💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MillieS (California)
Posts: 3
Posted:
We are a new five-member Board of a HOA in California; all NEW. None of us have previously served on a Board.

I have so many questions but for starters, this one pertains to foreclosures:

There are 45 townhomes in our complex. One unit was foreclosed on; I think it was about a year ago, and is owned by the bank.
It was empty for quite sometime. For the last several months, at least, someone has been living inside the unit.
Of course, the bank has not been paying any monthly association dues.
The Board recently approved foreclosure on the property which is owned by the bank.
Our management company has an attorney who handles everything pertaining to the foreclosure

How involved should the Board be? Should't we prepare an "estoppel"? As far as I know we haven't been asked for anything unless our management company has provided it to the attorney.
What about the "squatters" who have taken up residence in the unit?
What if the people inside cause damage which also damages the next unit attached to it? What are our responsibilities/obligations?
Since we are not the owner (the bank is) can we have these "free loaders" evicted? Should we? How?
They are utilizing the amenities of the complex, paying nothing.
What should we, as a Board, do? Should we notify the bank of these people? Remember, we approved filing foreclosure against the bank!!

THANKS for everyone's help!

MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Millie:

A couple of things:

Your association should have its own lawyer. You should not be relying on a third party, the management company, to handle the foreclosure. Under the current arrangement you may not even be able to contact the management company's attorney directly. I don't know about California but in my state the arrangement you describe would not be considered ethical.

My understanding of an estoppel letter is that it is a statement of what the seller owes to an association when he prepares to close on a sale. You are not involved in a sale so I see no reason for preparing an estoppel letter. If your attorney needs it he will ask.

A few weeks ago I set off a firestorm on this forum by suggesting that an association file a civil suit against the occupants of a unit where the owner was not paying his assessments. I see this as essentially a theft of services: the occupants are consuming services that they should reasonably know are available only for payment. I would suggest filing suit against the occupants in this situation.

You are in possession of knowledge that the bank's unit is occupied and there is a possibility that the cccupants may cause property damage. While a lawsuit for such damages is premature, you do have a duty to mitigate damages. Therefore, I would not withhold information from the bank that the unit is occupied and apparently by squatters. You should make this information known to your attorney who should transmit it to the bank's attorneys.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Your HOA does NOT own this property. The bank does. They are responsible for the damages to the property NOT the HOA. Your HOA can call the bank and report the situation. It is NOT liable for the damages to that property nor evicting any squatters who may or may not live there. The HOA can tell the bank about the dues and how much is owed. Your HOA may or may not ever see that money. Usually banks wait until the last minute to pay up IF then.

The biggest issue here is the HOA wanting to do a foreclosure on a house already foreclosed on by the bank. There is absolutely NO money to be gained here at all. The bank ALWAYS gets paid first and foremost. Even if your HOA did the foreclosure for back dues, the bank would still end up paid first. The HOA getting the "leftovers" if any.

I would do some more investigating on this property. See if there is an owner. It is found at the tax assessor's office if you know the lot number. That information will be current within a few months of the last transaction/sale.

You all could possibly file a lien on the property. However, still not guaranteed to see any of that money back at this point. Remember when hiring a lawyer it is the WHOLE of the HOA's lawyer NOT individual members. Your PM may recommend an attorney and it be the one they use. However, they are independent from your case. They are your contractors.

Former HOA President
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/25/2013 10:51 PM

Your HOA does NOT own this property. The bank does.

Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/25/2013 10:51 PM

I would do some more investigating on this property. See if there is an owner. It is found at the tax assessor's office if you know the lot number. That information will be current within a few months of the last transaction/sale.

Melissa, do you ever read your own nonsense before you post? In one paragraph you state that the bank owns the property. Then you suggest that maybe someone else owns it. Which is it?

Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/25/2013 10:51 PM

The biggest issue here is the HOA wanting to do a foreclosure on a house already foreclosed on by the bank. There is absolutely NO money to be gained here at all. The bank ALWAYS gets paid first and foremost. Even if your HOA did the foreclosure for back dues, the bank would still end up paid first. The HOA getting the "leftovers" if any.

Wrong again! If the bank owns the property as a result of a foreclosure, there is no bank lien. The foreclosure wiped out the lien and gave possession to the bank. The bank has already been paid all that it is due in the eyes of the law. The bank does not get a second bite at the apple. The association can foreclose to recover the amount of the assessments and may be awarded possession if no one bids enough to cover all the costs. If the association does get possession, it can sell the property for full value.

Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/25/2013 10:51 PM

You all could possibly file a lien on the property. However, still not guaranteed to see any of that money back at this point. Remember when hiring a lawyer it is the WHOLE of the HOA's lawyer NOT individual members. Your PM may recommend an attorney and it be the one they use. However, they are independent from your case. They are your contractors.

I would recommend leaving legal decision on how to proceed up to your attorney.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The OP stated the property was owned by the bank they suspected. However, there are also people living in the home. So it could be that it is NOT a bank foreclosure and someone bought the home. It's best NOT to assume the house is not owned by new owners nor to assume it is owned by the bank.

I have done a foreclosure. So I know exactly how it works for my state. No use on foreclosing on a foreclosed house by the bank. Just tossing good money after bad. Considering ANY foreclosure done by a HOA or bank is just a "Stop the bleeding" measure. It is NOT a money making one. You can NOT get blood out of a turnip and you can't get back dues from a foreclosure. Been there, done that, it ain't happening.

Best a HOA can hope for are new owners to move in and to start paying their dues. Only in Florida would there be the risk of the new owner's paying the old owner's debt. Otherwise, it's best to start with a clean slate.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I am not nor do I play a lawyer.

A recent topic of discussion of our HOA transition work group was centered around foreclosure for unpaid dues. Remember that each association has it's own situation, condition, state laws, etc. and one size does not fit all.

The bottom line of our discussion was we could see no advantage in our association foreclosing for overdue dues. Our dues are only $600.00 per year. The most ever owed our HOA in back dues was $1,500.00 and it was eventually (two years late) paid. The most we ever expect to get stuck with is about $1,500.00 or about 3% of annual dues. Our average home sale price is $120K. We just do not see the economics of it nor a willingness on our part to assume the responsiblity of a foreclosure.

Back to my one size does not fit all. I believe there could be situations/conditions where it would be a wise move for the association to do a foreclosure. I do believe the situations being right to do such are at the best rare, but they do exist.

Any association running so economically close to the bone that a few percentages of foreclosure (assuming they get what is owed them in a timely manner) are needed, has a severe budget/economic problem. I would say if their budget does not have a 5-7% uncollectible dues margin built in, they need to reevaluate their dues structure post haste.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
My HOA we did was a rare case. I inherited the issue. Over 3 years no payment and did not pay a special assessment risking us not getting separate water meters. The debt was over $2,500. Considering we only collected $50 a month. This was a big debt. They ignored the liens. Tried to make their tenant pay...Oh and they threatened to burn down the clubhouse...

We did not even plan for the foreclosure to go through. It just happened after it was filed. The owner hired several lawyers to fight it but did not pay them. So their lawyers (up to 4 I heard) quit on them. They lost their home for $3000. The tenant sued them and won another $10K.

The house stayed empty for awhile. It was extremely damaged inside and finally a tax lien took it out for new owners to pick up. I was gone by the time the house finally became a viable member again. We just got a check fo $2500 because someone did buy it at auction but failed to keep the home. However, we lost close to a 1K in legal fees and another few years of dues collections.

It was worth the effort for us but not for everyone. Would not recommend it to most people. It was not a money maker and just got rid of bad members.

Former HOA President
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/26/2013 3:30 PM

The OP stated the property was owned by the bank they suspected. However, there are also people living in the home. So it could be that it is NOT a bank foreclosure and someone bought the home. It's best NOT to assume the house is not owned by new owners nor to assume it is owned by the bank.

The OP is on the board of her condo association. I am not. You are not. If the OP says the unit is owned by the bank following foreclosure I have no reason to dispute her facts and I am not going to argue with her.

Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/26/2013 3:30 PM

I have done a foreclosure. So I know exactly how it works for my state.

I doubt this. In most states foreclosures are done under the supervision of the equivalent of the Superior Court and most states forbid anyone but an attorney from representing an incorporated association in that court. While you may have been on the board of an association that did a foreclosure (or maybe it was your mobile home that got towed away in the middle of the night) I highly doubt that you had any personal input in the court proceedings, such as researching the law or preparing a memorandum of points and authorities. Your knowledge is not that of a lawyer but rather that of a client who has been given some information from an attorney and then tried to reconcile that information with your own beliefs. My experience has been that attorneys do not normally explain things in great detail to their clients and, even when they do, the clients fail to fully understand what they have been told.

Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/26/2013 3:30 PM

No use on foreclosing on a foreclosed house by the bank.

This is the best circumstance under which to initiate foreclosure. The bank has clear title to the property with no mortgage lien to get in the way. The bank also has deep pockets. Once served with process, the bank will have to decide whether to pay a few thousand to clear up the back assessments plus court costs or let the foreclosure take proceed. Since the bank has little chance of recovering its investment if the property goes into foreclosure, they will likely pay up before the proceedings go very far.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Again you take things too literal. I was the one that hired the lawyer and started the foreclosure proceedings. An individual can't do a foreclosure. However, I was the one the took the steps and was involved in the ENTIRE process except when the lawyer his job of filing the paperwork and court stuff. I was there when it got auctioned off at the steps and even found a buyer. So I know the process as much as anyone possibly can NOT being a lawyer.

It is NOT worth spending ALL your members money on a foreclosure. It was foreclosed on for a reason. No money!!! Plus banks do NOT have "deep pockets" as you state. Their money comes from their membership as well. I've seen enough banks fail to know they do not have the deep pockets you think they do. They may keep the money in a vault but does not mean it is their money. Although they do tend to use it to invest to get money back for their customers.

Again a foreclosure is NOT worth the effort for an HOA. It is just a "stop the bleeding" measure and left at that. Otherwise your just investing your members money into something too expensive for them to afford. They all still have to pay the dues on that house to the HOA. Maintenance, insurance, taxes, dues, and general expenses of home ownership is NOT cheap. Can your HOA put those costs into your budget? I think not.

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Again a foreclosure is NOT worth the effort for an HOA.


Not all HOA's are the same. For some HOA's, renting a foreclosure can result in a big profits for the association. Your statement that is it is bad for everyone simply is not true.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Renting a foreclosure is ILLEGAL if the HOA does NOT own that foreclosed property. So if they did rent it out... ALL the rent collected could go to the bank who truly owns the property. So no profit there.

If your HOA does own the home, then it has to make possible house payments if there still is a mortgage. You don't always buy the home for the foreclosed auction price. You get it for that auction price and whatever is still owed on the property. Now your HOA has to also afford the HOA dues, maintenance,insurance, taxes, and associated costs. Plus your HOA may have to claim expenses on their Taxes raising tax liabilities.

So no it is not worth owning a foreclosed property or renting it for a HOA. Unless your HOA is willing to pay a few hundred to a few thousand a month on one...

Former HOA President
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Melissa,

Every time I think you cannot possibly say something dumber and more ignorant, you find a way to do it.

Hopefully the OP by now has figured out that all of what you write is nonsense and will ignore it.

BTW, the bank does not own the property until the court issues a deed. Until then, all it has is a lien against the original borrower. If an HOA forecloses on a home that is also subject to a bank's lien (which is not the case in this thread), the HOA has no obligation to pay the bank as there is no agreement between the HOA and the bank. There was an agreement between the original homeowner and the bank but the HOA is not a party to that.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Melissa, please stop talking about foreclosures. Your misinformation clearly shows you don't know what you're talking about.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Well you all show me the math on how a foreclosure makes a HOA money... Since you insist that it does...

Former HOA President
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Wait you mean I can simply find a house in foreclosure and rent it out? That is legal? If that is not, then why could a HOA do it?

Let me do some math. An owner owes the HOA 10K. The HOA forecloses on the owner. They pay 1K in legal fees. Total cost of foreclosure is 11K. The profit for a HOA is 0. That stops the bleeding. 10K was a HOLE. The 1K was paid out to fill it. Hopefully, new owners pick up the dues from when they get it. Clean slate.

Now your saying that the HOA should buy the home and rent it out. Well, it would seem the HOA would immediately be in the hole for 20K and $1. The dollar is the starting bid. So the HOA would already have a 20K debt load on the home. How much rent you got to charge and for how long before the money is made back?

So let us say that there is nothing owed to the bank by the owner. Most likely not a real world scenerio as no one would let a HOA take a paid for house for that much money. Let us play that game anyways. The HOA would still need to pay for home insurance, taxes, repairs, utilities while empty, and the HOA dues. I have owned rental property and there are always repairs and damages to pay. Plus there are "Tenant rights" to deal with as can not just kick someone out without paying court costs. They can stop paying rent up to a year. Plus tenants are not subject to following the HOA rules unless written in the rental agreement.

HOA are non profit. They must spend as much as they collect on the expenses they have. A profit on rental or sale would be subject to taxes. An other cost to factor in.

So let us take this scenerio here. 20K owed plus dues, insurance, taxes, repairs, and other costs. That could be about 1K a month out of the budget. A cost that has to be covered regardless if it is rented or not. Does that sound like a profit yet?


Former HOA President
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Melissa,

I think that what is being said is:

1) Association can foreclose and take title to the property (if no one buys it at auction).
2) All liens recorded after the Associations will typically be noncollectable after the foreclosure sale.
3) All liens recorded prior to the Associations or any 1st mortgage or tax liens still remain.
4) The Association may negotiate to satisfy those liens mentioned in #3 to make the title clean but they don't have to. If they don't negotiate, the title is not clean and at sometime in the future those lien holders may foreclose. Either way they now own the property.
5) As owner they may rent the property.
6) As you said, as owner, they Association must also pay insurance, fix any damages required by law prior to renting, pay taxes on the property and, until rented, pay any utilities on the property.

Now, what others are saying (as it was prompted by the OP stating the bank owned the property) if the Bank foreclosed and took possession of the property and failed to pay assessments, the Association could (and should) record a new lien for the unpaid assessments by the bank. If the Association foreclosed it's lien on the bank, other than any tax liens, the Association would now own the property with a clean title. Granted, this doesn't happen often. However it could.

Melissa, you are right that more often than not, an Association loses money when they initiate a foreclosure. However, more often than not does not equate to always. Therefore, if the situation is perfect, the Association could actually make money with a foreclosure. Not always, but sometimes.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
A court can only make you whole. With that being said, only profit that can be made is only after a court ruling. However, after that you are paying out money to make money. What point is that worth it?

Former HOA President
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/30/2013 3:42 PM
Wait you mean I can simply find a house in foreclosure and rent it out? That is legal? If that is not, then why could a HOA do it?

Well not in every State but all States have different laws which is why it is dangerous to give one size fits all answers. For instance in Ohio in a COA the Association can charge the owner rent in a foreclosure, as long as they do it correctly.

5311.18 Lien for common expenses
(2) In a foreclosure action a unit owners association commences pursuant to division (B)(1) of this section or a foreclosure action the holder of a first mortgage or other lien on a unit commences, the owner of the unit, as the defendant in the action, shall be required to pay a reasonable rental for the unit during the pendency of the action. The unit owners association or the holder of the lien is entitled to the appointment of a receiver to collect the rental. Each rental payment a receiver collects during the pendency of the foreclosure action shall be applied first to the payment of the portion of the common expenses chargeable to the unit during the foreclosure action.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
If you do not have the common sense the good Lord gave you...It should be understood that ALL advice here is dependent on where you live. ALWAYS realize this is FREE advice and there is NEVER one size fits all but pretty dang close to you do reasearch....

Former HOA President
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Melissa we do but the people who come here looking for solutions and the many lurkers who never post may not. You have a tendency to make pronouncements as if they were written in stone not electrons.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:

Let me do some math. An owner owes the HOA 10K. The HOA forecloses on the owner. They pay 1K in legal fees. Total cost of foreclosure is 11K. The profit for a HOA is 0. That stops the bleeding. 10K was a HOLE. The 1K was paid out to fill it.


It all comes down to numbers, not talk. For arguments sake I will use Melissa's $10k in back dues.

One Time Expenses:
Back dues $10k
Legal fees to finish foreclosure $1k
Paint / Repairs $200
Advertise house on craigslist $0
TOTAL - $11,200

Income:
Single family house $2500 month - 25% in taxes = $1875 month

Monthly Expenses
Property tax (1.5% on 250,000 home) $313 month
Insurance $0
Repairs $0
Mortgage $0
Utilities $0 (paid by tenant)

$1875 month - $313 taxes = $1562 month

Time to break even 7 months.

Most foreclosures are taking years. So lets say the bank doesn't foreclose for 2 years. After the break even point of 7 months, the HOA will collect rent for another 17 months at $1562 month which equals $26,554 profit for the HOA instead of a loss of the original $10k.
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Steve,

Do not forget that in the situation that started this thread, the bank already went through foreclosure and has title to the unit. Therefore, if the association forecloses and receives title then it could rent the unit out forever as there is no second shoe to drop.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
You missed the additional 10K. Remember the HOA is already OUT 10K. Buying the house for an ADDITIONAL 10K + 1 dollar at the auction. That is still 20K + 1 dollar. I have never ever seen a home in foreclosure that was in "good" condition for a $200 paint job. Most are missing appliance, need new carpeting, water damaged, and would never pass inspection. I have flipped foreclosed houses. The house I got now was one that was fixed up prior to me buying. I still had to invest in another 30K in this house. It was "liveable" if you did not mind not having air/heat, flooring, or good windows.

Reality is a foreclosed house has been abandoned. It is most likely going to need thousands of dollars of work done to it. I've never even painted my own house for $200 inside/out. Neither has Habitat for Humanity who I volunteer for. There are still sales costs associated with selling a house even on craig's list. Plus who is going to handle the deal? The board or president or a HOA member? Don't you think member would question that non-stop and think it was "crooked" that the HOA foreclosed on a house for profit?

Your methodology would have people believing HOA's foreclose on houses for selfish reason and profit. The reality is that HOA's foreclose on property for UNPAID debt. Foreclosing so the HOA can make a profit just perpetuates those nasty HOA urban legends everyone spouts off about in the media. Further damaging the intent of HOA living and what it means.


Former HOA President
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Let me guess at how you arrived at this conclusion:

The HOA goes to court seeking to foreclose on its $10,000 unpaid assessment. The court puts the property up for auction. In order to get title, the HOA has to bid $10,000 and pay that to the court. The court keeps it and the HOA gets title. The $10,000 unpaid assessment plus the $10,000 paid to the court equals a $20,000 loss.

Am I stating your argument correctly?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Not quite. The court gets nothing but processing costs. A court ONLY makes you WHOLE. The HOA is out 10K plus legal costs. That is what the owner is to pay to stop the foreclosure. The place goes up for auction by the court to collect the outstanding debt. The bid goes out at the amount owed. First bid to the HOA and then whoever wants to bid.

Keep in mind this is for a HOA foreclosure and NOT a bank. The HOA basically does the job of the bank when it forecloses. The bank is always paid FIRST and foremost. The HOA just gets the leftovers. So even if the bid grows, the bank gets what it is owed.

So the court allows the HOA to put the property up for bid to collect their debts. Paying the bid price to win the property satisfies that debt but it is paying back itself. Out the money twice. If the bank does not get the money first.

Former HOA President

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here