💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RichardL7 (Colorado)
Posts: 105
Posted:
Request assistance from our Internet friends. Subject is the Official classification by Colorado Law on Commercial Vehicles, Class 1 - 2 - 3 16,000 lbs and lighter, Vans in particular and What will constitute a van as commercial. I’m at a loss. Info needed for HOA parking and to better understanding of the word commercial for the HOA. Residents. All we have in our laws is no Commercial vehicles 3/4 ton and larger or Vans. See picture.
Thanks You.
Richard.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichardL7 on 11/17/2013 9:43 AM

All we have in our laws is no Commercial vehicles 3/4 ton and larger or Vans.

I expect that when you used the word "laws" in this sentence that you were actually referring to CC&Rs or Association Rules/Regs.

An Association can typically define what is considered a "commercial vehicle" for it's Association. This authority, of course, would be determined by the governing documents. therefore, check to see exactly what all of your governing documents specify about commercial vehicles or parking restrictions.

Our Association has the following language:

In the CC&Rs:

No trucks (pick-up trucks, vans and blazer-type trucks free from a commercial license plate are excepted), trailers of any kind, boats, buses, commercial vehicles of any kind, abandoned or junk vehicles, or any vehicle which does not have a current license placed displayed thereon, or vehicle used for storage of unsightly or hazardous materials such as construction debris, oil drums, motor fuel, wheelbarrows, etc. shall be permitted to be kept parked overnight on the individual Lots, parking areas, or within the subdivision Common Areas or streets except in areas that may be designated by the Association for such parking. Vehicles which could be classified as campers (i.e., containing sleeping and/or eating facilities) cannot exceed 19 feet by 6 feet 6 inches by 9 feet 10 inches in size. Vehicles which exceed this size shall not be parked in the subdivision.

In our Resolution about vehicle restrictions:

1. The types of vehicles listed in subsections (a) through (i) below may not be parked or stored in open view on residential lots, common area parking spaces, or on common area open space or public rights of way within the boundaries of the [Association] community, except in such areas, if any, designated for such purpose by the Board of Directors:

a. Any boat or boat trailer;
b. Any motor home or self contained camper; however, any vehicle of this nature cannot exceed nineteen feet by six feet six inches by nine feet nine inches in size cannot be parked in the subdivision at any time;
c. Any camper slip on where the back of the camper is higher than the roof line of the cab of the truck;
d. Any mobile home, trailer or fifth wheel vehicle;
e. Any pop up camp/tent trailer or, similar recreation oriented portable vehicle or transportable facility or conveyance;
f. Any other vehicle not defined above which is not normally or regularly used for daily transportation, including dune buggies, non operational automobile collections or other automotive equipment not licensed for use on the highways of Virginia;
g. Any vehicle defined as a commercial vehicle by the code of Virginia.
h. Any vehicle with commercial signs, advertising or visible commercial equipment;
i. Private or public school or church buses.

Quote:
Posted By RichardL7 on 11/17/2013 9:43 AM

Subject is the Official classification by Colorado Law on Commercial Vehicles, Class 1 - 2 - 3 16,000 lbs and lighter, Vans in particular and What will constitute a van as commercial. I’m at a loss.

Per AN INFORMATIONAL HANDOUT, The Colorado statute which deals with minimum standards for commercial vehicles is §42-4-235 C.R.S.

Per §42-4-235 C.R.S., available via LexisNexis, the inimum standards for commercial vehicles are:

(1) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:

(a) "Commercial vehicle" means:

(I) Any self-propelled or towed vehicle bearing an apportioned plate or having a manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating or gross combination rating of ten thousand one pounds or more, which vehicle is used in commerce on the public highways of this state or is designed to transport sixteen or more passengers, including the driver, unless such vehicle is a school bus regulated pursuant to section 42-4-1904 or any vehicle that does not have a gross vehicle weight rating of twenty-six thousand one or more pounds and that is owned or operated by a school district so long as such school district does not receive remuneration for the use of such vehicle, not including reimbursement for the use of such vehicle;

(II) Any motor vehicle designed or equipped to transport other motor vehicles from place to place by means of winches, cables, pulleys, or other equipment for towing, pulling, or lifting, when such motor vehicle is used in commerce on the public highways of this state; and

(III) A motor vehicle that is used on the public highways and transports materials determined by the secretary of transportation to be hazardous under 49 U.S.C. sec. 5103 in such quantities as to require placarding under 49 CFR parts 172 and 173.

(b) Repealed.

(c) "Motor carrier" means every person, lessee, receiver, or trustee appointed by any court whatsoever owning, controlling, operating, or managing any commercial vehicle as defined in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1).

(2) (a) No person shall operate a commercial vehicle, as defined in subsection (1) of this section, on any public highway of this state unless such vehicle is in compliance with the rules adopted by the chief of the Colorado state patrol pursuant to subsection (4) of this section. Any person who violates the rules, including any intrastate motor carrier, shall be subject to the civil penalties authorized pursuant to 49 CFR part 386, subpart G, as such subpart existed on October 1, 2001. Persons who utilize an independent contractor shall not be liable for penalties imposed on the independent contractor for equipment, acts, and omissions within the independent contractor's control or supervision. All civil penalties collected pursuant to this article by a state agency or by a court shall be transmitted to the state treasurer, who shall credit them to the highway users tax fund created in section 43-4-201, C.R.S., for allocation and expenditure as specified in section 43-4-205 (5.5) (a), C.R.S.

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection (2):

(I) Intrastate motor carriers shall not be subject to any provisions in 49 CFR, part 386, subpart G that relate the amount of a penalty to a violator's ability to pay, and such penalties shall be based upon the nature and gravity of the violation, the degree of culpability, and such other matters as justice and public safety may require;

(II) When determining the assessment of a civil penalty for safety violations, the period of a motor carrier's safety compliance history that a compliance review officer may consider shall not exceed three years;

(III) The intrastate operation of implements of husbandry shall not be subject to the civil penalties provided in 49 CFR, part 386, subpart G. Nothing in this subsection (2) shall be construed to repeal, preempt, or negate any existing regulatory exemption for agricultural operations, intrastate farm vehicle drivers, intrastate vehicles or combinations of vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of not more than twenty-six thousand pounds that do not require a commercial driver's license to operate, or any successor or analogous agricultural exemptions, whether based on federal or state law.

(IV) This section does not apply to a motor vehicle or motor vehicle and trailer combination:

(A) With a gross vehicle weight, gross vehicle weight rating, or gross combination rating of less than twenty-six thousand one pounds;

(B) Not operated in interstate commerce;

(C) Not transporting hazardous materials requiring placarding;

(D) Not transporting either sixteen or more passengers including the driver or eight or more passengers for compensation; and

(E) If the motor vehicle or combination is being used solely for agricultural purposes.

(c) The Colorado state patrol shall have exclusive enforcement authority to conduct safety compliance reviews, as defined in 49 CFR 385.3, as such section existed on October 1, 2001, and to impose civil penalties pursuant to such reviews. Nothing in this paragraph (c) shall expand or limit the ability of local governments to conduct roadside safety inspections.

(d) (I) Upon notice from the Colorado state patrol, the department shall, pursuant to section 42-3-120, cancel the registration of a motor carrier who fails to pay in full a civil penalty imposed pursuant to this subsection (2) within thirty days after notification of the penalty.

(II) Repealed.

(3) Any motor carrier operating a commercial vehicle within Colorado must declare knowledge of the rules adopted by the chief of the Colorado state patrol pursuant to subsection (4) of this section. The declaration of knowledge shall be in writing on a form provided by the Colorado state patrol. The form must be signed and returned by a motor carrier according to rules adopted by the chief.

(4) (a) The chief of the Colorado state patrol shall adopt rules for the operation of all commercial vehicles. In adopting the rules, the chief shall use as general guidelines the standards contained in the current rules and regulations of the United States department of transportation relating to safety regulations, qualifications of drivers, driving of motor vehicles, parts and accessories, notification and reporting of accidents, hours of service of drivers, inspection, repair and maintenance of motor vehicles, financial responsibility, insurance, and employee safety and health standards; except that rules regarding financial responsibility and insurance do not apply to a commercial vehicle as defined in subsection (1) of this section that is also subject to regulation by the public utilities commission under article 10.1 of title 40, C.R.S. On and after September 1, 2003, all commercial vehicle safety inspections conducted to determine compliance with rules promulgated by the chief pursuant to this paragraph (a) shall be performed by an enforcement official, as defined in section 42-20-103 (2), who has been certified by the commercial vehicle safety alliance, or any successor organization thereto, to perform level I inspections.

(b) The Colorado public utilities commission may enforce safety rules of the chief of the Colorado state patrol governing commercial vehicles described in subparagraphs (I) and (II) of paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of this section pursuant to his or her authority to regulate motor carriers as defined in section 40-10.1-101, C.R.S., including the issuance of civil penalties for violations of the rules as provided in section 40-7-113, C.R.S.

(5) Any person who violates a rule promulgated by the chief of the Colorado state patrol pursuant to this section or fails to comply with subsection (3) of this section commits a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense.

RichardL7 (Colorado)
Posts: 105
Posted:
Hello Tim. OK, your hired. L.O.L. Thank you for your comeback. I will start reading this today and get a handle on it. Again my thanks, I'm sure this will be of great help.
Richard.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Richard,

This issue comes up from time to time on this forum and the problem is almost always that the covenants refer to "commercial vehicles" without defining just what constitutes one. Your state statutes may have a definition of such but it may differ markedly from the federal standards. There is no universally accepted definition.

In Arizona a van with windows is considered a passenger car yet I saw just such a van full of passengers with Ohio truck plates. So that little Astro Van is a passenger car if licensed in one state but a commercial vehicle if licensed in another.

There have been threads on this site where people have insisted that a passenger car with a sign on it is a commercial vehicle.

Colorado courts have already ruled that for a covenant to be enforceable, it must be unambiguous and not open to multiple interpretations. See Allen v. Reed at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/co-court-of-appeals/1464443.html

Unless your members are willing to amend your declaration to unequivocally define a commercial vehicle, my advice would be to forget about trying to enforce your restriction.

RichardL7 (Colorado)
Posts: 105
Posted:

Hello Larry,
You got that correct and that is the problem with our Association. They have
asked me to keep track of the parking for the association. The first thing I ran
into was just what you have mentioned. I sent out E-mails to all the board
members and ask them if we can set a better guideline on the subject. As of
today, we have class 6 trucks parked in the Association and looks to be part of a
construction company, but not for us, not at all. I'm sure the driver lives in the condo. Our
management company is about as useless as ---, Well you know.
Thanks for the info, and all help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Richard.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Richard

One can try and define a commercial vehicle by what the state commercial motor vehicle registration laws are. This will get you part way there.

Then comes the tricky part. Some examples that have been discussed:

1. Identical Ford F-150 pickups. One plain, the other festooned with racks, ladders, etc.

2. Identical VW Beetles. One plain, the other wrapped in advertisement.

3. Identical mini-vans. One plain, the other has signs on it saying Airport Shuttle.

4. Identical Ford Explorers. One plain, the other has a sign on the back window saying So and So. So and So Real Estate Company. 800-our-home.

In one HOA I was a member of, all of the above were considered commercial vehicles and could not be parked overnight in ones driveway and there was no overnight street parking. This was all well and fine as each home had at least a two car garage and the above vehicles could be parked in one's garage.

If no garages, then it gets real tricky.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichardL7 on 11/17/2013 12:29 PM

Hello Tim. OK, your hired. L.O.L.

No problem. Took a whole 5 minutes max doing an internet search.
RichardL7 (Colorado)
Posts: 105
Posted:
Your information is well taken, and what you have expressed is some of the major problems I
have now and needed to contend with. Also the undermining of some of the decisions I made.
Case and Point. We have three panel trucks that are used for commercial use. I was told by the
management company to have the one with advertising on it towed. Now all three are of the
same size and weight (GVWR) but one had ladders, NOW the MANAGE CO. call them and
said if they remove the two ladders they would not be towed. ( ?????) It’s like taking the ladders
of a fire truck and calling it a ambulance. Fact of the matter is, we have no consistency what so
ever on parking, it’s no wonder they asked me to do the job. They wanted a fall guy, the only
problem is that I have worked in the trucking ( heavy ) industry for 35 years and after
investigating the parking and the association, and with the help of the information source as I
have with you and the others, ( that was a big help). I realize it was a greater problem then first
thought. I will address it in a faction I think will work. Face to Face with our management Co.
and inform the board of my findings. We have much more of a problem then the parking but I
wish to address the subject and start with that in a lawful understanding of the problem. I will do so with the information I have received, it was food for thought. Fairness, equality and some type of conformity that has to this time not been available
Thanks.
Richard.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Richard,

We allow those with magnetic signs to park the vehicle if they remove the signs at night.
We also use ladder racks (not actual ladders) as a determination.

BTW - why is the MC making such decisions on their own?
That call should have been at the Boards level.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/18/2013 12:21 AM
Richard,
Why is the MC making such decisions on their own?
That call should have been at the Boards level.

Richard,

This was my thought, as well. If the board has asked you to investigate and advise them then your management company should not be threatening your members with half-assed enforcement efforts at this time. Right now, you have a bus with two steering wheels and each driver (you and the management company) are trying to go in different directions.

If the management company insists on acting independently of the board, then you should request that the agenda for the next board meeting include the topics of terminating the current contract and finding another management company.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
when you don't have clear definitions, everything becomes a sticky wicket.

If advertisements make something a commercial vehicle, then what do you say about decals, car covers, bumper stickers, dealer license plate frames, etc.? Or even the word "Ford"? Where does the line get drawn? Percentage of car covered? Total square inches of advertising space? Technically, "My child is an honor student at Wellington Academy" is an advertisement, since the advent of vouchers and charter schools.

If ladder racks make it commercial, what about ski racks or bike racks? What if the owner is a ski instructor? Or writes a blog about mountain biking? What about Hay racks? Toolboxes? Camper Shells? What about Dog crates, if the owner is a breeder/field trial professional?

What if the owner runs a ride-share service? Is that commercial? Or is a Mary Kay or Avon consultant? Or baby sits, and offers to pick up or drop off a kid as part of that business?

Or, what if they simply claim their vehicle as a business expense on their taxes, and you never know about it?

One needs to clearly define what is and isn't desired, and then enforce it. Even if that means using a lot of words, instead of a nice easy simple one word "definition", because the more you boil down to one and two word definitions, the worse your definition becomes.
RichardL7 (Colorado)
Posts: 105
Posted:
Brian,
What you have just stated if very true. With today methods of
transportation and how vehicles are use what constitutes a commercial
vehicle?? The word commercial is so vague and obscure in definition of
a vehicle, how can one tell?? Can we only use GVWR ???, No that
will not work, Size and construction of vehicle? Well that can help but
still not the answer, and how about, -- how it’s used?? If we combine
all the answers and stipulate which vehicles are authorized in our bylaws
and rules and what we will allow we may be close to the answer. In
saying that, have we completed our objective? Just not sure at this time.

That’s why I say and have said, the Management Company if qualified
should take this and find a solution and address the board on his or her
findings. It is a hard subject but must be addressed for the solitude of
the community.
Thanks you for your help.
Richard.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
I think before the mgt company can come up with an answer, the board has to know what the question is. If you charged me with "come up with a definition of commercial vehicles", my first question back to you is "What are you going to do with the answer?"

Then, I would ask "Okay, what kinds of things is it you really don't want to see in the neighborhood?" Because, honestly, THAT is the answer the board wants given back to them, a list of definitions that keeps vehicles out that they don't want, and allows vehicles in that they do.

If you don't want big trucks, then ban big trucks. But, you said nothing about big vans, so they must be okay. Oh... you meant big vehicles... that's different, you said trucks. Okay, so nothing larger than XXXX weight. Unfortunately, that now includes smaller vehicles with batteries instead of engines, so... Oh, you meant "volume", not weight. Okay, so what's "big" in your view? A stretch limo? A jacked up 4 wheeler? Is a semi tractor without the trailer big? It's smaller than this pick up in length, but taller.

The key is that people need to be specific in what they really want. The hard part is that no one wants to admit what they really want, not on record.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Not sure I can do this:

tatic.buildasign.com/cmsimages/carWraps-austin%20graphics.jpg?v=38497931416B47385A41593D

Take a look at this. I say this is a commercial vehicle.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 11/18/2013 3:04 PM

I say this is a commercial vehicle.

I am sure you do, but does your declaration define a passenger car with wrap-around graphics that way? I'll bet your declarant never even thought about it.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
John, can you explain what it is about that car that makes it a commercial vehicle in your mind/definition?

Because if you can, then you begin to define the set of vehicles/conditions that can be used for a definition.

Is it the color? Colors? Wording? Size of the letters? Is it because there is a web address?

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BrianB on 11/19/2013 6:18 AM

Is it because there is a web address?

Some states print their web address on their license plates. I guess that would make all vehicles licensed in those states commercial vehicles.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BrianB on 11/19/2013 6:18 AM
John, can you explain what it is about that car that makes it a commercial vehicle in your mind/definition?

Because if you can, then you begin to define the set of vehicles/conditions that can be used for a definition.

Is it the color? Colors? Wording? Size of the letters? Is it because there is a web address?


I am not nor do I play a lawyer.

In my mind it is because of the "advertisement" on the vehicle. Even a simple door sign with a business name/address/phone is an advertisement.

Defining the type vehicle, colors, wording, wording size, etc. is what becomes subjective.

Had a go around about this in one association. Two identical, small vehicles. One had the simple word Xerox in red letters on each door. To me the word alone meant a commercial vehicle.

Where does one draw the line? The problem is defining between the vehicle wrap in the pic and the word Xerox on the door. Where does it cross the line? Make the line simple like any wording crosses the line. Some might say that is Draconian and while I agree it could be, it is simple enough for even the village idiot to understand.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
John, (and others) I know that's my point, and likely, most of our points: It all depends on the definition, and we are horrible at actually laying out a clear, concise, precise definition.

We love to say "I can't define it, but I know what it is when I see it", but as John points out (among others) that leads to very subjective decisions. What is advertisement to one may not be to another. (BTW, I am NOT trying to pick on John, I appreciate what he showed, and his honesty in attempting to define and speak to what problems he's had with defining ads. I use him because he was nice enough to provide some examples for us to look at and discuss.)

A big "xerox" on the side of a car may well be an ad. As pointed out, WWW.DMV.GOV could also be an ad. I can make a darn good case that "Ford, Toyota, Dodge, Civic," and even the BMW hood ornament are ads. I would even give it the old college try that "Live Free or Die" and "Land of Ah's" is an ad: Honestly, all a state NEEDS for a license plate is a series of distinct, unique numbers and letters. Isn't everything else really a self-promotional attempt to make the state seem good?

Bottom line to me: In order to enforce a "no commercial vehicle" policy, you had better sit down and come up with a set of definitions on what IS and ISN'T a commercial vehicle. because if you can't do that, then you haven't got a very solid platform on which to ever begin enforcement.

RichardL7 (Colorado)
Posts: 105
Posted:
My question now is, why does the word commercial show up in
associations rules and Regulation when it is so broad and deceptive that
in fact has no meaning when it comes to parking in a association.
Understanding the Board and the authority they possess it may well
come down to a picture gallery ( if possible ) of vehicles authorized to
park. Not fully versed on HOA’s and laws on parking, I would feel they
want conformity, simplicity, non-evasive vehicles. More to the point
no business vehicles, still what constitutes a business vehicle may in fact
be a disability type van, large family van. Can it be said only family
type vehicle???? but who will or who can establish that ruling. God
know, I would have no idea. Man in his great wisdom still has
problems. Our laws said, No VAN or 3/4 ton trucks. Yet I see Large
class 6 and 7 trucks parked in the area, Note: two association very close
together, -- work truck from a major satellite company and a P/U truck
with all the things a construction company needs and a GMC van used
for construction work, and yes the same make and model of truck with
windows that is a handicap vehicle. Looks like the Board will have its
work cut out for them. Still the assistance I have received from each
one of you I sincerely appreciate, we may not have all the answers but
we sure try. Good going people.
Thanks.
Richard.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Richard,

You might want to check out the two links below. They both pertain to a Florida lawsuit where an HOA tried to force the owner of a pickup truck to park in his garage because the association felt it was a commercial vehicle. The first link is a news story about the case and the second is the judge's order granting summary judgment to the truck owner.

http://newsdeskinternational.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/florida-man-wins-right-to-park-in-own-driveway/

http://www.floridalawyer.com/news/news-homeowners-dispute.pdf

RichardL7 (Colorado)
Posts: 105
Posted:
Hello LarryB13
Good info, I have come to the conclusion the Rules and Regulation would best be served by an
attorney and not the Board, Most if not all have no idea of the complexity of such rulings. It
would appear to me that any attempt to establish HOA parking rules would best be served as I
said by an attorney. It's Total frustration for board members and I’m still not sure how a
management Company will handle the problems. Most of us want peace and conformity,
reasonable rules that will work and not hinder our neighbors. I’m not sure that can be done.
Thanks for the info, good reading and informative.
Richard.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 11/19/2013 8:45 PM
Richard,

You might want to check out the two links below. They both pertain to a Florida lawsuit where an HOA tried to force the owner of a pickup truck to park in his garage because the association felt it was a commercial vehicle. The first link is a news story about the case and the second is the judge's order granting summary judgment to the truck owner.

http://newsdeskinternational.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/florida-man-wins-right-to-park-in-own-driveway/

http://www.floridalawyer.com/news/news-homeowners-dispute.pdf


The truck in the article was a Ford F-350. It had no commercial signage, rigging, etc.

I say not a commercial vehicle.

http://www.edmunds.com/ford/f-350-super-duty/2014/
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichardL7 on 11/19/2013 3:25 PM
 My question now is, why does the word commercial show up in
associations rules and Regulation when it is so broad and deceptive that
in fact has no meaning when it comes to parking in a association.

Because 99% of all CC&R's are copied/boilerplate from other copies, which were copied from others, from way back when things were, perhaps, simpler.

That's why you will also find CC&R's that "prohibit the establishment or operation of a business from the home"... Likely because, 70 years ago, the idea that someone could run a million dollar a year business from a glorified television screen was impossible to comprehend. Business meant deliveries, vehicles, personal traffic, or perhaps chemicals wafting in the air (home based styling salons), etc.. No one could have imagined a twelve year old designing websites, or mining World of Warcraft magic items for sale, by sitting at a desk for 16 hours a day. Or someone with a small device in their garage producing 3d widgets out of plastic, quietly.

Perhaps, back then, commercial vehicles were easier to spot: they had to be licensed by the state as a commercial vehicle. People didn't put signs on their cars, heck, a lot of the CC&R rules may have been copied from before bumper stickers were common (they really didn't become common until the 50's, and didn't explode until the 70's). So the idea of wrapping an entire car with a thin film of mylar, brightly painted? Inconceivable.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
The more we talk about this allow me to throw out some "rules/suggestions" and get opinions:

1. Any signage makes it a commercial vehicle.

2. A specific weight, number of wheels, etc. makes it a commercial vehicle. I say a Ford F350 would be about the max. Not sure how such vehicles are classified.

3. Any vehicle containing ladders, ladder racks, pipe racks, commercial machinery, commercial racking of any kind, platform bedding, staked bedding, etc. is a commercial vehicle.

4. Any vehicle with a commercial license plate as designated by state motor vehicle registration is a commercial vehicle.

There will always have to be exceptions. As an example. SC has a vehicle registration/plate called Business. It allows one to park in a loading/unloading zone for one hour. Many downtown small business owners have this plate on their personal vehicles. In every other way the vehicle is a person vehicle, not a commercial vehicle. I have seen such a plate on a Ferrari.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Many HOA's seem to have rules that one may park a commercial vehicle in the driveway but it must go in the garage at night.

I do not understand the logic of this. If commercial vehicles are offensive, as some suggest, then what is the logic of allowing them to be in full view of everyone during the hours when most people are up and about but keeping them hidden from view at those times when no one is likely to see them anyway? The opposite policy would make more sense.

BTW, because I now collect Social Security I have a vested interest in keeping the rest of you on the job and paying for my benefits. I wish to do nothing to hinder people from earning a living and would never discourage anyone from parking his work vehicle in my neighborhood.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 11/20/2013 10:22 AM
Many HOA's seem to have rules that one may park a commercial vehicle in the driveway but it must go in the garage at night.

I do not understand the logic of this. If commercial vehicles are offensive, as some suggest, then what is the logic of allowing them to be in full view of everyone during the hours when most people are up and about but keeping them hidden from view at those times when no one is likely to see them anyway? The opposite policy would make more sense.

BTW, because I now collect Social Security I have a vested interest in keeping the rest of you on the job and paying for my benefits. I wish to do nothing to hinder people from earning a living and would never discourage anyone from parking his work vehicle in my neighborhood.


Larry

During the day they could well be a service vehicle there to deliver, fix, service, whatever. Some say a bunch of them parked after hours would be unsightly thus no overnight parking of them.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 11/20/2013 9:02 AM
The more we talk about this allow me to throw out some "rules/suggestions" and get opinions:

1. Any signage makes it a commercial vehicle.

2. A specific weight, number of wheels, etc. makes it a commercial vehicle. I say a Ford F350 would be about the max. Not sure how such vehicles are classified.

3. Any vehicle containing ladders, ladder racks, pipe racks, commercial machinery, commercial racking of any kind, platform bedding, staked bedding, etc. is a commercial vehicle.

4. Any vehicle with a commercial license plate as designated by state motor vehicle registration is a commercial vehicle.

There will always have to be exceptions. As an example. SC has a vehicle registration/plate called Business. It allows one to park in a loading/unloading zone for one hour. Many downtown small business owners have this plate on their personal vehicles. In every other way the vehicle is a person vehicle, not a commercial vehicle. I have seen such a plate on a Ferrari.

Thank you for a good line in the sand for a starting point!

I could ask on #1, does a bumper sticker count as signage? Or a license plate frame? Does a car cover, or complete paint job count as signage? What if I put a big #43 on my door, in homage to my favorite Nascar Driver? or a big KC Chiefs sticker or flag?

#2 is a good way to start defining.

#3 is pretty good, except for the ladder part. My truck sometimes carries a ladder in the bed too, does that make it commercial?

#4 Pretty good definition.

Thank you for taking the time to toss out some ideas. I think (with some areas to debate) you have a good start on how an HOA would go about defining a commercial vehicle.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Brian

I could ask on #1, does a bumper sticker count as signage? Or a license plate frame? Does a car cover, or complete paint job count as signage? What if I put a big #43 on my door, in homage to my favorite Nascar Driver? or a big KC Chiefs sticker or flag?

I have seen the argument that the badge on the hood of my car my hood saying Ford is advertising, thus commercial. I think when there is a name, address, phone number, website address, etc. it has crossed the line especially if it profits me or draws business to me. Yes one could argue if I work for so and so Ford Dealership and my license plate frame has the name and phone number of that Ford Dealer on it, it could be commercial.

There will always be exceptions to rules and those pushing for exceptions to their "case". I think the answer can also be common sense. If live in SC and there is a car dealer sticker on my car for a dealer in MA so I am accussed of advertising that dealer, does not pass the common sense test anymore then the Ford badge on the hood of my car does.

My business name, address, phone number, website address on the door of my car or on the back window does pass the common sense test as commercial.

One HOA had a go around about police cars having advertisements on them. Raised by a person that had the their business name on the door of their car and was cited for it by the HOA. The BOD ruling was the police car was a public safety vehicle, thus exempt for the signage.

No rule will cover all issues especially when one feels personally wronged. With command, comes responsibility to make the tough decisions.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
And John, this is where I think drilling down and defining what is and isn't "commercial" is what boards should do, and state plainly. You started a good thing, I think all boards should do this, before they have troubles.

If a name, address, and website is commercial, fine. What about a name and address, but no website? Do you need all three? or just two out of three? What about just a name? Or, not even a name, but a logo? If I have a big stylized CBS eyeball, Nike Swoosh, is that okay? Can I have an Avon sticker? What about a Lowjack sticker? That's certainly an ad, but not all ads make a car a commercial vehicle, right?

Public safety vehicles can be exempted. Good rule/definition, for a variety of reasons. That would mean a Wildland Fire Fighter truck is acceptable too, right? With the toolboxes, racks, fire hoses, winches, etc.. And the DARE Drug car, with the crazy paint scheme. But the Union Pacific Railroad Fire Truck would not be acceptable, because it's private company safety, not public safety.

And honestly, if that's the very clearly defined, spelled out rule, I would be fine with it. You tell me the rules before I buy, and I agree, it's my bad for breaking them. If I don't agree with them, then I can go buy somewhere else.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Brian,

You have raised a lot of issues and the only point I would disagree with you is in your very first sentence. You wrote: "drilling down and defining what is and isn't 'commercial' is what boards should do, and state plainly."

HOA boards should not be defining what is and is not a commercial vehicle. The declarant should have done that instead putting in vague references to commercial vehicles. The board has no power to add restrictions that are not in the original declaration.

Vague and ambiguous phrases are not enforceable. If the owners wish to amend the CC&R's to exclude certain vehicle types, that is their choice. Keep in mind that some state courts, such as mine, have held that CC&R's cannot be made more restrictive.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
i can't disagree with that. Unfortunately, lazy people pass down their problems to others to handle, leaving the mess for them.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here