FionaC1 (Washington)
Posts: 93
Posts: 93
Posted:
We have recently come into the issue of a owner who filed for CHp 13 about 4 months ago. They have since defaulted again on thier dues to about 4 months/ over $1000 at this point.
Our board sought support from our PM who stated we can't file a lien or accept payment plan on this if the owner desires such as this is in default of the CHP 13 agreement. The Bankruptcy Court is to be notifed and the BK case would be dismissed. Meaning all past dues at that time would could be pursued legally etc.
There has been some push back from a board member or two asking we operate on a private agreement and let this owner make payments to us, accept a payment plan and "as long as it's all documented" we should be fine.
I am sure this is of a personal friendship they have with this owner, but realistically are we not being fiduciarily repsonsible if we do NOT treat every owner the same when it comes to bankruptcy laws?
Pleas advise. many thanks. Meanwhile majority ruled to move forward on this and pursue filing with courts.. but the push back on this was incredible!
How should anything like this be presented in the future to emphasize our obligation to make decisions for betterment of our HOA vs. friendships and favoritism.
Our board sought support from our PM who stated we can't file a lien or accept payment plan on this if the owner desires such as this is in default of the CHP 13 agreement. The Bankruptcy Court is to be notifed and the BK case would be dismissed. Meaning all past dues at that time would could be pursued legally etc.
There has been some push back from a board member or two asking we operate on a private agreement and let this owner make payments to us, accept a payment plan and "as long as it's all documented" we should be fine.
I am sure this is of a personal friendship they have with this owner, but realistically are we not being fiduciarily repsonsible if we do NOT treat every owner the same when it comes to bankruptcy laws?
Pleas advise. many thanks. Meanwhile majority ruled to move forward on this and pursue filing with courts.. but the push back on this was incredible!
How should anything like this be presented in the future to emphasize our obligation to make decisions for betterment of our HOA vs. friendships and favoritism.