Mike's Appeal for Rehearing DENIED

For some time now Mike has made claims as to his legal actions in regards to his own HOA. While suggesting to others suing their HOA was in fact a positive route to go. Over the past 10+ years each effort on his part has failed. Most recently, he held up the possibility his efforts were not over. According to the documents available online the court did in fact just rule on one of Mike's appeals. It was denied. But by all means read it for yourself.

"08/06/2013 #12 ORDER: The petition for rehearing filed by the appellants having been considered, it is ordered that the said petition be and it hereby is denied (Cypher, Rubin & Wolohojian, JJ.). *Notice."

Now I don't have a $250 online law degree like Mike but going out on a limb here when Mike's party asks for a rehearing and that request is denied my guess not a good thing.

I just have to wonder why Mike has not announced what has in fact occured. Why not provide us ALL with an update on what he has accomplished following his own advice.

The person who claims there is some anti-HOA movement. The man who claims to be slapping down his won Board and taking their homes. The man who gives legal advice to others as if he is some authority. The man who has failed each and every time for 10+ years seems to have failed once again.

So BraveHeart to some. The voice of reason to some. The man who has a point to some. Well seems his promises, claims, predictions are to this date, as empty and hollow as his advice.

Yes, Mike had another day in court and the court ruled against him again.

But by all means read the documents for yourselves becausee Mike is unwilling or unable to pass this news along because it doesn't support his claims.

BraveHeart not so much......................

APPEALS COURT
Panel Cases
Case Docket

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SANDRA MARKT-REARDON & another vs. FALMOUTH AIRPARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
2012-P-0505
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CASE HEADER
Case Status Petition for rehearing denied Status Date 08/06/2013
Nature Equity Entry Date 03/26/2012
Sub-Nature Subdivision, Construction of Air SJ Number
Appellant Plaintiff Case Type Civil
Brief Status Brief Due
Panel Cypher, Rubin, Wolohojian, JJ. Argued/Submitted 01/11/2013
Citation 83 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 Decision Date 02/27/2013
Lower Court Barnstable Superior Court TC Number BACV2011-00076
Lower Ct Judge Christopher J. Muse, J. TC Entry Date 02/07/2011
FAR Number FAR-21509 SJC Number

INVOLVED PARTY ATTORNEY APPEARANCE
Sandra Markt-Reardon
Pro Se Plaintiff/Appellant
Blue br, app & reply br filed
2 Extensions, 30 Days

Michael Reardon
Pro Se Plaintiff/Appellant
Blue br, app & reply br filed
2 Extensions, 30 Days

Falmouth Airpark Homeowners Asso
Defendant/Appellee
Red brief filed
Michael W. Merrill, Esquire

DOCKET ENTRIES
Entry Date Paper Entry Text
03/26/2012 #1 Entered.
03/26/2012 Notice of entry sent.
03/26/2012 #2 MOTION to waive additional filing fee, filed by Sandra Martk-Reardon, and Michael Reardon.
03/27/2012 RE#2: Allowed. The additional fee of the appellant is waived. *Notice.
04/06/2012 #3 Docketing Statement received from Sandra Martk-Reardon, Michael Reardon.^
04/09/2012 Copy of DAR application of Sandra Martk-Reardon, & Michael Reardon.
04/30/2012 #4 MOTION to extend brief & appendix due date, filed by Sandra Martk-Reardon and Michael Reardon.
04/30/2012 RE#4: Allowed to 06/04/12. Notice
05/08/2012 DAR DENIED (on 05/02/2012).
06/06/2012 #5 MOTION to file late brief & appendix, filed by Sandra Martk-Reardon, Michael Reardon.
06/06/2012 RE#5: Denied without prejudice until the appellant files the required seventh copy of the appendix volumes as only six were received by this clerk's office. The seventh set of appendices is due on or before 6/8/2012. Notice to counsel.
06/06/2012 RE#5: REVISED ACTION. Allowed this date for filing the brief of Sandra Martk-Reardon, Michael Reardon, Plaintiffs/Appellants. Notice to counsel.
06/06/2012 #6 SERVICE of 7 briefs, 7 appendices (4 vols.), and 7 transcripts (1 vol.) for Plaintiffs/Appellants Sandra Markt-Reardon & Michael Reardon.
07/06/2012 #7 SERVICE of brief for Defendant/Appellee Falmouth Airpark Homeowners Association, Inc.
07/18/2012 #8 SERVICE of reply brief for Plaintiffs/Appellants Sandra Markt-Reardon and Michael Reardon.
01/11/2013 Under consideration by Panel. (Cypher, J., Rubin, J., Wolohojian, J.).
02/27/2013 #9 Decision: Rule 1:28 Judgment affirmed. (Cypher, Rubin, Wolohojian, JJ.). *Notice.
03/12/2013 #10 PETITION for Rehearing, filed by Sandra Markt-Reardon, Michael Reardon.@
03/19/2013 Copy of FAR application of Sandra Markt-Reardon, Michael Reardon.^
08/06/2013 #12 ORDER: The petition for rehearing filed by the appellants having been considered, it is ordered that the said petition be and it hereby is denied (Cypher, Rubin & Wolohojian, JJ.). *Notice.

Steve you are certainly entitled to your opinion. Trust me I have no infatuation with Mike or his kind.

What I do have is a concern some of the more gullible visitors to this site might, as some have done, come to believe and consider Mike's advice and opinions as valuable.

I believe the popular term now is accountable. As no doubt Mike would demand for full disclosure, in his absence of doing so in his own case I will do it for him.

I have dealt with folks like Mike over the years. They reside in their own world of make believe and delusion. Even after 10 years of failure Mike comes to this site claims victory and offers insults to those who don't line up in agreement with him.

Now I am sure Mike is incapble of living in the truth. But others who come to sites like this should be provided the reality of what Mike has done versus his claims, lies, and misrepresentations.

The truth is this week the court denied his request for a rehearing of a matter that was previously ruled on.

In light of those facts it would seem impossible for anyone living within the grasp of realiy to not understand Mike's crusade has suffered yet another loss.

So after being provided the facts it is now up to those who visit here to determine for themselves whether Mike is less than forthcoming with all the details or still might be seen as some cartoon character fighting for Truth, Justice and the American Way! As he would have you believe.

Thanks for he advice but in my world 2+2=4 not some number I pull out of my head when the need arises.

Facts are facts and with Mike being unwilling to share them I will.

Melissa,

Your participation on another thread that aims to target one specific individual does in fact help educate us. Probably not what you are intending to help us dummies learn though.

circa 2012

would you please DOCUMENT that 'other person' is Mike15

juuuuust say'n

I believe that can document who MikeR15 is.

There have been two main threads that discussed Mikes case:
Subject: Taking your board of directors to court and Subject: Suing the HOA board.

On page three of Subject: Taking your board of directors to court, Mike, at 12/22/2012 5:58 PM, actually posted a link to the MA Court index saying how proud he was that the case was #2 in the index. That is no longer the case but if anyone checked it out at the time, they would have seen the case number and name. It was from this posting that His name was known and pointed out in various other posts (see Subject: Suing the HOA board, page 5, Jon's post on 01/14/2013 10:13 AM) and, as you will see if you read that thread, Mike never denies it. Well, since he pointed us to his court case, it would be rather difficult for him to deny it.

John, you mean someone might lie or assume another person's identity on the interweb? My whole foundation and reality has been shaken to the core. To the core man.

Ha Ha Ha Ha.

You folks don't know who your talking to or who is real and who are multiple logins.

Ha Ha Ha ha.

Poor JonD1 who is so withdrawn from 'percieved' life to the point of starting a thread about chasing records and files of public record to prove what???

That he'so cunning to find all this, or was he led right to it.

Ha ha ha ha.

I apologize for the other thread with that other poster. Some Just will not see anything outside their "Real world". Try as you might there are people like them and MikeR that you just can't help. It can be frustrating to try to put a little "Reality" into their worlds.

We really do try to help on here. It's a bit frustrating when someone will not listen. There are many solutions available outside of taking your HOA to court. We try to find you those solutions, save you or the HOA money, or inform you of the ramifications of your actions. It is NOT always what you may want to hear.

I am no where near perfect and was just a newbie to the HOA world. After several years of being on BOTH sides of the HOA, you learn a few things that can be helpful to others. I've been a victim of my HOA and I have saved my HOA. You can choose to listen to my advice or walk away. I don't care. However, don't keep doing damage to your own HOA if there is a sliver of reality that makes sense in the advice your getting... Mike's case it's pretty obvious he's doing more damage than good for his HOA...

he he he ha ha ha ho ho ho ...................

they're coming to take me away, ha ha he he ho ho

i hope they come sooooooooooooooooooon

i relly need asylum from all this............................

really really need asylum

I was thinking more of the song "I want to be sedated"...