FrankS10 (Kansas)
Posts: 276
Posts: 276
Posted:
Article 9 of our By-Laws states:
Section 1. Members' Easements of Enjoyment. Each Member has a right and easement of enjoyment to the Common Areas, and such easement is appurtenant to and runs with the land of every lot.
We were told by one of the developers when we were looking to buy land in our development that each lot had access to the 5 miles of trail system. The marketing brochures at that time also stated 'Every' lot had access to the trail system. The most recent marketing states "most" lots have access, and this changed after the fence was challenged.
A neighbor recently installed a fence that blocks several homes from accessing the trails unless they use a public road to do so. The DRC committee approved the fence, and the Board also upheld their decision. (Note: The fence was installed by a Board member who is also on the DRC. They recused themselves from the vote; however, our Board of 5 is made up of 3 members who sit on the DRC so it was no surprise that the Board supported the DRC's decision.)
The 4 or so homes that have had their access blocked is due to a creek that separates our lots from the trails. These neighbors who used to want to access the trails would just walk along the edge of their neighbors' lots until they reached the bridge on the Common Areas. No one had a problem with this until the neighbors built the fence. They previously lived in another home in the community but bought this one because it was a foreclosure. They do not like their neighbor which may have something to do with blocking access.
My question is simply what does 'appurtenant' mean in this structure? 3 lawyers have told us it definitely means that every lot has the right of an easement on their neighbor's property if needed to access the Common Areas. Do you agree? The two developers, who sit on our Board say they can not grant access to private property.
Thanks.
Section 1. Members' Easements of Enjoyment. Each Member has a right and easement of enjoyment to the Common Areas, and such easement is appurtenant to and runs with the land of every lot.
We were told by one of the developers when we were looking to buy land in our development that each lot had access to the 5 miles of trail system. The marketing brochures at that time also stated 'Every' lot had access to the trail system. The most recent marketing states "most" lots have access, and this changed after the fence was challenged.
A neighbor recently installed a fence that blocks several homes from accessing the trails unless they use a public road to do so. The DRC committee approved the fence, and the Board also upheld their decision. (Note: The fence was installed by a Board member who is also on the DRC. They recused themselves from the vote; however, our Board of 5 is made up of 3 members who sit on the DRC so it was no surprise that the Board supported the DRC's decision.)
The 4 or so homes that have had their access blocked is due to a creek that separates our lots from the trails. These neighbors who used to want to access the trails would just walk along the edge of their neighbors' lots until they reached the bridge on the Common Areas. No one had a problem with this until the neighbors built the fence. They previously lived in another home in the community but bought this one because it was a foreclosure. They do not like their neighbor which may have something to do with blocking access.
My question is simply what does 'appurtenant' mean in this structure? 3 lawyers have told us it definitely means that every lot has the right of an easement on their neighbor's property if needed to access the Common Areas. Do you agree? The two developers, who sit on our Board say they can not grant access to private property.
Thanks.