Quote:
Posted By JohnB26 on 05/19/2013 7:30 AM
BonnieG1;
some tough love:
since you did not even know what HOPA is, you probably are not in compliance
HOPA was a 1995 exemption from the Federal Fair Housing Act of ?1972?
HOPA has extremely strict and unbending requirements (which are fairly easy to meet)
however, if they are not met 'to the letter' the exemption for age restriction is LOST
demonstrated intent
advertising
signage
ANNUAL VERIFICATION to ensure 80% minimum ONE resident per home (if not performed, exemption is lost)
ps. under HOPA a child's LEGAL GUARDIAN and/or PARENT may have the child in permanent residence REGLARDLESS OF ANY AGE RESTRICTIONS ~ this does NOT include visiting/residing grandchildren UNLESS the GPs are awarded guardianship
? wanna bet the house ?
Actually I was the person who fought for no advertising indicating we would allow someon uner 55 move into a unit. I have known about the 80% requiriement of at least one person 55 or older residing in a unit almost since I bacam a Baord member. Shortly after I was on the Board I read a book written by a cou[;e of lawyers.
The main reason we are trying to get the young man who "snuck" into the unit out is because we don't want to open the door for other underage residents to move into any unit. This young man knows he is not supposed to be here and is keeping a very low profile.
Currently (with the exception of the young man who is not supposed to be here) we have only one unit with a couple underage living in it. So we more than meet the requirements. Even in this situation, the man will be 55 in a few months.
I know about the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the amendments to this that allowed senior communities to deiscriminate due to age. Just bacause I don't know all the abbreviations does not mean that I haven/t researched this issue.
And the lady working as our manager had ages verified this year.
As I mentioned before, other people were told they could not move in. Our Board is very concerned about keeping this a retirement community.