MarqA (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posts: 9
Posted:
We are a small 13 unit detached condo site of multi acre lots.
We have the right to build an out building up to 1600 square ft as long as they are "architecturaly compatable" to the main home.
So far no issue with the "architecturaly compatable" portion.
Also a note, there is one home that has a second garage that faces the garage attached to the primary residence and there is roofing that connectes everything together, sort of has a tunnel through the building. More on this in a second.
The by laws state that the out building has to be in the "backyard" but gives no detail on what defines "backyard".
#1 One homeowner states backyard is defined as lines parallel to the sides of the residence reaward, like a shadow.
#2 Another homeowner states the back yard is defined by a line along the front of the house rearward, so a building on the side would be acceptable.
A third states that the home described about has set the standard for definition #2 since that outbuilding, connected or not to the main building, is clearly not in the shadow of the primary building.
Very interested in any comments. If anybody has any actual definitions in their by laws, that wording would be helpful.
We have the right to build an out building up to 1600 square ft as long as they are "architecturaly compatable" to the main home.
So far no issue with the "architecturaly compatable" portion.
Also a note, there is one home that has a second garage that faces the garage attached to the primary residence and there is roofing that connectes everything together, sort of has a tunnel through the building. More on this in a second.
The by laws state that the out building has to be in the "backyard" but gives no detail on what defines "backyard".
#1 One homeowner states backyard is defined as lines parallel to the sides of the residence reaward, like a shadow.
#2 Another homeowner states the back yard is defined by a line along the front of the house rearward, so a building on the side would be acceptable.
A third states that the home described about has set the standard for definition #2 since that outbuilding, connected or not to the main building, is clearly not in the shadow of the primary building.
Very interested in any comments. If anybody has any actual definitions in their by laws, that wording would be helpful.