Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 05/02/2013 6:15 AM
Posted By DanH6 on 05/02/2013 5:54 AM
The restriction is in the Architecture Guidelines. Does that make a difference?
Guidelines are just that, guidelines. They are (should) be used by the approving authority (Board/Committee) to establish uniformity in the approval process.
A Board may not waive covenants but they may waive guidelines.
Since others have the similar fireplaces I would suggest that you request a hearing before the approving authority and present your findings. Have pictures and facts of the unit your desiring. If possible, have a list and pictures of similar fireplaces in the community (as this can show that they have been approved in the past and your not asking for special treatment). It would be good if you could also bring statements from your neighbors saying that they have no problem if you installed the unit.
Make sure that you have copies of everyone on the committee for your presentation and keep the tone civil.
If the approving authority is a committee and your request is denied, appeal to the decision to the Board of Directors.
Hope this helps,
Tim
Dan
Tim offers good advice especially the make nice part. You would be wise not to become know as the Chief Complaining Officer (CCO) before you even move in.
Also there might be reference somewhere (Covenants, Bylaws, Rules and Regulations) as to the function/duties of the ARB. If such then it might well show/indicate that their responsibilites might be external only and nothing to do with inside the house. Personlly I think they over stepped the boundries of their responsibility.
Some states do ban flueless fireplaces. SC does not ban them.
Hope this helps.