💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DavidB35 (Texas)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Texas

1. Both a husband and wife are on our Hoa-might this be/not be giving them more chance to get items done to their personal ideals?
2. Husband is president. Is he allowed to vote?
3. If 'things' seem to be getting done by their building, should we insist that they are abusing Hoa to improve their property stop? Is this considered abuse of standing?
We have had so much of past Hoa doing projects that improve the looks of their buildings that we are wary of a member doing any work where they live.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
1. Sure could happen.

2. Unless there is something in your CC&R's to prevent it, yes he is.
The one vote per household common in most CC&R's only refers to items the homeowner may vote on. Every Board member has a vote.

3. If you and your neighbors are unhappy about how things are being done, then you need to step up, get some viable candidates and either recall them or vote them off at the next election.

While most posters agree that it is a bad practice to have members from the same household serving on the Board at the same time, unless your CC&R's prohibit it, it is allowable. I've seen husbands and wives that were in lockstep and others who disagreed about everything. Just like two best friends or you will hear this a lot in HOA's when a vote doesn't go the way someone thinks it should, X director and his/her henchmen.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
LynneV1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 211
Posted:
I do not like that arrangement. When husbands and wives are on the same board and/or other commitees, they get twice the votes of the other board members and control decisions unfairly. The nominations that get mailed out next time should state only one member per household can run for any board or committee. Also make sure both their names on on the deed to the property since only "owners" can run for board positions.
good luck.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Is it really any different than 2 or 3 golf/poker/drinking/etc... buddies being on the board together?
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Glen's 2 & 3 are correct so far as I know. The only way to keep co-owners from serving on the Board simultaneously would be if your governing documents prevent it. Read yours, David. Lynne would seem to be incorrect.

I agree, though, that the co-owners both being on the board gives off a bad impression. Homeowners will suspect self dealing. They will think that couple is making decisions that benefit the couple, or benefit them the most.

More, what if it's a Board of only three? How many are on your board, David?

Tell us about your "buildings," David. Are several dwellings in each building? How many such buildings are there? Are there also detached homes in your HOA? Depending on the physical set up of your HOA, it is possible that the couple votes in such a way as to create a "conflict of interest." If there is a clear conflict of interest, the rest of the board should tell them to recuse themselves from voting (not vote on that topic).

CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Glen's 2 & 3 are correct so far as I know. The only way to keep co-owners from serving on the Board simultaneously would be if your governing documents prevent it. Read yours, David. Lynne would seem to be incorrect.

I agree, though, that the co-owners both being on the board gives off a bad impression. Homeowners will suspect self dealing. They will think that couple is making decisions that benefit the couple, or benefit them the most.

More, what if it's a Board of only three? How many are on your board, David?

Tell us about your "buildings," David. Are several dwellings in each building? How many such buildings are there? Are there also detached homes in your HOA? Depending on the physical set up of your HOA, it is possible that the couple votes in such a way as to create a "conflict of interest." If there is a clear conflict of interest, the rest of the board should tell them to recuse themselves from voting (not vote on that topic).

DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
But if this is a case of "building vs building" in the case of townhomes or something of the sort, there again is no material difference between a husband & wife serving on the board, or two friends in the same building serving on the board.

To get beyond that, the documents would need to be amended to prevent multiple board members per building.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Or, you know, people could get off their apathetic behinds, and vote someone else onto the board.

or not. it's easier to do nothing and whine.
DavidB35 (Texas)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Thanks everyone.
Yes both of them are on title.
There are 10 buildings, 4-8 units per building
Four Board members.

Question...
Looking at Robert's Rules, I am confused I do not have the physical book but online book I see "the pres has same voting/motion rights as other members". Then I see " in a business a pres does not have the right to vote except breaking a tie" Is this because a condo HOA is not a "business", but a "non-profit"?
Thank you
DavidB35 (Texas)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Oh..getting owners "off their apathetic behinds"?!! You must be jesting!!
DavidB35 (Texas)
Posts: 19
Posted:
I also see that the vast majority of Hoa do not truly follow RR because they are so intricate. That an Hoa will SAY they use RR but really are very loose so should not say they are.
Comments??
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Not a real fan of RR but I believe where you see that the president only votes in case of a tie would be for large Boards. Someone once posted here that RR stated that didn't apply to small Boards. Why only four members on the Board? Most are set up with odd numbers 3,5,7,9 to prevent ties although they still can happen, it is less likely.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
While most HOA's are non-profit, they are still businesses. If you take the time to add up the value of the land, the buildings and any amenities, you'll find that the Board is responsible for more than your average for profit business.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DavidB35 on 09/17/2013 8:25 PM
Thanks everyone.
Yes both of them are on title.
There are 10 buildings, 4-8 units per building
Four Board members.

Question...
Looking at Robert's Rules, I am confused I do not have the physical book but online book I see "the pres has same voting/motion rights as other members". Then I see " in a business a pres does not have the right to vote except breaking a tie" Is this because a condo HOA is not a "business", but a "non-profit"?
Thank you

Robert's Rules aside, the answer is simple:

If a board member was elected as a board member (director) by the unit owners, he/she is entitled to one vote, regardless of any officer position that person may hold. It is improper to deny a director of that right.

Officers and directors are two different positions. One person may be a director AND be an officer. Directors vote, officers have no vote. When a person votes, that person votes as a director, not as an officer.

In many associations, board members are also officers. Some associations require that the president be a board member. Being elected president does not remove the right of that person to vote as a director.

No one gets two votes. A person who is president cannot vote as a director and also as president to break a tie. That is a definite no-no.

In many organizations, the presiding officer, in order to preserve the appearance of neutrality, does not vote, even if that person is a member, unless the vote would affect the outcome (such as voting to break a tie or voting to make a tie).

Some people get the idea of the presiding officer voting only to break a tie from the way our U.S. Senate works. The vice-president, who presides over the senate, votes only to break a tie. This is because the vice-president is not a senator and therefore not a member of the Senate and therefore has no vote other than for the purpose stated in the U.S. Constitution.
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
I haven't read all the responses. But I know the state of FL prohibits a husband and wife serving on a Board at the same time. However, even in Fl there is an exception made if there are no one else is able and willing to serve as a Borad member.

Granted this is not the best arrangement, but it is the arrangement we have at this time. Neither our state laws nor our documents prohibit a husband and wife from serving at the same time.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
I'm curious about why there are 4 on your Board, David? Do your bylaws or other docs specify four?

Yes, the prez may vote on small boards as others have pointed out.

So, David, is your primary concern that the couple on the board is spending too much $$$ on their building and neglecting the other nine buildings? In what ways do they get extras goodies? New roof and no one else does? Better landscaping?
JH3 (Maryland)
Posts: 67
Posted:
Assuming "on our HOA" you mean "are on the board of your HOA."

You can only have 1 vote per unit owned. Its unclear if they own more than one unit. If they both own the same unit, only one can serve on the board, as only one of them can vote. If they own multiple units, then it presents a conflict of interest and needs to be disclosed. Then you need to check your documents, and FL corporate law to see if its legal for a husband and wife to serve on the board at the same time if they own multiple units.

"Roberts Rules" is a book as is "the art of war", not a binding legal document. Yeah, it helps you figure out things, but you're not required to follow it - unless specifically stated in your documents (which would be amazingly dumb).

Everyone who gets on an HOA board is there for a reason - theirs. You dont like where the board is doing work, get on the board and do work somewhere else.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JH3 on 09/20/2013 11:42 PM
Assuming "on our HOA" you mean "are on the board of your HOA."

You can only have 1 vote per unit owned. Its unclear if they own more than one unit. If they both own the same unit, only one can serve on the board, as only one of them can vote. If they own multiple units, then it presents a conflict of interest and needs to be disclosed. Then you need to check your documents, and FL corporate law to see if its legal for a husband and wife to serve on the board at the same time if they own multiple units.

"only one can serve" yet "check your documents"? You seem very quick to assume on a topic that certainly varies from HOA to HOA.

One vote per unit in matters upon which the entire membership is entitled to vote: YES. Normal
One vote per unit even if two people from the same unit serve on the board: No. Completely incorrect if the documents and laws permit multiple board members from the same unit. Each board member gets one vote. It has nothing to do with one per unit at that point.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JH3 on 09/20/2013 11:42 PM
Assuming "on our HOA" you mean "are on the board of your HOA."

You can only have 1 vote per unit owned.

JH,

I believe that you are confusing a members voting rights with that of Directors voting rights.
It is certainly clear that when members vote, they get 1 vote per lot (although some Condominiums actually use percentages). Members cast their votes at general membership meetings.

Directors get 1 vote each. Directors cast their votes at Board of Directors meetings.

Officers of an Association get no votes.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JH3 on 09/20/2013 11:42 PM

Its unclear if they own more than one unit. If they both own the same unit, only one can serve on the board, as only one of them can vote.

The validity of that statement would depend on each Associations governing documents and applicable State laws.

Governing documents vary from Association to Association and State laws vary from State to State.

As for the one vote per unit, that rule typically does not apply to votes by Directors. See my earlier post.

Quote:
Posted By JH3 on 09/20/2013 11:42 PM

If they own multiple units, then it presents a conflict of interest and needs to be disclosed.

I'm not sure that the mere fact of owning multiple units presents a conflict of interest. However, depending on the issues, it might.

Quote:
Posted By JH3 on 09/20/2013 11:42 PM

Then you need to check your documents, and FL corporate law to see if its legal for a husband and wife to serve on the board at the same time

Good advice except that DavidB35 lives in Texas. Therefore, the TX corporate laws would be applicable.

You can tell where the individual is located by reading the name of the State under their name.

Quote:
Posted By JH3 on 09/20/2013 11:42 PM

"Roberts Rules" is a book as is "the art of war", not a binding legal document. Yeah, it helps you figure out things, but you're not required to follow it - unless specifically stated in your documents (which would be amazingly dumb).

True Statement.

However, Robert's Rules of Order is considered the defacto standard for facilitating discussions and group decision-making. Unfortunately, even parliamentarians don't fully understand Robert's Rules.

Quote:
Posted By JH3 on 09/20/2013 11:42 PM

Everyone who gets on an HOA board is there for a reason - theirs.

Excellent point
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
JH,

Granted, it is a common misunderstanding to think that the rules for voting of the members also apply to votes by Directors. I do hope that you simply misunderstood the postings vs. you truly believe that the "one vote per lot" language actually applies to Directors as well.

I say this because in a different thread you mentioned that your firm manages several Associations.

Many individuals who serve on Boards expect that the advice received from a management company or property manager is accurate and won't bother to verify if the advice truly is correct (I'm not one of those). Therefore, I become concerned when those who are considered professionals in the COA/HOA industry offer what I perceive to be incorrect advice.

As I said, I don't think it's wise for more than one individual from any family to serve on the Board (regardless how many properties they own). However, it's more typical than not for the Association governing documents to not have any qualifications for a Director that prevent this from happening. Heck, I'd go as far to say that most Assocaitions don't have any qualifications to serve as Director.

Once an individual purchases property within an Association, that individual becomes a member of the Association. As a member, this person is allowed to exercise all the powers and authority associated with membership in the Association and subject to any limitations on such power/authority (such as only one vote per lot regardless of how many members own the lot) outlined within the contract (the CC&Rs). Typically this is the right to use common areas and common amenities, and the right to cast one vote per lot owned on any issue brought before the membership for a vote.

If an individual meets any qualification requirements outlined in applicable laws or the governing documents, when that individual is elected or appointed as a Director they are allowed to exercise all the powers and authority associated with that position. Typically, this is simply the authority to cast a single vote on all matters brought before the Board. However, this power and authority is in addition to any power or authority they may have as a member of the Association.

If that same individual is appointed as an Officer of the Association, that individual is allowed to exercise all the powers and authority associated with that office. This would be in addition to any power and authority they may have from serving as a Director or simply being a member of the Association.

Tim

CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Tim, while JH3 claims to for a MC, JH3 doesn't set that s/he's a property manager. So I'm skeptical about the level of knowledge.

I agree with you and DaveD3
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Jeez, sorry about my typos. JH3 doesn't claim--on the post Tim referred to--to be an actual property manager only to work for an MC. We don't know in what capacity.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
NP on the typos.

I understood what you were posting Carol. It was also an excellent point that we don't know in what capacity JH works.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Our Bylaws say:

The directors shall be Members or spouses of such Members; provided, however, no person and his or her spouse may serve on the Board at the same time.

No brainer for us.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
John,

I like your Bylaws. Our Bylaws have no requirements to serve. Therefore, you could serve on my Board if duly elected or appointed.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Let me know when your elections are Tim. I feel like I might have a shot at a seat
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Yoohoo! Only 2 more seats to fill

There on October 24th.

E-mail me your info for the ballot.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here