RobM2 (Illinois)
Posts: 6
Posts: 6
Posted:
I am the president of a 20-home association. We have two retention ponds down at the end of the street. Next to one of the ponds is a house that is closer to the ponds than any other house in the new subdivision. The lady that lives there loves to call the city and the alderman to complain about the trees being too tall, grass not cut in a timely manner, etc.
I got to wondering why we are paying to maintain those ponds when someone else is "benefiting" from them. I read a little bit about storm runoff but I still can't see why our 20 homes that aren't anywhere near those ponds just our responsibility. Shouldn't homes within a certain radius ALL have to "pitch in" their fair share? I wanna get a civil engineer out there to determine whether or not other homes in the area benefit from those ponds.
I mean, if an animal got stuck in one of the ponds and died, thus creating a bad smell of rotting flesh, wouldn't the home closest to the dead animal be the first to get a good whiff? What am I not seeing here?
I got to wondering why we are paying to maintain those ponds when someone else is "benefiting" from them. I read a little bit about storm runoff but I still can't see why our 20 homes that aren't anywhere near those ponds just our responsibility. Shouldn't homes within a certain radius ALL have to "pitch in" their fair share? I wanna get a civil engineer out there to determine whether or not other homes in the area benefit from those ponds.
I mean, if an animal got stuck in one of the ponds and died, thus creating a bad smell of rotting flesh, wouldn't the home closest to the dead animal be the first to get a good whiff? What am I not seeing here?