💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KarenC15 (Florida)
Posts: 118
Posted:
I recently requested the records of the association, including emails among board members, and was told by a lawyer for the property manager that the board can email in quorum as long as it does not vote and those records are private. I have done a great deal of research and can't find where they would get that conclusion. Part of what a voting member would like to know is the position of officers and directors. Having the board meet privately via email or phone and just show up to the meetings to vote seems inconsistent with the statutes in Florida. Has anyone had experience with that? I was thinking of contacting the DPR to inquire, but they don't seem to do much except tell you to sue yourself.

Hatred is contagious, so one should work to avoid it.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Our Board often sends out items prior to a meeting taking place. Sometimes there are questions of clarifying nature, sometimes there are no questions at all. This is done in order to save time at the actual meeting.

Motions and Decisions to any of those items are done at the meeting itself. The position of any individual Director would be known by the way they voted.

If any decisions were made through e-mail the e-mails would then become part of the minutes to show an action without a meeting. Otherwise, the e-mails would not be part of the official record.
JeanneK3 (Maryland)
Posts: 562
Posted:
In Maryland all discussions and voting must be done at an open announced meeting of the board. Any discussion by e-mail would be illegal.
Jeanne
KarenC15 (Florida)
Posts: 118
Posted:
The statue in FL seems to also read that way too.

Hatred is contagious, so one should work to avoid it.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Sounds like you need to understand your state's laws.

We routinely conduct business by meeting. Vote, approve things, and anything else that we would do at a normal meeting. Our bylaws explicitly permit such acivity. However, decisions made without a meeting are read into the official minutes.

I'm not sure why you would have a problem with that. The official record of the HOA is the minutes. A meeting of the board, with or without other members present, can have small talk, opinions, and other things that are tangential to the motions raised and voted on. THOSE are the official records. It's not like you would ask for a word-for-word transcript of a meeting, would you?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Regulations concerning BOD Member discussions about association business (via Email, phone, FAX, face to face, etc.) outside of a formal meeting will vary from state to state. Most states do allow such discussions to take place as long as no motions are made nor votes are taken.

A discussion is not always a meeting.

Allowed or not, one has to be extremely naïve to think such does not happen. Paranoid people are sure such is happening as they know they are the one being talked about.....LOL

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DaveD3 on 08/29/2013 9:46 AM
Sounds like you need to understand your state's laws.

We routinely conduct business by meeting. Vote, approve things, and anything else that we would do at a normal meeting. Our bylaws explicitly permit such acivity. However, decisions made without a meeting are read into the official minutes.

I'm not sure why you would have a problem with that. The official record of the HOA is the minutes. A meeting of the board, with or without other members present, can have small talk, opinions, and other things that are tangential to the motions raised and voted on. THOSE are the official records. It's not like you would ask for a word-for-word transcript of a meeting, would you?

Dave

Many have requested/demanded a word for word transcript. Myself, I believe in audio recording meetings and allowing anyone to have a copy for a nominal charge.

Now that we know what I am, all that remains is discussing the nominal charge...LOL
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
What would you gain by having a word for word transcript? You have the official voting records and action taken, right?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DaveD3 on 08/29/2013 2:29 PM
What would you gain by having a word for word transcript? You have the official voting records and action taken, right?

Dave

Easy to agree with that but the vote does not always reflect what one had to say about some things...or someone...for the paranoia crowd.

I was on an elected business/fraternal organization BOD. We had a contrarian/fool elected. I 2nded every motion he ever made and then I voted against most of them. He asked me why did I 2nd then vote against? I said for two reasons. You deserve to be heard and how else will people know how foolish/stupid you are if not in the minutes.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:

Allowed or not, one has to be extremely naïve to think such does not happen.


Humans talk to each other. It may be at the breakfast place over coffee, at the local bar, email, phone, etc. Legal or not, you really can't stop it. It's not controllable.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Its unreasonable to expect that all board business can be done at formal meetings; there are day to day operational decisions that must be made and the decisions can be ratified later at a meeting. Examples include approving ARB forms that are routine and do not need discussion (such as someone requesting to paint their house an already approved color). Often, emails include lots of information in the one email, like homeowners that are past due and in collections, which in Florida, is protected information. So long as decisions are being made in the open at meetings that are properly noticed, there is no need for you to see emails.
KarenC15 (Florida)
Posts: 118
Posted:
I am not in a house HOA (we are townhomes) so we don't have architectural issues, etc. The board limits talking about issues in meetings because they do not appreciate any input or dissent, which has made them ineffective. I would like to see Sunshine law extended to these boards because most of what they are doing (in the case of my community) is in private, especially if they are not required to disclose their arguments and points of view on issues...Does anyone know if that is in Part II of Florida's HOA law changes?

Hatred is contagious, so one should work to avoid it.
KarenC15 (Florida)
Posts: 118
Posted:
Dave,

I think members could see why a decision was made. For example, once we had a change limiting the age of people who could use the pool. Turns out, the decision was made by the board president and one other board member calling the treasurer repeatedly at her home until she purchased signs revealing an age restriction. The PM then had the sign mounted. No meeting. No discussion. So, members had no idea when or why that happened. Turns out, it was all private and done because the two people didn't like someone's kid using the pool. At subsequent meeting, the board refused to change it even though it had not been discussed, etc. It took HUD action to remove something that was not legal or appropriate in the first place. Doing business in an open, noticed meeting would have prevented that rather than having phone call and email meetings.

Hatred is contagious, so one should work to avoid it.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Even if your board never emailed and every single thing they ever did, they did in front of you, they might still limit talking about issues because they do not appreciate any input or dissent. They are not required to disclose their arguments and points of view on issues. All they are required to do is properly notice a meeting, put certain pending items up for discussion and vote. HOA boards do, to a certain extent, operate in the sunshine, however; they are not subject to public records requests like government agencies are. The homeowners are entitled to request certain documents as stated in the statute and those documents are limited to the ones the HOA is required to keep, and that does not include emails.
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:

It's true in FL that personal emails of BOD members are not official records and thus not subject to member review.
An offocial email account of the association would be a different matter.

The use of the term quorum is misplaced in the context presented. You can't meet via email per se so a quorum is unobtainable by definition.
You could Skype or meet via other electronic means simultaneously but the technology superceedes the laws (and likely always will).

The law does however give you the right to speak on matters of the agenda only.

I understand if the directors minds are made up prior to meeting before it's membership, its impossible to prevent the item(s) from becoming ratified as they are not compelled to consider audience opinions in their decisions.

Anther tool available to many FL BODs is the "Action without a meeting". However it requires 100% unanimity and must follow other specifics such as be certified at the next regular scheduled BOD meeting.

Your best to further review your rights and act in good faith to exercise them.

See if others feel as you do apply the laws available.

This includes recalling directors and organizing a change of regime at the next election cycle.

DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KarenC15 on 08/30/2013 4:23 PM
Dave,

I think members could see why a decision was made. For example, once we had a change limiting the age of people who could use the pool. Turns out, the decision was made by the board president and one other board member calling the treasurer repeatedly at her home until she purchased signs revealing an age restriction. The PM then had the sign mounted. No meeting. No discussion. So, members had no idea when or why that happened. Turns out, it was all private and done because the two people didn't like someone's kid using the pool. At subsequent meeting, the board refused to change it even though it had not been discussed, etc. It took HUD action to remove something that was not legal or appropriate in the first place. Doing business in an open, noticed meeting would have prevented that rather than having phone call and email meetings.

Sounds like there was a rule made.
If the decision to enact such a rule was not made in a meeting, was not read into the minutes of a meeting as having been voted on & passed, then the rule simply does NOT exist. No more so thank if you decided to put up a sign on your own.

Two people emailing "I think we should.... ok, let's do it" is not a meeting.

It sounds like your board is comprised of some idiots that aren't following common procedures. Do your documents state that meetings are to be held per Roberts Rules of Order, or anything of the sort? If so, they are clearly in violation and I would suggest pointing that out to them. Perhaps a not-so-friendly letter from an attorney to that point would help.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here