💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MichaelO4 (Montana)
Posts: 40
Posted:
I am the Chair of the Board of our condominium HOA. Prior to, and after, my election as a Board member, not all Protective Covenants were and have been consistently enforced by the Board. Question: What are the legal implications for Board members if a Board fails to enforce Protective Covenants? Are they exposed to the possibility of a lawsuit by one or more owners? Must an owner demonstrate "harm" to themselves to prevail in such a suit? What other issues
may lead to a charge of negligence by a Board?
Thanks in advance for all responses.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Welcome to the Forum, Michelle. Read your CC&Rs. In them it may say that other owners besides Board members are able to enforce your covenants--via the courts if necessary.

Can you supply some examples of violated covenants that your Board is not enforcing? Do any jeopardize the health or safety of HOA members?
MichaelO4 (Montana)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Thanks for the prompt reply, Carol.
Yes, other owners may indeed bring an action at law to enforce covenants. None of the unenforced covenants involve health and safety...mainly
"nuisance" covenants, like "no basketball standards shall be located on the common elements or visible from the street", or bothersome ones like "all owners shall provide proof of homeowners' insurance each year to the Board." Note: We are thinking about initiating strict enforcement, but our CC&Rs are about 10 years old and, in light of experience, should be revised before we start enforcing ones that should be deleted or modified. However, one of the Articles states that the original (current) CC&Rs are "binding for a period of twenty-five years"...until 2029! So it appears that we are stuck with the original ones til then.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichaelO4 on 06/11/2013 5:31 PM

Question: What are the legal implications for Board members if a Board fails to enforce Protective Covenants?

For legal advice you should consult your attorney.

Typically, the governing documents authorize the Association and individual member to enforce the covenants, restrictions and conditions. The documents usually do not require that a member or the Association actually enforce violations. They have the authority to enforce and may enforce if desired, but are not required to enforce.

Additionally, there is typically language in the governing documents that specify failure to enforce a covenant now does not prevent enforcement in the future.

Now, every State is different and some States will specify that if x amount of time has passed once the Association has learned of a violation, they may no longer enforce that violation. This is why I said you should consult with an attorney.

Quote:
Posted By MichaelO4 on 06/11/2013 5:31 PM

Are they exposed to the possibility of a lawsuit by one or more owners?

Board members are always exposed to the possibility of a lawsuit for any decision, action or inaction they do.

The best recommendation I can offer is if an Association is going to enforce a covenant they should enforce that covenant on every member equally. Otherwise they face a potential legal action for selective enforcement.

Quote:
Posted By MichaelO4 on 06/11/2013 5:31 PM

Must an owner demonstrate "harm" to themselves to prevail in such a suit?

That is a legal question best asked of an attorney. I am not an attorney.

In my mind, I would ask the owner, if the issue bothered them so much why didn't they exercise their authority and bring enforcement action against the violator themselves vs. bringing legal action against the Association for failure to enforce.

Quote:
Posted By MichaelO4 on 06/11/2013 5:31 PM

What other issues may lead to a charge of negligence by a Board?

Negligence, as described by JoeF in this thread: In order to prove negligence you must show 3 things: That the person had responsibility for and control over the item in question; that he was aware (or should have been aware) that a problem or defect existed; and that he did not make a good-faith attempt to correct the problem or defect within a reasonable time-frame.

Lets take worst case for the Association. Selective enforcement. This is where the Association forces compliance on one member but not another for the same violation. If it goes to court the following may occur:

1) The judge rules the covenant unenforceable.
2) The judge rules the covenant enforceable and the member must correct the issue.
3) The judge rules the covenant enforceable and the member must correct and the Board must start enforcement action on all other violators.

Oh, of course there will be court costs and legal expenses no matter who thinks they are the winner.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichaelO4 on 06/11/2013 5:50 PM
However, one of the Articles states that the original (current) CC&Rs are "binding for a period of twenty-five years"...until 2029! So it appears that we are stuck with the original ones til then.

This expectation is typically in error.
The governing documents are binding for x amount of time and may need to be renewed or are auto renewed.
However, there should also be a process to amend those documents. Typically, the documents may be amended at anytime and the amendment is valid once recorded with the county and/or published to the membership.

If you're not sure, ask an attorney if the documents may be amended at anytime or only when renewed.
MichaelO4 (Montana)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Tim,
Thanks for the above. Very helpful.
Mick
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Yes, Michael, Tim's advice really is helpful. Since you most likely will be able to restate your CC&Rs, you may have the opportunity to remove certain current restrictions if the majority of your HOA members agree. It's a good time to talk about these and to get an attorney's advice.
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Michael,

If your covenants allow any member to enforce the covenants through civil action in the courts, then it is my opinion that you cannot be held liable for failing to enforce them. Your power to enforce the restrictions are pretty much the same as any member's, so I cannot see a court upholding a lawsuit against the board for failing to remedy a situation that the plaintiff himself had equal right to remedy. I just do not believe that you can compel someone to file a lawsuit that you yourself could file.

MichaelO4 (Montana)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Matthew,
Thanks for the input.
Mick

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here