this possibly be enforced? Estimate the weight? Get a court order to weigh a dog? What do you do when an elderly person's dog gains a few pounds and now weighs 16 pounds when there's a 15 pound weight limit? Require them to have the dog put down (killed)? Sell their home of many years and relocate? For many, the dog (or cat) is a member of the family, possibly the greatest joy in their life.

Requiring picking up after the dog is reasonable (and the law in many jurisdictions). Prohibiting dogs is reasonable as long as this restriction is in place before anyone purchases property or existing pets are "grandfathered".

Ron
SC
JeanW2 (California)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Dear Ron,

Please be assured that I would never advocate that anyone have their pet put down because of weight gain nor sell their home of many years and relocate. As far as enforcing the weight restriction, okay, lose that and just require that all dog owners carry rather than walk their dogs in common areas. If you can carry a 50lb dog, so be it. If you can't, hire someone who can. If you say you can't afford a "dog walker," then take a close look at what is really important to you and make your choice(s) I have. I live on a fixed income and don't have cable TV (which means no TV) because of it.

I'm afraid that I strongly disagree with the idea of "grandfathering" anything other than condo ownership/tenant rent or lease agreements (until after the agreement has expired or the tenant has moved out). Times change and people have to realize they have to change, too. It is never easy, but it is unavoidable.

In our case, the CC&R's put in place by the original developer were "boilerplate;" meaning, one size fits all. Case in point is that they refer to what may transpire in garages - and we have no garages, only carports.

So, our CC&R's don't begin to address the realities of the ramifications of having numerous dogs living in a high-density condo complex where there is no dog area (and absolutely no where to put one)and the dogs living here needing a place to relieve themselves. Poop can be picked-up; urine burns in the lawn areas throughout are a another matter.

I started this forum because I am seeking some wisdom (and because I told our Board President I would research it) on how to proceed. Currently, we are 3 buildings, 2 stories, 12 units each. On the horizon (the immediate horizon) is the sale of 7 more two-story buildings with an additional 84 units. All within close proximity of each other, all to be surrounded by a significant amount of lawn. If I were Queen, I would say lose the lawns and put in tanbark and groundcovers and shrubs -alas, the new developer of the new phases does not care to grant me an audience in this subject.

Try to get dog owners to carry a watering can when walking their female dogs? Try to have a conversation with them about trying a different diet or supplement to mitigate their urine burns? I'd have better luck convincing Al Gore that global warming isn't happening. And these are the dog owners that are my "friends" here!

I love dogs. I would love to HAVE a dog, but I can't. We have a two pet rule. I have a 15 year-old-cat who is most likely going to out live ME. I rescued a kitten abandoned here two years ago when a neighbor had her in her car on the way to a kill shelter. You would not believe what I have been through with her as she grew up. I had a cardboard and duct barricade constructed in my kitchen for over a year so that she couldn't jump from on top of my kitchen cupboards to behind my stacked washer/dryer combo. And, that's just for starters.

Funny thing was, as the crazy kitten grew into adulthood, the more the older cat came out of her shell and became friskier, more social, healthy and happy. So, in short, I love my two cats as much as I do my two grown daughters (perhaps more since they have no "issues?" :-) )and I truly hold the pet/guardian connection sacred.

I think if more dog owners would treat common areas the way in which they would expect others to treat their private space (i.e., their homes), we wouldn't need to be having this discussion.

Sorry for the length of this post. Our Board meeting is this Friday night at 7pm and I am kind of dreading it. The good news is that I HAVE received much wisdom from the members here about this topic - and for that I sincerely thank you all.

Jean

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Jean:
I could repeat the same words many here would tell you...it is not your grass...but that wouldn't make you feel any better.
As for verbiage for the CC&Rs, you could propose something like:
While pets are outside: 1) a clean-up bag must be carried & used for pet feces; 2) your pet must be controlled with a leash at all times.

As for the renters' pets, it is the owner who is responsible to see that the renters follow the 'rules'. If not, the owner must be fined.
As far as the 2 suggestions above, both can be observed by another, and a photo is always good for proof of violation.
This is an ongoing problem with residents in condos, HOAs, and you will never have the problem disappear, but maybe it will get better as time goes on. Hope so.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
JEAN...Perhaps the developer/landscaper/Board could get together to designate 1-portion of the flower bed area that line the carports for each of the 3-buildings where the dogs could be 'taken while on their leash to urinate'. Perhaps an area with the grass/dirt dug out and replaced with a bed of stones.
Just something to think on...
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JeanW2 on 04/10/2007 6:59 PM
Dear Ron,

Please be assured that I would never advocate that anyone have their pet put down because of weight gain nor sell their home of many years and relocate. As far as enforcing the weight restriction, okay, lose that and just require that all dog owners carry rather than walk their dogs in common areas. If you can carry a 50lb dog, so be it. If you can't, hire someone who can. If you say you can't afford a "dog walker," then take a close look at what is really important to you and make your choice(s) I have. I live on a fixed income and don't have cable TV (which means no TV) because of it.

I'm afraid that I strongly disagree with the idea of "grandfathering" anything other than condo ownership/tenant rent or lease agreements (until after the agreement has expired or the tenant has moved out). Times change and people have to realize they have to change, too. It is never easy, but it is unavoidable.

............

I believe making significant changes to the covenants (or rules if you will) can be unfair to existing owners or residents. Picture the eighty year old widow who is now told she must cary her dog (her only companion) whenever it is outside. As for what is important to her, the dog may well be the most important thing in her life at this point.

By "grandfathering" I mean that current residents can keep the pets they owned when the change was made for the rest of their natural lives.

Others have suggested possible solutions to the dog waste problem. I'm sure there is a solution somewhere if everyone keeps an open mind.

Ron
SC
JeanW2 (California)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Paul - I think your suggestion of using the beds lining the carport area a good one. Hadn't thought of stones, so that is a very good idea which I shall propose at the Board meeting on Friday.

Ron - Your comments made me realize that I could offer to "walk" another's dog for them that may not be able to do so themselves. Actually, I already do so for my immediate (retired) neighbor who attends classes at the local junior college a couple of nights a week. Being a "cat person" it's kinda fun getting out and stretching my legs at the end of a leash.

Maybe putting yourself (myself) in another's "paws" broadens one's perspecive.

Thanks. I'll report back on the outcome Friday night. Wish me luck.

Thanks again,
Jean

JeanW2 (California)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Sorry, forgot to ask this:

Paul: It's not my lawn? How is it not my lawn? I paid for it and I pay to maintain it every month when I write a check to my HOA.

Not trying to be difficult, but I beg to strongly disagree. Please enlighten me otherwise.

Respectfully,
Jean

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Jean, check your docs. Do they state that you 'own' the land to the rear and around your unit? Or, does it specify the ground as 'common area', meaning the area is common to all residents. Yes, you do pay to maintain it every month with your checks, unfortunately, that is the 'price we pay' when we live in a condo or HOA. You chose a site with a lovely rear lawn area, and perhaps your condo price reflected it; however, common area is not yours as in owning it. Sad but true.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here