Quote:
Posted By TammyI on 06/14/2013 1:51 AM
You may want to inform all members that they are in noncompliance with state law, quote the laws making it look very legal and explain that going into receivership is very expensive and add that they loose all control over their dues. Out of the 11 owners of our 16 units only 2 decided they couldn't serve on the board, which is amazing considering 12 of the units are rentals and the ex-management co said they could get no one to be on the board for the past 6 years.
Well, I'm not surprised at the off-site owners. As you know, apathy is the number one problem homeowner associations face, mostly because most homeowners buy their home because "the association" will take care of certain things so they won't have to. They figure as long as the work's being done, they can go on about their business. And as you also know, this is the point where problems start.
What may really move people to act is money - if you want someone else to do certain things, fine, but you need to understand there will be a price for that. The cost for those services can and will go up every year, so as long as a homeowner's ok with that, carry on. Otherwise, there's no point in yelling about "assessments being too high" - you always get what you pay for, one way or another
If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius