💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi folks, I have a question regarding installing antenna.

I have a balcony (exclusive use) on a second floor condo. I put up an antenna to receive OTA signal. Previously, I mounted it on the rail of the balcony, and surely I got a letter.

So now, I set up a chair, and mounted antenna on the chair. I also put a lot of heavy books on the chair. The antenna is pretty light (http://www.amazon.com/ANT751-Quality-Durable-Compact-Outdoor/dp/B0024R4B5C/ref=sr_sp-btf_title_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1380575931&sr=8-4&keywords=antenna), so in this way, it would never fall. The mounting is also pretty good. I put my antenna and chair entirely within the balcony.

Now HOA sends me another letter, insisting that I need to mount antenna on a "free standing pole", not on the chair. Are they legitimate to require this? Can I fight back? I am really frustrated. I don't want to get a stupid pole or something.

If needed, I can share a picture.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Wouldn't a pole take up less room on your balcony? Seems it would provide more room and look better to the neighbors and potential buyers. Why not get a PVC pipe attach it to the corner of the rail and put the attenna in it? You may be able to paint it to conceal it more. The chair just seems too bulky and not a good look.

Former HOA President
JamesG (Connecticut)
Posts: 83
Posted:
This can be a complex issue. I would suggest that you start by reading the real FCC rules (law):

http://www.fcc.gov/guides/over-air-reception-devices-rule

Your association can establish it's own rules that are consistent with the FCC law and the latitude that this law gives to associations. You should request a written copy of your associations rules in this regard. Absent any legitimate rules, then you may be OK if you do not violate the FCC rules. If the association feels that there is a safety issue due to your "installation" that may not appear to be secure, then your setup may be denied on that basis. For example, can a wind storm blow your antenna off of the balcony?

Jim
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Thanks for your response! I admit since that I am a renter, I didn't pay that much attention to appearance... They also said something about free standing, so I doubted they would allow me to attach it to the rail.

Furthermore, the signal is really weak, and I have to adjust for quite long to get my current reception without protruding the balcony. Any re-installation will basically impact my reception a lot, and I am not confident to get the best signal.

Talking about pole, do you guys have any suggestion on how to set up a free standing pole on the balcony? I presume that I need some very heavy stuff at the bottom... otherwise the pole will not be firm.

Thanks again!
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi Jim,

That's my understanding too. I think the only point they can possibly make is safety. But honestly, it won't really fall. If there's a windstorm strong enough to blow away my antenna, it'll definitely blow away other stuff on other tenant's balcony, such as plants etc.

I think the true reason is that they might not like the appearance of the way I put it up, but they can't really say about the appearance because of FCC rule. I really don't know how to get a free standing pole, without putting some heavy/clumsy stuff to secure it. So frustrating.

Thanks,

Hengzhou
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Do an internet search for "portable mounting pole for satellite dish"

This should identify some options for you.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Right, your HOA rules do not, as you know, permit you to attach anything to your balcony rail, ceiling, wall or floor. This is a very common rule and is to prevent water penetration into the building.

Our rules also state that balconies must be nice-looking and clean. They cannot be"unsightly." I know--"unsightly" is a matter of definition and personal taste sometimes. We are twin high rise twin towers so many of us can easily see many balconies of the other tower.

For me, a permanent view of a chair with a stack of old books on it would be unsightly. We only permit the erection of freestanding items, e.g., tripods.

HOAs can, indeed, make rules about the appearance of balconies/patios/decks.
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Thanks for your explanation. Unsightly is indeed personal and subjective. Can I cover my rail with some "beautiful" curtains? In that case, you don't have to bother.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Well, Hengzhou, you'd better read your HOA's CC&Rs and its Rules & Regulations for the details about what's permitted on the balconies. Since our HOA doesn't allow laundry or beach towels draped on the rails, we would't allow curtains.

But your rules may be different. Your landlord or his property mgr. should have given you copies of the documents mentioned above.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Well, Hengzhou, you'd better read your HOA's CC&Rs and its Rules & Regulations for the details about what's permitted on the balconies. Since our HOA doesn't allow laundry or beach towels draped on the rails, we would't allow curtains.

But your rules may be different. Your landlord or his property mgr. should have given you copies of the documents mentioned above.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CarolR11 on 09/30/2013 3:47 PM
Right, your HOA rules do not, as you know, permit you to attach anything to your balcony rail, ceiling, wall or floor. This is a very common rule and is to prevent water penetration into the building.

Our rules also state that balconies must be nice-looking and clean. They cannot be"unsightly." I know--"unsightly" is a matter of definition and personal taste sometimes. We are twin high rise twin towers so many of us can easily see many balconies of the other tower.

For me, a permanent view of a chair with a stack of old books on it would be unsightly. We only permit the erection of freestanding items, e.g., tripods.

HOAs can, indeed, make rules about the appearance of balconies/patios/decks.

ABSOLUTELY FALSE!

You need to read the OTARD rules!

If you take the time to read the case decisions of the FCC (there are links on the FCC website) you will learn that the FCC is very adept at determining when the motivation behind HOA rules is really anesthetic when the rule claims to be otherwise.

All this person needs to do is file a petition with the FCC (free). Based on what the OP has posted, most likely the association will be shot down.
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Carol, thanks! I think I misread something initially We are not in a twin tower structure. People normally won't see other people's balcony, unless, they try to peek.
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Bruce, thank you. I will file a petition with FCC.

Hengzhou
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Bruce, in our HOA and many others we are not required to permit any attachments to balconies, patios or decks. But I will follow your advice and look up this topic.

If your neighbors can't see your balcony, Hengzhou, I can't imagine why the Board cares about your current arrangement. I think Bruce makes sense here--give FCC a try!
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Hengzhou before you file a petition with the FCC might I suggest you go your local building supply place, buy a empty five gallon bucket, a bag of redi-mix and a piece of pipe. Fill the bucket with the prepared redi-mix, place the pipe in the center, making sure it is straight, let it set and viola you have a free standing antenna pole.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
ThomasD2 (California)
Posts: 208
Posted:
You are in California, I hope you saw this part of the Davis Stirling law.

http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/CableTVMenu/tabid/332/Default.aspx#axzz2gR1Rwpi2

I think someone provided this link about the FCC rules

http://www.fcc.gov/guides/over-air-reception-devices-rule
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi Thomas,

Thanks for referring the link to me. I didn't find any particular interesting info in it, were you trying to point to me something? Thank you very much in advance!

Hengzhou
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi Glen,

Sounds like a plan! I do have a question... say if I don't want an upright pole because I want to point my antenna to a particular angle. Do you know if there's any bent/L shaped pipes that I can buy?

Honestly, I just feel that a cement pod with a pole isn't looking any better than my chair. Well, not sure what HOA really wants from me. Maybe they just don't like the look of that antenna.

Thank you!

Hengzhou
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Hengzhou, you'll have to get a 90* (degree) elbow and another short piece of pipe but it can be done. Talk to the people at the hardware store and explain what you need it for, pipe comes in all sizes and strengths and they can help you get what will work best for you.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By HengzhouD on 09/30/2013 8:17 PM
Well, not sure what HOA really wants from me. Maybe they just don't like the look of that antenna.

Rather than guessing, you can always ask.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CarolR11 on 09/30/2013 5:47 PM
Bruce, in our HOA and many others we are not required to permit any attachments to balconies, patios or decks. But I will follow your advice and look up this topic.

If your neighbors can't see your balcony, Hengzhou, I can't imagine why the Board cares about your current arrangement. I think Bruce makes sense here--give FCC a try!

Your HOA can make any rule it wants to. That doesn't mean it will be enforceable.

Again, don't use statements like "if your neighbors can't see your balcony." That's a definite tip-off to the FCC that the real motivation is aesthetic which the FCC prohibits.

If a balcony is an exclusive use area the OTARD rules prohibit many restrictions whereas others may be allowed. For example, restrictions prohibiting drilling holes into walls may be permitted. Restrictions on mounting antennas on railings may or may not be permitted. For example, if an antenna is mounted on a balcony railing in such a manner that it hangs over the outside (into the area over the common area), a rule prohibiting this would be permitted. However, if the antenna is mounted on a railing so that it lies entirely within the exclusive use area, a rule prohibiting such an installation might not be permitted. Also, the association cannot require advance approval to determine if the antenna complies with its rules or not. The association must state in advance that "you can mount it here but not there" or, "you can mount it this way but not that way."

The OTARD rules are very complicated. While much can be learned from reading the Q&A on the FCC's website, one needs to read the case decisions to understand how the FCC really interprets and applies the OTARD rules.

For Hengzhou, I would suspect that mounting an antenna on a chair wouldn't be very safe. There are tripods with short masts that are made specifically for that purpose that are much safer.

But don't call the FCC today. They're closed.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
If you want to avoid ugly, here's two ideas:

See if you can simply buy an umbrella base, one of those plastic, sand/cement filled bases that the huge patio umbrella's/table umbrella's stand in. That's a pretty heavy base, and standard poles fit right into them.

Or, to make Glen's great idea more pretty, get a nice, decorative flower pot (heavy clay, steel, tin, etc.) fill it with concrete, and put a PVC pipe into it. not sure if you need 1" pipe or 1.5" pipe, but something big enough to hold your system. Once you have a nice pipe cemented inside, sticking up, you can cut it/add 90 angels, 60 angles, 45 angles, etc. to it. You can also easily drill it, or use it as a base to mount your system at nearly any angle, even adjustable, with airplace hose strap/plumber's strapping, etc.

One thing I might suggest, go with the larger pipe, because you can always slide a smaller pipe inside it, and start all over again, if you mess up the bigger piece totally.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Hengzhou, Tim's first post and Glen's & Brian's are good ideas.

With all due respect, Bruce, HOAs with common area or exclusive use common areas may have rules that prevent water penetration into the common area walls, balcony decks, etc. That's why such devices cannot be attached to a railing by penetrating it. I did read the FCC Q&A.

My note about aesthetic issues, Bruce, was NOT about the antenna, but about the stack of books on the chair. We only have a couple of dishes here and both are on free standing tripods.

Hengzhou, it occurs to me that your HOA requires Architectural Committee approval to erect antennae. Once again, I urge you to read your HOA's documents, including its architectural guideline. The Architectural Committee per FCC regs must act quickly on your request.
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi Carol, thanks again for your explanation. Previously, the way I mounted my antenna on the rail, I didn't drill a hole or penetrate it... I just used some bracket and attached my antenna. However, I did agree this may never fly with HOA.

Out of curiosity, how did you know that my HOA has this approval requirement? I'll start reading it. I heard from a board member that the CC&R was pretty dated.
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi Bruce/Folks,

Please see an image of how I set up my antenna. It may sound unsafe when I said that I mounted it on the chair. But, the antenna is pretty light (a little over a pound), and my piles of paper and chair is pretty heavy (I can even add more on top of it). Personally speaking, it is a very secured and safe "makeshift" installation.

However, I am starting to make a pole as suggested by the people on the forum. Thanks for all the useful advice!

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/60253610/Temp/antenna.jpg

Hengzhou
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Hengzhou,

Thank you for providing that picture.

I was under the impression we were talking about a satellite dish antenna vs. a VHF antenna.

There are different antennas available to receive todays digital television transmission that work well and have a much smaller footprint.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CarolR11 on 10/01/2013 10:12 AM
Hengzhou, Tim's first post and Glen's & Brian's are good ideas.

With all due respect, Bruce, HOAs with common area or exclusive use common areas may have rules that prevent water penetration into the common area walls, balcony decks, etc. That's why such devices cannot be attached to a railing by penetrating it. I did read the FCC Q&A.

My note about aesthetic issues, Bruce, was NOT about the antenna, but about the stack of books on the chair. We only have a couple of dishes here and both are on free standing tripods.

Hengzhou, it occurs to me that your HOA requires Architectural Committee approval to erect antennae. Once again, I urge you to read your HOA's documents, including its architectural guideline. The Architectural Committee per FCC regs must act quickly on your request.

You are WAY off base. The HOA cannot require advance approval no matter how quickly they claim to act. The FCC does not say the Architectural Committee must act quickly, it say advance approval is PROHIBITED for exclusive use areas.

Many HOA boards have thought as you do and they got shot down. That's why I've suggested reading more than the Q&A. You need to take the time (a lot, I agree) to read the declaratory judgements to gain an insight into how the folks at the FCC really think and how the OTARD rules are interpreted. You will find that even in recent years associations have tried the same stuff that was tried in previous years by other associations as was rejected by the FCC. That's what comes from reading only the Q&A.

Can you explain to me how mounting a dish to a rail with a bracket can cause water penetration into walls or decks?
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
I got a response from the property manager that they don't like the look of my chair with books. I probably would get a pole with umbrella base.

Regardless of this, I wonder if they are allowed to reject my current setup for aesthetics? They seemed to indicate that they have power to enforce rules on what can show up on the patio. I started to develop a feeling that a standing pole would not be too much of a requirement, and I may well lose if I bring this to FCC.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 10/01/2013 11:41 AM
Hengzhou,

Thank you for providing that picture.

I was under the impression we were talking about a satellite dish antenna vs. a VHF antenna.

There are different antennas available to receive todays digital television transmission that work well and have a much smaller footprint.

Sorry, Hengzhou, but your antenna isn't covered or protected by the OTARD rules.

1. It's bigger than 1 meter. The rules cover antennas one meter or less in diameter. Your antenna is longer than that. From the picture one can conclude that the antenna is longer than the chair is high. Typical chair seats are 17" from the ground and the back appears to be at least that long. That's 34" and the antenna, if standing on the ground, appears as if it would be higher than the chair.

2. The rule doesn't cover "stick" or what in technical terms is sometimes referred to as a "yagi" antenna. That's what you have. From the FCC's Q&A:

"Q: I want a conventional "stick" antenna to receive a distant over-the air television signal. Does the rule apply to me?"

"A: No. The rule does not apply to television antennas used to receive a distant signal."

3. Furthermore, the antenna is not mounted to efficiently receive a direct broadcast signal. TV broadcast signals are horizontally polarized which means to be most effective, yagi antennas should be mounted in the horizontal plane. Yours is vertical and is pointing upwards as if to receive a signal coming from the sky. You have lost the gain that can be obtained from the parasitic elements (directors and reflectors) of a yagi antenna.

Simply put, your antenna is not protected by the FCC OTARD rules and apparently is not permitted by your association.

Take it down.
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hi Bruce,

Thank you for your very detailed response.

1. My antenna is less than 1 meter in any dimension... I can give you an exact measure when I am at home, but I think the photo may be a bit tricky to look at.

2. They have similar appearance but it's not a yagi antenna. Please see this link:
http://www.amazon.com/ANT751-Quality-Durable-Compact-Outdoor/dp/B0024R4B5C/ref=sr_sp-atf_title_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380666254&sr=8-1&keywords=ANT751

3. To be honest, I have tried all positions of my antenna. And the current setup gives me the most number of channels.
CapabelC (California)
Posts: 18
Posted:
I use this antenna mounted inward on my patio and haven't had any complaints. it's a little more in cost, but it's such a high gain antenna you could lay it flat on the floor of your patio and still get an amazing signal.

http://www.amazon.com/Antennas-Direct-ClearStream4-HDTV-Antenna/dp/B001BRXW74/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1380668199&sr=8-9&keywords=hd+antenna
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Well, Bruce, as i said we only have two dishes in twin towers of 200+. So I won't be reading case law about how the FCC has prevailed. ARC approval, in this case, means simply making sure the 1 meter isn't exceeded and that it's erected safely. For now, and since it's non-essential for me because we're still hammering out our '14 budget, I'll take the opinions at the davis-stirling.com website written by attorneys.

Others may certainly wish to pursue more reading on the topic.

Our balcony rails, which are tube steel, are exclusive use common areas. Water inside of them conceivably could enter the buildings to which they're attached or cause rust in the railings themselves. I promise you that numerous HOAs such as ours have rules against such penetration.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CarolR11 on 10/01/2013 4:31 PM
Well, Bruce, as i said we only have two dishes in twin towers of 200+. So I won't be reading case law about how the FCC has prevailed. ARC approval, in this case, means simply making sure the 1 meter isn't exceeded and that it's erected safely. For now, and since it's non-essential for me because we're still hammering out our '14 budget, I'll take the opinions at the davis-stirling.com website written by attorneys.

Others may certainly wish to pursue more reading on the topic.

Our balcony rails, which are tube steel, are exclusive use common areas. Water inside of them conceivably could enter the buildings to which they're attached or cause rust in the railings themselves. I promise you that numerous HOAs such as ours have rules against such penetration.

In all due respect, you are now grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to be right and have the last word..

Many associations that have been shot down by the FCC were represented by attorneys. What a waste of homeowners' money.

Balcony rails made of tubular steel do not necessarily equate to water penetration into walls or decks. Furthermore, you did not address how a clamp, that doesn't penetrate the tubular steel, causes a problem.

ARC approval still is prohibited. Period! If the concern is safety, the association must specify how the the safety problem can be mitigated.

Federal law trumps Davis-Stirling.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Did anyone miss this is a RENTER? The homeowner would be pentalized for their actions? It may be the owner that does not want things attached. The owner is not requesting this and the HOA should address the owner. Just saying all this does not matter if this is a renter in violation. The owner is responsible and to their property/HOA.

Former HOA President
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By HengzhouD on 10/01/2013 3:27 PM
Hi Bruce,

Thank you for your very detailed response.

1. My antenna is less than 1 meter in any dimension... I can give you an exact measure when I am at home, but I think the photo may be a bit tricky to look at.

2. They have similar appearance but it's not a yagi antenna. Please see this link:
http://www.amazon.com/ANT751-Quality-Durable-Compact-Outdoor/dp/B0024R4B5C/ref=sr_sp-atf_title_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1380666254&sr=8-1&keywords=ANT751

3. To be honest, I have tried all positions of my antenna. And the current setup gives me the most number of channels.

Who told you it wasn't a yagi antenna? The link you provided is merely an Amazon.com link that does not provide any detailed specifications.

I'm an electrical engineer with education in antenna design and I know a yagi antenna when I see one. Even looking at the picture on Amazon.com it has all the characteristics of a yagi antenna. Elements 1, 2 and 5 appear to be active elements (counting from the left). Elements 3 and 4 are parasitic elements and are either VHF director elements or UHF reflector elements, or both. Elements 6, 7 and 8 appear to be director elements. Judging from the relative length of these elements, I would guess that element 6 is a VHF director and elements 7 and 8 are UHF directors. I've been doing this since before 1960.

You may get the most channels, but that's because you've lost the directional characteristics afforded by a yagi antenna because of the way you have it mounted.

It's still not covered by the FCC OTARD rules. Sorry, but if it was, I would be the first to tell you.
HengzhouD (California)
Posts: 13
Posted:
hmmm... I see. Thank you!
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
For heaven's sake, Bruce. In one of my posts, I supported your suggestion that folks take a look themselves beyond the FCC Q&A. This is so especially if it's an issue in their HOA. It's not in mine.

No need to debate the extent to which water could intrude into our common area walls, ceilings, balcony floors. It's in black & white in our original CC&Rs. I see lots of balconies in three neighboring HOA's towers and they, too, do not have items attached to their balcony walls, railings, ceiling, etc. No one here ever has complained about this CC&R. I thought perhaps there was a similar one Hengzhou's HOA, but I was only guessing. Do note, Bruce, he didn't mention his clamp set-up till much later in the thread.

Right, Melissa, I think we all noticed that Hengzhou is a tenant. We don't know if his owner was notified of the infraction or not.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 10/01/2013 5:38 PM
Did anyone miss this is a RENTER? The homeowner would be pentalized for their actions? It may be the owner that does not want things attached. The owner is not requesting this and the HOA should address the owner. Just saying all this does not matter if this is a renter in violation. The owner is responsible and to their property/HOA.

That's irrelevant.

The FCC doesn't care if the antenna is put up by a renter or an owner. The OTARD rules covers owners and renters. As far as the association is concerned, the owner may be the responsible party, but the FCC doesn't care. The antenna is either protected by the OTARD rules or its not. If the owner doesn't want something attached, that issue is between the owner and the renter and doesn't involve the HOA. If the HOA can't enforce a restriction against the owner because of the OTARD rules, it can't enforce it against the renter either.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here