💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RayM6 (Virginia)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Looking to see how other boards approach this - we are a 230 home subdivision in VA. Many of our homes are surrounded by wooded common areas which include a nature trail and walking paths. We have been getting requests and have been "put on notice" to take down several dead/dying trees, some of which are leaning toward houses.

Our PM suggests taking down ones that look to pose an immediate threat. Seems reasonable, however given the amount of trees in our neighborhood, there is concern about the cost. We have already spent over 10k this year and have estimates for another 5k. One tree alone will cost 2k. Obviously we don't want to see anyone hurt, but we do need to manage it consistently, fairly and within our means. If it means just cut them down and bite the bullet so be it, just looking for any other perspectives.

How do some other HOA's handle? Cut them down when asked, case by case, let the owner do it?
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Ray,

I recall another thread on here a few months ago about the liability of falling trees.

This is from memory so it may not be correct: the owner of a fallen tree becomes liable for damages if he is made aware of the problem before the tree falls. Otherwise, there is no liability.

I am not sure how many trees you have to worry about but there should be money in the budget and in reserves to deal with tree trimming/removal/replanting. This should not be a budgetary surprise.

Ask yourselves what will happen if a tree that you knew was a problem falls onto a home? How much will that cost to remedy? What is your insurance deductible and how many claims can you make before your carrier drops your association?

Can any of the these trees be turned into wood for fireplaces? My experience has been that removal of a cut-down tree is the most expensive part of the job. If you can get homeowners to take the material off your hands you are money ahead.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Ray,

As for liability, as I understand it, once the Association is made aware of a dead or dying tree, if they do nothing and it falls (even in a storm) then the Association is likely responsible for any damage since they would have been negligent in failing to address the issue once known.

We are only 130 lots but also have many mature trees. This is what we have done:

1) Had an Arborist evaluate all trees and identify what was needed to be done (this was done for free by a company who then submitted a proposal of work). The Arbotist also placed each work into three priorities. (contact me and I'll provide the name: [email protected]

Basically, the Pri 1 were diseased trees that needed to be removed to prevent the diseased from spreading and dead trees that posed threats to property. Pri2 were dead trees that didn't pose threats to property and those with dead limbs. Pri3 were basically dead wood and general pruning.

The quote from that company was 50K (which we couldn't afford). However, we now had a plan of action for addressing the issue.

2) We then explained to the membership that we could either adopt a special assessment to do everything at once or work on the issues over several years.

The decision was made by the members to address things over several years. Therefore, we raised assessments and increased the tree trimming budget line item. We then work our way down the list bidding out each tree (or group of trees). This is our second year doing this and we are about 1/4 of the way through the list (as we have found the smaller tree trimming companies less expensive than the initial quote.

3) Considered, but was voted down, to add tree trimming as a reserve item.

BTW - if any member desires to remove a tree at their expense, we do allow it but they must request permission for each tree. Some have been on the list and some have not.

KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Tim's plan is solid to remove trees and seems sensible for the economic climate. Basically, any tree that is leaning any direction is theoretically at risk of falling and can be defined as such by professional "tree people."

Create a budget expense item.

Have a frank discussion within the community about whether the community should raise special dues or increase regular dues to cover the expense.

Create a tree trimming/removal budget item to solely handle the individual job

Target the most urgent trees for removal within that budget.

Repeat every year

When the urgency has passed, reallocate your tree budget to match the ordinary maintenance needs of your trees.

People can argue that the HOA should know the condition of its trees and therefore has under-funded the effort, leading to a maintenance "crisis." I don't think that's true in this case. This is a special and rather unusual case that you can handle with proper planning. My opinion is that the HOA is not negligent if it begins its planning to adjust its spending for tree removal. A tree might fall but there's only so much an HOA can do given their abilities to meet, debate and approve policy changes. I'm not sure I'd tap Reserve Funds to cut trees - enough "stuff" gnaws on reserve fund levels to keep them low.
RayM6 (Virginia)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Thanks. Tim's plan does look solid and is generally in line with what a couple of us are thinking. Thoughts vary on the board so this is helpful. We allocate funds each year, but this year has been a bit extreme.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I went through this exact situation. We had some Southern pine trees on the boarder of the property. I had a professional arborist come and do an evaluation. A few of the trees showed signs of pine beetle infestation. Which spreads between trees pretty readily. The beetle made the trees a risk of falling over. The debate we had was that these pine trees (and others) were there at the beginning of the development. The developer just never cut them down when developing the land. At the time the trees were not very large. Now they are about 30 feet in the air or more. So the debate then became who's responsibility for existing or planted trees?

Our HOA one owns the lot and the house the house sits on. Outside of that it is considered "Common property". Which you can have some "exclusive use" of in your yard. The HOA was responsible for the common areas and this allowed us to be able to mow everyone's yard. This meant that we also were responsible for what was planted on the property and discouraged large tree plantings. So the existing trees became a serious issue as they got larger and more unstable. We eventually had several trees removed and spent a few grand on the project. (Bradford pears were a BIG issue and banned those).

However, as for those large pine trees on the boarder, we could NOT afford to remove those. They were atleast 2K a tree. Having atleast 3 trees on that list made it impossible. Our budget was 5K a month and we collected right at 5K a month. No extra money and would have to have a special assessment. Most people were for removing those trees as we all had those concerns but no one was willing to fork over the special funds to do it.

Eventually, you can tell, one of those trees did indeed fall over on a house. My last week as President of course. The tree was on piece of property but fell into the neighbors. It turns out the owner with the tree did not have insurance. That meant the home next door insurance had to handle the issue. The HOA's responsibility turned out to be to provide the cleanup of the tree debris. A $1500 bill people were none to happy I paid out for that. The tree also went across a fence between the two houses. However, fences are NOT maintained or installed by the HOA. We just APPROVE them. Meaning that the fence damage would be the individual owner's responsibility to pay for the repair.

The lesson learned from this is to consult your insurance company on the responsibility. Do NOT assume certain liabilities or lead people to believe any. These owner's and other believed the HOA would be responsible for paying the homes repairs. Not true. We had to pay for the CLEANUP and removal of the tree/debris. The owner's insurance is to pick up the damages. If anything the HOA may have to pick up their deductible worse case. So do your research and then weigh the damage versus removal. You will be surprised as what you think isn't the reality...

Former HOA President
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Ray,

I would have an arborist look at your situation but probably not one with a financial interest in getting the job - even if you pay a couple of hundred dollars for an assessment. After all, this is at least a $20,000 effort and the more you investigate, the more needs you'll find in those wooded areas.

Your community - especially those threatening the HOA - must be kept in the loop as you address the issue. You do have a legitimate interest in gauging if they're willing to fund immediate, comprehensive tree service via special assessment. I don't hold the HOA responsible for "not seeing" the tree removal challenge. Trees are meant to last longer than 30 years in many cases - beyond the window of an HOA that tries to forward-plan for property amenity replacement. This job is too big for the regular operating budget yet not qualifying as Reserve Fund item in all likelihood - a true special situation.

Trees are a regular part of our regular budget with our community funding special tree/landscape projects for three years running. You're handling this well. It's just a matter of whether the community wants immediate and comprehensive service or long-term service but not immediate fundraising. It appears your community will not have it both ways in this case.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Our area has been hit hard by Emerald Ash Borer and we've been losing a lot of Ash trees as a result. Our solution is to let residents cut them down for firewood. However, none are threatening anything other than other trees in our common area. No risk of damage to dwellings at all.

Ray, what are you getting for the couple-few thousand dollars per tree? Cut down, and completely removed from the property? Maybe a cheaper option is to have it safely put onto the ground in the common area, or laid down and cut into logs for residents to take away? Yeah yeah yeah, liability and all that stuff will be the usual concern.
RayM6 (Virginia)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Thanks for the suggestions and replies. Our meeting is tonight, and your insights are helpful. I like the suggestion about an arborist with no vested interest. For the trees that are at the edge of wooded areas, we typically just drop those. The pricey ones in question are in "high profile" common areas and close to structures. They need to be dropped and removed, along with some cleanup. That's why they're 2k.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
2K seems awfully high for any tree unless it's some 150ft (100 yr old) specimen. At one time, the Board was using the big 3-4 tree companies here in Northern Virginia and they were outragious. There are plenty of good, professional,licensed and insured tree contractors out there. When we started getting bids from different companies, the prices where all over the board (no pun).
RayM6 (Virginia)
Posts: 40
Posted:
it's a really tall, old pine tree very close to a house. We had 3 companies come out 2 local guys and a big company. Each bid was in the same ballpark. It requires use of a bucket truck - it's too tall to cut low as it will fall on a home or private property and none of the companies would climb it since the trunk is rotting.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:

How do some other HOA's handle? Cut them down when asked, case by case, let the owner do it?


Depends....

Is it HOA land, or is it privately owned land within the HOA. BIG DIFFERENCE.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
1,500 to 2K is NOT that high to pay for this type of tree removal. It's about average. It really does depend on the tree, location, and equipment/manpower needed. Our Bradford pear trees were only $60 to remove the biggest. However, we paid a few hundred for another much larger oak type tree. Considering we also had to do the tree stump grinding and sod replacement, it can get expensive...

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MikeS1 on 08/19/2013 10:38 AM
2K seems awfully high for any tree


Although someone might pay you to cut down a hardwood tree in the middle of nowhere, where it cant hit anything. They are quoting $2,500 to cut down a tree 3 feet from your $300,000 house.

You're paying them to be careful and not destroy your entire house. This will take considerably more time, skill and equipment.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here