BM5 (Kansas)
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Posted:
I'd like to file a 1120-H this year for the neighborhood, but I am confounded by this ridiculous "90% expenditure test."
Virtually all of our income is exempt - the only exception being some nominal bank account interest.
We had about $237,000 in exempt (dues) income this year, but we're only going to spend about $175,000 (all on maintenance, etc.) For the remainder, we planned to roll it over to our reserve account to pay for upcoming capital improvements.
To qualify to use Form 1120-H, you have to pass the "90% expenditure test", which means that "at least 90% of the association's
expenditures for the tax year must consist of expenses to acquire, build, manage, maintain, and care for property." Ok, well that should be fine, since we spent all $175k on maintenance items. The problem is, the instructions for the test also says "do not include investments or transfers of funds held to meet future costs. An example would be transfers to a sinking fund to replace a roof, even if the roof is association property."
So that seems to indicate that our roll over to reserves is also an expense, but not a maintenance-related expense, which effectively means that if we roll over the excess to reserves, then only 74% of our expenses (175k / 237k) were maintenance-related, right?
So what do we do? Just leave the excess sitting in our operating account?! Going forward, if we earmark a portion of our assessments as reserve-funding, then we wouldn't have to treat this as an "expense" on the operating budget, right?
I am a little frustrated, if I'm understanding these rules correctly, that we are being penalized and having to jump through extra hoops just for being good stewards of our neighbors' money!
Virtually all of our income is exempt - the only exception being some nominal bank account interest.
We had about $237,000 in exempt (dues) income this year, but we're only going to spend about $175,000 (all on maintenance, etc.) For the remainder, we planned to roll it over to our reserve account to pay for upcoming capital improvements.
To qualify to use Form 1120-H, you have to pass the "90% expenditure test", which means that "at least 90% of the association's
expenditures for the tax year must consist of expenses to acquire, build, manage, maintain, and care for property." Ok, well that should be fine, since we spent all $175k on maintenance items. The problem is, the instructions for the test also says "do not include investments or transfers of funds held to meet future costs. An example would be transfers to a sinking fund to replace a roof, even if the roof is association property."
So that seems to indicate that our roll over to reserves is also an expense, but not a maintenance-related expense, which effectively means that if we roll over the excess to reserves, then only 74% of our expenses (175k / 237k) were maintenance-related, right?
So what do we do? Just leave the excess sitting in our operating account?! Going forward, if we earmark a portion of our assessments as reserve-funding, then we wouldn't have to treat this as an "expense" on the operating budget, right?
I am a little frustrated, if I'm understanding these rules correctly, that we are being penalized and having to jump through extra hoops just for being good stewards of our neighbors' money!