💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
In our condo complex, we have 200 units and in several buildings with an upper condo unit and a lower condo unit...

One owner has his unit rented out and the new tenant is complaining that he has dish TV but cannot pick up the signal because of some
tree branchesin front of his downstairs unit. The owner(in order to satisfy his tenant) is demanding that the HOA cut off some major branches on the tree in front of his unit in order for his tenant to receive the signal. In the first place, I was not aware that some tree branches could distort/cut off a signal. If we met his demands, we would make some major limb cut offs to satisfy him.

My question is... just how far does the HOA have to go to satisfy this tenant and his dish antenna?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Tree branches and even leaves can interfere with a satellite signal. Our Association has a firm policy in place that the Association will not pay to trim any trees for the sole purpose of obtaining a satellite signal. If you start doing it for one, you will have to start doing it for everyone.

However, when the board does receive such a request, the Board always adds that the member is free to hire a tree service to trim the tree at their expense. I understand that the last person who asked us now has cable.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Tim for once we disagree, altering a common element item to suit one homeowner is a bad path to start on. Next thing you will have homeowners left and right with their chainsaws out to get a better picture. The HOA has to allow a dish on the homeowners property, it does not have a responsibility to alter common elements to assure a better signal.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
I don't think it is the HOAs responsibility to trim the tree for a homeowner to receive satellite. Why don't they try re-positioning the satellite or get another form of TV?
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Supposedly... that one TV receiption company stated that there is absolutely NO way to position the dish...ironically, a very good friend of this same individual has dish and CANNOT pick up signals and I remember at that time, the Dish company said there was no way they could position their dish to pick up the signal... (for ur info... the OTHER cable company has NO problem positioning their antenna)
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
It could be that IF we tell the tenant to do it themselves, they could butcher the tree....... and yes
other individuals could follow suite byhiring their own tree trimmers and really butcher a tree.
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Ah.... I did NOT know that tree leaves could interfere with a satellite signal......your association ahs a firm policy but is that firm policy in its rules/regulations or in the CC&Rs?
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
The HOA should hold firm and not tree trim for satellite purposes. That "challenge" is one between the landlord and the tenant, not the community.
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
I would agree with Kelly. The trees were there when the tenant rented the place. If having a dish was that important to him the tenant should have gone elsewhere. This is not an HOA issue but a landlord-tenant issue.

I also agree with Glen that allowing owners (or their tenants) to trim trees is not a wise policy. Your forest could be reduced to a garden of stumps by an idiot with a chainsaw. Not to mention the liability for falling trees and branches. Even if there is a licensed arborist involved, any tree trimming should be done at the direction of the association and not at the direction of a member or his tenant.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Sorry but as someone who has studied electronics and worked in the field a long time... The tree is not blocking their signal. It's most likely just the satellite that needs moved to a better position. They need to call the satellite company/installer and see if they can adjust the satellite. It may just be moved around to catch the satellite signal better.

Former HOA President
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 06/04/2013 1:25 AM

The tree is not blocking their signal. It's most likely just the satellite that needs moved to a better position.

LOL

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 06/04/2013 1:25 AM
Sorry but as someone who has studied electronics and worked in the field a long time... The tree is not blocking their signal. It's most likely just the satellite that needs moved to a better position. They need to call the satellite company/installer and see if they can adjust the satellite. It may just be moved around to catch the satellite signal better.

You're joking, right?
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 06/04/2013 1:25 AM
Sorry but as someone who has studied electronics and worked in the field a long time... The tree is not blocking their signal. It's most likely just the satellite that needs moved to a better position. They need to call the satellite company/installer and see if they can adjust the satellite. It may just be moved around to catch the satellite signal better.

I can picture the meeting now: "Ah, boss the HOA refused to trim the tree in front of Mr. Busybodies unit, we need to reposition the satellite. Yeah I know if we move it we'll black out Toledo but Mr. Busybodies really needs his MTV.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
As I understand the rules (see the FCC website, http://www.fcc.gov/guides/over-air-reception-devices-rule) the HOA cannot prevent the tenant or owner from positioning the dish anywhere within his exclusive use area.

The rules do not appear to require the HOA to allow positioning outside of the exclusive use area OR the removal of obstacles.
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
I also THOUGHT that leaves could not or would not really interfere with such a communication signal....to me, that is the crux of the whole issue
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlexM1 on 06/04/2013 5:40 AM
I also THOUGHT that leaves could not or would not really interfere with such a communication signal....to me, that is the crux of the whole issue

Today's communications are largely digital because digital signals use less bandwidth. The problem with digital communication is that acceptable reception does not depend solely on signal strength, which is an analog measurement, alone.

To assure acceptable reception of a satellite signal, it is recommend that you have a clear line of sight from the reception device (dish) to the satellite, without any obstruction, which includes trees.

If trees are causing poor reception, you can cut or trim them if they are yours. If the trees belong to someone else, or if they are on common property, there is nothing you can do except to try and find a better location or increase the height of the antenna (dish) so that the line of sight is above the top of the obstruction (trees).
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
How can a tree after a signal is blasted from the outer atmosphere from a satellite dish somehow be blocked by a tree and some leaves? Seriously, do you think there would ever be a company in the business of providing Wi-Fi, cell towers, or satellite TV business if that were the case? Cabins in the woods can get satellite... The reception may be bad but that's because it's not in a good location. There could be sun flares or a storm. A tree with leaves should not be the reason for the bad reception. It's bad installers and location to get the signal...

Former HOA President
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 06/04/2013 7:08 AM
A tree with leaves should not be the reason for the bad reception. It's bad installers and location to get the signal...

And that's a contradiction. Change the location to one that provides a clear line of sight to the satellite, free from trees.

I've had more than 55 years experience in radio and TV communication, and more than 25 years experience in digital and satellite communication. Digital communication allows several communications "channels" to be multiplexed on the same "carrier" signal. These signals are not only multiplexed, but are highly compressed by means of various algorithms with "correction" coding embedded into the signal to allow the original analog version to be reconstructed at the receiver. Poor reception does not mean a weak, fuzzy, noisy, or fading signal. Poor reception usually results in "pixelating" (seeing individual colored blocks instead of a picture), complete "freezing" of the image, or loss of the image altogether. Digital communication is not like analog communication where the received signal can be there with varying degrees of strength or with some noise. Digital communication consists of a series of bits, and the bit is either there or it's not. It's on or it's off. There is no in between. Noise in the signal, caused by obstructions and interference, can be interpreted by the receiver as bits of information, which they are not.

Obstructions, such as trees, which can cause poor reception with analog signals, can result in totally useless and unacceptable reception, or even no reception, of digital signals. I have even known of cases where acceptable reception can be received in the wintertime, but not during summer when there are leaves on the trees.

Sure, it's possible to get acceptable reception at a home surrounded by trees, as long as you can get a clear line of sight between the reception device and the satellite. That also depends on the latitude of the location where the receiver is.

For example, the line of sight to the Echostar 10 and 11 satellites (DirecTV) in Orlando, Florida (latitude 28.54 degrees) is 44.2 degrees; almost a 45-degree angle or about mid-way between the horizon and straight up. At that location, an object located 163 feet away would have to be over 160 feet tall before it would interfere with the satellite signal from the dish. In Anchorage, Alaska (latitude 61.22 degrees) the light of sight angle is only 13.2 degrees above the horizon. At that location an object located 163 feet away would need to be only about 38 feet tall to interfere with reception from the satellite.

The point is, whether or not you can be surrounded by trees and still get acceptable reception depends not only on the height of the trees and the height of the dish, but on how far away the trees are from you and where on the earth (the latitude) you are located.

Of course, a good installer should know all this. But, even the best and most competent installer cannot overcome nature, the laws of physics, or the laws of communication theory.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Hey I am about saving trees over technology... Why kill a tree so you can get better TV reception?

Former HOA President
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
> How can a tree after a signal is blasted from the outer atmosphere from a satellite dish somehow be blocked by a tree and some leaves?

At high frequencies anything containing water will absorb electromagnetic waves to some degree.

This, by the way, is why your microwave oven works.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Alex, does your HOA have rules about how dishes may be installed? In mine, for instance, they may not be affixed to balcony rails ceilings, walls, or floors. This is to prevent water intrusion into our condo buildings. Dishes only may be installed on tripods.

AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Our CC&Rs (which should be changed on this issue) state that no antenna on the patio at all.. BUT FCC regs trump that so we have allowed antennas ON the patios or balconies BUT... they may NOT be affixsed to the walls/ceilings/floors... they can be weighted down with sand bags or whatever... iron made fixtures, or whatever but NOT screwed i any way to the walls, etc.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here