Quote:
Posted By SavonB on 03/30/2007 11:45 PM
We live in a gated community in Texas. There is a house(owned by a financial institution) that has been sitting empty for three years. There were no "No Trespassing" signs on the property. Recently a family has quietly taken up residence (squatters). They have been paying the HOA dues and have made several improvements to the property.
Do we have a right to interfer or is that between them and the financial institution? Is this considered adverse possession? They don't appear to be hiding.
SavonB - Adverse possession is another means of involuntary transfer. An owner may lose title to another person who has some claim to the land, takes possession and uses the land. In some states a person may acquire title by adverse possession through the continuous, open, notorious, hostile, and exclusive occupation of another preson's property for 20 years. After that time the user may perfect the claim of title to land through adverse possession by bringing a court suit to quiet title. To prevent adverse possession every person having a right or title to real estate must inspect the property at least once within a 20-year period and take action against any adverse claim. Action could be an acknowledgement (physical confrontation) of the real owner with the squatter, usually with a sherriff present. This will break the 20 year chain of exclusive occupation.
The squatters are on the road to adverse possession because they are doing it openly, paying dues, etc. They are trespassing on the property and I cannot see how that is beneficial to the association. The financial institution (owner) should be notified by the HOA Board through the Property Manager and or attorney. The last thing the HOA Board needs is for someone to turnaround and ask why nothing was said, that's not acting in good faith. The Board has no jurisdiction to evict, that's up to the financial institution and authorities. The dues should be paid by the financial institution, not the squatters.