Quote:
Posted By BruceF1 on 06/23/2013 5:47 AM
Posted By MatthewW4 on 06/22/2013 6:32 PM
Yes, it is a lazy lender. Most of the information requested is public information available from either the county recorder, the county assessor, or the clerk of courts. Many of the other questions (such as commercial space) could be answered with a drive-by or in-person visit to the site.
Yes, some of the information is public information, and some might be obtained by visiting the site. However, if you read all of the questions carefully, some can only be answered by an individual who is personally closer to the situation. It would take a person representing the lender, who knows nothing about the condo community to begin with, several hours, if not days, to obtain that information, and it may not even be entirely accurate. Is the lender being lazy or just trying to save time and money? I could claim it is the person who knows, or should know, or could easily look up the information that is being lazy. As I said earlier, I completed the form for my community in less than 20 minutes, and it was the first time I had done one. If I had to do a second one it would take me probably half that time. So, who's being lazy? The person who is unwilling to take 10-20 minutes to fill out a form or the person who needs to spend hours, or possibly days, to obtain the information?
Also, as I said, if a community has a property manager, then this form should be completed by the PM. If the community does not have a PM, then somebody has to have volunteered to perform some of those functions, or a person or small form is being paid to do some of it. Unfortunately, with that comes the need to occasionally fill out form similar to the one asked for by PNC.
By the way, PNC's form appears to me to ask for a lot more detail than most of the ones I have seen from other lenders.
Quote:
Posted By MatthewW4 on 06/22/2013 6:32 PM
I notice that you did not address the other issue I raised: that the bank employee tried to obtain the information by fraudulently claiming that the association was required by law to fill out what is actually an internal bank form.
I saw no need to. If you go back and read the original post, nowhere is is it stated that the bank employee actually said the information was required by law or that the form was anything other than a bank form. The title of the thread is "New Federal Law?", but those are the words of the person starting this thread. They are not the words of the bank employee. All the bank employee said was that the information is required by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. If you do some research you will learn that over the past few years Fannie and Freddie have tightened their lending underwriting requirements with respect to condominiums and now require substantially more detail than they have in the past. Spot FHA approvals are out, and all blanket FHA approvals of projects were terminated. Projects desiring blanket FHA approval must now apply and re-apply every two years.
Probably because of the title of the thread and and the statement that Fannie and Freddie now require this information (which is a true statement; maybe not ALL of it, but much more than they used to in the past) some people who posted to this thread jumped to the conclusion that someone claimed this was a Federal form and not a bank form. As I said, read the original post. Nowhere is it claimed that the form is a Federal form or that the law requires it to be completed. If the form is not completed, and if the bank's underwriters cannot make the loan without the information requested on the form, then they deny the loan. Simple as that.
Quote:
Posted By MatthewW4 on 06/22/2013 6:46 PM
I am really disappointed in you for making that statement. A registered agent does not need to be a member, officer, or director, of an association (or other corporation). A registered agent's sole function is to receive process and other legal notices sent or delivered to the corporation. Appointment as a registered agent does not give that person any legal authority to sign on behalf of the corporation.
Did you know that a registered agent is not even required to be a real person? There are several large nation-wide corporations who do nothing except act as the registered agents for other corporations.
Really? No kidding?
You are making assumptions about what I might or might not know. I've been around a long time. I might just surprise you.
Yes, I do know what the function of a registered agent is.
1. Of course I know that a registered agent does not have to be a member, officer, or director of an association or any other organization.
2. Yes, I also know that there are companies, or corporations, whose only business is to serve as a registered agent for other organizations.
But, I also know that sometimes some other individual may be a registered agent. I've seen this before, too. The registered agent for our community was originally the developer (the person, not the company) himself. Bad idea. Our registered agent now is our management company.
It's not generally a good idea for an individual to be a registered agent. What if that individual is away, on vacation, or otherwise unavailable? If papers are served for that agent to appear in court on a specific date and the individual can't be there - not good. If the registered agent is a firm or company, then at least some representative from the firm should be available for the court appearance.
My point was that
someone from the association has to have the authority to sign legal documents for the association. Usually that person is the president, but other officers might have the authority to sign other documents. I did not mean to imply that a registered agent could sign legal documents on behalf of the association. My point was that just as an association must have a registered agent, it must also have an individual who can sign legal documents on behalf of the association.
Bruce not sure what banking institutions you deal with in CT but in speaking with the woman who handles these forms at the MCs office she has told me some of the forms now are 6-8 pages. So perhaps even more complicated then this one form provided. My assumption every bamk or agency has their own form and might ask similar but not exactly the same questions.
My point long long ago was if possible the MC should be filling out these forms. In the real world THEY would have ALL the information on hand to fill his out as fully and completly as possible. So why bother attempoting to complete a form when another office can simply do it themselves without the need to make phone calls and gather information.
Now I have yet to hear how or why any Board President or Board member would be obligated or forced to fill out and sign such a form. And to suggest only they can sign for the HOA is simply not correct. IN 26 years no Board member has completed or sigend such a form here. So somehow someway its been possible for us to satisfy the banking requirements without a Board member involving themselves.
My concern would be many Board members would not have the knowledge or ability to fill out these forms. Based on the fact when most folks apply for a mortgage through a bank do THEY complete their own forms? Could they?
And as Board members you have now involved the HOA in the production of these documents.
"A good man has to realise his limitations." Dirty Harry.
And sometimes what you think you know is in fact a lot less than you ever thought.
And as to registered agents. Many have no real function other then o be a contact point for an organization or corporation with litte if any real authority to act alone on behalf of that entity.
Our MC acts in that capacity but they do not act in the name of the property without Board knowledge and approval.
And finally, over the years I have signed legal documents, contracts, liens, etc. but I did NOT prepare them. For me there is a huge difference. Our lawyer prepared the liens. Our lawyer drew up legal documents. Our MC handles contracts and agreements.
Filling out loan information for the sale of a private piece of property not directly involving the HOA IMO is no the duty, responsibility, or obligation of a Board member. Now they can make it so using the flawed justification they laone know best, or they have now some duty to see the sale of a home goes through, or perhaps their conclusion that this is all making a federal case out of nothing. In that case let THEM complete the form and sign.
As I mentioned I spoke with our MC. 25+ years managing properties. 1,000+ units under management. Heads the local chapter of CAI. Offers lectures and seminars to both Boards and other MCs.
His opinion in today's world you have to be very careful who fills out these forms, how they are filled out and the information you provide. Failure to do so can cause the person signing these forms serious problems. I take him at his word. He just might know more than I or others think we know.