Posted By PaulM on 03/14/2007 11:42 AM
So, to have a surplus in the reserve fund is to have this fund so maxed to the limit that it is enough for ALL long-term items requiring maintenance.
PaulM - no, not at all. not for all of the long-term items because not all items need to be replaced at the same time. the excess is temporary.
lets say reserve transfers are $50,000.00 a year. and year 1 for funding was 2006. By 2008 you'll expect to have $150,000 set aside. now lets say that in 2007 the driveways technically needed to be sealed at a cost of $30,000 but that wasn't done (for whatever reason). $150,000 was not debited by $30,000 hence an excess at that particular time.
the phenomenon that i've encountered when dealing with many boards is that they don't perform their own adequacy test by taking the yearly transfers, compound them each year and subtract the reserve expenditures projected by the transition engineer. one inadequacy i encountered was a reserve balance that fell below the transition engineer's minimum balance in year 30 of the funding schedule. the board is having a hard time accepting that they must fund now for the future, even though most if not all will be gone.