๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Tim - Our parking resolution policy from 9 years ago was retired in favor of another revised parking resolution that was implemented 3 years ago. We've noticed that the disclosure packages were only showing the one from 9 years ago. What are the possible ramifications of this? Care to speculate?
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
Your HOA should not fine for violations of the version that has not been provided.

Your HOA should distribute the new (now in effect) version and begin to enforce as appropriate.

The ramification is that some people look a little foolish. It will pass.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Mike,

It would depend on what the difference is.

Since the parking area is common area, VA ยง 55-513 gives the Association the right to make rules regarding common areas. I suspect your governing documents provides this same authority. Therefore, I would simply send the new plan to everyone who purchased three years ago.

Obviously, as Fred pointed out, infractions to the parking rules should be given the benefit of the doubt until the Board knows the new plan has indeed been provided to everyone. I suspect you have already corrected the issue and only the new plan is now being provided in the packages.

One thing we are going to do this year is republish our governing documents to the membership. It will be a bit of expense but there have been enough amendments that we felt it's good to make sure everyone has the same set. You may want to consider doing the same.

Tim
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
I know this might be a radical suggestion but how about printing the new policy up mark it as addendum effective 00/00/2010 and attach it to the package.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Glen,

That's what should have been done.

The concern, if I understand it correctly, is that VA law binds the Association to any errors in the disclosure package. Therefore, if the Association said that there were no discrepancies of the governing documents on the property they can't go after the new owner for a shed or wrong paint colors that existed when the disclosure was issued.

An argument could be made that this would be the same for the governing documents. However, since documents can be amended, I believe that this is a minimal concern providing the updated documents are provided and any infractions prior to the member being notified be given additional time to correct.

MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Thanks Tim - I believe that it was only the electronic version of the package that was inaccurate but we are researching. Revised Documents are on our website and of course, everything is subject to "due process".

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here