💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
For months we were subjected to the ranting of Crazy Mike the anti-HOA zealot from Mass. The lies, promises and predictions never ended about how he would single handedly end HOAs as we know them not only in Mass. but across the nation. He would protect the Constitution, truth, justice and his version of the American way.

Recently, the courts ruled on his latest appeals to decisions that went against him. Those appeals were denied as were all the others.

The link below provides the details as to the status of his cases. Now all closed or denied. Michael Reardon the one man HOA wrecking crew who in the end slapped down no one. Who changed nothing. Who accomplished ZIPPO. Even with his on-line legal degree he failed.

10 years of right fighting to prove some point in his mind alone and in the end 10 years of total and complete failure.

Funny how Mike has quieted down and ridden off into the sunset.

Perhaps reality has sunken in for him. Hopefully, his fan club and followers don't take the news to hard. Their hero was a fraud.

Oh what Mike was going to do.......

http://www.ma-appellatecourts.org/search_party.php?pln=reardon&pfn=michael&dfy=&dsc=&ddt=&dtp=&sort=&get=Search
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Jon,

Let sleeping dogs lie. There is no good reason to continue to bash Mike no matter how much anyone feels he deserves it. Let's all move on.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 09/24/2013 8:46 PM
Jon,

Let sleeping dogs lie. There is no good reason to continue to bash Mike no matter how much anyone feels he deserves it. Let's all move on.

Larry with all due respect the lesson some people should take away from all of this is that there are snake oil salesman like Mike and OTHERS out there willing to sell you a bill of goods as to how YOU can get YOUR way in YOUR HOA.

Mike suggested on several occasions suing your HOA was the way to go. Mike suggested cases have been settled supporting HIS version of reality.
Mike claimed courts had ruled in similar cases to his in favor of the plaintiffs. Mike claimed to have an understanding of the law and why it would rule in his favor. Mike like others made it sound rather simple, cut and dry and easy. Guess after 10 years reality shows us all something far different.

Mike in fact was or is a liar. SO...... before you file a suit against your HOA better do your homework and find out if what you are doing is even possible. Mike claimed it was, when NONE of his actions succeeded.

Mike Reardon is a fraud. A wind bag loaded, hot air spitting fraud.

Beware of people who promise YOU what YOU want when they can't even get it for themselves............

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
I've always just ignored what mike said. You should too.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
i've ignored the entire fight between Mike and others here, and will continue to do so. But, there's a piece of golden advice in the OP's original post:

Beware of others who promise you what you want to hear.

Everyone would do better in life if they remembered and practiced that.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
For the record, I think Mike is a real jerk. I also think the same about Jon. But discussions about Mike's and Jon's characters belong on Facebook and not on this forum. Mike's loss in court is not a gain for me and it's doubtful that anyone else on this forum gained from his loss.

This thread is totally inappropriate for this forum and should die a quick death. The only purpose of the post was to perpetuate a dispute between a couple of jerks.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 09/25/2013 1:44 PM
For the record, I think Mike is a real jerk. I also think the same about Jon. But discussions about Mike's and Jon's characters belong on Facebook and not on this forum. Mike's loss in court is not a gain for me and it's doubtful that anyone else on this forum gained from his loss.

This thread is totally inappropriate for this forum and should die a quick death. The only purpose of the post was to perpetuate a dispute between a couple of jerks.


Well then Larry skip it.

And sorry to have to tell you Larry I gave up taking instructions from folks like you LONG ago.

This is after all a public forum so deal with it.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Larry the posters here and I don't exempt myself, have never found it hard to flog a dead horse. Although this is info Jon has posted before in other threads so I see no purpose of this posting except an effort to stir the pot.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
There is something to be said for closure/resolution. It can be done without beating a dead horse though.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GlenL on 09/25/2013 3:07 PM
Larry the posters here and I don't exempt myself, have never found it hard to flog a dead horse. Although this is info Jon has posted before in other threads so I see no purpose of this posting except an effort to stir the pot.

Well Glen reality is that the courts just rendered their decision earlier this month on Mike's remaining case and appeal. So.... your assumption this was information I already provided would in fact be incorrect.

And with this most recent denial ALL of Mike's pending litigation is now concluded.

Each and every one a loss.

But it would appear you did not bother to check the link or review the information.

Mike had made the comment his legal action was FAR from over and that the fat lady had not yet sung. Well it seems the fat lady sang and her song is now over.

So there was a purpose I intended not the assumptions you made.

PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
You subjected yourself [to rants] JonD1.

You invested how much time of your short life to this pursuit?

I never read them.

After the first 100 words of any post I get bored.

Now you're subjecting us to your crazy rants. Well for me actually the first sentence or two.

The fact you follow cases, links, etc. on such things is indicitive of an obsession.

I guess you were right, congratulations.

Now what?
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
I'd say that someone has a fixation that may be at questionable levels.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PeterD3 on 09/25/2013 3:57 PM
You subjected yourself [to rants] JonD1.

You invested how much time of your short life to this pursuit?

I never read them.

After the first 100 words of any post I get bored.

Now you're subjecting us to your crazy rants. Well for me actually the first sentence or two.

The fact you follow cases, links, etc. on such things is indicitive of an obsession.

I guess you were right, congratulations.

Now what?

So Peter clicking on a link in your world is that much of an effort?? And your reading this post and replying in such a meaningless manner is wise use of your time here on Earth?

Now that's interesting.

What amazes me is your need to comment along with others. If you find no purpose than simply move along. I do that all the time.

Myself, when someone makes claims and promises as to what they have done and what they plan to accomplish I have an interest in finding out in that is fact based.

Some people just might not be forthcoming with their behavior and that requires an effort to determine for yourself whether their version is true or not.

But that requires a little time, effort and attention span longer that a few hundred words.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Want to know what court case Mike will win? A restraining order against JonD1.
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
"Some people just might not be forthcoming with their behavior and that requires an effort to determine for yourself whether their version is true or not."

Who cares if it's true or not?

This is just an anoymous forum mostly about HOAs.

You don't even know if Mike is who he says he is or someone pretending to be the individual involved in this or other cases.

How will you determine that?

For me it's entertainment and typically when its raining outside.

There exactly one hundred words no more no less.

Go ahead and count them yourself if you want.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
I do Peter and if you don't who cares?

How do I even know you are Peter? How do I even know you exist?

So I guess Mike fabricated the entire story, the ten years with hundreds of posts on this site and others, the written articles quoting him, the court records, the Facebook page that's really YOUR position?

That would explain your limited attention span.

I would hope for lots of sunshine in the sunshine state to keep you better occupied.
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
You don't know if I [Peter Dikke or Dikke Peter] exist. That's been my point for a long time.

Out of nowhere you have to bring up Mike, his this, his that, and the other things then complain about being sujected to it.

Why come on a public forum and exhibit obsessive behaviour and not expect someone to comment about it?

It's always a pleasure to chat with you.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here