💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DianaE (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Our new board will soon decide contracts. Our MC and her husband recently bought a unit, and husband is now on the board. I understand they must disclose this conflict of interest, but our policies and procedures say only he must remove himself from discussion and vote, but can still remain in the room as a member to listen. How can we, the other board members speak freely what is on our mind , with him sitting there? Also, their daughter , who also works for the MC, takes our minutes , so she , too, would be present. I feel this is intimidating for two members of the family to be present during our discussion. Perhaps at some later date, we can change the procedure, or maybe I can request they leave the room. Any suggestions?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Why should they leave? Do you not have open meetings? They are members and have the same right to be informed. Your MC is to do what you the board tells them to do. It seems it would only benefit an open communication. The MC has no vote but would know the reason behind what you ask them to do.

I think your focusing on the conflict and not the fact that they are also members. If the board member with that relationship obstains from voting what is the conflict then? He still has a right to voice an opinion on how his property is managed. Just like everyone else.

Former HOA President
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Say, Diana, although the site where the below quote was excerpted often is specific only to CA, it also has advice that's useful to all HOA leaders & members. Their opinion is that you have more to worry about than whether or not the PM's family leaves the room. But, I don't think there's any reason to permit them to stay when you discuss MC contracts.

"Problems. Even when a director recuses himself, associations should avoid contracting with companies where a director has a financial interest. Such arrangements are fraught with peril both politically and legally as follows:

1. Political Problems. At election time, owners may accuse the board member of reaping secret profits, taking advantage of his or her position on the board, doing shoddy work, etc. and demand his/her ouster.

2. Legal Problems. If the work by the interested director's company is defective, the board faces the unpleasant prospect of making legal demands on a fellow board member. At the same time, they face political problems with the membership for having given the fellow director the contract in the first place."

Read more: Conflicts of Interest http://www.davis-stirling.com/tabid/1299/Default.aspx#ixzz2QSip0FJj
from Davis-Stirling.com by Adams Kessler PLC.
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
COI, one of the most touted yet misunderstood terms here.

Here's a very pithy definition:

"A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary."

KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
I don't see an issue with them staying in the room but is it possible to get another employee of the MC to take minutes or take minutes yourself?
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
In CA and I think in many other states too, personnel matters must be handled in executive session. I'm thinking that your board will, in part be, evaluating the performance of your PM when you're considering MC contracts. I can see, Diana, why you and the other directors would be reluctant to speak freely with her husband & daughter in the room!

Our PM is not in the room when we discuss her annual evaluation, her MC supervisor is. That person summarizes to our PM our assessment of her strengths areas needing improvement, etc.

In CA, contracts in formation also may be discussed in executive session. If you are interviewing, say, two other MC's, you certainly don't want to conduct those interviews in front of the PM's husband and daughter.

Your board secretary can take minutes.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DianaE on 04/14/2013 10:41 AM
Our new board will soon decide contracts. Our MC and her husband recently bought a unit, and husband is now on the board. I understand they must disclose this conflict of interest, but our policies and procedures say only he must remove himself from discussion and vote, but can still remain in the room as a member to listen. How can we, the other board members speak freely what is on our mind , with him sitting there? Also, their daughter , who also works for the MC, takes our minutes , so she , too, would be present. I feel this is intimidating for two members of the family to be present during our discussion. Perhaps at some later date, we can change the procedure, or maybe I can request they leave the room. Any suggestions?

How did the husband get on the BOD?

DianaE (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
It is a small association, and impossible to get people to volunteer for the board. Also, MC was named on proxy for voting by out of state owners. I questioned the prperness of this, and was told " it is the standard".
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Diana,

When you agreed to serve on the board you accepted all the responsibility that goes along with it, including having to make difficult decisions in uncomfortable circumstances. That is part of being in the driver's seat and part of being all grown up.

There is no reason on earth for you to have to meet in secret session to discuss this. Simply state that another board member has a conflict of interest in that he has one duty to the association and another duty to his family business. Ask him point blank to choose one or the other. If he chooses to remain on the board, immediately move to terminate the contract with his family's business.

BTW, I am not familiar at all with proxy voting as it is not permitted here, but my understanding is that the person who holds the proxy must be entitled to cast his own ballot. This leads me to conclude that the manager could not exercise the proxies as she had no right to vote in the election at that time.

DianaE (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Thank you,Carol, this is very helpful and I will share the excerpt with other board members.
DianaE (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
And now I am stumped.If the director excuses himself from voting , then we could very well end up with a 2-2 vote, as we have 5 directors. Then would this issue go to the general membership for a vote?
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
If there is a tie vote, the motion loses. Let's say a director moves to hire MC X. Two vote for hiring MC X and two vote against. The motion to hire MC X fails because a majority is needed for a motion to pass--to be approved

Matthew makes a really important point! Owners could not have given their proxies to the manager because she is not a voting member of your HOA. (I know nothing about proxies.) I'm even more worried now about your PM!! Especially if she's the one who said "it's standard."

Others here are very familiar with proxies and may reply about this topic. Or, Diana, you might want to start a new thread with proxy in the subject.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DianaE on 04/14/2013 10:41 AM
Our new board will soon decide contracts. Our MC and her husband recently bought a unit, and husband is now on the board. I understand they must disclose this conflict of interest, but our policies and procedures say only he must remove himself from discussion and vote, but can still remain in the room as a member to listen. How can we, the other board members speak freely what is on our mind , with him sitting there? Also, their daughter , who also works for the MC, takes our minutes , so she , too, would be present. I feel this is intimidating for two members of the family to be present during our discussion. Perhaps at some later date, we can change the procedure, or maybe I can request they leave the room. Any suggestions?

There is a conflict of interest with the husband and the daughter being in the room when considering bids from management companies when a family member is one of the bidders. The Board should go into executive session to decide on which MC to award the bid without any family member allowed to be present.

Also, it is the job of the Board to award contracts. The Colorado Nonprofit Act does not allow proxies at a Board meeting so the MC has no vote at Board meetings. Your HOA should create a rule that no employee of the MC can be a proxy at member meetings.
DianaE (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Carol, Again thanks for info about actions after a tie vote. Regarding the proxies, our MC also does PM for several owners and it was those members who sent her their proxies when we earlier had done the board election, at the general members meeting. She was voting in their stead. I always thought it was a possible conflict of interest when a PM votes for a board member who, in turn, will renew her contract to be the MC.

Matthew- Our bylaws say nothing as to whom owners should give a proxy, but our policy says only the owner or owners "representative by proxy" can vote. I believe since the MC was the owners rep ,but also our MC she should have told her client to name another representative for the vote.
Thanks, everyone.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CarolR11 on 04/14/2013 5:17 PM
If there is a tie vote, the motion loses. Let's say a director moves to hire MC X. Two vote for hiring MC X and two vote against. The motion to hire MC X fails because a majority is needed for a motion to pass--to be approved

Matthew makes a really important point! Owners could not have given their proxies to the manager because she is not a voting member of your HOA. (I know nothing about proxies.) I'm even more worried now about your PM!! Especially if she's the one who said "it's standard."

Others here are very familiar with proxies and may reply about this topic. Or, Diana, you might want to start a new thread with proxy in the subject.

Carol

In another discussion concerning elections, it was shown that a Proxy Holder does not need to be a member/owner. They are the Designated Proxy Holder and can vote as the proxy dictates. I believe it was also decided that they could "participate" as a member/owner can.

Hope this helps.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
EDIT...CORRECTION

In another discussion concerning elections, it was shown that a Proxy Holder does not need to be a member/owner. They are the Designated Proxy Holder and can vote as the proxy dictates. I believe it was also decided that they could not "participate" as a member/owner can.

Not participate such as discuss, make motions, etc, Just vote as designated

Hope this helps.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Diana

This is where things can get tricky like how was the motion made.

If one did not like the present MC but knows the BOD is split say 2-2 then one not wanting to keep the MC makes a motion to renew the MC contract. 2-2 vote. The motion fails and the MC's contract is not renewed.

Do you still beat your spouse, yes or no..........LOL

KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
The PM' spouse should step or the HOA should receive a different property manager if the PM wants a proxy say in board matters.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I am not nor do I play a lawyer but I am a liker of proxies.

In SC, proxies are allowed unless your Covenants/Bylaws say otherwise. If proxies are allowed then I say a BOD member could hold a general proxy (one saying the proxy holder can vote as they wish) from a fellow BOD member and act accordingly.

The proxy must also count toward having a quorum but an other subject.

If your Covenants/Bylaws say a BOD Member must be in attendance (personally, electronically, phone, etc.) then this must would override any proxy.

Hope this helps.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Diana,
1. If your HOA is under the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA), a written policy on Conflict of Interest should have been established and provided to all members of the HOA prior to 1/1/2006. If your HOA has not complied then do so immediately. Perhaps your MC did not inform your HOA of this requirement; if so they are not competent. Otherwise, why would you have posted on this topic?

2. If incorporated, the Colorado Nonprofit Act does not allow proxies for members of the Board of Directors at Board meetings.

3. Check your Bylaws, it probably includes duties and responsibilities under the Board of Directors; including their authority to awards Agreements, including hiring a MC and for terminating a MC.

4. If there is a tie vote, the discussion and voting continues until the issue is resolved.

Hope this clarifies all of your questions. If not, you may contact DARCO MC; info at www.CypressGreensHOA.com and other Googled sites.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Oh, Roger, isn't it so that a tie defeats the motion? This seem to be so in cases where the president has a voice & vote like every other director, at least per Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised in Brief, 11the ed., p. 69.

But perhaps CO laws say something other than that?

The way I understand it is that if there's tie vote for an officer, whom directors usually elect/appoint, then they'd keep voting until the tie is broken or they'd eventually flip a coin.
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Wow! You learn something new every day!

Even though proxies are not legal in HOA's in Arizona (ARS 33-1812), they are legal in other non-profit corporations. I just found out that in those cases, a member may designate anyone, including a non-member, to vote by proxy. ARS 10-3724. And a director can also designate someone else to vote of his behalf by proxy. ARS 10-3824.

BTW, Arizona's prohibition of proxies seems to apply only to votes by members ("votes allocated to a unit"). If this is correct, then a director may vote by proxy at board meetings.

You may want to check your own state's non-profit corporation act and association statutes to see whether this same situation applies in your state.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here