💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DianaE (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
At one of our former BoD meetings, only 2 directors attended, with one bringing a proxy from the third. It was used to second a motion and take a vote. This was in violation of our bylaws , which are totally silent regarding proxies at board meetings. My question is what action should be taken? It was not realized until the new board was voted into office. Should a new vote be taken? Or just acknowledge that an invalid action took place , and move on from there.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
If I was on your Board, I would bring up the issue that there were procedural issues with that last vote and then make the motion again with a new vote.

Hopefully the issue isn't anything big.

Please note, even if you don't redo the vote, the procedural issue is only a real issue if that vote resulted in an action that is challenged in court.
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
If your by-laws make no mention of proxies then I would think it would go to state laws. If those don't specify any requirements I don't see how this would be invalid unless quorum wasn't met.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
A new board's arrival gives the HOA chance at a fresh leadership start. If the allegedly invalid vote was on a matter of great importance for HOA business, I would revisit it under the new board's leadership. If the vote approved a rather routine matter of regular business, I wouldn't mention it at all and ensure the new board followed proper protocol.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
My HOA's bylaws state directors must be present in person or by phone at meetings to be counted as present and thus be able to vote. CA Corp. Code says the same thing. CO corp. code probably says that too.

As others have advised, I'd leave it alone unless important, but make sure it doesn't happen again.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Do you have any basis for your conclusion this violated your by-laws?

If so would you care to share it?

Without a review of your by-laws and/or your state laws tough to tell whether this violated either.

And what documents from other states and properties contain means little if anything.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Diana, assuming you're a corporation, if your state corporation codes are silent on this matter, which I doubt, and if your board follows Robert's Rules of Order (RONR), proxies cannot be used by directors on a board.

The reason is that proxies are "incompatible with the essential characteristics of a deliberative assembly," (Robert's Rules In Brief, 11th ed., p. 117) like a board of directors.

What do your bylaws or state codes say about this topic, Jon?
DianaE (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Our bylaws only mention use of proxies under members meetings. Also, the Colorado Corp law also says that even if bylaws allow for proxies at board meetings, they may cast a vote that is "directed", otherwise may not vote or act by proxy.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Hmmmm, Diana, Roger of CO added to his reply to your Conflict-of-Interest post: "The Colorado Nonprofit Act does not allow proxies at a Board meeting."

I think I recall he's a property manager with a lot of HOA experience in your state.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here